Re: Modify gcc for use with gdb (issue5132047)

2011-09-27 Thread Jakub Jelinek
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 03:05:00PM -0700, Lawrence Crowl wrote: > There a non-transparent change in behavior that may affect some users. > The inline functions will introduce additional lines in a sequence of > gdb 'step' commands. Use 'next' instead. That is IMHO a serious obstackle. If anythin

Re: [PATCH] Fix stack red zone bug (PR38644)

2011-09-27 Thread Uros Bizjak
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 4:36 AM, Jiangning Liu wrote: > Fix a typo and CC x86/rs6000/arm ports maintainers. > > ChangeLog: > >        * config/i386/i386.c (ix86_stack_using_red_zone): Change inline >        to be extern. >        (TARGET_STACK_USING_RED_ZONE): New. >        * config/rs6000/rs6000.

Re: Modify gcc for use with gdb (issue5132047)

2011-09-27 Thread Richard Guenther
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 9:14 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 03:05:00PM -0700, Lawrence Crowl wrote: >> There a non-transparent change in behavior that may affect some users. >> The inline functions will introduce additional lines in a sequence of >> gdb 'step' commands.  Use 'n

Re: Modify gcc for use with gdb (issue5132047)

2011-09-27 Thread Richard Guenther
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 9:35 AM, Richard Guenther wrote: > On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 9:14 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: >> On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 03:05:00PM -0700, Lawrence Crowl wrote: >>> There a non-transparent change in behavior that may affect some users. >>> The inline functions will introduce ad

[arm-embedded] No loop unroll for Os and option has higher priority

2011-09-27 Thread Joey Ye
Committed to ARM/embedded-4_6-branch. 2011-09-27 Jiangning Liu No loop unroll for Os and option has higher priority. * config/arm/arm-protos.h (unroll_loops): New. (max_unroll_times): Removed. * config/arm/arm.c (arm_default_unroll_times): Deleted. (arm

Re: [PATCH] Fix stack red zone bug (PR38644)

2011-09-27 Thread Richard Guenther
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 5:32 AM, Jiangning Liu wrote: >> Think of it this way.  What the IR says is there is no barrier between >> those moves.  You either have an implicit barrier (which is what you >> are proposing) or you have it explicitly.  I think we all rather have >> more things explicit r

Re: [PATCH, SMS 1/2] Avoid generating redundant reg-moves

2011-09-27 Thread Revital Eres
Hello, > This > +  /* Skip instructions that do not set a register.  */ > +  if (set && !REG_P (SET_DEST (set))) > +    continue; > is ok. Can you also prevent !set insns from having reg_moves? (To be updated > once auto_inc insns will be supported, if they'll deserve reg_moves too.)

[Patch,AVR]: Clean-up some SP insns

2011-09-27 Thread Georg-Johann Lay
This is just a code clean-up. The bulky code from *addhi3_sp_R_pc2 and *addhi3_sp_R_pc3 is done by a small C function that does the same (except that it prints some comment depending on -dp or -fverbose-asm). *movhi_sp is an insn that should not be there and go away because it is a move insn and

Re: [PATCH] Add explicit VIS intrinsics for addition and subtraction.

2011-09-27 Thread Eric Botcazou
> Eric, I'm sure you have noticed this, but the Sparc target test > "combined-1.c" fails for some time on 32-bit because of how float > arguments are passed in the 32-bit SPARC ABI. > > Since they are passed in integer registers, the vectorizer does > the initial logical operations using non-VIS in

Re: [PATCH] Add explicit VIS intrinsics for addition and subtraction.

2011-09-27 Thread David Miller
From: Eric Botcazou Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2011 10:04:35 +0200 > Yes, I noticed it, but this is a regression and probably is > unrelated to the vectorizer. IIRC the problem comes from the RA, > which forces a bogus reload. That wouldn't be the first time some > RA change breaks vector support on SPA

Re: MIPS Fix PR18141

2011-09-27 Thread Richard Sandiford
Dinar Temirbulatov writes: > I prepared the new version of patch, re-tested new version on again on > mipsel-unknown-linux-gnu with no new regressions. Thanks, looks good. I'll apply once the copyright assignment comes through. Richard

[PATCH] Fix PR50363

2011-09-27 Thread Richard Guenther
This fixes PR50363. Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu. Richard. 2011-09-27 Richard Guenther PR tree-optimization/50363 * tree-ssa-pre.c (create_expression_by_pieces): Handle pointer conversions in POINTER_PLUS_EXPRs properly. * gcc.dg/tortu

[Ada] Add new locking policy to support concurrent readers

2011-09-27 Thread Arnaud Charlet
The Concurrent_Readers_Locking policy is added. This policy is needed to implement concurrent readers on PO functions. this is a work in progress, more changes to enable this capability will follow Tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, committed on trunk 2011-09-27 Pascal Obry * rtsfind.ads:

