Re: [CANCEL][VOTE] Release Apache Baremaps 0.8.1-rc3 (incubating)

Thanks for the response, Justin. It's a topic for another thread, but I think the ASF and the Incubator is facing an existential problem. Times have changed. We can't carry on doing what we're doing. Good projects that would have been in the ASF five or ten years ago are choosing to go elsewher

Re: [CANCEL][VOTE] Release Apache Baremaps 0.8.1-rc3 (incubating)

don’t do these checks. Where are the law-suits? If the harm is not that great, why do we bother? Julian [1] https://xuanwo.io/2024/09-what-did-asf-do-wrong/ [2] https://www.morling.dev/blog/thoughts-on-moving-debezium-to-commonhaus-foundation/ > On Dec 2, 2024, at 1:48 AM, Bertil Chapui

Re: [CANCEL][VOTE] Release Apache Baremaps 0.8.1-rc3 (incubating)

delay the result by a further 72 hours. Seems to me like rule-following for rule-following’s sake. Julian > On Nov 29, 2024, at 7:26 AM, Craig Russell wrote: > > Hi, > > It's really best if the first vote is on your public list and that your > Mentors vote on the

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Baremaps 0.8.1-rc2 (incubating)

Forwarding my vote from the dev@ vote: +1 jhyde (IPMC member) > On Nov 20, 2024, at 4:14 AM, Bertil Chapuis wrote: > > Hello Everyone, > > This is a call for a vote to release Apache Baremaps 0.8.1 (incubating), > release candidate 2. Apache Baremaps is a toolkit and a set of infrastructu

Re: Proposal: Recording votes in podlings

our own house in order. What do you all think? If there is agreement I can start a vote thread. Julian [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/xkfrnt8f733hhokmh0lvyhsn50x4qfw0 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@inc

Re: [DISCUSS][IP CLEARANCE] Apache DataFusion sqlparser-rs

> The long-standing tradition for IP CLEARANCE is LAZY CONSENSUS. Yes, but it's still good to see a few votes in the affirmative. It means that someone is doing diligence. On Tue, Sep 24, 2024 at 9:15 AM Dave Fisher wrote: > > The long-standing tradition for IP CLEARANCE is LAZY CONSENSUS. > > T

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Baremaps 0.7.3-rc1 (incubating)

I am a mentor of Baremaps. Sorry that I didn't have time to vote on this RC on dev@. +1 (binding) Downloaded, checked keys, compiled and ran tests (following instructions in README), ran RAT. I am not familiar with "Creative Commons Public License". Is it compatible with ALv2?

Re: Registering a release

I don't think this is required for a podling release. Reporter tool > only seems to worry about TLP releases. > > The releases have to be announced on mailing lists including this one > and the main ASF announce list. > > On Thu, 21 Mar 2024 at 00:30, Julian Hyde wrote: >

Re: Registering a release

; to go here: >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/ >> Kind Regards, >> Justin >>> On 21 Mar 2024, at 10:29 am, Julian Hyde wrote: >>> >>> Can someone remind me where I go (whimsy or reporter, I presume) to >>> register a release from a p

Registering a release

me to the registration page. But for SDAP I can't figure out where to register the release. Thanks! Julian - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: gene

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache SDAP (Incubating) as a Top Level Project

+1 (binding) ...and good luck! Julian On Fri, Mar 15, 2024 at 3:19 PM Riley Kuttruff wrote: > > Hi all, > > Following the positive feedback we received in the DISCUSS thread [1], > we would like to open the official VOTE to graduate now. > > Below are some facts and projec

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache SDAP (incubating) 1.2.0-rc4

Forwarding my vote from the dev@ list: +1 (binding) The points made by Sebb and PJ seem valid but they do not affect this vote. Julian On Fri, Mar 8, 2024 at 2:25 PM sebb wrote: > > On Fri, 8 Mar 2024 at 22:17, PJ Fanning wrote: > > > > Hi Stepheny, > > > > C

