https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99918
Jeffrey A. Law <law at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|[12/13/14/15 Regression] |[12/13/14 Regression] |suboptimal code for bool |suboptimal code for bool |bitfield tests |bitfield tests CC| |law at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #13 from Jeffrey A. Law <law at gcc dot gnu.org> --- The main bug (and known regression) has been fixed on the trunk. However the additional testcase in c#9 has not. Given c#9 was unaffected by the changes on the trunk and we have no sense if c#9 is a regression or not, I've extracted that testcase into a new bug (bz118267) and I'm adjusting the regression markers on this bug.