Re: Go patch committed: Update libgo to Go release r60

2011-09-27 Thread Rainer Orth
Ian Lance Taylor writes: >> * IRIX will be worse: while it has TIOCNOTTY, it completely lacks >> TIOCSCTTY. >> >> Suggestions? > > For a missing TIOCSCTTY I think the simplest solution will be to set it > in syscall_irix.go to some innocuous value if there is one. E.g., > TIOCNXCL if Irix supp

[Ada] Add binding for pthread_rwlock_t and pthread_rwlockattr_t

2011-09-27 Thread Arnaud Charlet
Both types and corresponding routines are defined for GNU/Linux. Those definitions are made aliases for pthread_mutex_t and pthread_mutexattr_t on platforms where read/write lock is not supported by the GNAT runtime. Still work in progress, more changes to follow. Tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu,

[Ada] Use rwlock for protected objects

2011-09-27 Thread Arnaud Charlet
Continuation of previous changes: Protected object are now using rwlock. This is to enable multiple readers (functions) to enter the PO at the same time. The rwlock is based on GNU/Linux pthread implementation. Tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, committed on trunk 2011-09-27 Pascal Obry *

[Ada] Better implementation for the read/write lock support

2011-09-27 Thread Arnaud Charlet
This new implementation do not introduced a new API in s-taprop. It is then simpler and will be nicer with cross platforms. It will also be easier to introduce new locking policies if needed. Tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, committed on trunk 2011-09-27 Pascal Obry * s-osinte-hpux.ads,

[Ada] Fix stack usage for windows-64

2011-09-27 Thread Arnaud Charlet
According to some experiments, the guard area size is 16KB on Windows 64. (Stack size must be a multiple of the allocation granularity - 64KB - to get better guard size estimation). No OS independant testcase. Tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, committed on trunk 2011-09-27 Tristan Gingold

[Ada] Small cleanup in Safe_Prefixed_Reference

2011-09-27 Thread Arnaud Charlet
This fixes a few things in Safe_Prefixed_Reference that are hard to grasp by the reader and restores the original semantics of the function with regard to the Variable_Ref parameter. Tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, committed on trunk 2011-09-27 Eric Botcazou * exp_util.adb (Safe_Prefix

[Ada] Entry family calls on single protected object that implements interfaces

2011-09-27 Thread Arnaud Charlet
If the prefix is a single protected object and the selector is a discriminant or an entry family, this is a non-overloaded candidate interpretation, and possible primitive operations of the type must not be examined. The following must compile and execute quietly in Ada 2005 mode: --- with FooBar

[Ada] Small tweak to recent change

2011-09-27 Thread Arnaud Charlet
This turns the call to Directly_Designated_Type into a call to Designated_Type in the recently applied change aimed at improving the handling of the indirect array case. It is OK to look at the actual designated type here. Tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, committed on trunk 2011-09-27 Eric Botcaz

[Ada] Add option for strict standard interpretation in Alfa mode

2011-09-27 Thread Arnaud Charlet
In Alfa mode for formal verification, the default is now to interpret compiler permissions like GNAT does, with an option to have a stricter standard-only interpretation. This is currently used for sizes of implicit base types of integer types. Tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, committed on trunk 20

[PATCH] Fix objsz folded stmt dumping

2011-09-27 Thread Richard Guenther
I noticed we dump the original statement twice since tuples. Fixed as obvious. Richard. 2011-09-27 Richard Guenther * tree-object-size.c (compute_object_sizes): Fix dumping of folded statement. Index: gcc/tree-object-size.c ==

[C++ Patch] PR 32489

2011-09-27 Thread Paolo Carlini
Hi, submitter asks us to be more accurate in some error messages about naming 'struct' vs 'class'. Turns out - IMHO the issue is a bit nitpicking - that we do have in place machinery for this, already used by cp_parser_class_head, which sets CLASSTYPE_DECLARED_CLASS appropriately. I'm simply

patch about MELT for GCC extensions.html page

2011-09-27 Thread Basile Starynkevitch
Hello All Gerald suggested me to submit a patch to the http://gcc.gnu.org/extensions.html page about GCC MELT. I am attaching it. Gerald, if the patch is OK, could you please apply it? I am very uneasy about CVS for the GCC website. Regards. -- Basile STARYNKEVITCH http://starynkevi

Re: [PATCH, SMS 1/2] Avoid generating redundant reg-moves

2011-09-27 Thread Ayal Zaks
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 10:47 AM, Revital Eres wrote: > Hello, > >> This >> +  /* Skip instructions that do not set a register.  */ >> +  if (set && !REG_P (SET_DEST (set))) >> +    continue; >> is ok. Can you also prevent !set insns from having reg_moves? (To be updated >> once auto_i

