On Apr 19, 2010, at 15:52, Tobias Schlitt wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi all,
>
> please find below our proposal for Zeta Components. The proposal is also
> available in the wiki:
>
> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ZetaComponentsProposal
+1!
Yeah, I kn
On 04.03.2008, at 20:27, Carl Trieloff wrote:
sebb wrote:
...
>RESOLVED, that the initial Apache Qpid Project be and
>hereby is tasked with the creation of a set of bylaws
intended
>to encourage open development and increased
participation in
>the Qpid
On 01.03.2008, at 12:26, Leo Simons wrote:
That should be fine! As far as I know, the ASF has just the one fax
number.
Though we've recently changed it - the new one is 919-573-9199 so you
should be fine as long as you did use that one.
Cheers,
Erik
(An alternative to faxing is printing
On 14.02.2008, at 14:14, Santiago Gala wrote:
...
The typical workflow in distributed scm is that authoritative
repositories pull (as requested and after review) from non-official
ones, so typically security is easier: no longer lots of people with
write access, but only a handful, taking change
On Jan 23, 2008 9:07 PM, Mark Slee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi all,
We've just posted the Apache Incubator proposal for Thrift onto the
Wiki:
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ThriftProposal
+1.
Cheers,
Erik
-
To unsubscr
On 31.01.2008, at 13:26, Dirk-Willem van Gulik wrote:
On Jan 31, 2008, at 6:40 AM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
and only the PPMC member votes are binding.
The error is the use of PPMC. It should say that only PMC member
votes
are binding.
But somehow I like the fact that in most cases the v
On 30.01.2008, at 21:29, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
you probably have noticed a number of emailed audit reports (see
below). i've been doing some testing (apologies for the SPAM) but
think that everything's working ok now.
1. frequency: weekly? biweekly? monthly?
Maximum one per week I'd sa
On 30.01.2008, at 10:35, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
On Wednesday 30 January 2008 15:24, Mark Slee wrote:
What we'd really
like to set up here is a system where there are different people with
committer priveleges to different parts of the project.
Hmmm... I would oppose this for two reasons;
1.
On 30.11.2007, at 05:00, Marshall Schor wrote:
Thanks, Erik. It makes sense to me to have the update site under the
dist/ directory, since it is a kind of distribution.
I see there was an update to the page
http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.html
about a month ago which a
On 29.11.2007, at 22:41, Marshall Schor wrote:
In our next release of Apache UIMA from the incubator, we would
like to
include an additional packaging of some of our Eclipse tooling as an
Eclipse "update site". This is a location, reachable via http, which
Eclipse can use to download Eclipse
On 31.10.2007, at 03:54, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
I didn't see a thread get started on this topic yet but I've been
mulling this over for a bit so perhaps we can continue the
discussion in this thread?
I'm not sure that there should be a hard requirement for 3, 5 or n
unique committers. As a
On 29.10.2007, at 16:02, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
On Monday 29 October 2007 21:26, Erik Abele wrote:
The process on the above page is beyond most users'
imagination.
As said, they probably don't even care otherwise they would know...
I rest my case; If I don't care about routin
On 29.10.2007, at 13:49, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
...
IMO this needs to be done at the protocol level to gain the required
security (rather than just the appearance of security). if there's
anyone around who's active on HTTP standards then now would be a great
time to jump in...
And back t
On 29.10.2007, at 03:13, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
On Sunday 28 October 2007 23:15, Erik Abele wrote:
As BenL always says: "I don't give a shit about some random document,
that could be faked anyway. All I care about is the email address
connected to the key I intend to sign - is it
On 28.10.2007, at 08:57, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
On Sunday 28 October 2007 06:24, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Perhaps
we should add some information on getting into the Web of Trust,
although
that is really a general committer item, not Incubator specific.
