[Bug c++/55988] New: Incorrect code generation with const and -std=c++0x

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55988 Bug #: 55988 Summary: Incorrect code generation with const and -std=c++0x Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: major

[Bug c++/55986] RHS of logical operators may render LHS unevaluated in constant-expression

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55986 --- Comment #3 from David Krauss 2013-01-15 08:02:55 UTC --- Likewise this is allowed: switch( 0 ) case i-i: ; I think this is a purposeful language extension, which could use a switch to disable. It would be nice if static_assert we

[Bug tree-optimization/48766] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] Infinite recursion in fold_binary_loc()

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48766 --- Comment #15 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-01-15 08:17:09 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Jan 15 08:16:56 2013 New Revision: 195186 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=195186 Log: PR tree-optimization/48766 * o

[Bug fortran/55983] [4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE in find_typebound_proc_uop, at fortran/class.c:2711

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55983 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code

[Bug fortran/55983] [4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE in find_typebound_proc_uop, at fortran/class.c:2711

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55983 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed

[Bug tree-optimization/48766] [4.6/4.7 Regression] Infinite recursion in fold_binary_loc()

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48766 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||4.8.0 Summary|[4.6/4.

[Bug c++/54988] fpmath=sse target pragma causes inlining failure because of target specific option mismatch

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54988 Jonathan Liu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||net147 at gmail dot com --- Comm

[Bug c++/55988] Incorrect code generation with const and -std=c++0x

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55988 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/55893] [4.7/4.8 Regression][C++11] runtime segfault with static const object with virtual destructor

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55893 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pavel.zbitskiy at gmail dot

[Bug sanitizer/55989] New: [4.8 regresion] build failure in libsanitizer

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55989 Bug #: 55989 Summary: [4.8 regresion] build failure in libsanitizer Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: blocker

[Bug sanitizer/55989] [4.8 regresion] build failure in libsanitizer

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55989 --- Comment #1 from Kostya Serebryany 2013-01-15 08:49:42 UTC --- Will the following patch work? Index: sanitizer_common/sanitizer_linux.cc === --- sanitizer_common/saniti

[Bug c++/54988] fpmath=sse target pragma causes inlining failure because of target specific option mismatch

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54988 Alexey Pavlov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||alexpux at gmail dot com --- Co

[Bug sanitizer/55989] [4.8 regresion] build failure in libsanitizer

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55989 --- Comment #2 from Paul H. Hargrove 2013-01-15 08:59:42 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) > Will the following patch work? [...] Yes, it allows the compilation to complete. SInce I don't know anything to the contrary, I'll assume tha

[Bug fortran/55983] [4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE in find_typebound_proc_uop, at fortran/class.c:2711

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55983 --- Comment #3 from Sylwester Arabas 2013-01-15 09:03:28 UTC --- Hi Janus, Re .f90 - it's not valid f90 code after all :) Re missing "use bcd_m" - I was aware of this case, and I submitted the "Bad statement code" ICE as a separate is

[Bug sanitizer/55989] [4.8 regresion] build failure in libsanitizer

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55989 --- Comment #3 from Kostya Serebryany 2013-01-15 09:04:35 UTC --- >> False return from these functions will not negatively impact GCC at run time No change in libsanitizer can affect GCC at run time unless you are building something with -

[Bug fortran/55983] [4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE in find_typebound_proc_uop, at fortran/class.c:2711

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55983 --- Comment #4 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-15 09:09:50 UTC --- Hi, > Re .f90 - it's not valid f90 code after all :) well, yes. But it ain't valid f77 either ;) The file extension basically just tells gfortran whether to inte

[Bug c++/55663] [C++11] Alias template combined with constexpr function is considered non-const

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55663 --- Comment #5 from Dodji Seketeli 2013-01-15 09:12:42 UTC --- Author: dodji Date: Tue Jan 15 09:12:30 2013 New Revision: 195189 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=195189 Log: PR c++/55663 - constexpr function templ instantia

