http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59584
--- Comment #5 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
The actual bug causing the ICE is that the combination of
expr.c:find_args_size_adjust and expr.c:fixup_args_size_notes\
can't handle a define_split matching for the stack-adjustment assignment
instructi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59584
--- Comment #6 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
Author: hp
Date: Mon Dec 23 22:33:52 2013
New Revision: 206187
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=206187&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/59584
* config/cris/predicates.md (cris_nonsp_regist
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59584
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P5
Summary|[4.9 Regressio
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59203
--- Comment #3 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
Author: hp
Date: Mon Dec 23 23:12:09 2013
New Revision: 206188
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=206188&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/59203
* config/cris/cris.c (cris_pic_symbol_type_of): Fi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59203
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51051
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51086
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hp at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51051
--- Comment #8 from Hans-Peter Nilsson 2011-11-14
23:31:17 UTC ---
Author: hp
Date: Mon Nov 14 23:31:13 2011
New Revision: 181371
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=181371
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/51051
* cfgrtl.c (cfg
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51105
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hp at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51105
--- Comment #5 from Hans-Peter Nilsson 2011-11-16
00:11:37 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> > Please fill in (host and) target fields.
> What for? AFAICT the field should be *-*-* with lto enabled.
A *-*-* would certainly be better than empty,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51105
--- Comment #6 from Hans-Peter Nilsson 2011-11-16
10:21:38 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> I have no doubt the regression occurred in 181189:181208 as per the archive
> link; I'll bisect from that.
It's r181205:181206 (r181205 was a build fai
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51201
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hp at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51038
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51386
Bug #: 51386
Summary: [4.7 Regression]:
23_containers/unordered_set/hash_policy/load_factor.cc
execution timeout
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Ver
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51386
--- Comment #3 from Hans-Peter Nilsson 2011-12-02
11:07:20 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Hans-Peter, can it be a memory issue? The recent changes imply that more
> memory
> is used by these data structures, and that is largely unavoidable,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51386
--- Comment #6 from Hans-Peter Nilsson 2011-12-02
11:15:54 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
(My reply probably seems slightly odd due to the mid-air collision with comment
#2.)
> Oh, I see floating-point changes, has the patch perhaps increased
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51105
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51444
Bug #: 51444
Summary: [4.4 Regression]: Spurious "is used uninitialized"
warning for structure with bitfields
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.7
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51444
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51051
--- Comment #12 from Hans-Peter Nilsson 2011-12-07
19:07:27 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #11)
> I still have HP's patch in my local tree.
I assume you mean Bernd's patch referenced in this PR.
(I was only doing the legwork.)
> Should I remove i
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51521
Bug #: 51521
Summary: [4.7 Regression]: build fails on cris-elf building
libstdc++-v3: verify_flow_info failed
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51603
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hp at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51128
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hp at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
||2011-12-28
CC||hp at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Hans-Peter Nilsson 2011-12-28
09:38:27 UTC ---
I checked my logs for r182695 (latest at this time) and yes, cris-axi-elf too
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51728
Bug #: 51728
Summary: [4.7 Regression]: libstdc++
25_algorithms/count_if/1.cc,
25_algorithms/partition_point/1.cc,
25_algorithms/search/1.cc SEGV ICE
Classifica
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51722
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hp at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85663
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|8.0.1 |8.1.0
--- Comment #7 from Hans-Pete
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85663
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|8.1.0 |unknown
Target Milestone|8.3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85663
--- Comment #12 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
(In reply to Sergei Trofimovich from comment #9)
> (In reply to Hans-Peter Nilsson from comment #8)
> > The report is misleading regarding version, thus I'm resetting the versions.
> > For mips, sanitiz
other
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: hp at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
In the gcc-8.1.0 tarball, the file NEWS contains, near the top:
"As of this time no releases of GCC 8 have yet been made."
further down:
"Disclaimer: GCC 8 has not b
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85666
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hp at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: hp at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
See the attached test-case, ready to drop into testsuite/gcc.dg.
The suboptimization results in separate div and mod sequences
across all architectures where division or
||2018-05-09
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |hp at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85726
--- Comment #1 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
Created attachment 44107
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44107&action=edit
test-case
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85666
--- Comment #7 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
Thank you for your interest in the MMIX port.
(In reply to Wilco from comment #3)
> (In reply to Sergei Trofimovich from comment #1)
>
> > #define MMIX_CFUN_NEEDS_SAVED_EH_RETURN_ADDRESS
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85666
--- Comment #9 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
(In reply to Wilco from comment #8)
> I don't think that comment is accurate.