Re: Handle multi-word regsiters in REG_CFA_RESTORE notes

2011-09-27 Thread Bernd Schmidt
On 09/25/11 19:27, Richard Sandiford wrote: > The store itself can still be a single SDC1 instruction, so we should > generate the same notes regardless of mips_split_64bit_move_p. > > If that's right, then how about the patch below (tested on > mips64-linux-gnu, but without the shrink-wrap patche

Re: [PATCH, SMS 2/2] Support instructions with REG_INC_NOTE (second try)

2011-09-27 Thread Ayal Zaks
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 9:47 AM, Revital Eres wrote: > Hello, > >> ok, so if we have an auto-inc'ing insn which defines (auto-inc's) an >> addr register and another (say, result) register, we want to allow the >> result register to have life ranges in excess of ii (by eliminating >> anti-dep edges

[patch] Support multiple types in SLP

2011-09-27 Thread Ira Rosen
Hi, This patch adds a support of multiple types (in the same SLP instance) in basic block vectorization. Bootstrapped and tested on powerpc64-suse-linux. Applied to trunk. Ira ChangeLog: * tree-vect-stmts.c (vectorizable_type_demotion): Handle basic block vectorization.

Re: [0/4] Modulo scheduling with haifa-sched for C6X

2011-09-27 Thread Bernd Schmidt
Ping: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-09/msg00811.html Bernd

Re: [C++ Patch] PR 32489

2011-09-27 Thread Jason Merrill
OK. Jason

Re: [patch] Support vectorization of widening shifts

2011-09-27 Thread Richard Guenther
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 8:32 AM, Ira Rosen wrote: > On 26 September 2011 17:12, Richard Guenther > wrote: >> On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 9:54 AM, Ira Rosen wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> This patch adds a support of widening shift left. The following >>> pattern is detected: >>> >>> type a_t; >>> TYPE a_T,

Re: Slim lto objects

2011-09-27 Thread Richard Guenther
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 8:42 PM, Jan Hubicka wrote: > Hi, > this patch implements slim LTO. It is updated version of Andi's patch.  It is > done by terminating IPA optimization after analyzing and outputting LTO and in > compile_file skipping stuff that outputs assembly. > > After some considerati

Re: RFA: Avoiding unprofitable speculation

2011-09-27 Thread Richard Guenther
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 12:30 AM, Jeff Law wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 08/18/11 15:59, Richard Henderson wrote: >> On 08/17/2011 12:21 AM, Richard Guenther wrote: >>> The patch itself looks sensible, though I am surprised ifcvt >>> doesn't run in cfglayout mode

[committed] Fix warning in ipa-inline-analysis.c

2011-09-27 Thread Richard Sandiford
An --enable-werror cross build (but apparently not a normal C++ bootstrap) showed up a signed/unsigned warning in ipa-inline-analysis.c. Tested on arm-linux-gnueabi. Applied as obvious. Richard gcc/ * ipa-inline-analysis.c (predicate_probability): Avoid comparison between signe

Re: Slim lto objects

2011-09-27 Thread Diego Novillo
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 14:42, Jan Hubicka wrote: > Hi, > this patch implements slim LTO. It is updated version of Andi's patch.  It is > done by terminating IPA optimization after analyzing and outputting LTO and in > compile_file skipping stuff that outputs assembly. Nice! Have you measured ob

Re: [wwwdocs] IA-32/x86-64 Changes for upcoming 4.7.0 series

2011-09-27 Thread Kirill Yukhin
Hi, Gerald, thanks for fixing my "excellent" English :) Here is updated patch: Index: htdocs/gcc-4.7/changes.html === RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs/gcc-4.7/changes.html,v retrieving revision 1.28 diff -p -r1.28 changes.html *** ht

Re: Slim lto objects

2011-09-27 Thread Jan Hubicka
> On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 14:42, Jan Hubicka wrote: > > Hi, > > this patch implements slim LTO. It is updated version of Andi's patch.  It > > is > > done by terminating IPA optimization after analyzing and outputting LTO and > > in > > compile_file skipping stuff that outputs assembly. > > Nic

Re: Go patch committed: Update libgo to Go release r60

2011-09-27 Thread Ian Lance Taylor
Rainer Orth writes: > Solaris 8 and 9 suffer from the same problem. The following patch > allowed the bootstrap to complete. An IRIX bootstrap is currently > running, but will take some time to complete. > > Rainer > > > 2011-09-23 Rainer Orth > > * mksysinfo.sh: Provide TIOCSCTT

Re: [SH] PR 49468 - Integer SI abs

2011-09-27 Thread Kaz Kojima
Oleg Endo wrote: > The attached patch improves the generated code for integer abs > operations on SH, in particular SH4. There was already some code that > was supposed to utilize SH's conditional execution it but it was never > triggered, because the standard branch-free abs code was generated at

