http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54139
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> 2013-01-15
09:25:45 UTC ---
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2013-01/msg01425.html
as an example of armv5tel-*-linux-gnueabi shows
FAIL: gcc.target/arm/ftest-armv6t2-arm.c execution test
FAIL: gcc.target/arm/ftest-armv6t2-thumb.c execution test
FAIL: gcc.target/arm/ftest-armv7a-arm.c execution test
FAIL: gcc.target/arm/ftest-armv7a-thumb.c execution test
FAIL: gcc.target/arm/ftest-armv7r-arm.c execution test
FAIL: gcc.target/arm/ftest-armv7r-thumb.c execution test
(not sure on what hw has it been run) and
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2013-01/msg01494.html
(armv7hl-*-linux-gnueabi), which shows
FAIL: gcc.target/arm/ftest-armv4t-thumb.c (test for excess errors)
UNRESOLVED: gcc.target/arm/ftest-armv4t-thumb.c compilation failed to produce
executable
FAIL: gcc.target/arm/ftest-armv5t-thumb.c (test for excess errors)
UNRESOLVED: gcc.target/arm/ftest-armv5t-thumb.c compilation failed to produce
executable
FAIL: gcc.target/arm/ftest-armv5te-thumb.c (test for excess errors)
UNRESOLVED: gcc.target/arm/ftest-armv5te-thumb.c compilation failed to produce
executable
FAIL: gcc.target/arm/ftest-armv6-thumb.c (test for excess errors)
UNRESOLVED: gcc.target/arm/ftest-armv6-thumb.c compilation failed to produce
executable
FAIL: gcc.target/arm/ftest-armv6k-thumb.c (test for excess errors)
UNRESOLVED: gcc.target/arm/ftest-armv6k-thumb.c compilation failed to produce
executable
FAIL: gcc.target/arm/ftest-armv6z-thumb.c (test for excess errors)
UNRESOLVED: gcc.target/arm/ftest-armv6z-thumb.c compilation failed to produce
executable
FAIL: gcc.target/arm/mmx-2.c (internal compiler error)
FAIL: gcc.target/arm/mmx-2.c (test for excess errors)
All these tests are new for 4.8 and all test new functionality in 4.8, so the
regression status (beyond having some extra FAILs) is questionable.