I am not very security fluent, and perha
On 01.10.2007, at 18:43, Roland Weber wrote:
Erik Abele wrote:
Sure, am happy to help (as a satisfied user of both,
HttpComponents and
JMeter); just let me know where you'd like to see me subscribed... (I
assume [EMAIL PROTECTED] and [EMAIL PROTECTED])
That's great! Yes, those w
On 30.09.2007, at 18:17, Roland Weber wrote:
Niclas Hedhman wrote:
I don't know what to suggest, but perhaps recruiting one or more
veteran
ASFer, either just off the member's list or some experienced
Incubator
mentor, feeling this being important could just join the PMC and
at least
ensu
it, here it is again:
On 28.06.2007, at 16:51, Erik Abele wrote:
On 28.06.2007, at 09:37, Gilles Scokart wrote:
I'm an ivy commiter since a few weeks, but I didn't manage to
subscribe to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I tried with my gmail address 2 times, and with my apac
On 12.07.2006, at 19:39, robert burrell donkin wrote:
On 7/11/06, Geir Magnusson Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
(And I'll note now that I'm interested in participating, although
can't
commit the time to be a mentor right now.)
this seems like a good opportunity to reintroduce an existing
On 30.06.2006, at 15:22, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
robert burrell donkin wrote:
On 6/30/06, William A. Rowe, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
One thing that bothers me is that there is a very small handful of
ASF
people
(committers and members) participating in standards efforts.
perhaps o
On 29.06.2006, at 12:11, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
On 6/29/06, Martin Sebor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm not quite comfortable with the word inaccurate here. What
exactly does it refer to? (Assuming it's bullet 5, there doesn't
seem anything inaccurate about putting out a press release
announc
On 25.05.2006, at 01:47, James M Snell wrote:
Ok, so here are a few of the name options that seem to be the
safest (in
no particular order)
Iaea (adapted, of course, from the U.N. nuclear watchdog
group)
Anu (Dims suggestion, sanskrit for "atom")
Atomico (Spanish/I
On 23.03.2006, at 14:36, Jason van Zyl wrote:
Erik Abele wrote:
On 22.03.2006, at 18:01, Jason van Zyl wrote:
Hi,
Just poking around the incubator site and I see a
responsibilities page for Mentors which is good but I don't see
any criteria for being a mentor. But I think starting
On 22.03.2006, at 18:01, Jason van Zyl wrote:
Hi,
Just poking around the incubator site and I see a responsibilities
page for Mentors which is good but I don't see any criteria for
being a mentor. But I think starting with three simple ones would
be a start:
1) Active interest in the pr
On 13.03.2006, at 08:34, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
The Apache Jackrabbit committers have voted to request graduation
from the Incubator as a TLP.
...
Please send in your +1/0/-1 to approve/abstain/disapprove.
+1.
Cheers,
Erik
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
On 21.02.2006, at 21:18, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Infrastructure,
All projects in the Incubator are managed by the Incubator PMC.
All Mentors
are Incubator PMC members (see committee info if in doubt).
Requests for infrastructure and accounts should be coming from those
Mentors, and should b
On 24.01.2006, at 10:39, Steven Noels wrote:
On 23 Jan 2006, at 14:30, Sam Ruby wrote:
In addition, the Kabuki project will also include server-side
infrastructure to facilitate the AJAX programming model.
In the current download (http://www.zimbra.com/community/
ajaxtk_download.html), all
On 18.01.2006, at 02:37, Erik Abele wrote:
On 18.01.2006, at 02:32, Yonik Seeley wrote:
I had read that guide, but it seems geared toward existing projects
wasn't clear what to do in the case of a new project in the
incubator.
You are right, this manual is a bit thin on detail
On 18.01.2006, at 02:32, Yonik Seeley wrote:
I had read that guide, but it seems geared toward existing projects
wasn't clear what to do in the case of a new project in the incubator.
You are right, this manual is a bit thin on details for incubator-
related projects.
Shall I send the emai
[changed subject line though I don't intend to have a big discussion
about this topic]
On 18.01.2006, at 00:16, Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
Is this becoming the current de-facto process, posting to a wiki?
(or "@)#!)#@ wiki", as I tend to think of them...)
Can we please have things go to the
On 17.01.2006, at 03:55, David Crossley wrote:
Erik Abele wrote:
+1 - I don't know how to add this to the incubator-site myself (is
anakia now ready to use?) but I'd really like to see this somewhere
on incubator.a.o, e.g. http://incubator.apache.org/faq.html...