Re: [wwwdocs] Add info about IPA optimization and LTO improvments

2011-09-27 Thread Jan Hubicka
Gerald, Andi, thanks for corrections. This is what I've comitted now. Index: changes.html === RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs/gcc-4.7/changes.html,v retrieving revision 1.33 diff -u -r1.33 changes.html --- changes.html25 Se

Re: [PATCH, SMS 2/2] Support instructions with REG_INC_NOTE (second try)

2011-09-27 Thread Revital Eres
Hello, > Ok, this does have two anti-dep edges. But still, only a single true > dependence(?) ... can you see why? The intra edge [3681 -(T,2,0)-> 3682] was created by haifa-sched and I guess that because both of the expected true-dep edges (one for the target and one for the address) are identic

Fix type of SRAed enum accesses

2011-09-27 Thread Richard Sandiford
This patch fixes a miscompilation of stage1 c-parser.o in an ARM bootstrap. When an access to an enum field was SRAed, a component ref used the type of the integer temporary variable instead of the type of the enum. It therefore didn't alias other accesses to the same structure, and was scheduled a

RFC: ARM: Add comment enumerating emitted .eabi_attribute tags

2011-09-27 Thread Nick Clifton
Hi Richard, Hi Paul, Hi Ramana, I am planning to check in the patch below to add comments to the .eabi_attribute directives emitted by the ARM GCC backend. So for example a simple hello world source file might compile to something like this: .cpu arm7tdmi .fpu softvfp

Make ipa-inline-analysis to track parameters passed by reference again

2011-09-27 Thread Jan Hubicka
Hi, it has turned out that I was bit too optimistic in my expectations that improved ipa-inline-analysis on scalar parameters will be enough to solve needs of tramp3d. In tramp3d as in many of C++ programs most code is passed by reference and while I have some patches in this area, the tracking is

Re: Fix type of SRAed enum accesses

2011-09-27 Thread Richard Guenther
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 4:26 PM, Richard Sandiford wrote: > This patch fixes a miscompilation of stage1 c-parser.o in an ARM bootstrap. > When an access to an enum field was SRAed, a component ref used the type > of the integer temporary variable instead of the type of the enum. > It therefore did

Re: [RFC] Context sensitive inline analysis

2011-09-27 Thread Jan Hubicka
> > This caused: > > > > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49179 > > > > > > This also caused: > > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49091 > Hi, the problem is sign overflow in time computation. Time should be capped by MAX_TIME and we compute MAX_TIME * INLINE_SIZE_SCALE *

Re: Fix type of SRAed enum accesses

2011-09-27 Thread Martin Jambor
Hi, On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 03:26:03PM +0100, Richard Sandiford wrote: > This patch fixes a miscompilation of stage1 c-parser.o in an ARM bootstrap. > When an access to an enum field was SRAed, a component ref used the type > of the integer temporary variable instead of the type of the enum. > It

Re: RFC: ARM: Add comment enumerating emitted .eabi_attribute tags

2011-09-27 Thread Ramana Radhakrishnan
Hi Nick, On 27 September 2011 15:38, Nick Clifton wrote: >  Any comments or objections to this patch ?  If not, I will apply it >  next week. I've got a few objections to this patch as it stands today while I don't object to the motivation for it. > +/* Get the definitions of the ARM EABI Attri

Re: RFC: ARM: Add comment enumerating emitted .eabi_attribute tags

2011-09-27 Thread Richard Henderson
On 09/27/2011 07:38 AM, Nick Clifton wrote: > +#define EMIT_EABI_ATTRIBUTE(name,val) > \ > + do \ > +{ > \ > + as

Re: [Patch,AVR]: Clean-up some SP insns

2011-09-27 Thread Richard Henderson
On 09/27/2011 12:56 AM, Georg-Johann Lay wrote: > * config/avr/avr-protos.h (avr_out_addto_sp): New prototype. > * config/avr/avr.c (avr_out_addto_sp): New function. > (adjust_insn_length): Handle ADJUST_LEN_ADDTO_SP. > * config/avr/avr.md (adjust_len): Add "addto_sp". >

Re: RFC: ARM: Add comment enumerating emitted .eabi_attribute tags

2011-09-27 Thread Paul Brook
> Hi Nick, > > On 27 September 2011 15:38, Nick Clifton wrote: > > Any comments or objections to this patch ? If not, I will apply it > > next week. > > I've got a few objections to this patch as it stands today while I > don't object to the motivation for it. > > > +/* Get the definitions o

Re: RFC: ARM: Add comment enumerating emitted .eabi_attribute tags

2011-09-27 Thread Ramana Radhakrishnan
On 27 September 2011 16:55, Paul Brook wrote: >> Hi Nick, >> >> On 27 September 2011 15:38, Nick Clifton wrote: >> >  Any comments or objections to this patch ?  If not, I will apply it >> >  next week. >> >> I've got a few objections to this patch as it stands today while I >> don't object to th

