https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115892
Surya Kumari Jangala changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115894
--- Comment #1 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Surya Kumari Jangala
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:60ba989220d9dec07d82009b0dafe684e652577f
commit r15-2036-g60ba989220d9dec07d82009b0dafe684e652577f
Author: Surya Kumari Jang
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115872
Hongtao Liu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115872
--- Comment #5 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by hongtao Liu
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:13bfc385b0baebd22aeabb0d90915f2e9b18febe
commit r14-10422-g13bfc385b0baebd22aeabb0d90915f2e9b18febe
Author: liuhongt
Date:
สำหรับเจ้าของกิจการ ที่มี Project ต่อยอดเพิ่มกำไรให้ธุรกิจ
แต่ยังหาทุนทรัพย์ไม่ทัน (เราช่วยคุณได้)
✔️สำหรับเจ้าของธุรกิจที่มีการจดทะเบียน ใบประกอบกิจการ
✔️อนุมัติสูงสุด 5,000,000 บาท
✔️ไม่เช็คเครดิต บูโรเอกสารไม่ยุ่งยาก ไม่ต้องมีบุคคลค้ำประกัน
✔️อัตราดอกเบี้ยเริ่มต้น1.5%
✔️ตัดต้นลดดอกเบี้ยทันที
ถ้า
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115872
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by hongtao Liu
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9a1cdaa5e8441394d613f5f3401e7aab21efe8f0
commit r13-8913-g9a1cdaa5e8441394d613f5f3401e7aab21efe8f0
Author: liuhongt
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115872
--- Comment #3 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by hongtao Liu
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e1427b39d28f382d21e7a0ea1714b3250e0a6e5d
commit r12-10617-ge1427b39d28f382d21e7a0ea1714b3250e0a6e5d
Author: liuhongt
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115892
--- Comment #1 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Surya Kumari Jangala
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8b1492012e5a11e9400e30ee4ae9195c08a2a81e
commit r15-2034-g8b1492012e5a11e9400e30ee4ae9195c08a2a81e
Author: Surya Kumari Jang
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115932
Bug ID: 115932
Summary: [15 Regression] performance regression after
r15-1619-g3b9b8d6cfdf593
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115931
Bug ID: 115931
Summary: mips: vec_pack_usat_m's pattern is wrong at
gcc/config/mips/loongson-mmi.md:167
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115526
--- Comment #14 from Sam James ---
(In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #12)
> (In reply to Andreas K. Huettel from comment #11)
> > > Can someone please regression test the attached patch?
> >
> > More in a bit, but:
> Any progress with testi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110057
--- Comment #16 from user202729 ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #14)
> So something like this, and then use it in containers instead of
> _Alloc_traits::destroy
>
> template
> _GLIBCXX20_CONSTEXPR
> void
> _Destroy_s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115706
--- Comment #8 from Dev Dude ---
Hmmm it seems adding an attachment lost my comment. I'll try to remember most
of it.
First, thanks Nathaniel for your polite comments. Much appreciated.
I'm not sure why Sam is mentioning multiple bugs because
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115889
Hongtao Liu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53947
Bug 53947 depends on bug 115889, which changed state.
Bug 115889 Summary: [15 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-vfa-03.c execution
test with -march=znver4 --param vect-partial-vector-usage=1 since
r15-1368-g6d0b7b69d14302
https://gcc.gnu.org/bu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115889
--- Comment #8 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Hongyu Wang :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:02a3bf5e2f0c18078bf67fc0002219edba1d76ff
commit r15-2030-g02a3bf5e2f0c18078bf67fc0002219edba1d76ff
Author: Hongyu Wang
Date: Sat J
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115049
--- Comment #12 from LIU Hao ---
Created attachment 58662
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58662&action=edit
test patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115706
--- Comment #7 from Dev Dude ---
Created attachment 58661
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58661&action=edit
A script to try to build gcc module headers
A script to try to build gcc module headers, used in absence of knowing
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115930
Bug ID: 115930
Summary: ICE: tree check: expected type_argument_pack or
nontype_argument_pack, have integer_type in
template_parm_natural_p, at cp/mangle.cc:1828
Product: g
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115706
Nathaniel Shead changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nshead at gcc dot gnu.org
S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115185
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Mileston
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55004
Bug 55004 depends on bug 115902, which changed state.
