it's not like we are limited to having just a few moderators. Nothing wrong with mentors and initial committers both being on the list of mods.
On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 12:57 PM, Ted Dunning <ted.dunn...@gmail.com> wrote: > I usually start with mentor moderation and try to transition quickly to > committers. > > > > On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 9:56 AM, Jake Farrell <jfarr...@apache.org> wrote: > >> depends, if its private@ the mods control the subscription >> >> -Jake >> >> On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 12:52 PM, Marvin Humphrey <mar...@rectangular.com> >> wrote: >> >> > On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 9:44 AM, John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org> >> > wrote: >> > > On that note, interesting thing, just saw the commit go in for infra to >> > > create the mailing lists. Are we really allowing new committers to be >> > the >> > > mods? It's typically the mentors (from what I've seen). >> > >> > Definitely having committers serve as listmods is better than Mentors. >> > >> > Nobody is moderating messages from subscribers. The job of >> > mailing-list moderators is mostly to approve messages from >> > non-subscribers and occasionally to deal with list-related >> > administrivia. >> > >> > A common fail I've seen after graduation is for queued messages to get >> > lost because Mentors were the only moderators and they've drifted >> > away. Having core contributors serve as listmods generally avoids >> > that problem. >> > >> > Marvin Humphrey >> > >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org >> > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org >> > >> > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
