http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51105
--- Comment #6 from Hans-Peter Nilsson <hp at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-11-16 10:21:38 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) > I have no doubt the regression occurred in 181189:181208 as per the archive > link; I'll bisect from that. It's r181205:181206 (r181205 was a build failure, the next was a partly revert), but you knew that already didn't you Richi? ;-] (Being already CC:ed.)