Bug 115902 Summary: [14/15 Regression] Can't call immediate function within "if
consteval" when optimizing
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115902
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115583
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gcc at nospam dot
scs.stanford.edu
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115902
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115902
--- Comment #3 from David Mazières ---
This might be the same as Bug 115583.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115877
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115877
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|NEW
Resolution|DUPLICATE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109682
--- Comment #3 from Arsen Arsenović ---
further reduced reproducer (this one should also be fully valid):
#include
#include
struct test
{
test () {}
test (int) {}
struct promise_type {
test get_return_object () { return {}; }
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115925
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.2
Version|unknown
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115929
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |15.0
Version|unknown
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115927
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at gcc dot gnu.org
Stat
: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib
gcc version 15.0.0 20240714 (experimental) (GCC)
[552] %
[552] % gcctk -O2 -fno-gcse -fschedule-insns -fno-guess-branch-probability
-fno-tree-fre -fno-tree-ch small.c
during RTL pass: late_combine
small.c: In function ‘main’:
small.c:42:1: internal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114864
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski ---
*** Bug 115926 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115926
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|UNCONFIRME
igure --disable-bootstrap
--enable-checking=yes --prefix=/local/suz-local/software/local/gcc-trunk
--enable-sanitizers --enable-languages=c,c++ --disable-werror --enable-multilib
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib
gcc version 15.0.0 20240714 (experimental) (GCC)
[537] %
[5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115926
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|tree-optimization |ipa
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski
-gnu
Configured with: ../gcc-trunk/configure --disable-bootstrap
--enable-checking=yes --prefix=/local/suz-local/software/local/gcc-trunk
--enable-sanitizers --enable-languages=c,c++ --disable-werror --enable-multilib
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib
gcc version
igure --disable-bootstrap
--enable-checking=yes --prefix=/local/suz-local/software/local/gcc-trunk
--enable-sanitizers --enable-languages=c,c++ --disable-werror --enable-multilib
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib
gcc version 15.0.0 20240714 (experimental) (GCC)
[583] %
[5
/local/suz-local/software/local/gcc-trunk
--enable-sanitizers --enable-languages=c,c++ --disable-werror --enable-multilib
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib
gcc version 15.0.0 20240714 (experimental) (GCC)
[517] %
[517] % gcctk -O1 small.c; ./a.out
[518] %
[518] % gcct
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115924
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
Note better example:
```
#include
uint32_t f(uint32_t i2, uint32_t aa, uint32_t aa1)
{
return ((i2 >> 17) + (aa >> 17) + (aa1 >> 17)) << 17;
}
uint32_t fa(uint32_t i2, uint32_t aa, uint32_t aa1)
{
ecking=yes --prefix=/local/suz-local/software/local/gcc-trunk
--enable-sanitizers --enable-languages=c,c++ --disable-werror --enable-multilib
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib
gcc version 15.0.0 20240714 (experimental) (GCC)
[522] %
[522] % gcctk -O2 small.c; ./a.out
[52
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115924
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
Note clang also falls over for 3 additions and swapping the order of the
addition just slightly.
```
#include
int32_t f(int32_t i2, int32_t aa, int32_t aa1)
{
return ((i2 >> 17) + (aa >> 17) + (aa1 >>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115924
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|tree-optimization |middle-end
--- Comment #1 from Andrew P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109682
Arsen Arsenović changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2024-07-14
Status|UNCONFI
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115924
Bug ID: 115924
Summary: Failure to optimize back and forth shifts of several
operands by the same amount with operations in the
middle to ands
Product: gcc
Versi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105989
Arsen Arsenović changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||arsen at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99798
--- Comment #5 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Mikael Morin
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c80a7460239037d8cf8426dbb7d03c6ddac09bab
commit r14-10420-gc80a7460239037d8cf8426dbb7d03c6ddac09bab
Author: Mikael Morin
Da
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115706
--- Comment #5 from Dev Dude ---
I'm not sure what's difficult about me posing a question about what the correct
way is to build module headers so they all build properly, and also providing
my own script to show what I'm doing in absence of kno
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115705
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115706
--- Comment #4 from Sam James ---
I'd really suggest filing one bug per issue in future. Making it very clear
what a specific bug is about and how to reproduce with a standalone attachment
is good too (your last issue at least seems to need your
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115706
--- Comment #3 from Dev Dude ---
Hello, any update on this bug? Has anyone run the script I provided in the
prior post for building the module headers? Or can anyone comment on the
correct way to build module headers? I can't progress on modules
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115705
--- Comment #4 from Dev Dude ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #3)
> Confirmed; suspended.
>
> We should do a fix includes once this has been fixed in glibc.
