On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 11:04 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz <bdelacre...@apache.org> wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 4:40 PM, David Nalley <da...@gnsa.us> wrote: >> On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 1:52 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz >> <bdelacre...@apache.org> wrote: >>> ...my suggestion is for infra (David or Greg) to give us their ok to >>> proceed with the vote... > >> ...The Office of the President doesn't have any oversight over PMCs, so >> strictly speaking the IPMC can proceed with this however it likes on >> whatever timetable it sees fit... > > My intention as the NetBeans champion is to be collaborative, so even > though you guys have no formal power w.r.t voting the podling in I > think it's worth agreeing on how we proceed.
Yep, my paragraph was primarily directed at those who are new and might confuse titles with authority. > >> ...With my VP Infra/member/IPMC member hats on, I'd prefer seeing the >> plan for plugins.nb.o in place before you consider this.... > > I see two options then: > > a) We don't vote on the NetBeans proposal until the current NetBeans > team + mentors have worked with infra (on this list I assume) on a > plan for plugins.netbeans.org once NetBeans moves to the ASF. I > suspect this can easily take two weeks. > This is my personal leaning, I am sure Greg and Daniel can help provide attention in sussing out potential issues. > b) We vote on the NetBeans proposal without waiting, and the podling > assumes the risk of having to wait for budget or technical solutions > to run plugins.netbeans.org at or via the ASF. > > Do people agree that these options make sense, and Geertjan which one > is your and your team's favorite? --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
