Heheh... good question!
This one gets actual clock time, as in time of day, down to the
nanosecond, with NTP and user-initiated changes taking effect.
(Nanoseconds on solaris and linux... microseconds on mac... "it's
complicated" on windows).
System.nanoTime() is unrelated to time of day, a
nanoTime, like this one?
http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5.0/docs/api/java/lang/System.html#nanoTime()
is there a difference?
Filip
Julius Davies wrote:
Hi, Commons Developers, Incubator,
I've been too busy over the last year to spend much time on incubating
not-yet-commons-ssl, but I just wante
Hi, Commons Developers, Incubator,
I've been too busy over the last year to spend much time on incubating
not-yet-commons-ssl, but I just wanted to let you know that I will get
back into it this weekend. I'll update the proposal (from a year ago
- blush!), and then find out who would still like
All good ideas!
However, Les and Siegfried, let's move this discussion to the
jSecurity dev list. This is a general incubation mailing list.
Regards,
Alan
On May 8, 2008, at 12:36 PM, Les Hazlewood wrote:
Hi Siegfried,
Please see my inline comments...
1) would it be possible to integ
On 5/9/08, David Nuescheler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 10:40 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 8:57 PM, David Reiss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> I'm not sure exactly what else needs to go into the software grant
>>> process.
Ahh, the scars won't come from you. No, they won't come from
you ;)
Regards,
Alan
On May 8, 2008, at 9:38 AM, Les Hazlewood wrote:
Alan, this is fantastic news!
Thanks so much for offering your time and experience. We're really
looking forward to your input - we'd prefer not to cont
On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 10:40 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 8:57 PM, David Reiss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I'm not sure exactly what else needs to go into the software grant
>> process. I still have not gotten an answer to my question about our
>>
2008/5/9 Bertrand Delacretaz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 11:34 AM, Aidan Skinner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> ...Our main source distribution is at
>> http://people.apache.org/~aidan/qpid-M2.1-RC6/qpid-1.0-incubating-M2.1-src.tar.gz...
>
> There's one weirdness in ./java/resou
Hi,
On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 11:34 AM, Aidan Skinner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ...Our main source distribution is at
> http://people.apache.org/~aidan/qpid-M2.1-RC6/qpid-1.0-incubating-M2.1-src.tar.gz...
There's one weirdness in ./java/resources/META-INF/NOTICE:
This product includes/uses so
One observation from me:
On 5/9/08, Robert Burrell Donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * It is not necessary to stop development outside Apache during import
> and clean up.
Provided that this does not result in code drops coming in at friday
5pm. We all know the risks involved in such a develo
We're definitely happy to receive mentors when possible. All 5 of us
on the current JSecurity team have not been on an Apache project team
(that I'm aware of at least), so I'm sure we could use the direction.
Thanks for offering!
On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 9:29 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny <[EMAIL PROTECTED
Les Hazlewood wrote:
Hi Alex,
Sounds great. The JSecurity team has had an identity management
server in our heads for quite a while. Indeed much of the current
framework reflects flexibility that was designed into it with the
intention of making an identity server an easier task. We also plan
On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 11:54 PM, David Reiss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> My understanding was that we also needed to get ICLAs from anyone who
>>> has contributed patches to Thrift.
>>
>> I would think that depended on the terms of their contributions,
>> wouldn't it? Nearly all of the Thrift s
Hi Alex,
Sounds great. The JSecurity team has had an identity management
server in our heads for quite a while. Indeed much of the current
framework reflects flexibility that was designed into it with the
intention of making an identity server an easier task. We also plan
on including nice SSO
On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 2:00 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin
> who must be listed on a CCLA is reduced to a manageable number. For
> example, say that Company X owns the copyright for all wcoveredork
^^^
work covered
(i hate m$ mice)
- robert
-
On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 4:47 AM, Doug Cutting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
>>
>> Upayavira wrote:
>>>
Also, has the software grant process yet been started?
>>>
>>> Not sure. From later questions in the thread it seems that a CCLA is
>>> enough?
>>
>> No - on a compl
On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 5:34 AM, Aidan Skinner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm pleased to say that Apache Qpid is ready to ask for IPMC approval
> for it's 3rd release from the incubator, M2.1.
+1.
Yoav
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
I'm pleased to say that Apache Qpid is ready to ask for IPMC approval
for it's 3rd release from the incubator, M2.1.
We voted on the list, recieving 10 +1's and no -1's, archive available
here:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-qpid-dev/200804.mbox/[EMAIL
PROTECTED]
The release
hi. I mailed in my icla a week or so ago.
Jake
On 5/8/08, Doug Cutting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I just compared the initial committers listed in
>http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ThriftProposal
> to the list of folks who've filed CLAs in:
>http://people.apache.org/~jim/committers.html
19 matches
Mail list logo