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate Apache SDAP (Incubating) as a Top Level Project

tions of a project (regular releases, up to date website, decisions made on list, and openness to new contributors). Nga, Riley, and Stepheny especially have worked to turn the project around, and make it outward-facing and open. I recommend that the Incubator PMC members vote for SDAP's graduati

Re: [LICENSE QUESTION] Use jmh as a benchmark tool

PS Use of jmh was addressed explicitly: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-399 On Fri, Dec 29, 2023 at 4:50 PM Julian Hyde wrote: > > According to https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-450, it's OK > to use a GPL linter. And a project can use GPL "build tools pr

Re: [LICENSE QUESTION] Use jmh as a benchmark tool

hat it does not produce any artifacts and therefore was acceptable. Can someone explain how a benchmarking utility is different from a linter? Julian On Wed, Dec 27, 2023 at 9:19 AM tison wrote: > > > For instance, if your maven build is `-Pbenchmark` and it's clear > > that the

Re: [VOTE] Accept XTable into the ASF Incubator

+1 (binding) Good luck! On Sat, Dec 16, 2023 at 12:50 PM Austin Bennett wrote: > > +1 [ non-binding ] > > On Fri, Dec 15, 2023 at 8:18 PM Jesus Camacho Rodriguez > wrote: > > > Hi All, > > > > Following the discussion in the incubator mailing list [1], I am starting > > this official vote for t

Re: [DISCUSS] Procedure for graduating an existing sub project to new top level project

For what it's worth, Arrow was created in Jan 2016 [1]. Here is the text of the Board resolution. Julian [1] https://www.apache.org/foundation/records/minutes/2016/board_minutes_2016_01_20.txt --- 7. Special Orders A. Establish the Apache Arrow Project WHEREAS, the Boa

Re: [DISCUSS] Procedure for graduating an existing sub project to new top level project

could search the archives for the board resolution that created Arrow. The Incubator is not involved in the process. (Except in some minor ways, such as a name search.) Julian > On Dec 15, 2023, at 7:09 AM, Andrew Lamb wrote: > > I apologize if this is not the right list on which to

Re: [DISCUSS] OneTable proposal

Pronounced “eks table” I presume, and not “cross table” or “times table”? The Java package prefix would be org.apache.xtable, not x_table. (It’s good to check. I’m still traumatized whenever I have to say “PostgreSQL” out loud.) Julian > On Dec 13, 2023, at 7:13 AM, Jean-Baptiste Ono

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache SDAP (incubating) 1.2.0-rc3

Forwarding my vote from the dev thread: +1 (binding) Julian > On Dec 13, 2023, at 9:05 AM, Stepheny Perez wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > This is a friendly reminder that the Apache SDAP community is looking for > approval on our 1.2.0-rc3 release. I'll extend th

Re: [DISCUSS] OneTable proposal

’ and then renamed, but not before it had appeared in a few conference talks; people are still asking me ‘What happened to Optiq?' Julian > On Dec 11, 2023, at 5:08 PM, Jesus Camacho Rodriguez > wrote: > > Thanks to everyone who expressed support and offered help. It's g

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache SDAP (incubating) 1.2.0-rc2

d the project (automating their license hygiene). Julian On Sat, Nov 4, 2023 at 11:01 AM Justin Mclean wrote: > > Hi, > > -1 (binding), as I think you may have an issue here as > apache-sdap-nexus-1.2.0-incubating-src depends on LGPL licensed chardet. [1] > ASF project can not

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache Baremaps 0.7.2-rc3 (incubating)

members (including non-PMC committers). Julian > On Oct 12, 2023, at 03:05, Bertil Chapuis wrote: > > Thanks a lot for the clarification, we will eventually get familiar with the > process 😅 > >> On 11 Oct 2023, at 21:02, Julian Hyde wrote: >> >> Note th

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache Baremaps 0.7.2-rc3 (incubating)

Note that 3 of those +1s (me, Calvin, JB) are binding because they are Incubator PMC members, 2 are not (Bertil, Leonard). 3 binding +1s is sufficient for the vote to pass. Congratulations! Julian On Tue, Oct 10, 2023 at 12:49 AM Bertil Chapuis wrote: > > Hello Everyone, > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Baremaps 0.7.2-rc3 (incubating)

