On 10/8/06, William A. Rowe, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Garrett Rooney wrote:
> I disagree with filtering even inactive old contributors to an
> incoming project (at least for open source projects, I'm not sure how
> I feel with regard to inactive contributors to proprietary code that's
> bei
On Sun, 2006-10-08 at 02:09 -0400, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
>
> I'd previously suggested (with an fresh message topic, even) a meeting at
> ApacheCon
>
> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> but no one replied. I'm still game for an Incubation meeting with whomever
> wants to gather.
If this is
Garrett Rooney wrote:
> I disagree with filtering even inactive old contributors to an
> incoming project (at least for open source projects, I'm not sure how
> I feel with regard to inactive contributors to proprietary code that's
> being contributed). I think it would be quite wrong if a former
On 10/8/06, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 8 Oct 06, at 8:55 AM 8 Oct 06, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> On 10/8/06, Jim Jagielski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> However, in that case I would really like to see it that
>> if committers from other ASF projects read the proposal
>> and
On 10/5/06, Andrus Adamchik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Now a practical question - what's involved in distributing the
release? Anything beyond placing a copy to "people.apache.org:/www/
people.apache.org/dist/incubator/cayenne/" ???
AFAIK, no (i've never cut incubator releases so i hope that
On Sun, Oct 08, 2006 at 09:32:56AM -0500, Jason van Zyl wrote:
> ---
> As far as how we came up with the commit list, it's actually pretty
> neat. For the proposal, I added everyone who had commit. For the
> actual giving commit, I was much more cautious. I created a status
> file and gave
On Sun, Oct 08, 2006 at 08:55:47AM -0500, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> Noel and I were chatting about this last night, and my position is that I'm
> okay with 'piling on' by ASF folks *if* the podling community is happy with
> that. If the podling folks do not want them on the initial list and desir
Justin,
On Sunday October 08 2006 9:55 am, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> On 10/8/06, Jim Jagielski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > However, in that case I would really like to see it that
> > if committers from other ASF projects read the proposal
> > and have a sincere interest in helping, that they
On 10/8/06, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
In addition I would like to add the process used for OpenEJB as the
gold standard for creating this initial list:
---
As far as how we came up with the commit list, it's actually pretty
neat. For the proposal, I added everyone who had commit
On 8 Oct 06, at 8:55 AM 8 Oct 06, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
On 10/8/06, Jim Jagielski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
However, in that case I would really like to see it that
if committers from other ASF projects read the proposal
and have a sincere interest in helping, that they be
included in the
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
On 10/8/06, Jim Jagielski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
However, in that case I would really like to see it that
if committers from other ASF projects read the proposal
and have a sincere interest in helping, that they be
included in the initial list, since I think it he
On 10/8/06, Jim Jagielski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
However, in that case I would really like to see it that
if committers from other ASF projects read the proposal
and have a sincere interest in helping, that they be
included in the initial list, since I think it helps
bootstrap the community
On Oct 7, 2006, at 6:29 PM, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
--On October 6, 2006 5:38:37 AM -0700 Cliff Schmidt
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I wish we could just have an objective list of numerical
requirements,
but I think it has to come down to the judgement of the Incubator PMC
members.
Umm,
13 matches
Mail list logo