[Bug target/55433] [4.8 Regression][LRA] ICE on excessive reloads

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55433 --- Comment #3 from Paul H. Hargrove 2013-01-15 09:15:44 UTC --- This bug is still present and "biting me" as of r195176. Is there anything I can do to help make some progress on this? -Paul

[Bug testsuite/54139] [4.8 regression] some ARM Thumb-2 tests appear to be run on ARMv5TE hardware causing unhandled exceptions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54139 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Co

[Bug tree-optimization/55955] [4.8 Regression] ICE in optab_for_tree_code, at optabs.c:402

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55955 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-01-15 09:31:43 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Jan 15 09:31:28 2013 New Revision: 195190 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=195190 Log: PR tree-optimization/55955 * tr

[Bug tree-optimization/55955] [4.8 Regression] ICE in optab_for_tree_code, at optabs.c:402

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55955 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug other/55973] r195150 doesn't properly handle out of tree isl 0.11.1

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55973 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug sanitizer/55989] [4.8 regresion] build failure in libsanitizer

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55989 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0

[Bug target/55987] Redundant constant emitted

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55987 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/55985] Misleading message about which variable 'may be used uninitialized in this function'

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55985 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic Status|U

[Bug fortran/55978] [4.8 Regression] class_optional_2.f90 -Os fails

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55978 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 Target Milestone|---

[Bug fortran/55984] [4.8 Regression] ICE: gfc_trans_code(): Bad statement code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55984 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/55984] [4.8 Regression] ICE: gfc_trans_code(): Bad statement code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55984 --- Comment #2 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-15 10:04:31 UTC --- Confirmed. Reduced test case: type, abstract :: bcd_t contains procedure(bcd_fill_halos), deferred :: fill_halos end type abstract interface

[Bug fortran/55984] [4.8 Regression] ICE: gfc_trans_code(): Bad statement code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55984 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code

[Bug fortran/55983] [4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE in find_typebound_proc_uop, at fortran/class.c:2711

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55983 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 Target Milestone|

[Bug fortran/54767] [4.7/4.8 Regression] Incorrect code generated with "-O2 -fcheck=bounds"

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54767 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-01-15 10:47:36 UTC --- Yeah, indeed. The bug seems to be in the second vrp pass on xxx function. iaii_23: [_79, _79] EQUIVALENCES: { } (0 elements) looks wrong (iaii_23 is only conditionally equal t

[Bug tree-optimization/54767] [4.7/4.8 Regression] Incorrect code generated with "-O2 -fcheck=bounds"

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54767 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Component|for

[Bug fortran/55990] New: Absent optional: gfortran.dg/class_optional_2.f90: Conditional jump depends on uninitialised value

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55990 Bug #: 55990 Summary: Absent optional: gfortran.dg/class_optional_2.f90: Conditional jump depends on uninitialised value Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Versio

[Bug fortran/55990] Absent optional: gfortran.dg/class_optional_2.f90: Conditional jump depends on uninitialised value

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55990 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug fortran/55978] [4.8 Regression] class_optional_2.f90 -Os fails

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55978 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org --- C

[Bug sanitizer/55483] gfortran.dg/class_optional_2.f90 execution failures with -fsanitize=address

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55483 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug fortran/55978] [4.8 Regression] class_optional_2.f90 -Os fails

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55978 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added CC||howarth at nitro dot

[Bug c++/55663] [C++11] Alias template combined with constexpr function is considered non-const

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55663 Dodji Seketeli changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug tree-optimization/54767] [4.7/4.8 Regression] Incorrect code generated with "-O2 -fcheck=bounds"

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54767 --- Comment #9 from Richard Biener 2013-01-15 11:28:48 UTC --- Exactly the same issue as PR53465, just instead of an equivalence we have a symbolic range [_79, _79] which is of course also an "equivalence". Trunk fails for the reduced te

[Bug tree-optimization/54767] [4.7/4.8 Regression] Incorrect code generated with "-O2 -fcheck=bounds"

