https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120930
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||skothadiya at whileone dot in
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=122124
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Blocks|120763
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121845
--- Comment #3 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
I've pushed Robin's patch to the trunk. What I don't know is whether or not
this likely affects gcc-15, in which case we should add the regressinon marker
and backport in a week or so.
Robin, any sense of
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=122147
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120782
--- Comment #9 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
In response to c#8, yes the alignment data attached to a MEM should be
conservatively correct.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117760
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118945
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=122114
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121742
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120763
Bug 120763 depends on bug 110812, which changed state.
Bug 110812 Summary: Check availability of builtins at expand time
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110812
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110812
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=122147
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |law at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=122076
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120763
Bug 120763 depends on bug 121995, which changed state.
Bug 121995 Summary: [RISCV] [Miscompile] GCC - riscv64 target, miscompiles with
multiplication on unsigned char at -O3 as well as -O2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121995
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=122147
--- Comment #1 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Probably the (subreg (mem ... )) created by combine that causes the problems:
Trying 7 -> 14:
7: r134:V2QI=[r140:DI]
REG_DEAD r140:DI
14: r138:HF=r134:V2QI#0
REG_DEAD r134:V2QI
Successfu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=122102
--- Comment #8 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
*** Bug 121995 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121995
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120763
Bug 120763 depends on bug 122076, which changed state.
Bug 122076 Summary: [RISCV] [Miscompile] GCC - riscv64 target, miscompiles at
-O3 as well as -O2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=122076
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=122102
--- Comment #7 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
*** Bug 122076 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101188
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=122124
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rzinsly at ventanamicro dot com
--- Co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=122124
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121845
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120763
Bug 120763 depends on bug 121742, which changed state.
Bug 121742 Summary: [15] RISC-V rv64gcv: miscompile at -O1/O2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121742
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121780
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120763
Bug 120763 depends on bug 121780, which changed state.
Bug 121780 Summary: [Trunk] RISC-V rv64gcv: miscompile at -O1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121780
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=122147
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120763
Bug 120763 depends on bug 121937, which changed state.
Bug 121937 Summary: [16 Regression] RISC-V rv64gcv: crash at -O3 during RTL
pass: combine
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121937
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121937
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53947
Bug 53947 depends on bug 120378, which changed state.
Bug 120378 Summary: Support narrowing clip idiom
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120378
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26163
Bug 26163 depends on bug 120378, which changed state.
Bug 120378 Summary: Support narrowing clip idiom
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120378
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120378
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118840
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WONTFIX
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113362
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |SUSPENDED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105870
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105330
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121973
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121652
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[15/16 Regression] round|[15 Regression] round
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118945
--- Comment #13 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
wrt c#12, clearly it's not moving fast enough. So once your patch is approved
by Robin we'll integrate it and close out this BZ.
Thanks for picking this up Zhongyao!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121937
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=122051
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=122106
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=122102
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=122051
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |law at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110812
--- Comment #35 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Not only that, hiway is too painfully slow to build that it would blow up
testing times beyond all usefullness.
As Sam noted, we reduce regressions from hiway and include those. We also rely
on the likes
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=122086
--- Comment #1 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Adding Edwin and Robin for awareness as it's virtually certain this is going to
be triggering failures in the RV CI system across many tests. My tester is
currently flaging 125-150 regressions related to t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=122106
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=122108
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2025-10-01
Status|UNCONFIR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111875
--- Comment #9 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Note we may be seeing the same core issue showing up outside the sanitizer
context. My tester flagged this on sh3eb-linux-gnu
Tests that now fail, but worked before (4 tests):
gcc: gcc.target/sh/cmpstr.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121778
--- Comment #5 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Yea, I don't see a great target in the rv64 dumps.
As far as the patch itself. I'd bet we want to change all those SIs to X so
that it works on rv64 on a comparable testcase like:
unsigned long test_011
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121983
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121985
--- Comment #5 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Somehow ranger is mucking things up.