Not yet ready. Lac
On 17.01.2006, at 03:12, Sam Ruby wrote:
Erik Abele wrote:
On 16.01.2006, at 02:42, Sam Ruby wrote:
The discussion has died down, and the time has come to call for
a VOTE to see if the incubator wants to sponsor and accept this
proposal for incubation.
As Roy and Leo (and others
On 17.01.2006, at 03:04, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Erik Abele wrote:
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
FWIW, I would want to see your technical concerns addressed before
graduation, but so far, we have had little if any discussion of
what those tecnical issues really are, or so it seems from the
archives
On 17.01.2006, at 00:33, Sam Ruby wrote:
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
We seem to agree on the rest, but the proposal should make it clear,
since those are points that appear to concern (some) others.
To be honest, I would rather those points be placed on an general
incubator page as they apply to
On 17.01.2006, at 00:02, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Martin Cooper wrote:
whether I get involved with the Zimbra toolkit, and try to help them
see the light, I need to make a personal decision between putting my
energy into that, here at the ASF, or putting it into a non-ASF
project that is already
On 16.01.2006, at 02:42, Sam Ruby wrote:
The discussion has died down, and the time has come to call for a
VOTE to see if the incubator wants to sponsor and accept this
proposal for incubation.
As Roy and Leo (and others?) already noted, the proposal as sent is
lacking some vital informat
On 23.12.2005, at 16:57, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
On Fri, Dec 23, 2005 at 09:11:55AM -0500, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
...
I think that there's little downside to this. A check on the
Incubator PMC is the board - any member or PMC could appeal to the
board in the event that they believed their
On 23.12.2005, at 00:23, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
On Dec 22, 2005, at 10:53 AM, Erik Abele wrote:
On 21.12.2005, at 21:57, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
On Dec 21, 2005, at 11:04 AM, Ted Leung wrote:
How is this possible when any other PMC can vote to bring a
project in without approval of the
On 21.12.2005, at 21:57, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
On Dec 21, 2005, at 11:04 AM, Ted Leung wrote:
How is this possible when any other PMC can vote to bring a
project in without approval of the incubator PMC? Just look at
the raft of projects being brought in via Geronimo and the WS
PMC. Th
On 18.12.2005, at 05:49, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Please vote on the following:
New mailing lists should be created under the
@incubator.apache.org domain, just as all of
the other project resources, e.g., the web
site and SVN subtree.
+1.
Cheers,
Erik
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cr
On 02.09.2005, at 17:25, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
On Friday 02 September 2005 20:23, Erik Abele wrote:
I honestly don't feel like "fueling" this thread, so please don't
hesitate to
say I am outright stupid and don't know what I am talking about,
and I'll
s
On 02.09.2005, at 14:45, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
Sal and Ian from HP expressed interest on [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=webservices-
general&m=111901932102075&w=2
Quoting: "What are the steps for me to get set up w/ admin
rights for SVN? Once I get set up, I'll read up o
On 02.09.2005, at 14:07, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
Leo,
Specifically 2 people asked read persmissions on the files. they were
told that's not possible. Am NOT talking about root privs.
Which files? Why? Who?
Cheers,
Erik
-- dims
On 9/2/05, Leo Simons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 02-09-20
On 02.09.2005, at 13:03, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
On Friday 02 September 2005 17:42, Leo Simons wrote:
By all means, please help make it happen! Step 1 is subscribing to
infrastructure _at_ apache _dot_ org, if you haven't already.
After almost 2 years of trying to find angles of helping out,
On 07.06.2005, at 22:48, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Demo? Technology preview? Milestone? Happy Meal?
Look, maybe this is hard to understand, especially if people are
coming from
an enviroment focused on code quality first, but this isn't about
the state
of the code. It is about the state of
On 19.04.2005, at 20:34, Doug Cutting wrote:
I just faxed a software grant to Apache. Can someone please tell me
when this has been recieived and filed?
Jim, the ASF secretary, recorded it yesterday...
Cheers,
Erik
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
On 16.03.2005, at 18:39, Ceki Gülcü wrote:
...
By insisting heavily on community building and rigid rules like 3+
committers, the ASF may be undermining the very thing it is trying to
cultivate. Developers are drawn to the ASF in order to develop
software in a friendly environment and
On 02.02.2005, at 17:26, Martin Marinschek wrote:
...
