On Tue, Aug 4, 2020 at 11:01 PM Justin Mclean
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > 1. Change all MXNet to Apache MXNet (incubating) from documentation
> where it necessary
> > 2. Change maven package description ” MXNet Engine Adapter for DJL”
> to "Deep Java Library (DJL) Engine Adapter for Apache MXNet" for
On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 5:55 PM Justin Mclean wrote:
>
> HI,
>
> >>> (2) The community is being called AgensGraph Extension and it is very
> >>> likely that the VP, Brand will not approve.
> >>
> >> Regarding the name: One of the 1st efforts will be a renaming of the
> >> project.
> >
> > Thanks
On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 8:57 PM Justin Mclean
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > I also wonder if opinions might have changed in the 5 years since that
> discussion. In that time, GitHub has only become more ubiquitous and more
> adopted by many Apache projects.
>
> Probably more a discussion for the board or In
rs and have granted permission to use
> another license.
>
> On Mon, Feb 3, 2020 at 4:59 PM David Nalley wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 3, 2020 at 9:27 PM Justin Mclean
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > HI,
> > >
> > > I agree with what John wrote,
On Mon, Feb 3, 2020 at 9:27 PM Justin Mclean wrote:
>
> HI,
>
> I agree with what John wrote, part of the code is EPL which is not compatible
> with the ALv2, you need the owner permission to change the license on that..
>
> My understanding of "Let me try to get in contact with Walmart Labs to g
Hi folks,
I am happy to report that this vote is now closed and has passed unanimously.
25 +1 (14 of which were binding) votes were cast.
I am excited to welcome the TubeMQ community into the Apache Incubator.
--David
On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 9:48 PM David Nalley wrote:
>
> Hi folks,
&
and mentor: David Nalley ke4...@apache.org (ASF Member, Incubator PMC)
Mentors: Junping Du junpin...@apache.org (ASF Member, Incubator PMC)
Justin Mclain jmcl...@apache.org (ASF Member, VP of Incubator)
Sijie Guo si...@apache.org (ASF Member, Incubator PMC)
On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 7:50 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>
> Hi David,
>
> Very interesting proposal.
>
> How do you compare with Apache Kafka or Pulsar ?
> It sounds to address the same use cases, right ?
>
> I would be interested to be mentor on the proposal if you are looking
> for an additi
entor: David Nalley ke4...@apache.org (ASF Member, Incubator PMC)
Mentors: Junping Du junpin...@apache.org (ASF Member, Incubator PMC)
Justin Mclain jmcl...@apache.org (ASF Member, VP of Incubator)
Sijie Guo si...@apache.org (ASF Member, Incubator PMC)
Zhijie
>
> I'd like to see the IPMC get out of the way of the podlings' releases. I
> see no reason for us to be a gate, and many more reasons to back off and
> let podlings get their work done.
>
I strongly agree with your sentiment, even if I differ with your tactics a bit.
I think that they are relea
On Mon, Aug 5, 2019 at 6:52 AM Furkan KAMACI wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> One of the projects that I am mentoring has a situation needs to be
> resolved. I've copied the case below. What do you think about it:
>
> "I want to resolve this soon.
>
> Again the issue is this:
>
> I pushed a bad package.json
On Wed, Jul 3, 2019 at 4:59 PM Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Jul 3, 2019, at 2:37 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> >
> >
> > This is correct. Provided we *do* explicitly acknowledge that special
> > status of the Incubator.
> >
> > This acknowledgement will basically put podling source code rele
On Wed, Jul 3, 2019 at 2:38 PM Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jul 2, 2019 at 10:27 PM Greg Stein wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 3, 2019 at 12:10 AM Justin Mclean
> > wrote:
> > >...
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > > Although not a "real" PMC, we do need to provide legal protection for
> > > each PPMC
>
> Have you checked with infra that they will allow this? Previous they have
> said they will remove any release with an issue like this. I’ve tried to get
> clarity on this (see board report before last) but with no luck.