Re: [wwwdocs] IA-32/x86-64 Changes for upcoming 4.7.0 series

2011-09-27 Thread Gerald Pfeifer
On Tue, 27 Sep 2011, Kirill Yukhin wrote: > So, if you are ok, let's wait a couple of days for maintainers inputs. Yep, looks good. Unless you hear to the contrary from one of the x86 maintainers, I suggest you go ahead and commit in two days. Gerald

[pph] Prepare for mutation detection [1/3] (issue5124050)

2011-09-27 Thread Diego Novillo
This series of patches prepare support for detecting state mutation when reading tree nodes from different PPH images (http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-09/msg00658.html). This first patch introduces a new data structure to represent entries in the pickle cache (pph_cache_entry). The data as

Re: RFC: ARM: Add comment enumerating emitted .eabi_attribute tags

2011-09-27 Thread Nick Clifton
Hi Ramana, +/* Get the definitions of the ARM EABI Attribute tag values. */ +#define BFD_ARCH_SIZE +#include "elf/arm.h" Defining BFD_ARCH_SIZE appears to be a bit of a hack. I would also ifdef this inclusion on TARGET_AAPCS since we shouldn't really be caring about object attributes for non

Re: RFC: ARM: Add comment enumerating emitted .eabi_attribute tags

2011-09-27 Thread Nick Clifton
Hi Richard, You should only emit the comment for -dA, I think. Really ? I thought that it was kind of nice to have the comments in the default output. If I go with -dA as the trigger then I assume that it is also OK to add the comments if --verbose-asm is enabled, yes ? Cheers Nick

[pph] Prepare for mutation detection [2/3] (issue5142049)

2011-09-27 Thread Diego Novillo
The second patch re-factors pph_cache_get to remove the cache selection logic into a separate function. I needed this to implement pph_cache_sign in terms of pph_cache_get. Before this, pph_cache_get tried to decide what cache to use. After this patch, a separate pph_cache_select() function mak

Re: [wwwdocs] Add info about IPA optimization and LTO improvments

2011-09-27 Thread Gerald Pfeifer
On Tue, 27 Sep 2011, Jan Hubicka wrote: > thanks for corrections. This is what I've comitted now. And here are some markup fixes on top, that address complaints by the validator. Gerald Index: changes.html === RCS file: /cvs/gcc/w

Re: Slim lto objects

2011-09-27 Thread Andi Kleen
Diego Novillo writes: > On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 14:42, Jan Hubicka wrote: >> Hi, >> this patch implements slim LTO. It is updated version of Andi's patch.  It is >> done by terminating IPA optimization after analyzing and outputting LTO and >> in >> compile_file skipping stuff that outputs asse

[pph] Prepare for mutation detection [3/3] (issue5139052)

2011-09-27 Thread Diego Novillo
This finishes removing constants and builtins out of the cache. This time in a slightly more elegant way. The patch introduces a new version of pph_out_start_record exclusively for trees (pph_out_start_tree_record). If the tree is not cacheable then it emits a PPH_RECORD_START_NO_CACHE record to

Re: Slim lto objects

2011-09-27 Thread Diego Novillo
On 11-09-27 13:00 , Andi Kleen wrote: The other obvious way to make it faster would be to skip the assembler for slim LTO and just output the data directly. There's not much need for it with LTO. Agreed. That's what we do with pph images. But that's a larger project. Indeed. Diego.

Re: [pph] Do not read pph files more than once (issue4983055)

2011-09-27 Thread Diego Novillo
On 11-09-12 10:50 , Gabriel Charette wrote: Oops forgot to reply all the first time... On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 4:54 PM, Diego Novillo wrote: This was not causing any failures, but it is pretty wasteful to read the same PPH more than once. We cannot just skip them, however. We need to read the

Update testsuite to run with slim LTO

2011-09-27 Thread Jan Hubicka
Hi, this patch updates testsuite to cover both fat and slim LTO when linker plugin is used and also both linker plugin and collect2 paths. I didn't wanted to slow down testing too much so I just distributes the flags across existing runs with aim to maximize the coverage of testing matrix that is

Re: [google] Add SECTION_EXCLUDE flag and exclude .gnu.callgraph sections (issue5126041)

2011-09-27 Thread Richard Henderson
On 09/23/2011 04:45 PM, Sriraman Tallam wrote: > I also want the SECTION_EXCLUDE part alone to be considered for trunk. This is ok for trunk. Kai, is there a similar flag for pe-coff? I.e. is there something reasonable that we can add to i386_pe_asm_named_section? r~