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54767 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P4 |P2 --- Comment #10 from Richar

[Bug fortran/55978] [4.8 Regression] class_optional_2.f90 -Os fails

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55978 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code --- Comment #6 from

[Bug tree-optimization/55920] [4.8 Regression] ICE in expand_debug_locations, at cfgexpand.c:3753

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55920 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-01-15 12:04:13 UTC --- Created attachment 29168 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29168 gcc48-pr55920.patch Looking at the #c3 patch, I wonder if this wouldn't be more appropriate

[Bug tree-optimization/55920] [4.8 Regression] ICE in expand_debug_locations, at cfgexpand.c:3753

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55920 --- Comment #7 from Martin Jambor 2013-01-15 12:18:40 UTC --- (In reply to comment #6) > Created attachment 29168 [details] > gcc48-pr55920.patch > > Looking at the #c3 patch, I wonder if this wouldn't be more appropriate > (untested s

[Bug target/55981] std::atomic store is split in two smaller stores

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55981 Paul E. McKenney changed: What|Removed |Added CC||paulmck at linux dot

[Bug middle-end/55882] [4.7/4.8 Regression] unaligned load/store : incorrect struct offset

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55882 --- Comment #14 from Richard Biener 2013-01-15 12:48:28 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Tue Jan 15 12:48:13 2013 New Revision: 195194 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=195194 Log: 2013-01-15 Richard Biener

[Bug middle-end/55882] [4.7 Regression] unaligned load/store : incorrect struct offset

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55882 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 Known to work|

[Bug middle-end/55308] /usr/ports/lang/gcc48/work/build/sparc64-portbld-freebsd10.0/libstdc++-v3/src/.libs/libstdc++.so.6: Undefined symbol "__emutls_v._ThreadRuneLocale"

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55308 --- Comment #2 from Anton Shterenlikht 2013-01-15 12:56:28 UTC --- I get a different line at 3163: # pr -n /usr/ports/lang/gcc48/work/gcc-4.8-20121014/gcc/configure.ac | grep -C5 3163 3158 .text 3159 movia8, f

[Bug bootstrap/55961] [4.8 Regression] system.h includes gmp.h but system.h is included for build and not just target

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55961 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 Status|NEW

[Bug other/55973] r195150 doesn't properly handle out of tree isl 0.11.1

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55973 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener 2013-01-15 13:08:05 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Tue Jan 15 13:07:56 2013 New Revision: 195195 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=195195 Log: 2013-01-15 Richard Biener P

[Bug other/55973] r195150 doesn't properly handle out of tree isl 0.11.1

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55973 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug fortran/55991] New: Support or document "Escape Sequences"

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55991 Bug #: 55991 Summary: Support or document "Escape Sequences" Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug middle-end/55308] /usr/ports/lang/gcc48/work/build/sparc64-portbld-freebsd10.0/libstdc++-v3/src/.libs/libstdc++.so.6: Undefined symbol "__emutls_v._ThreadRuneLocale"

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55308 --- Comment #3 from Anton Shterenlikht 2013-01-15 13:26:17 UTC --- In the latest version the line numbers are different again. # pr -n /usr/ports/lang/gcc48/work/gcc-4.8-20130106/gcc/configure.ac | grep "\-32 \-\-fatal" 2982

[Bug target/55940] Incorrect code for accessing parameters with 32-bit Intel hosts

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55940 --- Comment #4 from Frank Mehnert 2013-01-15 13:53:04 UTC --- The problem is that I cannot reproduce this problem either. Some versions of gcc 4.7 might be affected (the affected user uses 'Exherbo gcc-4.7.2-r2'), others not. As far as I c

[Bug bootstrap/53300] [4.8 Regression] AIX bootstrap related to varpool patch

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53300 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug rtl-optimization/55845] [4.8 Regression] 454.calculix miscompares with -march=btver2 -O3 -ffastmath -fschedule-insns -mvzeroupper for test data run

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55845 Venkataramanan changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|VERIFIED --- Comment #13 from

[Bug fortran/55991] Support or document "Escape Sequences"

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55991 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug target/55981] std::atomic store is split in two smaller stores

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55981 --- Comment #5 from Uros Bizjak 2013-01-15 14:22:14 UTC --- Obviously, not all DImode immediates are atomic. I have a patch that prohibits moves of immediates that do not satisfy "e" constraints to volatile memories.