>
Justin,
I apologize for missing that question in the May report. Can
On Sun, Jun 23, 2019 at 11:26 PM Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jun 22, 2019 at 3:31 PM Rich Bowen wrote:
> >
> > A couple of thoughts:
>
> And a couple of thoughts on top of that.
>
> > Podlings are not permitted to call themselves "Apache Foo" because they are
> > not yet full Apache proje
On Sat, Jun 22, 2019 at 6:31 PM Rich Bowen wrote:
>
> A couple of thoughts:
>
> Podlings are not permitted to call themselves "Apache Foo" because they are
> not yet full Apache projects.
>
Actually we compel them to call themselves Apache Foo (incubating)
https://incubator.apache.org/guides/bran
There's been a lot of discussion in various threads about bureaucracy,
whether podlings are part of the ASF, etc. As a result of that I've
spent a good deal of time reading resolutions and older discussions
and organizing those thoughts from a legal and community perspective.
I've also read a numbe
+1 (binding)
I agree with Greg, this feels superfluous. Let’s get out of the way of
people doing the work.
—David
On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 01:37 Greg Stein wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> (and IMO this vote should never have been needed/called; let's help them,
> rather than hinder)
>
> On Mon, Jun 1
On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 5:58 AM Christofer Dutz
wrote:
>
> But if you are releasing Maven artifacts, I would assume that you change the
> group-ids to not start with "org.apache"
> and the packages should probably be changed too. But not 100% sure if this is
> just a nice-to-have or a hard r
Regardless of the project's TLP status, all significant code
contributions from outside the project have to go through the IP
Clearance process.
Here's the page that applies to TLPs (as opposed to new incubating projects).
https://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/
On Thu, Jun 6, 2019 at 3:37 AM
On Sun, Jun 2, 2019 at 2:23 PM Hen wrote:
>
> Wrote a long thing... decided it wasn't useful :)
>
> The tldr;
>
> * Incubating releases are Apache releases. No user cares if they are
> endorsed or official (for whatever they may mean). Perhaps if we said GA we
> might be clearer.
Agreed.
We distr
On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 11:32 PM Daniel Shahaf wrote:
>
> I think Jim and Greg were describing theory, not practice. We can shout
> from the rooftops that We Do Not Release Binaries, but then you have
> download pages like [1] that present binary artifacts on equal footing
> with source artifact
On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 9:39 PM Greg Stein wrote:
>
> On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 12:25 PM Julian Hyde wrote:
>
> > Jim, you’re re-iterating the premise of my question. In the context of my
> > question, it doesn’t matter what these things are called. But we need to
> > know how reviewers are to hand
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INFRA/Jenkins#Jenkins-HowdoIgetanaccount
On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 4:25 PM, Dan Kirkwood wrote:
> Hi,
>
> My apologies if this is the wrong forum to ask..Can someone please
> add permission for the users dangogh and neuman to modify Jenkins
> confi
On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 4:09 PM, Ate Douma wrote:
> Hi Mark,
>
> On 2016-09-26 17:22, Mark Struberg wrote:
>>
>> Stian, this is established practice in the ASF since the very early days
>> of playing with GIT.
>> It is used e.g. in the following TLPs:
>> TomEE
>> DeltaSpike
>> Johnzon
>> CouchDB
>
On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 11:04 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 4:40 PM, David Nalley wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 1:52 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
>> wrote:
>>> ...my suggestion is for infra (David or Greg) to give us their o
On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 11:21 AM, Geertjan Wielenga
wrote:
> We're actively discussing with various organizations about the future home
> of plugins.netbeans.org. We'd certainly not want to go into the future
> without our Plugin Portal and plugins, there's no point in pointing out to
> the NetBea
On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 1:52 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 5:57 AM, David Nalley wrote:
>> ...My guess is, based on Daniels estimate, that
>> first year is 13-30k - each year thereafter is 3-10k per year in costs..