- I propose the establishment of such a Prize in the Open Source
movement, from people using and developing Open Source - for people
developing Open Source, on the base of a yearly vote...
...
What do all of you think about a project like that?
On 23.12.2004, at 11:40, Ted Husted wrote:
Make sure that the requested project name does not already exist and
check www.nameprotect.com to be sure that the name is not already
trademarked for an existing software product.
Do we have an account with NameProtect?
A prior post mentioned using the
On 18.10.2004, at 13:34, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
On Monday 18 October 2004 19:05, Santiago Gala wrote:
El lun, 18-10-2004 a las 11:08 +0200, Stephen McConnell escribió:
Seems to me that he's talking about a very real dark-side of the
ASF.
Facts? I would like to see something substantial.
Same here.
Until now message moderation was turned off - I've actived it now so
this shouldn't happen again. Not sure why it wasn't actived
initially... let me know if something doesn't work as expected...
The current moderators are:
wrowe at rowe-clan.net
sterling.hughes at gmail.com
ianh at apache.org
On 08.10.2004, at 10:08, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
For "small" projects we have created a common
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list.
Over time I haven't seen that a common list is needed, as all common
requests go to the general mailing list. In essence, it's not working
as
On 31.08.2004, at 14:39, Ted Husted wrote:
OK, now I'm starting to worry :)
The CLAs that Manfred sent by surface mail should have arrived a week
ago. Might they still be pending, or should we try again?
Hmm, root@ has a bunch of account req rec'd for the MyFaces project but
none of the CLAs have
On 21.06.2004, at 22:38, Sander Striker wrote:
[X] +1 - The SpamAssassin project has met the requirements
for incubation and will be recommended to the
board for TLP status
[ ] -1 - The SpamAssassin project as not met the requirements
for incubation
I'd like to be able to
On 17.06.2004, at 21:11, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Is it already possible to end and summarize this vote?
There is a request that we approve clearly marked incubation
distribution of
Lenya to help further community development. The request has the
support
for Steven Noels and others in the Lenya co
On 15.06.2004, at 17:03, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Over here [1] there are some FAQs about Apache.
I think that they are much better to be put here [2].
[1] http://incubator.apache.org/faq.html
[2] http://www.apache.org/foundation/faq.html
You mean just the first section, right? Sounds reasonable. W
On 15.06.2004, at 18:32, Marinschek Martin wrote:
Another question - what do we have to change regarding project
infrastructure to enter the incubator/ and later to be a project? Do
we have to embrace Maven or can we somehow ship around this?
The most basic things you'd have to move are source co
On 19.05.2004, at 02:48, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
I'm changing the subject to make it clear to those skimming their mail
that
this is a VOTE to incubate Beehive, based upon their proposal.
See:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/eyebrowse/BrowseList?
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
tor.apache.org&by=thread&from=7
On 22.04.2004, at 01:43, Alex Karasulu wrote:
can record it appropriately (and make sure that others have access to
it if need be). On the other hand, if it's only a PMC-wide license the
respective PMC can handle it itself of course... ;)
Say was it you Erik that had the contact at JetBrains?
Nope
On 13.04.2004, at 22:48, Alex Karasulu wrote:
Hi,
I would like to get a free group clover license that is offered for
open source projects for the Directory project.
First off I was wondering if we already have one for the entire
ASF. Secondly I was wondering if there are any requirements I must
On 09.03.2004, at 15:21, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
Folks,
There was a VOTE on [EMAIL PROTECTED] and we are VOTE'd to graduate JaxMe.
Please go ahead and adjust
the web site and wish you all best of luck :)
+1 here too! Good luck!
Cheers,
Erik
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signatur
On 22.01.2004, at 01:23, Sander Striker wrote:
On Thu, 2004-01-22 at 01:15, Malte S. Stretz wrote:
On Thursday 22 January 2004 00:34 CET Erik Abele wrote:
Indeed and if someone is really interested in meeting other
German/Austrian/Swiss/etc. ASF fellows, he/she should have a look at
/docs/de
On 21.01.2004, at 23:13, Malte S. Stretz wrote:
...
