http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55920
--- Comment #7 from Martin Jambor <jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org> 2013-01-15 12:18:40 UTC --- (In reply to comment #6) > Created attachment 29168 [details] > gcc48-pr55920.patch > > Looking at the #c3 patch, I wonder if this wouldn't be more appropriate > (untested so far). It tries to match roughly what the modify_this_stmt > case does a few lines before. Yes, that's what I had in mind for 4.9. I wanted the #c3 patch to be minimal, given that we are now in stage 4 and we were even considering reverting patches. But if it is OK now, I'll be more than happy to test it and commit it.