Of course it isn't accurate *now*, but it explains why the code looks as it is.
I see the "phase-computing" code in expand_u
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85666
--- Comment #10 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
Created attachment 44180
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44180&action=edit
patch to mmix.c
Builds libgcc. More late this weekend, I hope.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85666
--- Comment #11 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
(In reply to Hans-Peter Nilsson from comment #10)
> Created attachment 44180 [details]
> patch to mmix.c
>
> Builds libgcc. More late this weekend, I hope.
I now see the assertion in assemble_integer
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: hp at gcc dot gnu.org
CC: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Target: cris-elf, pru-elf, m68k-unknown-linux-gnu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91419
--- Comment #2 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> Jeff also noticed this. The issue should happen on targets where
> alignof(int) != sizeof(int) since there we cannot conclude that with int *p,
> *q; the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91419
--- Comment #4 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
(In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #3)
> OK, so all testcases in this PR use 'int' which means disabling
> for !natural_alignment_32 would be enough (unless 'int' is not 32bit ;))
I'd assume al
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91419
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91091
Bug 91091 depends on bug 91419, which changed state.
Bug 91419 Summary: [10 Regression]: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr91091-2.c, ssa-fre-61.c,
ssa-fre-61.c with r273232
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91419
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91492
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hp at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: hp at gcc dot gnu.org
CC: rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Host: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
Target: cris-elf
Created attachment 46986
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91948
--- Comment #1 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
There were subsequent reload-related commits, but building still fails as above
at r276395.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84877
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hp at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: hp at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Target: cris-elf
For this code, similar to the newlib newlib/libc/misc/init.c:__init_array
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90553
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90553
--- Comment #1 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
(JFTR the cutnpaste got tangled with paste and tape everywhere; the newlib
function in newlib/libc/misc/init.c is named __libc_init_array)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90553
--- Comment #2 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
Author: hp
Date: Wed May 22 00:35:32 2019
New Revision: 271498
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=271498&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/90553
* ira-lives.c (process_bb_node_lives
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90553
--- Comment #3 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
Author: hp
Date: Wed May 22 00:43:23 2019
New Revision: 271499
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=271499&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/90553
* gcc.dg/torture/pr90553.c: New test
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90553
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Version|9.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90315
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hp at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
|*-*-solaris2.1[01], |
|x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu|
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
CC||hp at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|FIXED |---
--- Comment #12 from Hans-Peter Nilsson
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8
--- Comment #13 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
Created attachment 46392
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=46392&action=edit
stacked-qualified-types-3.s generated for cris-elf at r271469
|2019-5-22
CC||hp at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #15 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
Still fails for cris-elf, at r271469, and apparently at least some of the other
listed targets, according to gcc-testresults list.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83237
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hp at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84877
--- Comment #12 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
(In reply to Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke from comment #10)
> Created attachment 46567 [details]
> Fix for targets that pass the argument by invisible reference
Thanks for your efforts. This *may* have affe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84877
--- Comment #16 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
(In reply to Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke from comment #13)
> I tried if I could reproduce this with a cross-compiler built for
> --target=hppa-linux-gnu;
My target of concern is cris-elf, just as in my earl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86779
--- Comment #1 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
Author: hp
Date: Wed Sep 5 23:14:42 2018
New Revision: 264134
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=264134&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/86779
* config/cris/cris.c (TARGET_HAVE_SPECUL
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86772
Bug 86772 depends on bug 86779, which changed state.
Bug 86779 Summary: Cris port needs updating for CVE-2017-5753
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86779
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86779
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
Priority: P3
Component: bootstrap
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: hp at gcc dot gnu.org
CC: dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
(Note: no cross-binutils or anything needed, just gcc sources and a native
gcc-4.4. This is an
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85666
--- Comment #12 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
Author: hp
Date: Sun Sep 9 18:05:48 2018
New Revision: 264182
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=264182&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/85666
* config/mmix/mmix.c (MMIX_CFUN_NEEDS_S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85666
--- Comment #13 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
Author: hp
Date: Sun Sep 9 18:12:14 2018
New Revision: 264183
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=264183&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/85666
* config/mmix/mmix.c (mmix_assemble_int
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86794
--- Comment #1 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
Author: hp
Date: Sun Sep 9 18:13:18 2018
New Revision: 264184
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=264184&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/86794
* config/mmix/mmix.c (TARGET_HAVE_SPECUL
||2018-09-09
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |hp at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone|--- |9.0
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #14 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
I'll build the gcc-8 branch too b
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86794
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86772
Bug 86772 depends on bug 86794, which changed state.