And maybe there will be a chance to meet and exchange keys with other
Apache-related developers at this year's CeBIT. Ok, I don't think
you'll
want to wait till then but it might be a chance for others, too :)
Indeed and if someone is really inte
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 21.01.2004, at 11:41, Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
* The developers PGP keys aren't part of any web of trust. Mainly an
issue of physical separation between the developers.
Jochen, where are you located? A whois lookup of ispsoft.de revealed
Eningen ne
On 14.01.2004, at 21:17, Leo Simons wrote:
Please place your votes:
[X] +1 -- yes
[ ] ±0 -- abstain
[ ] -1 -- no
Cheers,
Erik
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 07.11.2003, at 15:28, Reini Urban wrote:
just returned from holidays.
someone obviously removed the fax sheet at this url.
could someone please check this?
the url must be okay, it is also listed in the commiters faq:
http://www.apache.org/dev/committers.html
The CLA has moved, please see
htt
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Pluto is in incubator.
> Where can I find the pluto home-page in the CVS repository? I would like
> to make an update of the home page.
Have a look at
cvs.apache.org:/x1/home/cvs/jakarta-pluto
> Do I need any special rights for the task?
Hmm, an account on cvs.apache.
am 24.10.2003 14:12 Uhr schrieb Jochen Wiedmann unter [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> Hi,
>
> is there any reason, that the archive at
>
> http://nagoya.apache.org/eyebrowse/SummarizeList?listId=172
>
> does not contain any messages from october? Whom to contact?
Please enter a 'bug' in Bugzilla for this
On 22/10/2003, at 08:00, Greg Stein wrote:
On Wed, Oct 22, 2003 at 04:08:31PM +0200, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
Incubator releases are basically Incubated Projects' release to the
Sponsor PMC. So I gather that how incubation is done is our "code".
Hence I would not see the need to "ratify" such rul
On 01/10/2003, at 06:47, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
Cliff Schmidt wrote:
"XMLBeans is an incubated subproject under the sponsorship of the
Apache
Software Foundation's (ASF) XML project.
it all looks good, except for this. i think i would prefer something
like
'XMLBeans is an effort undergoin
On 24/09/2003, at 10:54, Cliff Schmidt wrote:
On Tuesday, September 23, 2003 11:26 PM, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
I put up a Wiki page for it here:
http://nagoya.apache.org/wiki/
apachewiki.cgi?IncubatorReleaseManagement
From the Wiki page:
"This means that Projects under
= = =
http://www.marketwire.com/mw/release_html_b1?release_id=57498
Registration Opens for ApacheCon 2003, the Global Hub
for All Things Apache
(MARKET WIRE) -- 09/15/2003 --
http://www.apachecon.com/ -- ApacheCon, the official
conference of the Apache Software Foundation (ASF),
announced today t
On 09/09/2003, at 12:26, Luigi R. Viggiano wrote:
On Mon, 2003-09-08 at 22:56, robert burrell donkin wrote:
please take a look at
http://incurbator.apache.org/projects/geronimo.html
Currently seems to be down:
An error occured while loading
http://incurbator.apache.org/projects/geronimo.html:
Th
I wonder if someone should collect the addresses of all the interested
people coming in here with absolutely no clue and send them a
standardized mail with some instructions on how to get involved
(mailing list subscription, incubator site and so on)? They are clearly
asking for further informa
On 25/07/2003, at 02:05, Andrew C. Oliver wrote:
On 7/25/03 7:46 AM, "Nicola Ken Barozzi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It's simple:
The Incubator PMC is responsible for the project. All others (can)
help.
No this is difference than in the past. Remember the Incubator is
here to
help and its OUR
On 25/07/2003, at 02:40, Tetsuya Kitahata wrote:
On Fri, 25 Jul 2003 14:14:04 +0200 "Sander Striker"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm 0 on both suggestions. Go with this one for now*. And lets not
delay kicking off a project for this for too long.
applause!!
Okay, I'm fine with this for now, but w
On 24/07/2003, at 03:48, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
Since IMHO this has been already discussed enough and different POVs
remain, I ask for a vote on the following.
What should we use as a policy in creating resources for incubating
projects?
...
I'm not on the incubator pmc but I'd like to see
77 matches
Mail list logo