>
> Are these estimates sufficie
On Sat, Sep 24, 2016 at 8:35 AM, Shane Curcuru wrote:
> Excellent cliff notes, and I'm really glad to see us surfacing the
> issues - and costs - of incubating such a large podling.
>
> Question: do you have a rough forecast of how long this expense/extra
> infra burden will last? I.e. is this li
On Sat, Sep 17, 2016 at 10:54 AM, Geertjan Wielenga
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Can we be specific about what info is needed, or what further details
> specifically, before going into a vote for acceptance of the proposal? My
> concern is that each question we answer is answered by further questions to
>
On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 5:41 PM, Jochen Theodorou wrote:
> On 16.09.2016 00:36, Geertjan Wielenga wrote:
> [...]
>>
>> Public servers:
>> - www.netbeans.org: ...
>> - hg.netbeans.org: ...
>> - deadlock.netbeans.org: ...
>> - bits.netbeans.org: ...
>> - updates.netbeans.org: ...
>> - statistics.net
On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 6:36 PM, Geertjan Wielenga
wrote:
> Notes on the NetBeans infrastructure from the NetBeans build engineer. Who
> from Apache infra is going to do 1:1 discovery?
Daniel Gruno will - feel free to reach out directly to him at
humbed...@apache.org
In the meantime, this is a g
On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 8:15 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
wrote:
> Hi Incubator PMC,
>
> On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 9:40 AM, Geertjan Wielenga
> wrote:
>> ... https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/NetBeansProposal ...
>
> At this point I ask anyone with concerns or questions that haven't
> been addressed so
On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 9:10 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 2:57 PM, Geertjan Wielenga
> wrote:
>> ...there is no code on plugins.netbeans.org at all. No one can donate
>> any code from anywhere on plugins.netbeans.org to anyone else. It simply
>> contains binari
On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 4:49 AM, Ian Dunlop wrote:
> Hello,
>
> In the Taverna Incubator project we have been developing an Android mobile
> app which is almost ready for a first release. Are there any ASF procedures
> and policies for doing an Android release? Can an ASF based Android app be
> re
On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 5:48 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 11:19 AM, Daniel Gruno wrote:
>> What is the expected impact on infrastructure here?...
>
> I'll let Geertjan or someone else who's familiar with the existing
> setups comment on the below list, f
+1 - thanks for going into detail on CCLAs, and the schedules for
each. Made it much easier to review.
On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 7:40 AM, Milamber wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Apache JMeter is receiving a code for a new Dashbord / Report module.
>
> See http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/jmeter-dashboard-
5 releases of software, and 4 of them before an SGA appeared is troubling.
The code being imported and writable at all at the ASF prior to a
valid SGA being filed appears to be a violation of Incubator policy[1]
This, plus John's comments are troubling and give me pause
--David
[1] http://incuba
On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 7:48 AM, Sterling Hughes wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 9:24 PM, David Nalley wrote:
>> Hi Sterling, this looks fascinating.
>> I have a few questions for you:
>>
>> How many arches are you targeting initially? I saw ARM and MIPS
>> commen
Hi Sterling, this looks fascinating.
I have a few questions for you:
How many arches are you targeting initially? I saw ARM and MIPS
commented below, but not sure if that's the initial list, or just a
few notable.
What's the CI/Build/Testing environment that you currently have? How
many nodes, ho
+1 (binding)
On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 10:06 AM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote:
> This is the Incubator vote to decide if Apache Brooklyn should graduate from
> the Incubator. Please see the proposed resolution below.
>
> See also discuss thread [1]. Mentors were invited to join the future TLP PMC
> on req
+1(binding) the Brooklyn folks have done a good job in building a
community and adapting processes.