Re: Slim lto objects

2011-09-27 Thread Jan Hubicka
> On 11-09-27 13:00 , Andi Kleen wrote: > >> The other obvious way to make it faster would be to skip the assembler >> for slim LTO and just output the data directly. There's not much need >> for it with LTO. > > Agreed. That's what we do with pph images. > >> But that's a larger project. > > Inde

Re: RFC: ARM: Add comment enumerating emitted .eabi_attribute tags

2011-09-27 Thread Paul Brook
>2. Abandon using a header file at all. Instead use a configure test > to see if we are using an assembler that supports textual names in a > .eabi_attribute directive and if so use the names rather than the numbers. I'm not sure this is mutually exclusive with using a header file, but using

Re: [google] Add SECTION_EXCLUDE flag and exclude .gnu.callgraph sections (issue5126041)

2011-09-27 Thread Kai Tietz
2011/9/27 Richard Henderson : > On 09/23/2011 04:45 PM, Sriraman Tallam wrote: >> I also want the SECTION_EXCLUDE part alone to be considered for trunk. > > This is ok for trunk. > > Kai, is there a similar flag for pe-coff?  I.e. is there something > reasonable that we can add to i386_pe_asm_named

Re: [PATCH] Add SECTION_EXCLUDE to list of section flags

2011-09-27 Thread Sriraman Tallam
Submitted to trunk after approval from Richard : http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-09/msg01747.html Thanks, -Sri. On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 2:09 PM, Sriraman Tallam wrote: > Hi, > >   Here is a simple patch to add SECTION_EXCLUDE to the list of > section flag macros. Is this ok for trunk? > >

Re: [google] Add SECTION_EXCLUDE flag and exclude .gnu.callgraph sections (issue5126041)

2011-09-27 Thread Sriraman Tallam
Submitted the SECTION_EXCLUDE part to trunk. Thanks, -Sri. On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 10:51 AM, Kai Tietz wrote: > > 2011/9/27 Richard Henderson : > > On 09/23/2011 04:45 PM, Sriraman Tallam wrote: > >> I also want the SECTION_EXCLUDE part alone to be considered for trunk. > > > > This is ok for tr

Re: [google] Add SECTION_EXCLUDE flag and exclude .gnu.callgraph sections (issue5126041)

2011-09-27 Thread Cary Coutant
> Index: final.c > === > --- final.c     (revision 179104) > +++ final.c     (working copy) > @@ -4428,7 +4428,7 @@ rest_of_handle_final (void) >       && cgraph_node (current_function_decl) != NULL >       && (cgraph_node (current_fun

Re: [PATCH] Fixup fortran type_for_size langhook

2011-09-27 Thread Paul Richard Thomas
Dear Jakub, This is, of course, OK for trunk. In fact, I would say that it verges on obvious. Thanks for taking care of it. Paul On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 4:44 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > Hi! > > I've noticed with the > 2009-05-29  Eric Botcazou   > >        * tree-ssa-loop-ivopts.c (strip_offse

Re: [Patch,AVR]: Fix PR50447 (2/n)

2011-09-27 Thread Richard Henderson
On 09/23/2011 02:10 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > On 09/23/2011 10:56 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >> Also, I am curious about one thing: while this is of course a very >> pragmatic solution, you could also convert AVR to get rid of CC0, do >> this at expansion time, and get split-wide-types to work as in

[google] Cherry pick r179209 to add demangler support for cloned functions

2011-09-27 Thread Cary Coutant
OK to cherry-pick r179209 from gcc-4_6-branch to google/gcc-4_6? http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2011-09/msg00828.html -cary include/ChangeLog: PR 40831 * demangle.h (enum demangle_component_type): Add DEMANGLE_COMPONENT_CLONE. libiberty/ChangeLog: PR 40831

Re: [google] Linker plugin to do function reordering using callgraph edge profiles (issue5124041)

2011-09-27 Thread Easwaran Raman
+static inline hashval_t +edge_hash_function (unsigned int id1, unsigned int id2) +{ +  /* If the number of functions is less than 1000, this gives a unique value +     for every function id combination.  */ +  const int MULTIPLIER = 1000; +  return id1* MULTIPLIER + id2; Change to id1 << 16 | id2

Re: [wwwdocs] Add info about IPA optimization and LTO improvments

2011-09-27 Thread Gerald Pfeifer
On Tue, 27 Sep 2011, Jan Hubicka wrote: > thanks for corrections. This is what I've comitted now. Here is another small update I just crafted, that makes a stylistic change here and there, introduces LTO as an abbreviation, adds some missing articles and spaces,... Installed. Gerald Index: cha

Re: [google] Cherry pick r179209 to add demangler support for cloned functions

2011-09-27 Thread Diego Novillo
On 11-09-27 14:21 , Cary Coutant wrote: OK to cherry-pick r179209 from gcc-4_6-branch to google/gcc-4_6? http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2011-09/msg00828.html Sure. Assuming you've validated it. Diego.