+1 (binding) Downloaded, checked signatures, README, LICENSE, NOTICE, DISCLAIMER-WIP; compared src-tar contents with git; built using OpenJDK 17/Maven 3.8.1 on Ubuntu/amd64; ran RAT. Checked that file headers are now correct. Julian > On Oct 3, 2023, at 11:48 AM, Leo wrote: > > +1

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Baremaps 0.7.2-rc2 (incubating)

* limitations under the License. */ Julian > On Sep 25, 2023, at 7:06 AM, Calvin Kirs wrote: > > Hi, > > sorry for my late check. I've been a little busy lately. > > -1 (binding) > > I checked: > > - checked the asc and sha

Re: Feedback requested - How to deal with retired podling resources

ted at …’.) It is certainly useful for people to be able to access the podling’s source code as of the day it retired. If there are other considerations (cost, security, legal) then we could reconsider. Julian > On Jul 31, 2023, at 3:51 AM, Daniel Gruno wrote: > > Hi incubator f

Re: Little "upsie" at the Wayang podling

out there. Julian > On Jul 25, 2023, at 6:22 AM, Christofer Dutz > wrote: > > (Also fixed what my mail client thought I wanted to say, to what I said in > the subject ;-) ) > > And I think the main problem with the leftpad was the general usage of the > Maven equ

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache SDAP (incubating) 1.1.0-rc0

approaching graduation, when do you plan to solve this issues? Julian > On May 1, 2023, at 10:20 AM, Nga Chung wrote: > > Hello Incubator PMC, > > This is a call for a vote to release Apache SDAP (incubating) version > 1.1.0-rc0. > > The Apache SDAP community has vote

Re: [QUESTION] are binary distributions/releases required?

facts” of the release. Julian [1] https://www.apache.org/legal/release-policy.html#artifacts On Feb 8, 2023, at 7:19 AM, Dave Fisher wrote: Hi PJ, Daffodil uses sbt and produces binary releases - https://daffodil.apache.org/releases/3.4.0/ - https://GitHub.com/Apache/daffodil/ Best, Dave Se

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache SDAP (incubating) 1.0.0-rc3

vote has been open for almost 72 hours already and it would be great to get it done before the (US) weekend. Thank you. Julian On 2023/01/10 18:43:22 Riley Kuttruff wrote: > Hello everyone, > > This is a call for a vote to release Apache SDAP (incubating) version > 1.0.0-r

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache SDAP (incubating) 1.0.0-rc2

l RC. > Frank Greguska wrote: > > What does ASL refer to in this context? I think that Larry meant 'Apache Software License'. Strictly, the license is these days called 'Apache License' and abbreviated 'AL'. Julian ---

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache SDAP (incubating) 1.0.0-rc2

members surface several issues this time around, the second release should be much cleaner. Julian [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-570 On Thu, Dec 29, 2022 at 5:44 PM Calvin Kirs wrote: > > Hi, > > There has a compiled code (gradle-wrapper jar) in the source release.

SDAP release vote

ember because I think that with a small push they can graduate into a successful TLP. They are making a real effort to make releases and to graduate. I think that they deserve our support.) Thanks! Julian [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/t1nb81kbxlqwzv4p9hzk3om15jt

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache SDAP (incubating) 1.0.0-rc2

I am a mentor of SDAP. Forwarding my vote from the PPMC thread [1]: +1 (binding) Julian [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/vh9472q76kzndcs55pmpjmld8snzn1ny On Thu, Dec 22, 2022 at 7:19 PM Riley Kuttruff wrote: > Hello everyone, > > This is a call for a vote to release Ap

SDAP 1.0.0-rc2

list, but could we do them a favor and shorten the cycle a bit? If you are an IPMC member and have some time to inspect an RC, can you please read their vote email [1], inspect the artifacts, and reply with your feedback/vote. Your feedback will help them get to a good release sooner. Julian [1

Removed 'incubator.' from project status template

FYI, I removed 'incubator' from the project status template [1]. In Baremaps we concluded that we wanted the shorter URL and email addresses that would survive into graduation. And I figured that the next podling would want to do the same. If there are objections I can back it out.