[Bug fortran/55991] Support or document "Escape Sequences"

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55991 --- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus 2013-01-15 14:25:10 UTC --- See -fbackslash at http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gfortran/Fortran-Dialect-Options.html

[Bug target/55981] std::atomic store is split in two smaller stores

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55981 --- Comment #6 from Uros Bizjak 2013-01-15 14:25:33 UTC --- Created attachment 29169 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29169 Patch that prevents non-atomic immediates in moves to volatile memory location

[Bug fortran/55991] Support or document "Escape Sequences"

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55991 --- Comment #3 from damage3025 at gmail dot com 2013-01-15 14:26:29 UTC --- As I tried with GNU Fortran 4.7.2 and I was trying to output CRLF explicitly. $ gfortran --version GNU Fortran (Ubuntu/Linaro 4.7.2-2ubuntu1) 4.7.2 Copyright (C) 20

[Bug fortran/55991] Support or document "Escape Sequences"

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55991 --- Comment #4 from damage3025 at gmail dot com 2013-01-15 14:28:01 UTC --- Thank you all and sorry for the invalid bug.

[Bug target/55981] std::atomic store is split in two smaller stores

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55981 Uros Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|unassi

[Bug target/15184] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] Direct access to byte inside word not working with -march=pentiumpro

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15184 --- Comment #24 from Richard Biener 2013-01-15 14:31:02 UTC --- We fail to fold (short unsigned int) ( X | (signed short) Y ) to (short unsigned int ) X | (short unsigned int) Y and thus end up with needlessly many conversion

[Bug bootstrap/55792] [4.8 Regression] Bad memory access with profiledbootstrap and LTO

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55792 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug tree-optimization/21485] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] missed load PRE, PRE makes i?86 suck

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21485 --- Comment #54 from Richard Biener 2013-01-15 14:40:39 UTC --- (In reply to comment #48) > I noticed PR 32120 is also involved. > > D.1716_7 = k_4 * 8; > D.1717_9 = array_8(D) + D.1716_7; > D.1718_10 = *D.1717_9; > k_11 = k_4

[Bug fortran/55978] [4.8 Regression] class_optional_2.f90 -Os fails

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55978 --- Comment #7 from Tobias Burnus 2013-01-15 14:47:31 UTC --- (In reply to comment #6) > Looks as if code of the form: > if (y.data) > D.1914 = _gfortran_internal_pack (&y); > else > D.1914 = NULL; > > is missing The b

[Bug bootstrap/25672] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] cross build's libgcc picks up CFLAGS

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25672 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org --- C

[Bug target/55940] Incorrect code for accessing parameters with 32-bit Intel hosts

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55940 --- Comment #5 from Frank Mehnert 2013-01-15 15:03:14 UTC --- Actually I was able to reproduce generating the buggy code. My gcc version: Using built-in specs. COLLECT_GCC=/usr/bin/gcc COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4

[Bug target/27855] [4.5/4.7/4.8 regression] reassociation causes the RA to be confused

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27855 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING

[Bug middle-end/48087] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] -Wall -Werror adds warnings over and above those generated by -Wall

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48087 --- Comment #22 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-01-15 15:11:40 UTC --- Created attachment 29170 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29170 gcc48-pr48087.patch Untested fix. That said, it seems that on the provided testcase g++ a

[Bug target/38134] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] speed regression with many loop invariants

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38134 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|una

[Bug target/55940] Incorrect code for accessing parameters with 32-bit Intel hosts