Re: [google] Add SECTION_EXCLUDE flag and exclude .gnu.callgraph sections (issue5126041)

2011-09-27 Thread Sriraman Tallam
I committed the patch to google/gcc-4_6 branch. Thanks, -Sri. * output.h (SECTION_EXCLUDE): New flag for exclude sections. * varasm.c (default_elf_asm_named_section): Add "e" to section flags marked as SECTION_EXCLUDE. * final.c (rest_of_handle_final): Exclude .gn

Re: [Patch,AVR]: Clean-up some SP insns

2011-09-27 Thread Georg-Johann Lay
Richard Henderson schrieb: On 09/27/2011 12:56 AM, Georg-Johann Lay wrote: * config/avr/avr-protos.h (avr_out_addto_sp): New prototype. * config/avr/avr.c (avr_out_addto_sp): New function. (adjust_insn_length): Handle ADJUST_LEN_ADDTO_SP. * config/avr/avr.md (adj

Re: [VTA, PR49310] O(n+m)-ish emit_notes

2011-09-27 Thread Alexandre Oliva
On Sep 20, 2011, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > For NOTE_INSN_CALL_ARG_LOCATION, the locations aren't location lists, but > a single location at the point of the call. They are independent of > all other locations, so any kind of caching only decreases the chance > that a suitable location With the pro

[patch windows]: Support SECTION_EXCLUDE for pe-coff targets

2011-09-27 Thread Kai Tietz
Hi, this patch enables same feature as in thread "[google] Add SECTION_EXCLUDE flag and exclude .gnu.callgraph sections (issue5126041)" for pe-coff x86 and x64 targets. ChangeLog 2011-09-27 Kai Tietz * configure.ac: Add test for new section attribute specifier "e" via define

Re: [patch windows]: Support SECTION_EXCLUDE for pe-coff targets

2011-09-27 Thread Richard Henderson
On 09/27/2011 12:58 PM, Kai Tietz wrote: > +#ifdef HAVE_GAS_SECTION_EXCLUDE > + if ((flags & SECTION_EXCLUDE) != 0) > +*f++ = 'e'; > +#endif If 'e' is not supported, I wonder if we should emit 'n'? Otherwise ok. r~

Re: [patch windows]: Support SECTION_EXCLUDE for pe-coff targets

2011-09-27 Thread Kai Tietz
2011/9/27 Richard Henderson : > On 09/27/2011 12:58 PM, Kai Tietz wrote: >> +#ifdef HAVE_GAS_SECTION_EXCLUDE >> +  if ((flags & SECTION_EXCLUDE) != 0) >> +    *f++ = 'e'; >> +#endif > > If 'e' is not supported, I wonder if we should emit 'n'? > > Otherwise ok. > > > r~ This sounds fair. At least

[wwwdocs] Omit "GCC Museum" section from extensions.html

2011-09-27 Thread Gerald Pfeifer
Installed. Gerald Index: extensions.html === RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs/extensions.html,v retrieving revision 1.49 diff -u -r1.49 extensions.html --- extensions.html 17 Sep 2011 22:24:10 - 1.49 +++ extensions.html

Re: Initial shrink-wrapping patch

2011-09-27 Thread Bernd Schmidt
On 09/15/11 00:51, Richard Henderson wrote: > On 09/13/2011 08:36 AM, Bernd Schmidt wrote: >> On 09/13/11 15:05, Richard Sandiford wrote: >>> It just feels like checking for trap_if or turning off cross-jumping >>> are working around problems in the representation of shrink-wrapped >>> functions.

[PATCH 2/2] Use urandom to get random seed

2011-09-27 Thread Andi Kleen
From: Andi Kleen When available use /dev/urandom to get the random seem. This will lower the probability of collisions. On other systems it will fallback to the old methods. Passes bootstrap + testsuite on x86_64. Ok? gcc/: * 2011-09-26 Andi Kleen * toplev.c (init_local_tick): Tr

[PATCH 1/2] Change random seeds to 64bit and drop re-crcing

2011-09-27 Thread Andi Kleen
From: Andi Kleen I had some trouble with random build failures in a large LTO project and it turned out to be random seed collisions in a highly parallel build (thanks to Honza for suggesting that) There were multiple problems: - The way to generate the random seed is pure (milli seconds plus pi

Re: [wwwdocs] Add info about IPA optimization and LTO improvments

2011-09-27 Thread H.J. Lu
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 7:59 AM, Andi Kleen wrote: >> > ld -r is now supported with LTO >> >> Thanks, forgot about this one.  This also needs support at linker side, >> right? > > Only if you include assembler or non LTO code. > Without that it should work with any linker. > >> Do you know minima