--David
On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 1:26 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote:
> The Brooklyn community and project made significant advances in the past
> months and believes it is ready to graduate as a top-le
On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 7:11 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> Hi Marko,
>
> On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 2:51 PM, Marko Rodriguez wrote:
>>> I think that Marvin's question to you was pretty cogent. Would you be
>>> willing to spend an hour or so each on 5 different projects you aren't
>>> involved in bef
On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 10:41 PM, Marko Rodriguez wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> Thanks for making a clear statement because it lets me focus on the
>> question that may be central to this discussion: can you tell us why
>> did you guys decided to join ASF in the first place? This is not a baited
>> question:
/me notes the mixed public and private lists
>
> I.e. assume you're a developer or sysadmin who is *not* an Apache
> committer. You know you need to get a software project management tool
> for the linux machines you maintain, and you've heard of something
> called "Maven".
>
> - What is the actu
On Sun, Aug 16, 2015 at 3:43 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 16, 2015 at 12:33 PM, Ted Dunning wrote:
>> On Sun, Aug 16, 2015 at 12:29 PM, Roman Shaposhnik
>> wrote:
>>
>>> > The Hadoop PMC is utterly free to produce a Hadoop RPM with Hadoop in it
>>> > that corresponds to an Apache Ha
On Sun, Aug 16, 2015 at 3:29 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> Seems like for the past two weeks I only have weekends to respond :-(
> Apologies for the delay on this thread.
>
> On Sun, Aug 9, 2015 at 7:30 PM, Ted Dunning wrote:
>>> > 1) The concept of a brand covering some artifact doesn't come int
On Sun, Aug 9, 2015 at 9:33 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 12:46 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
> wrote:
>> On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 2:50 AM, Roman Shaposhnik
>> wrote:
>>> ...is Apache Brand meant to protect *any* possible object/binary
>>> artifact or only those that PMC actually
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 5:55 AM, Jochen Theodorou wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> some of the general discussion recently made me wonder about one point with
> regards to binary distributions. It was pointed out, that a binary
> distribution of a source code release has to be handled like a release
> itself,
On Sun, Jul 26, 2015 at 8:41 PM, Ross Gardler
wrote:
> The proposed need to announce release votes on the IPMC list is how things
> were when the incubator was created. The need for IPMC to control the process
> is another case of the IPMC over-reaching itself and in so doing causing
> problems
>
> Empower the Mentors to run the podlings, teach the newcomers and bring it
> to TLP.
>
As a mentor of podlings, I dislike the above idea.
Mentors get busy, they miss things, sometimes big things. Sometimes
things that are obvious to an outsider are missed by mentors who don't
catch it. I've ce
On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 7:10 PM, Ted Dunning wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 2:29 PM, Daniel Gruno wrote:
>
>> The question of diversity in this case is not "are we enough
>> men/women/whatever", the question here is "is there a single corporate
>> entity with a deciding vote in the project?".
>
Please consider using commits@ - that's a well known design pattern
that is used pervasively.
If you need notifications@ in addition, that's okay too, but there are
lots of things that assume commits@
--David
On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 1:34 PM, Sean Busbey wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 4:50 PM,
cur” at the ASF.
> Period.
>
> Here are the immediate actions:
>
> 1. Mirror all UCI Gerrit to Apache AsterixDB mailing list (discussed
> in dev@asterixdb.i.a.o and agreed upon by the PPMC within 24-48
> hours) 2. Work with ASF infra (David Nalley is the VP of infra, so
> you
On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 2:31 AM, Jochen Wiedmann
wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 5:56 AM, David Nalley wrote:
>
>> We've explored gerrit 2-3 times in the past 24 months. We have seen
>> several projects request it over the years. As I've mentioned
>> elsewhe
mentioned Crucible [1] as another tool
> for code reviews. Is that a viable option?