Re: [MENTORS] Projects > 1000 days in Incubation

g up CI) that they don't strictly need to do. Sometimes the key step to graduate is the community waking up and saying 'Yes, we're ready to graduate!' Julian Julian On Wed, Oct 19, 2022 at 11:07 AM Justin Mclean wrote: > > Hi, > > We have several project

Re: [DISCUSS] What to do with long incubating projects?

itial committers drift away. Julian On Tue, Oct 18, 2022 at 12:27 PM Justin Mclean wrote: > > Hi, > > Looking at the longest incubating projects, one has graduated and needs some > cleanup, one had a reboot, one is discussing a reboot, and several have roll > calls in pro

Re: [DISCUSS] Remove 72 hour waiting time to add PPMC members.

> If we now exercise our means to object [to] a nomination after it’s executed, > we have this odd unpleasant situation of the person knowing what happened. While this is a legitimate concern, as far as I know the Board and the IPMC have not once exercised the right of veto, for hundreds if not th

Re: [VOTE] Accept Baremaps into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) Julian On Thu, Oct 6, 2022 at 8:10 AM Josh Fischer wrote: > > +1 (non-binding) > > On Thu, Oct 6, 2022 at 7:54 AM Bertrand Delacretaz > wrote: > > > Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > > > ...I'm calling a vote to accept Baremap into the >

Re: [Discuss] Baremaps Proposal

I’m happy to have this meeting if and when Baremaps starts incubation. But first let’s make the case to the IPMC that Baremaps should be in the Incubator, and get the vote passed. Julian > On Sep 28, 2022, at 12:45 AM, Bertil Chapuis wrote: > > >>> When I mentor a

Re: [Discuss] Baremaps Proposal

stakeholders (e.g. contributors’ managers) because people have a lot of questions, and it helps to set people’s expectations correctly early on. Julian > On Sep 27, 2022, at 3:44 PM, Josh Fischer wrote: > > I think we should call out in the proposal of initial goals is learn the > apach

Re: [DISCUSS] Incubating Proposal for Datark

HW-Chao, Your message is unreadable. Can you please resend without the HTML markup? Julian > On Sep 23, 2022, at 7:12 AM, HW-Chao Wang <576749...@qq.com.INVALID> wrote: > >     This is an interesting project, +1 on the proposal.  >     On 2022/09/23 13:06:00 Yu Li wrote: &g

Re: [VOTE] Accept StreamPark into the Apache Incubator

gies, it builds communities. There are many examples of 'overlapping' projects that have built their own communities and flourished (HTTP Server vs Tomcat, Spark vs Flink, Druid vs Pinot, ORC vs Parquet). Julian On Sun, Aug 28, 2022 at 12:17 PM Zur Aviem wrote: > > -1, > > Apach

Re: Short process intro for exec's?

Rich, Thanks for revising this presentation and sharing back. I hope others will find it useful. Julian > On Jul 23, 2022, at 8:58 AM, Salz, Rich wrote: > > Thanks Julian. > > Here is the current draft intended to be a stand-alone introduction to Apache > and Incubation

Crail retirement is complete

As you know, the Crail podling retired as of 2022-06-20 [1]. I am pleased to report completion of the steps to clean up [2][3]. I note that Crail's retirement is mentioned in the draft Board report for July [4]. Julian [1] https://incubator.apache.org/projects/index.html#crail [2]

Re: Short process intro for exec's?