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55940 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Co

[Bug target/55940] Incorrect code for accessing parameters with 32-bit Intel hosts

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55940 --- Comment #7 from Frank Mehnert 2013-01-15 15:37:43 UTC --- Actually this looks like some mixup in the generated machine code: VBoxHost_RTR0MemObjGetPagePhysAddr(): c1b: 8b 0f mov(%edi),%ecx c1d: 8b 47 04

[Bug testsuite/54139] [4.8 regression] some ARM Thumb-2 tests appear to be run on ARMv5TE hardware causing unhandled exceptions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54139 --- Comment #4 from Aldy Hernandez 2013-01-15 15:49:04 UTC --- Perhaps this is a duplicate of PR55780? If it is, there is already a proposed patch here: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-12/msg01339.html which has been pinged he

[Bug testsuite/55780] effective targets arm_arch_v*_multilib are not strict enough

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55780 Aldy Hernandez changed: What|Removed |Added CC||aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org --- C

[Bug bootstrap/55961] [4.8 Regression] system.h includes gmp.h but system.h is included for build and not just target

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55961 --- Comment #5 from Richard Biener 2013-01-15 15:54:10 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Tue Jan 15 15:54:05 2013 New Revision: 195205 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=195205 Log: 2013-01-15 Richard Biener P

[Bug bootstrap/55961] [4.8 Regression] system.h includes gmp.h but system.h is included for build and not just target

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55961 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug bootstrap/50229] [4.7/4.8 Regression] Can't cross compile for i686-apple-darwin10 from x86_64-redhat_linux

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50229 Ray Donnelly changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mingw.android at gmail dot

[Bug c++/55992] New: constexpr static member function not recognised in templated using statement

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55992 Bug #: 55992 Summary: constexpr static member function not recognised in templated using statement Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.1 Status: U

[Bug other/55982] __strncat_chk is buggy

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55982 --- Comment #3 from ppluzhnikov at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-15 16:02:51 UTC --- Author: ppluzhnikov Date: Tue Jan 15 16:02:42 2013 New Revision: 195207 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=195207 Log: 2013-01-15 Paul Pl

[Bug other/55982] __strncat_chk is buggy

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55982 Paul Pluzhnikov changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug bootstrap/50229] [4.7/4.8 Regression] Can't cross compile for i686-apple-darwin10 from x86_64-redhat_linux

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50229 --- Comment #15 from Ray Donnelly 2013-01-15 16:07:45 UTC --- What brought me here was a desire to add some information about this bug, when I saw the odcctools comment from Iain I thought I may as well mention my compilers. Further Inf

[Bug target/43961] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] [ARM thumb] "branch out of range" with thumb1_output_casesi

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43961 --- Comment #12 from Joseph S. Myers 2013-01-15 16:17:53 UTC --- Author: jsm28 Date: Tue Jan 15 16:17:28 2013 New Revision: 195208 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=195208 Log: 2013-01-15 Joseph Myers M

[Bug target/43961] [4.6/4.7 Regression] [ARM thumb] "branch out of range" with thumb1_output_casesi

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43961 Joseph S. Myers changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression]|[4.6/4.7 Regression] [ARM

[Bug testsuite/54139] [4.8 regression] some ARM Thumb-2 tests appear to be run on ARMv5TE hardware causing unhandled exceptions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54139 Janis Johnson changed: What|Removed |Added CC||janis at gcc dot gnu.org --- Co

[Bug tree-optimization/55920] [4.8 Regression] ICE in expand_debug_locations, at cfgexpand.c:3753

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55920 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-01-15 16:33:38 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Jan 15 16:33:24 2013 New Revision: 195209 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=195209 Log: PR tree-optimization/55920 * tr

[Bug c/55967] rightshift an unsigned value (X) by it's number of bits does not always yield 0, when X is an unsigned that's leftshifted by it's number of bits and offset

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55967 --- Comment #5 from Marc Glisse 2013-01-15 16:38:36 UTC --- Note that clang has -fsanitize=shift which produces a runtime message every time a >> is executed with an out of bounds argument.