=== BB 2
Imports: var_8
Exports: var_8
[local count: 153437704]:
var_8 = f;
pretmp_23 = a;
if (var_8 <= 5)
goto ; [85.7
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121983
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2025-09-18
Status|UNCONFIR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121910
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121982
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|law at gcc dot gnu.org |bergner at gcc dot
gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121985
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |law at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121512
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110812
--- Comment #31 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
*** Bug 121512 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120763
Bug 120763 depends on bug 121512, which changed state.
Bug 121512 Summary: internal compiler error: in generate_insn, at
config/riscv/riscv-vector-builtins.cc:4470
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121512
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58727
--- Comment #7 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
So part of the problem here is the ARM and x86 ports will accept the
"simplified" constant in their AND patterns. The ARM port will eventually
split it into components, but by then it's too late to clean th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121889
--- Comment #4 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Doesn't really make much sense to me. Your error is way up in the front-end
while the fusion change is deep in the RTL pipeline.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108016
--- Comment #15 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
WRT c#14. Yes, if had a stack object and the references to it go away during
the later optimization phases, then the useless stack adjustments will be left
lying around. I don't have the PR for that prob
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120811
--- Comment #10 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Just a quick update. We're seeing really good results with Shreya's in-flight
work. Hoping to test cactusBSSN on design this week.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121652
--- Comment #16 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
WRT c#13, yes, it's worth it, the performance gains were huge. Of course if we
look out Zfa should become ubiquitious and that other path won't matter. But
we're not at that point yet IMHO.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57650
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121660
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120763
Bug 120763 depends on bug 121660, which changed state.
Bug 121660 Summary: [16 Regression] RISC-V: internal compiler error: in
apply_scale, at profile-count.h:1187
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121660
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121523
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||skothadiya at whileone dot in
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121778
Bug ID: 121778
Summary: Improve rotation detection for RISC-V
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65266
--- Comment #1 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
So I took at peek at this as it looked like it might be an interesting missed
optimization case for one my interns.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121213
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121548
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|120763 |
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121753
Bug ID: 121753
Summary: [16 Regression] Recent vectorizer changes causes ICE
in vect_build_slp_tree_2
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89828
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99951
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101822
Bug 101822 depends on bug 7, which changed state.
Bug 7 Summary: Missed optimisation with -Os
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7
--- Comment #8 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Seems to be fixed on the trunk.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121548
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[15/16 Regression] ICE: |[15 Regression] ICE:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65964
Bug 65964 depends on bug 14617, which changed state.
Bug 14617 Summary: [tree-ssa] suboptimal code ('0' <= c && c <= '9') ? c - '0'
: 0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14617
What|Removed |Added
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14617
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17108
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117169
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118037
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121213
--- Comment #6 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
And you'll note the bug is still open and that Austin explicitly indicated the
redundant sign extend is still in there. That's a separate issue that needs a
completely different approach to solve.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121268
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|120763 |
--- Comment #2 from Jeffrey A. Law -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121548
--- Comment #1 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
It looks like we're unconditionally trying to get the merge_op_idx on an insn
that doesn't support that:
(insn 16 15 17 2 (set (subreg:V1DF (reg:RVVM1DF 149 [ _4 ]) 0)
(mem:V1DF (reg/f:DI 151 [ q
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121548
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2025-08-25
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121656
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120811
--- Comment #9 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Costing should prevent mvconst_internal from causing problems in this case.
>From the compiler's current cost model mvconst_internal+add has the same cost
as addi+addi. So there's no reason for combine to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121498
--- Comment #11 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
I still need to throw it under a debugger, but I suspect it's the whole
prologue/epilogue shrink wrapping that's the problem here. The component based
shrink wrapping code excludes RA.
Assuming that's th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120553
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121523
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120763
Bug 120763 depends on bug 120141, which changed state.
Bug 120141 Summary: [RVV] Noop are not removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120141
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120141
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WONTFIX
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117421
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118618
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|120763 |
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121538
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121538
--- Comment #3 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Fixed by Dimitar's patch on the trunk.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119275
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
1 - 100 of 1650 matches
Mail list logo