Here’s the original Google slides. Feel free to make a copy. https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1Q28ExXCggbsstqEa1KjnCuA3Ws4XWfR7itQzPmab8vk/edit?usp=sharing <https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1Q28ExXCggbsstqEa1KjnCuA3Ws4XWfR7itQzPmab8vk/edit?usp=sharing> Julian > On Jun

Re: Short process intro for exec's?

net/julianhyde/what-to-expect-when-youre-incubating> Julian > On Jun 17, 2022, at 10:50 AM, Salz, Rich wrote: > >> Depends on what you mean by short. > > Yeah, that's always the issue, innit. > > I was hoping for something 10 minutes for exec's. I've read

[RESULT] [VOTE] Retire Crail

With five binding +1 votes and no 0 or -1 votes, the vote passes. Thanks to all who voted. I'll work with other mentors to carry out the post-retirement steps. Julian On 2022/06/06 19:48:20 Julian Hyde wrote: > After years of declining activity[1][2], and following discussions on >

[VOTE] Retire Crail

-1 [ ] Do not retire Crail from the Incubator Here is my vote: +1 [x] Retire Crail from the Incubator Julian Hyde (Member IPMC, Crail mentor) [1] https://incubator.apache.org/projects/crail.html [2] https://lists.apache.org/list?d...@crail.apache.org [3] https://lists.apache.org/thread

Re: Thank you

ns to follow a similar process with their podlings. Ping me if you would like an editable copy of the slides. Julian [1] https://www.slideshare.net/julianhyde/what-to-expect-when-youre-incubating On Jan 4, 2022, at 5:37 AM, Matt Casters wrote: Dear ASF Incubator, Now that Hop graduated as a TLP I

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Hop (Incubating) as a TLP

the > scope of responsibility of the Apache Hop Project; and be it further > > RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and hereby are > appointed to serve as the initial members of the Apache Hop Project: > > * Bart Maertens > * Brandon Jackson > * Dave Campen &g

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Hop (Incubating) as a TLP

r data > orchestration.; and be it further Can you please fix it and re-start the vote? Julian > On Dec 2, 2021, at 5:57 AM, Bart Maertens wrote: > > Hi Incubator Community, > > After a discussion[1] with and vote by[2] the Hop community, we have > discussed Apache Hop&

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate Apache Hop (Incubating) as a TLP

, they can do that without requiring a vote on dev@hop. For the record, my reading of the thread is that resolutions MAY include non-Apache people but the candidate project removed the non-Apache people from the resolution in order to accommodate limitations in the tooling. Julian > On Nov

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate Apache Hop (Incubating) as a TLP

> On Nov 29, 2021, at 7:50 AM, sebb wrote: > > On Mon, 29 Nov 2021 at 04:58, Julian Hyde wrote: >> >> >> Is it possible to give someone an Apache id even if though are not a >> committer or PMC member of any project? Maybe that would solve some of the

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate Apache Hop (Incubating) as a TLP

cator have been very valuable and is in the >> process of becoming a committer. Our mentor Julian informed us that (and I >> quote) "There’s no rule that the initial PMC can consist only of people who >> were committers in the podling". > > That is rather different

Re: Report template generation changes

But one of the podlings I mentor just left the text, and added comments. Do you think it would help if you, say, enclosed the template text in brackets or braces? Also, "If not what actions..." should be "If not, what actions...". Julian On Wed, Nov 17, 2021 at 7:15 PM Just

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate Apache Hop (Incubating) as a TLP

I agree with Craig; the description of the project in the resolution definitely needs some work. I noticed that the project has not held formal vote for graduation on dev@hop. I’ll remind the project that they need to have that vote before proceeding to a vote on general@incubator. Julian

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate Apache Hop (Incubating) as a TLP

gt;> (PMC), to be known as the "Apache Hop Project", be and hereby is >>>>> established pursuant to Bylaws of the Foundation; and be it further >>>>> >>>>> RESOLVED, that the Apache Hop Project be and hereby is responsible for >>>&g

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hop (incubating) 1.0.0-rc1

Forwarding my +1 (binding) from the podling vote. > On Sep 26, 2021, at 11:58 PM, Hans Van Akelyen > wrote: > > Hi All, > > After a thorough testing period for Hop 0.99, we are ready to release > version 1.0.0 to the public. All issues raised during the previous release > have been resolved. D

Re: Require websites to have standard download URL?