>
> Has anyone on the list had any experience using it? -C
>
> [1] https://www.atlassian.com/software/crucible/overview/
>
> On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 8:56 PM, David Nalley wrote:
>> On T
On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 7:45 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 4:34 PM, Chris Douglas wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 4:21 PM, Roman Shaposhnik
>> wrote:
>>> As long as there's a human being in the loop reviewing what's going into the
>>> repo I don't think I've got any is
On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 5:48 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (3980)
wrote:
> Hi Folks,
>
> Can someone clarify in simple terms what the issue is here?
>
There's a few issues Chris:
1. Contributions are being submitted, discussed, and accepted
externally. No record of the submission, discussion, or accepta
On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 8:08 PM, Till Westmann wrote:
>
> On 14 Jul 2015, at 15:31, David Nalley wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 1:14 AM, Ian Maxon wrote:
>>
>>> We use Gerrit as
>>> a tool to do code reviews and to organize the commits, as well as
On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 1:14 AM, Ian Maxon wrote:
>> This is pretty far from what the norm is, and is being proposed by a
>> podling, so I'd expect some skepticism. Other podlings, have proposed
>> similar workflows (albeit with extra problems.) and were not allowed
>> to retain that procedure.
>
On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 9:38 PM, Ian Maxon wrote:
>> This is a severe problem and needs to be rectified promptly.
>> How are commits migrating from the external repository to the ASF repository?
>> We typically end up missing provenance information that is important
>> in blind mirroring of conten
On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 7:24 PM, Jochen Wiedmann
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am writing as one of the Mentors of the AsterixDB podling.
>
> It recently came to my attention, that there are, in fact, multiple
> Git repositories, which are used by the project, one of them being
> located externally of the AS
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 1:00 PM, Jochen Theodorou wrote:
> Am 25.06.2015 15:13, schrieb Sean Busbey:
> [...]
>>
>> If the Docker Hub page wasn't under the control of the Geode PMC, then I'd
>> say it was a marks violation and they'd have to seek out control of it or
>> removal.
>
>
> can you expla
On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 12:01 PM, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH)
wrote:
> +1 (to this and Jochen's response)
>
> Roman was explicit in his question about "clearly identifiable non-release
> artifacts available to the general public". We can debate words on a page
> forever, or we can work with the
On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 3:22 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
> Le 24/06/15 09:19, Rob Vesse a écrit :
>> Personally I think the policy should be clarified such that nightly
>> builds MUST only live on ASF infrastructure
>
> Non sense. Nightly built can stay wherever is suitable. It's not The ASF
> bu
On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 6:11 AM, Jochen Theodorou wrote:
> Am 23.06.2015 07:16, schrieb Marvin Humphrey:
> [...]
>>>
>>> How am I supposed to invite all the downstream developers of the
>>> world to start integrating with my awesome feature FOO before it
>>> gets formally released when our policy
On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 9:40 AM, Cédric Champeau
wrote:
> We are not using the Apache CI servers for that but our own CI server. IMHO
> you should make a difference between building and checking. Building should
> be automated as much as possible. Checking the release is a human job.
> There are lo
On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 3:23 PM, Patrick Hunt wrote:
> Ted can you give some concrete examples, because I see some good feedback
> along with folks attempting to address the feedback. Processes updated or
> re-iterated, etc... I haven't seen any comments like "stop the presses
> till... is addresse
On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 6:24 PM, Daniel Dekany wrote:
> Wednesday, June 3, 2015, 5:29:40 PM, Ralph Goers wrote:
>
>> As soon as it can be done. The question is, why would you want to
>> wait?
>
> I thought, maybe, after being voted in, but before actual incubation
> starts, the legal guys at ASF st
On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 12:11 AM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> Hi!
>
> apologies for CCing INFRA, but since I'm using
> their prior art perhaps somebody over there could
> share their experience in how they solved it.
>
> What I'm trying to do is to setup a Hipchat room
> for Geode poddling (because,
I am unaware of a policy that would prohibit a podling from having a
blog at blogs.a.o
--David
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 9:36 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> Hi!