Bug 86794 Summary: mmix port needs updating for CVE-2017-5753
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86794
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85666
--- Comment #15 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
Author: hp
Date: Sun Sep 16 21:23:36 2018
New Revision: 264351
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=264351&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/85666
* config/mmix/mmix.c (mmix_assemble_int
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85666
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67843
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hp at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54005
--- Comment #20 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
Please allow a couple of days so I can catch up.
Thanks.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80433
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hp at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
Severity: minor
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: hp at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 43833
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43833&action=edit
origi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85186
--- Comment #1 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
Created attachment 43834
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43834&action=edit
case 2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85186
--- Comment #2 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
Created attachment 43835
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43835&action=edit
case 3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85186
--- Comment #3 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
Created attachment 43836
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43836&action=edit
case 4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85186
--- Comment #4 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
I forgot to mention that this is likely a regression since gcc-4.7-era, but I
haven't proved that elsewhere than on the original target (not x86_64-linux /
sse2).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54005
--- Comment #22 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
The issue again, is using properties of the actual object in the value of
is_lock_free().
AFAICS, that still happens (at r264855)
libstdc++-v3/include/bits/atomic_base.h:246
static constexpr int
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54005
--- Comment #23 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
(In reply to Hans-Peter Nilsson from comment #22)
> Anyway, as per the arguments in n2992.html in the link above, I (still)
> think __atomic_*always*_lock free should be used instead; this'd make the
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54005
--- Comment #26 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #25)
> (In reply to Hans-Peter Nilsson from comment #23)
> > ...and also, a call might be generated as the result of using
> > __atomic_is_lock_free (instead of
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54005
--- Comment #27 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #24)
> (In reply to Hans-Peter Nilsson from comment #22)
> > Or do I misread that? Are __alignof(x) and the result of alignas(x)
> > in the declaration guarant
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54005
--- Comment #31 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
Created attachment 44851
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44851&action=edit
patch as per directions
Thanks. I also adjusted include/std/atomic, without which the struct X
test-case
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54005
--- Comment #34 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #32)
> I would prefer a function template instead of the LF macro e.g.
That will lose the __LINE__ information from the supposed error message in
VERIFY, i.e.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54005
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85726
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|hp at gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37916
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
URL|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55030
--- Comment #3 from Hans-Peter Nilsson 2012-11-12
04:37:04 UTC ---
Created attachment 28664
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28664
reduced test-case
Reduced test-case. Do e.g. "cc1 -fpreprocessed pr55030-chk.i -quiet
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55030
--- Comment #4 from Hans-Peter Nilsson 2012-11-12
04:53:55 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> Created attachment 28664 [details]
> reduced test-case
Only intended for code inspection, not a self-contained test-case; that's
already cove
reconfirmed||2012-11-12
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |hp at gcc dot gnu.org
|gnu.org |
Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #2 from Hans
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55257
--- Comment #4 from Hans-Peter Nilsson 2012-11-12
17:21:57 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> It can't be called from
> the middle end, because some targets need to perform various things before
> final_start_function (or perhaps after fi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55257
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|debug |target
--- Comment #5 from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55257
--- Comment #6 from Hans-Peter Nilsson 2012-11-13
06:15:59 UTC ---
Author: hp
Date: Tue Nov 13 06:15:53 2012
New Revision: 193467
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=193467
Log:
PR target/55257
* config/cris
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55257
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55325
Bug #: 55325
Summary: [4.8 Regression]: g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-complex.C
excess errors
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCO
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55325
--- Comment #3 from Hans-Peter Nilsson 2012-11-14
16:59:29 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> I also see failing g++.dg/parse/template23.C and for this one too the problem
> seems related to the recent changes for PR54413.
Right, thanks
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55325
--- Comment #11 from Hans-Peter Nilsson 2012-11-15
02:39:57 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> (In reply to comment #3)
> > Excess errors:
> > /tmp/hpautotest-gcc1/gcc/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/gnu_fext-numeric-literals.C:94:3:
> > ...
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55325
--- Comment #14 from Hans-Peter Nilsson 2012-11-15
08:44:05 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #13)
> [1] http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-11/msg01198.html
Thanks. Note that pa handles 'q'.
301 - 400 of 1135 matches
Mail list logo