Also: if anyone visits http://podling.apache.org/download it MUST redirect to https://podling.apache.org/download . (Note ‘http’ in first ‘https’ in second.) > On Sep 17, 2021, at 6:26 AM, Alexander Alten wrote: > > Go

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hop (incubating) 0.99-rc4

k you should remove the “a lot of things may be broken” language from README.md. Julian > On Aug 3, 2021, at 5:12 AM, fpa...@apache.org wrote: > > +1 (binding) > > regards, > > François > fpa...@apache.org > > Le 02/08/2021 à 12:58, Hans Van Akelyen a écrit : >&

Re: [VOTE] Apache StreamPipes 0.68.0 (incubating) RC1 release

+1 (binding) I checked * Signatures and Hashes * Builds Backend and Frontend * All Tests pass * Rats reports no error * No Snapshot Artifacts * Disclaimer exists * Incubating is in artefacts name Best Julian On 2021/07/21 05:19:52, Jean-Baptiste Onofre wrote: > +1 (binding) > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hop (incubating) 0.99-rc1

Forwarding my vote from the PPMC poll: +1 (binding) On Wed, Jun 9, 2021 at 5:54 AM Xun Liu wrote: > > +1 (non-binding) from me, I have checked the following items: > > - Incubating in name > - NOTICE is fine > - DISCLAIMER exists > - All links are valid > - No unexpected binary files > - All ASF

Re: Turn on GitHub Issues on apache/incubator

How much will this increase the email traffic? > On Jun 3, 2021, at 9:39 AM, Dave Fisher wrote: > > Unless there is an objection I will turn on GitHub Issues on > https://github.com/apache/incubator next Monday. > > I’ll also set notifications so that PRs and issues are sent to general@i.a.o >

[jira] [Commented] (INCUBATOR-245) Slider - Auditing Capability

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-245?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17311754#comment-17311754 ] Julian Hyde commented on INCUBATOR-245: --- Good point. Can an admin please c

[jira] [Commented] (INCUBATOR-245) Slider - Auditing Capability

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-245?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17311739#comment-17311739 ] Julian Hyde commented on INCUBATOR-245: --- [~jmclean], As an admin, can

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hop (incubating) 0.60-rc1

encoding: UTF-8 OS name: "linux", version: "5.4.0-64-generic", arch: "amd64", family: "unix" $ java -version java version "1.8.0_271" Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.8.0_271-b09) Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 25.271-b09, mixed

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hop (incubating) 0.60-rc1

ion about the errors and possible solutions, please read the following articles: [ERROR] [Help 1] http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/MojoExecutionException [ERROR] [ERROR] After correcting the problems, you can resume the build with the command [ERROR] mvn -rf :hop-assemblies-libs Ju

[jira] [Commented] (INCUBATOR-245) Slider - Auditing Capability

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-245?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17264435#comment-17264435 ] Julian Hyde commented on INCUBATOR-245: --- Great minds, [~elserj]! >

[jira] [Commented] (INCUBATOR-245) Slider - Auditing Capability

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-245?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17264434#comment-17264434 ] Julian Hyde commented on INCUBATOR-245: --- The attachment '2021_01_10

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hop (incubating) 0.50-rc2

binary files whose license has not been fully checked; * quite a few files are excluded from RAT checking. Hop plans to fix these issues in a later incubating release. I hope that exceptions to release policy can be made for these and similar issues in this early-stage incubating release. Julian

Re: [VOTE] Hop proposal

* Maximilian Michels (m...@apache.org) Nominated Mentors * Tom Barber (magicaltr...@apache.org) * Julian Hyde (jh...@apache.org) * Maximilian Michels (m...@apache.org) * Francois Papon (fpa...@apache.org) * Kevin Ratnasekera (djkevi..