[Bug middle-end/48087] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] -Wall -Werror adds warnings over and above those generated by -Wall

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48087 --- Comment #23 from Manuel López-Ibáñez 2013-01-15 16:39:22 UTC --- (In reply to comment #22) > Created attachment 29170 [details] > gcc48-pr48087.patch > > Untested fix. That said, it seems that on the provided testcase g++ already > generat

[Bug tree-optimization/55920] [4.8 Regression] ICE in expand_debug_locations, at cfgexpand.c:3753

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55920 --- Comment #9 from Martin Jambor 2013-01-15 16:43:14 UTC --- Author: jamborm Date: Tue Jan 15 16:43:05 2013 New Revision: 195210 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=195210 Log: 2013-01-15 Martin Jambor PR

[Bug rtl-optimization/55547] [4.8 Regression] Alias analysis does not handle AND addresses correctly

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55547 --- Comment #8 from Richard Henderson 2013-01-15 16:47:29 UTC --- The patch in #c4 is ok.

[Bug testsuite/54139] [4.8 regression] some ARM Thumb-2 tests appear to be run on ARMv5TE hardware causing unhandled exceptions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54139 --- Comment #6 from Aldy Hernandez 2013-01-15 16:49:24 UTC --- > The third is for failures like "FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/builtins/memset.c > compilation, -O2 -flto -fuse-linker-plugin -fno-fat-lto-objects" that fail to > link due to m

[Bug testsuite/54139] [4.8 regression] some ARM Thumb-2 tests appear to be run on ARMv5TE hardware causing unhandled exceptions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54139 --- Comment #7 from Aldy Hernandez 2013-01-15 16:51:54 UTC --- Oh Janis, and when you do, please reference the new PR here so we can close this PR in deference to those 3 individual PRs. Thanks.

[Bug libstdc++/55993] New: tuple_cat not a constant expression for result size >= 3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55993 Bug #: 55993 Summary: tuple_cat not a constant expression for result size >= 3 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/55940] Incorrect code for accessing parameters with 32-bit Intel hosts

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55940 --- Comment #8 from Frank Mehnert 2013-01-15 16:54:53 UTC --- Created attachment 29172 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29172 Preprocessed source

[Bug sanitizer/55938] g++.dg/asan/deep-stack-uaf-1.C fails at r195092 on darwin

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55938 --- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres 2013-01-15 16:55:13 UTC --- > Failure no longer present at r195150 remerged with llvm compiler-rt r172419 . Could you post the corresponding fix?

[Bug target/55940] Incorrect code for accessing parameters with 32-bit Intel hosts

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55940 --- Comment #9 from Frank Mehnert 2013-01-15 16:55:40 UTC --- Just added the preprocessed source, sorry for the delay. It's the source code from the VirtualBox ticket.

[Bug target/55940] Incorrect code for accessing parameters with 32-bit Intel hosts

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55940 --- Comment #10 from Frank Mehnert 2013-01-15 16:57:48 UTC --- And regarding your comment, Jakub, in this case it's not a question of not emitting the code of a function or not. The function code is emitted and the code is definitely wrong

[Bug middle-end/53073] [4.8 Regression] 464.h264ref in SPEC CPU 2006 miscompiled

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53073 Michael Paton changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpaton at swbell dot net --- Co

[Bug lto/55994] New: multiple definition or memset or strlen for builtins tests with LTO options

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55994 Bug #: 55994 Summary: multiple definition or memset or strlen for builtins tests with LTO options Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 S

[Bug testsuite/54139] [4.8 regression] some ARM Thumb-2 tests appear to be run on ARMv5TE hardware causing unhandled exceptions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54139 --- Comment #8 from Janis Johnson 2013-01-15 17:11:40 UTC --- The gcc.c-torture/execute/builtins failures with LTO options are now covered by PR55994.

  1   2   >