Any follow up / update on this. The related glibc bug says that should be a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102707
Arsen Arsenović changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||arsen at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115915
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2024-07-14
Status|UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115923
Bug ID: 115923
Summary: different diagnostic if using qualified name vs not
for missing template arguments
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115915
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
The question is does that friend is naming `::extent` or is naming
`std_1::extent` using the `using namespace` statement. I suspect GCC and EDG
think it is `::extent` while clang and MSVC think it is `std_1:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115912
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109828
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||iamanonymous.cs at gmail dot
com
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115920
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115877
--- Comment #4 from Sam James ---
(In reply to Andreas Schwab from comment #3)
> dup
>
> *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 115916 ***
This came first and it has a smaller testcase? The other is fine too, of course
though.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115912
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115916
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115916
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zsojka at seznam dot cz
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115877
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115918
--- Comment #2 from Arsen Arsenović ---
Created attachment 58660
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58660&action=edit
fail.log but with the patchlet applied
No, at least not entirely.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115922
Bug ID: 115922
Summary: Missed optimization: MIPS: clear bit 15
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115921
Bug ID: 115921
Summary: Missed optimization: and->ashift might be cheaper than
ashift->and on typical RISC targets
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115912
--- Comment #2 from Sam James ---
Surrounding this template from src/hb-open-type.hh w/ optimize("O0") cures it:
```
template
struct HBFixed : Type
{
static constexpr float shift = (float) (1 << fraction_bits);
static_assert (Type::static_s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113460
--- Comment #4 from Arsen Arsenović ---
actually, it seems to be the comma, not the fold; the following also fails:
#include
#include
#include
#include
using namespace std;
template
[[nodiscard]] auto
concat(Range1&& range1, Range2&& ran
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115914
Arsen Arsenović changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||arsen at gcc dot gnu.org
Reso
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113460
Arsen Arsenović changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hewillk at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115920
Bug ID: 115920
Summary: ICE: in tree_to_poly_int64, at tree.cc:3319
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115919
Bug ID: 115919
Summary: ICE: in tsubst_expr, at cp/pt.cc:20300
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115918
--- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab ---
Does the pseudo patch in PR115876#c7 help?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115918
Bug ID: 115918
Summary: Bootstrap failure in GNAT with
--with-build-config=bootstrap-lto
--enable-languages=c,ada,c++,lto
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115917
Bug ID: 115917
Summary: GNAT fails to bootstrap with LTO and
-Werror=lto-type-mismatch due to C_Version_String and
gnat_version_string on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
Product: gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115916
--- Comment #2 from Andreas Schwab ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115876#c7
It broke the ASHIFT case.
-return mask >> INTVAL (XEXP (x, 1));
+return (HOST_WIDE_INT)mask >> INTVAL (XEXP (x, 1));
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115916
Sergei Trofimovich changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113460
--- Comment #2 from Arsen Arsenović ---
this is a double-free it would seem.
but, the following works:
#include
#include
#include
#include
using namespace std;
template
[[nodiscard]] auto
concat(Range1&& range1, Range2&& range2) -> gene
O1 -g0'
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib
gcc version 15.0.0 20240714 (experimental) (GCC)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115049
--- Comment #11 from LIU Hao ---
The function template `std::discard_block_engine::operator()` is instantiated
in both translation units. The two specializations use different sets of
caller-saved registers. Specifically, the specialization in '
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115915
Bug ID: 115915
Summary: gcc fails to detect invalid friend declaration of
classes in different namespaces
Product: gcc
Version: 13.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keyw
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115914
--- Comment #2 from 康桓瑋 ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> I suspect this is a dup of bug 113460.
Definitely.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115876
--- Comment #7 from Andreas Schwab ---
It broke the ASHIFT case.
-return mask >> INTVAL (XEXP (x, 1));
+return (HOST_WIDE_INT)mask >> INTVAL (XEXP (x, 1));
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102609
--- Comment #30 from Gašper Ažman ---
I don't really understand what you meant by "they have corresponding object
parameters" - you mean that the object parameters are equal in both constraint
and type? "Corresponding" to my recollection is only
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115876
--- Comment #6 from Andreas Schwab ---
Probably that broke the sign extensions in carry_backpropagate.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115876
--- Comment #5 from Andreas Schwab ---
Note that the return type of carry_backpropagate should be unsigned as well,
but that does not fix the crash.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115876
--- Comment #4 from Andreas Schwab ---
This breaks build for m68k:
libtool: compile: /daten/aranym/gcc/test/Build/./gcc/xgcc -shared-libgcc
-B/daten/aranym/gcc/test/Build/./gcc -nostdinc++
-L/daten/aranym/gcc/test/Build/m68k-linux/libstdc++-v3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115049
--- Comment #10 from LIU Hao ---
(In reply to LIU Hao from comment #9)
> The bug exists around the initialization of a global variable in 'file2.cpp':
This is incorrect. The argument to `operator new` is `4` so the bug happens for
initializatio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115049
--- Comment #9 from LIU Hao ---
Created attachment 58656
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58656&action=edit
reduced testcase
After spending four days on this, I have reduced a testcase. `./test.sh` should
reproduce the segfa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115185
--- Comment #12 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Martin Uecker :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:44c9403ed1833ae71a59e84f9e37af3182be0df5
commit r15-2026-g44c9403ed1833ae71a59e84f9e37af3182be0df5
Author: Alejandro Colomar
Date
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115902
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comme
92 matches
Mail list logo