Re: [VOTE] Hop proposal

building a great community. I volunteered to become a mentor of this project because I am excited to see what they can achieve as part of Apache. Julian On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 6:29 AM Matt Casters wrote: > > Hi Apache, > > I'd like to call a vote on accepting Hop into the

Re: [DISCUSS] Hop proposal

this could be a very smooth ride : ) So, best from my side! Julian Am 10.09.20, 12:40 schrieb "Maximilian Michels" : I've met Matt and other folks from the Hop project more than a year ago through Beam Summit Europe. I can say that they are genuinely passionate ab

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache IoTDB as TLP

+1 (binding) Its an awesome community and so much fun to see the project grow! Julian Am 10.09.20, 10:54 schrieb "Patrick Wiener" : +1 (non-binding) keep up the great work! Patrick > Am 10.09.2020 um 10:02 schrieb Dominik Riemer : > &

[DISCUSS] Apache IoTDB Graduation

IoTDBs matureness and ist readiness to graduate. What do you think? Finally, big thanks to our Mentors Chris, Justin and Kevin who were really helpful in the whole process (as they were all the time) and to all members of the awesome IoTDB Community! Julian (on behalf of the IoTDB Community) [1

[DISCUSS] Apache IoTDB considers graduation

feedback from our mentors. So I just wanted to inform this list and also start a discussion about others thoughts about IoTDBs graduation. Best! Julian [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r7607cbf6ff2020dc7e7cc27eb698ce265b768ed2a63d3e353c2dc572%40%3Cdev.iotdb.apache.org%3E [2] https

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache IoTDB 0.10.1

! Julian Am 19.08.20, 16:17 schrieb "Xiangdong Huang" : Hi, > I just have a quick question about the README files. Why do we put them into the release directory? Thanks, Willem. Yes, you are right, we do not need to put the README files to the SVN (But they sti

Re: Giving our PMs and contributors triage rights on GitHub

pment efforts they choose to fund, and how much time they give committers to review patches from outside the organization. Julian > On Aug 13, 2020, at 9:27 AM, Maxime Beauchemin > wrote: > > xposting from d...@superset.apache.org - what's the right place to post this >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache IoTDB 0.9.3

("mvn clean install") - Comment: Fails with non-english locale. But "mvn clean install -Dmaven.test.skip=true" passes, so its "minor" Best and gratulations to this good RC! Julian Am 10.05.20, 09:21 schrieb "孙泽嵩" : Hello all, This is a call for

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache IoTDB 0.9.2

binaries Julian Am 21.04.20, 16:23 schrieb "Willem Jiang" : +1.（Binding） Download links are valid. Checksums and PGP signatures are valid. DISCLAIMER is included. Checked the git tag. No binary file in the source file. Willem Jiang Twitter: willemjiang

Re: "Fork Me" on GitHub (was Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate Apache ShardingSphere (incubating) as a TLP)

e on GitHub" is less contentious than it was 5 years ago, so whatever was decided then will suffice for now. Julian On Sat, Mar 28, 2020 at 3:38 PM Justin Mclean wrote: > > Hi, > > > I read the board@ thread and, unless I missed it, there was no edict from > > the board to

Re: "Fork Me" on GitHub (was Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate Apache ShardingSphere (incubating) as a TLP)

projects (or polling) what to do. Julian > On Mar 28, 2020, at 10:45 AM, Harbs wrote: > > I was wondering what the best place for this discussion would be. I couldn’t > really think of a better place than incubator. > > I considered starting the discussion on board@

Re: Tiered Storage Proposal

Neha, Did you perhaps intend to send this to d...@pinot.apache.org? This list covers all projects incubating at Apache, not just Pinot. Julian On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 10:32 AM Neha Pawar wrote: > > Hi, > > Please review the proposal below for Tiered Storage in Pinot: > https://

Re: [VOTE] Release 0.5.2-incubating, release candidate #1

Good luck with the vote on your dev@ list. When you're ready for a vote on general@ it will be helpful if you add 'hudi' to the subject, something like this: [VOTE] Release apache-hudi-0.5.2-incubating, release candidate #1 We on general@ see many release vote threads... Juli

Re: [MENTORS] March report signoff due Tuesday March 10

Ah, I had the right link but I think cwiki was temporarily down. Justin, Many thanks for creating the redirect page. It will be very helpful. I also created https://s.apache.org/incubator-report (as a shortcut to your redirect page) if folks would prefer to add that to their bookmarks. Julian