>
> can someone please remind me what's the policy
> for letting poddlings use blogs.apache.org as a
> blogging platform?
>
> Thanks,
> Ro
>
> The one thing I require is that I retain the right to do the same thing -
> publish and talk about the language by myself, call my products JavaX and
> so on.
>
>
Generally speaking, we wouldn't permit this. There have been
exceptions in the past, but generally if JavaX becomes a project at
th
Looks sane to me, +1
On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 11:03 AM, sebgoa wrote:
> Apache CloudStack is receiving code for an EC2 interface to the CloudStack
> API.
>
> http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/cloudstack-ec2stack.html
>
> Please vote to approve this contribution.
>
> Lazy consensus applies.
Looks sane to me, +1
On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 11:03 AM, sebgoa wrote:
> Apache CloudStack is receiving code for a Google GCE interface to the
> CloudStack API.
>
> http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/cloudstack-gstack.html
>
> Please vote to approve this contribution.
>
> Lazy consensus appl
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 10:18 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (3980)
wrote:
> I’ll note that the only person I see from infra that has been proposed
> in the current PMC is Jake Ferrel:
>
> * Acquia: Jake Farrell
>
> Someone also correct me in that I don’t think Jake is a paid infra
> contractor.
>
> In add
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 10:18 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (3980)
wrote:
> I’ll note that the only person I see from infra that has been proposed
> in the current PMC is Jake Ferrel:
>
The other person is Dan Norris. Dan is a paid contractor, but talked
with me before volunteering himself. I told him ab
On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 2:46 PM, Sam Ruby wrote:
> Initial sketch placed on the wiki:
>
> https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/WhimsyProposal
>
> Anyone who is so inclined is welcome to edit the proposal directly.
>
> No urgency or timeframe in mind (other than preferably starting sometime in
> 2015i
On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 1:45 AM, Henry Saputra wrote:
> Have any of the podling mentors help to verify the RC? I could not
> tell from the result VOTE link
>
No - with ApacheCon coming up, and almost all of the mentors
traveling, I don't think there's been any vote from any of the
mentors. (I am
I really hope we aren't setting the precedent that we can't look at
source code prior to bringing in a project to the incubator. Is there
a reason the repo remains private on Github?
In particular, you have what appears to be a relatively diverse set of
initial committers, but we can't look at who
>
> The above makes a really nice, security-conscious scheme
> that I would love to champion among various PMCs
> and suggest that we document it as part of our social
> media guidelines. The only open question in my mind
> is who (and by extension what email address) should
> the master ASFxxx acc
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 11:18 AM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 7:51 AM, Marvin Humphrey
> wrote:
>> In contrast, from a legal standpoint, a signed Software Grant doesn't change
>> much when the codebase is already under the ALv2. (Quite possibly it has
>> zero
>> effect bu
it's not like we are limited to having just a few moderators. Nothing
wrong with mentors and initial committers both being on the list of
mods.
On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 12:57 PM, Ted Dunning wrote:
> I usually start with mentor moderation and try to transition quickly to
> committers.
>
>
>
> On W
On Sun, Feb 8, 2015 at 9:04 PM, John D. Ament wrote:
> All,
>
> Just wanted to confirm with others. If a company is donating a new project
> to the ASF, a CCLA (or multiple ICLAs) are required to allow contributors
> from that project to continue on in Apache, as well as an SGA to allow the
> com
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 6:51 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 9:37 AM, David Nalley wrote:
>
>> My assumption was that 'setting binding policy on projects' was
>> something specifically excluded from my level of authority, as an
>> offi
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 11:23 AM, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH)
wrote:
> Well, David, I'm afraid you are the authoritative source on the policy you
> use as an example.
:) Well - I suppose I did open myself up for that.
