Bernd Fondermann wrote:
JSecurity was deemed as a potential naming conflict risk (much in the same
way Ki is now), so we dropped it, and finally came to a vote to change the
name to Ki. But this resolution took over 4 or 5 months to finally come to
a favorable vote, so we didn't want to go throu
On May 12, 2009, at 3:09 PM, sebb wrote:
On 12/05/2009, Craig L Russell wrote:
On May 12, 2009, at 2:08 PM, Brian Fox wrote:
Earlier, sebb wrote:
I don't think it's OK to expect users to have to trawl through
all the
NOTICE and LICENSE files to find all the required information. IMO,
th
On 12/05/2009, Craig L Russell wrote:
>
> On May 12, 2009, at 2:08 PM, Brian Fox wrote:
>
>
> >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > I don't think it's OK to expect users to have to trawl through all the
> > > NOTICE and LICENSE files to find all the required information. IMO,
> > > the top-level L & N files
On May 12, 2009, at 2:08 PM, Brian Fox wrote:
I don't think it's OK to expect users to have to trawl through all
the
NOTICE and LICENSE files to find all the required information. IMO,
the top-level L & N files need to relate to the entire contents.
Transitively or just for the first l
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 11:10 PM, Les Hazlewood wrote:
> How do you check to ensure that the name is actually usable? We did a lot
> of due diligence on Ki, checked USPTO searches for patents/trademarks on Ki
> and found not a single result, and performed lots of google searching and
> still we'r
On Tue, 2009-05-12 at 14:56 -0500, Nicholas L Gallardo wrote:
> Thanks Kevan, do I need to call for that formally myself or does it
> need to come from an Incubator PMC member?
If you have sufficient mentors on your proposal, then anyone can do it.
Just be sure to embed the proposal into the vote
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 22:58, Les Hazlewood wrote:
> On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 3:55 PM, Bernd Fondermann <
> bernd.fonderm...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
> What I don't get is why would anyone want to keep the name if there
>> are potential overlaps or troubles ahead?
>> I mean, there are probably bet
How do you check to ensure that the name is actually usable? We did a lot
of due diligence on Ki, checked USPTO searches for patents/trademarks on Ki
and found not a single result, and performed lots of google searching and
still we're in the current predicament. How does one ever rest assured th
>
>
>
> I don't think it's OK to expect users to have to trawl through all the
> NOTICE and LICENSE files to find all the required information. IMO,
> the top-level L & N files need to relate to the entire contents.
>
Transitively or just for the first level dependencies?
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 10:58 PM, Les Hazlewood wrote:
> But this resolution took over 4 or 5 months to finally come to
> a favorable vote, so we didn't want to go through that painful process all
> over again,
Suggestion; Allow people to submit suggestions for 1 week, then vote
for 72 hours on t
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 3:55 PM, Bernd Fondermann <
bernd.fonderm...@googlemail.com> wrote:
What I don't get is why would anyone want to keep the name if there
> are potential overlaps or troubles ahead?
> I mean, there are probably better (coding) and harder (releasing,
> graduating) things to do
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 8:12 PM, Craig L Russell wrote:
> The main point is that you and I disagree on whether FixFlyer Ki and Apache
> Ki are in the same domain.
>
> I have neither broad nor deep experience with securities trading systems,
> but I do know what financial securities are. And I cla
Thanks Kevan, do I need to call for that formally myself or does it need to
come from an Incubator PMC member?
-Nick
Nicholas Gallardo
WebSphere - REST & WebServices Development
nlgal...@us.ibm.com
Phone: 512-286-6258
Building: 903 / 5G-016
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 21:46, Craig L Russell wrote:
>
> On May 12, 2009, at 11:22 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
>
>>
>> On May 12, 2009, at 11:12 AM, Craig L Russell wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On May 12, 2009, at 10:56 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
>>>
On May 12, 2009, at 9:06 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
On May 6, 2009, at 11:40 AM, Nicholas L Gallardo wrote:
All,
Given that the discussion has quieted down after an initial flurry,
I was hoping we could move this forward.