Re: [MENTORS] March report signoff due Tuesday March 10

Is this the link i should be using? (It changes every month, so I never get around to bookmarking the link.) https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/incubator/March2020 > On Mar 5, 2020, at 6:35 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: >

Re: [VOTE] Apache Crail 1.2-incubating (rc2)

Changing my vote to +1. Be sure to fix the copyright date next time. I noticed another "2018" in the source code - https://github.com/apache/incubator-crail/blob/master/doc/source/conf.py#L38 - so change that too. Julian On Tue, Dec 10, 2019 at 4:31 AM Justin Mclean wrote: > &

Re: [VOTE] Apache Crail 1.2-incubating (rc2)

l to include basic build instructions in the distribution. I guessed to use JDK 8 and ‘mvn -DskipTests install’ and apparently I guessed right. Julian > On Dec 9, 2019, at 2:20 PM, Adrian Schuepbach > wrote: > > Please vote to approve the source release of Apache Crail 1.2-incu

Re: [VOTE] Recommend 'Apache Druid graduation to Top Level Project' resolution to the board

+1 (binding) Julian On Mon, Dec 9, 2019 at 3:32 AM Gosling Von wrote: > > +1, binding > > Best Regards, > Von Gosling > > > On Dec 8, 2019, at 5:55 AM, Gian Merlino wrote: > > > > Earlier this year, Druid voted to graduate to a top level project. The vote &

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Druid (incubating) 0.16.1 [RC2]

+1 (binding) Download, check signatures, NOTICE, LICENSE, DISCLAIMER; compile on macOS. > On Dec 9, 2019, at 10:56 AM, Gian Merlino wrote: > > +1 (binding) > > - Proper NOTICE, LICENSE, DISCLAIMER files are present in both src and bin > packages. > - Verified .asc signatures and .sha512 checks

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Accept StreamPipes into the Apache Incubator

Congratulations to the Streampipes Team : ) Julian Am 11.11.19, 09:51 schrieb "Christofer Dutz" : Hi all, usually the initiator of the vote also closes it ... However there were several "+1" without "binding" or "non-binding" so I had

Re: [VOTE] Accept StreamPipes into the Apache Incubator

Hi Dominik, I like StreamPipes, as you know, thus my vote is +1 (binding) Julian Am 07.11.19, 20:00 schrieb "Dominik Riemer" : Hi all, following up the [DISCUSS] thread on StreamPipes (https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/1cf79ef65888f695b4b925fd67ef8a2b845f6b0931c251

Re: [DISUCSS] Is there any neccessary to do an Apache Release if we publish an App to Apple Store?

Thanks Greg, I didn't know that! Julian Am 07.11.19, 19:24 schrieb "Greg Stein" : https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INFRA/Distribution+via+the+Apple+App+Store On Thu, Nov 7, 2019 at 12:14 PM Greg Stein wrote: > An app signed by the

Re: [DISUCSS] Is there any neccessary to do an Apache Release if we publish an App to Apple Store?

Hi, I think this cannot be done as PMC or PPMC as it would be a "binary release" which we cannot do with the ASF policy. So I think another entity than the ASF / the PMC would need to put the App in the store, and then you are also free with regards to releases. Julian Am 07.11

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Release of Apache Tamaya 0.4-incubating

Hi Anatole, first, congratulations, nicely done (took some stamina to over several RCs...)! Second, little commnt, the binding votes where from IPMC not PPMC : ) Julian Am 07.11.19, 12:04 schrieb "Anatole Tresch" : Thank you all vor voting. I will close this vote with a

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Tamaya 0.4-incubating

Hi Justin, yes, this is a minor issue (overcompensation of the to few hashes in the last RC) but thanks for the vote! Julian Am 05.11.19, 22:56 schrieb "Justin Mclean" : Hi, +1 (binding) I checked: - incubating in name - signatures and h

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Tamaya 0.4-incubating

Hi everybody, we would be really happy and grateful if we find two more people to vote on the tamaya release. @Justin Mclean as you already assisted in one RC (by the mandatory -1 Vote) you probably find some time to jump in again (a +1 would be welcome this time :P ). Thanks! Julian Am

  1   2   3   4   5   >