> If it's not documented and that's a problem then it's *your* problem. You
On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 12:55 PM, Doug Cutting wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 11, 2015 at 9:49 PM, Roman Shaposhnik
> wrote:
>> I think a better analogy would be "US Culture". Yes it is as nebulous
>> as it gets, but the fact that US Constitution exists as a written document
>> makes a LOT of things WAY e
On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 11:12 AM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> The temperature of this might be reduced by replacing, 'no one knows what
> the Apache Way is' with 'a lot of us have trouble translate it into
> practical decisions in a repeatable fashion.' Or not.
>
> As reported here, we have performed
>
> Members should look to the board to enforce policy, not define it (Though
> Directors are members and will be involved with the definition)
>
This disagrees with much that the Foundation has published. In example:
"The membership of the ASF elects the 9 member board to run the
foundation and
On Fri, Jan 2, 2015 at 11:52 AM, Andy Seaborne wrote:
> On 02/01/15 16:40, David Nalley wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Jan 2, 2015 at 5:36 AM, Stian Soiland-Reyes
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Git allows you to commit as "whoever you want" - e.g. like in SMTP
>>
On Fri, Jan 2, 2015 at 5:36 AM, Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote:
> Git allows you to commit as "whoever you want" - e.g. like in SMTP
> email, the headers are decided by the sender. SVN on the other hand
> will show the authenticated user in the commit log. So - speaking as a
> former sysadmin - it soun
On Wed, Dec 31, 2014 at 2:40 PM, John D. Ament wrote:
> On Wed Dec 31 2014 at 2:24:36 PM David Nalley wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Dec 31, 2014 at 11:59 AM, John D. Ament
>> wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > So something Jan and I ran into on the infra list, does
On Wed, Dec 31, 2014 at 11:59 AM, John D. Ament wrote:
> Hi,
>
> So something Jan and I ran into on the infra list, does anyone know
> definitively what the access rights given to a podling's git repo are, if
> they request one (instead of a svn directory)?
>
> If nothing else we should document i
>
> I recently found this confusing with the first parquet-format release. I
> thought that both commit id and tag were optional, given that the actual
> release candidate is a signed tarball (actually, the "necessary source code
> to build the project" [1]).
>
Commit id is not optional. Tag is.
T
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 11:36 AM, Daniel Gruno wrote:
>
> On 2014-12-18 17:28, Sam Ruby wrote:
>>
>> On 12/18/2014 11:16 AM, Marko Rodriguez wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello Jake,
>>>
>>> When talking with Sam Ruby (cc:d) we voiced our concerns about moving
>>> all of our infrastructure over to The Apache Fou
On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 7:28 AM, Sergio Fernández
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> one of the things I brought from ApacheCon is the idea if providing
> dashboard for the podlings. Bitergia presented there their approach [1], and
> I think could be useful. See for instance the dashboard they provided for
> Apache
On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 5:42 PM, John D. Ament wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Since I'm new at being a mentor, I was wondering how to handle slow infra
> requests for podlings?
>
Hi John:
An occasional ping will help on the tickets.
Failing that, feel free to complain to me. And if I fail, you can talk
to Ri
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 5:18 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In the vote thread about [1] a question came up about the following
> clause, from our IP clearance form:
>
>> Check and make sure that the files that have been donated have been
>> updated to reflect the new ASF copyright.
>
>
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 8:30 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
wrote:
> Hi Incubator PMC members,
>
> Apache Sling has received the donation of a new Sightly templating
> module and accompanying XSS module.
>
> See http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/sling-sightly-xss.html for
> details.
>
> Please vo
On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 4:46 AM, Ted Dunning wrote:
> The github listing is not a valid measure since many non-committer (and
> quite a few committer) changes were squashed into larger commits.
>
Why is author information not being preserved? Committer and author
are different entities with Git.
On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 1:08 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (3980)
wrote:
> Hi Guys,
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: David Nalley
> Reply-To: "general@incubator.apache.org"
> Date: Thursday, September 25, 2014 9:34 AM
> To: "general@incubator.apa
1 - 100 of 173 matches
Mail list logo