If there are no further comments/concerns, could we call for a vote
on whether or not to accept the proposal by Friday
On May 12, 2009, at 11:22 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
On May 12, 2009, at 11:12 AM, Craig L Russell wrote:
On May 12, 2009, at 10:56 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
On May 12, 2009, at 9:06 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 5:14 PM, Alan D. Cabrera > wrote:
...I'd like so
Paul,
Thank you for your interest in the VXQuery engine. We are looking for
mentors for the project. Would you be willing to be a mentor?
Thanks,
Vinayak
Paul Fremantle wrote:
Synapse would also be interested in using the XQuery implementation!
Thanks
Paul
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 7:22 PM,
At Apache XMLBeans, we're also could make use of an XQuery engine for
implementing selections and query on xbeans.
Cezar
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 1:28 PM, Paul Fremantle wrote:
> Synapse would also be interested in using the XQuery implementation!
>
> Thanks
> Paul
>
> On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 7:
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 2:22 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 5:14 PM, Alan D. Cabrera
wrote:
> ...I'd like someone to come up with a concise argument that would allow
> me to
> let this go other than "nope, it's not the same". Otherwise, I feel
> tha
On May 12, 2009, at 11:12 AM, Craig L Russell wrote:
On May 12, 2009, at 10:56 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
On May 12, 2009, at 9:06 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 5:14 PM, Alan D. Cabrera > wrote:
...I'd like someone to come up with a concise argument that would
al
On May 12, 2009, at 10:56 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
On May 12, 2009, at 9:06 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 5:14 PM, Alan D. Cabrera > wrote:
...I'd like someone to come up with a concise argument that would
allow me to
let this go other than "nope, it's not the sam
On May 12, 2009, at 9:06 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 5:14 PM, Alan D. Cabrera
wrote:
...I'd like someone to come up with a concise argument that would
allow me to
let this go other than "nope, it's not the same". Otherwise, I
feel that I
need to bring up a vot
The vote to release Apache Sling passed by lazy consensus. The following
Incubator PMC members already voted for the release of the podling:
Bertrand Delacretaz
Felix Meschberger
Carsten Ziegeler
Jukka Zitting
Thanks for voting; I'll upload the release on thursday.
Regards
Carsten
Carsten Zieg
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 5:14 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
...I'd like someone to come up with a concise argument that would allow me to
let this go other than "nope, it's not the same". Otherwise, I feel that I
need to bring up a vote to put the issue to bed once an
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 5:14 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
> ...I'd like someone to come up with a concise argument that would allow me to
> let this go other than "nope, it's not the same". Otherwise, I feel that I
> need to bring up a vote to put the issue to bed once and for all
The only thi
So, those of you may be aware that the JSecurity/Ki podling currently
is "administratively stuck" on a debate about its name. First some
history then a brief explanation of my position.
After a long and arduous debate the podling voted to change its name
from JSecurity to Ki. After the vo
On 12/05/2009, Vincent Siveton wrote:
> 2009/5/12 sebb :
>
> >> I was reliably informed that this was discussed on the Maven list in March
> >> 2008 (subject: legal-discuss) and for binary distributions that are
> created
> >> by the war packager that contained 3rd party libraries the DEPENDE
2009/5/12 sebb :
>> I was reliably informed that this was discussed on the Maven list in March
>> 2008 (subject: legal-discuss) and for binary distributions that are created
>> by the war packager that contained 3rd party libraries the DEPENDENCIES file
>> was sufficient to comply with ASF rules.
On 12/05/2009, Ian Boston wrote:
>
> On 12 May 2009, at 00:24, sebb wrote:
>
>
> > Some NOTICE files start with:
> >
> =
> > == NOTICE file corresponding to the section 4 d of==
> > == the Apache Licen
29 matches
Mail list logo