Re: Slim lto objects

2011-09-27 Thread Jan Hubicka
Hi, I build Mozilla without debug info with slim LTO and non-LTO. slim LTO build is: real14m26.882s user78m47.547s sys 6m58.870s jh@evans:/abuild/jh/build-mozilla-new14> du -s . 1056120 . jh@evans:/abuild/jh/build-mozilla-new14> size toolkit/library/libxul.so textdata bss

Re: [wwwdocs] Add info about IPA optimization and LTO improvments

2011-09-27 Thread Andi Kleen
> > I believe the assembler code only works with HJ's version of binutils > > and his BFD ld (not gold) currently. HJ can you supply the minimal version? > > Non assembler/LTO should work always. > > The Linux binutils 2.21.51.0.3 is the first Linux binutils which > supports "ld -r" on mixed IR/no

Re: [SH] Target testcase fixes

2011-09-27 Thread Kaz Kojima
Oleg Endo wrote: > The gcc.target/sh/mfmovd.c test was ran even for targets that can't > support it at all. While I was at it, I've also noticed that for some > reason SH4A specific tests were ran for other targets and reported a > fake pass, although the tests are actually unsupported. The patc

Re: [google] Linker plugin to do function reordering using callgraph edge profiles (issue5124041)

2011-09-27 Thread Sriraman Tallam
Made all the changes. Attaching new patch of updated files. On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 11:26 AM, Easwaran Raman wrote: > > +static inline hashval_t > +edge_hash_function (unsigned int id1, unsigned int id2) > +{ > +  /* If the number of functions is less than 1000, this gives a unique value > +    

[PATCH] [Annotalysis] Fix internal compiler error on template methods

2011-09-27 Thread Delesley Hutchins
This patch fixes a bug in the parser which cause an internal compiler error when copying attributes from cloned methods. The bug occurs when a class has both an annotated constructor and a template method. Bootstrapped and passed gcc regression testsuite on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu. Okay for goo

Re: [PATCH 2/2] Use urandom to get random seed

2011-09-27 Thread Joseph S. Myers
On Tue, 27 Sep 2011, Andi Kleen wrote: >if (!flag_random_seed) > { > + /* Try urandom first. Time of day is too likely to collide. */ > + > + int fd = open("/dev/urandom", O_RDONLY); > + read(fd, &random_seed, sizeof(random_seed)); > + close(fd); There appear to be no

Re: [google] Linker plugin to do function reordering using callgraph edge profiles (issue5124041)

2011-09-27 Thread Easwaran Raman
OK for google/gcc-4_6 and google/main branches. -Easwaran > > On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 4:07 PM, Sriraman Tallam wrote: >> >> Made all the changes. Attaching new patch of updated files. >> >> On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 11:26 AM, Easwaran Raman wrote: >> > >> > +static inline hashval_t >> > +edge_hash_

Re: [SH] PR 49468 - Integer SI abs

2011-09-27 Thread Oleg Endo
On Tue, 2011-09-27 at 22:36 +0900, Kaz Kojima wrote: > Thanks for this work! A few minor style issues: > Thanks for checking and sorry for the trouble. The attached patch and ChangeLog below should fix it. I have also added a test case for SI mode abs. Cheers, Oleg ChangeLog: 2011-09-28 O

Re: Slim lto objects

2011-09-27 Thread Jan Hubicka
> Hi, > I build Mozilla without debug info with slim LTO and non-LTO. > slim LTO build is: > > real14m26.882s > user78m47.547s > sys 6m58.870s > jh@evans:/abuild/jh/build-mozilla-new14> du -s . > 1056120 . > jh@evans:/abuild/jh/build-mozilla-new14> size toolkit/library/libxul.so >t

[pph] Add inline assembly test case (issue5127047)

2011-09-27 Thread Diego Novillo
This new test works already, but we had no coverage for inline assembly. Committed to branch. * g++.dg/pph/x0asm1.h: New. * g++.dg/pph/x1asm1.cc: New. diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/pph/x0asm1.h b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/pph/x0asm1.h new file mode 100644 index 000..82e191f

Re: patch about MELT for GCC extensions.html page

2011-09-27 Thread Gerald Pfeifer
On Tue, 27 Sep 2011, Basile Starynkevitch wrote: > Gerald, if the patch is OK, could you please apply it? > I am very uneasy about CVS for the GCC website. Sure, happy to Basile. I made some minor changes ( instead of , instead of , this kind) and committed the updated patch below. Thanks, Ge

Re: [PATCH 2/2] Use urandom to get random seed

2011-09-27 Thread Andi Kleen
On 9/27/2011 4:24 PM, Joseph S. Myers wrote: On Tue, 27 Sep 2011, Andi Kleen wrote: if (!flag_random_seed) { + /* Try urandom first. Time of day is too likely to collide. */ + + int fd = open("/dev/urandom", O_RDONLY); + read(fd,&random_seed, sizeof(random_seed)); +

  1   2   >