[Bug middle-end/105469] "execution reached an unreachable program point" with -flto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105469 --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener --- I can reproduce what you observe with -O3 -fwhole-program -fsanitize=unreachable (without the sanitize it gets into an infinite loop). -fno-ipa-cp-clone avoids the issue (whatever it is exactly). Can you

[Bug c++/104142] [9/10/11 Regression] Spurious warning unused-variable on const static variable and defaulted constructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104142 --- Comment #7 from Mike Hommey --- (In reply to Mike Hommey from comment #6) > There's a different warning that interestingly only happens on 11.2 and 11.3 > (not 11.1 or earlier versions), that is fixed by the patch in this bug: Forgot to men

[Bug c++/104142] [9/10/11 Regression] Spurious warning unused-variable on const static variable and defaulted constructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104142 Mike Hommey changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mh+gcc at glandium dot org --- Comment #6

[Bug tree-optimization/102892] [12/13 Regression] Dead Code Elimination Regression at -O3 (trunk vs 11.2.0)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102892 --- Comment #13 from palmer at gcc dot gnu.org --- I just posted a patch that removes the undefined behavior from this test case, with that it links on RISC-V.

[Bug tree-optimization/102892] [12/13 Regression] Dead Code Elimination Regression at -O3 (trunk vs 11.2.0)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102892 palmer at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||palmer at gcc dot gnu.org --

[Bug c++/105470] ranged for loop whitespace parsing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105470 --- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #5) > GCC even tells you exactly how to fix the code. > > Here's the GCC error reformatted to make it a bit easier to read: > > error: loop variable it of type > c

[Bug libstdc++/93978] A snippet using views::join fails to compile with -O1, but succeeds with -O0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93978 Bug 93978 depends on bug 94038, which changed state. Bug 94038 Summary: [9/10 Regression] Compiling with -Wall causes function template body to get needlessly instantiated https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94038 What|Re

[Bug c++/94038] [9/10 Regression] Compiling with -Wall causes function template body to get needlessly instantiated

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94038 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|10.4|11.0 Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/97679] [10 Regression] [concepts] ICE with CTAD for a nested class template with constrained constructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97679 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Target Milestone|10.4

[Bug c++/67491] [meta-bug] concepts issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67491 Bug 67491 depends on bug 105064, which changed state. Bug 105064 Summary: [10 Regression] requires crashes gcc https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105064 What|Removed |Added

[Bug c++/105064] [10 Regression] requires crashes gcc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105064 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Target Milestone|10.4

[Bug c++/103885] [9/10 Regression] ICE in capturing lambda for certain constexpr/auto combination

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103885 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|9.5 |11.3 Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/104507] [10 Regression] internal compiler error: unexpected expression ‘(int)(__ret)’ of kind cast_expr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104507 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|10.4|11.3 Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/105470] ranged for loop whitespace parsing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105470 --- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely --- GCC even tells you exactly how to fix the code. Here's the GCC error reformatted to make it a bit easier to read: error: loop variable it of type const std::pair& binds to a temporary constructed from ty

[Bug c++/105470] ranged for loop whitespace parsing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105470 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/105470] ranged for loop whitespace parsing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105470 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely --- It looks more like you're using -Werror and a new warning in the new GCC is being turned into an error, because you asked for it.

[Bug c++/105470] ranged for loop whitespace parsing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105470 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2022-05-03 Status|UNCONFIRM

[Bug c++/105470] ranged for loop whitespace parsing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105470 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c++/105470] New: ranged for loop whitespace parsing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105470 Bug ID: 105470 Summary: ranged for loop whitespace parsing Product: gcc Version: 11.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug c++/105469] New: "execution reached an unreachable program point" with -flto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105469 Bug ID: 105469 Summary: "execution reached an unreachable program point" with -flto Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal P

[Bug target/105468] Suboptimal code generation for access of function parameters and return values of type __float128 on x86-64 Windows target.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105468 --- Comment #4 from Michael_S --- Created attachment 52925 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52925&action=edit build script

[Bug target/105468] Suboptimal code generation for access of function parameters and return values of type __float128 on x86-64 Windows target.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105468 --- Comment #3 from Michael_S --- Created attachment 52924 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52924&action=edit Another test bench that shows lower impact on Zen3, but higher impact on some Intel CPUs

[Bug target/105468] Suboptimal code generation for access of function parameters and return values of type __float128 on x86-64 Windows target.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105468 --- Comment #2 from Michael_S --- Created attachment 52923 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52923&action=edit test bench that shows lower impact on Zen3, but higher impact on some Intel CPUs

[Bug target/105468] Suboptimal code generation for access of function parameters and return values of type __float128 on x86-64 Windows target.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105468 --- Comment #1 from Michael_S --- Created attachment 52922 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52922&action=edit test bench that demonstrates maximal impact on Zen3

[Bug target/105468] New: Suboptimal code generation for access of function parameters and return values of type __float128 on x86-64 Windows target.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105468 Bug ID: 105468 Summary: Suboptimal code generation for access of function parameters and return values of type __float128 on x86-64 Windows target. Product: gcc

[Bug c++/105351] [concepts] Constraint checking does correctly match static member attributes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105351 --- Comment #7 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a16fc9f1c96c7361d0b7a83a06f3649ace6c440d commit r13-95-ga16fc9f1c96c7361d0b7a83a06f3649ace6c440d Author: Patrick Palka Date: Tue

[Bug tree-optimization/102950] [11/12/13 Regression] Dead Code Elimination Regression at -O3 (trunk&11.2.0 vs 10.3.0)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102950 --- Comment #6 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Roger Sayle : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b3e98eb3396e16ae8b20c94916bc2bd7862d2c97 commit r13-89-gb3e98eb3396e16ae8b20c94916bc2bd7862d2c97 Author: Roger Sayle Date: Tue May

[Bug libstdc++/105324] std::from_chars() assertion at floating_from_chars.cc:78 when parsing 1.11111111....

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105324 --- Comment #7 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Alexandre Oliva : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:25389f3de489c25a6983db96428a6bf06aedc829 commit r13-87-g25389f3de489c25a6983db96428a6bf06aedc829 Author: Alexandre Oliva Date:

[Bug other/105404] new version of zlib

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105404 --- Comment #7 from David Binderman --- (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #6) > Can't see the warning when I build the current zlib library with clang. You might need to switch on -Wall or (more likely) -Wextra. > Can you please paste a b

[Bug target/105460] sizeof (unsigned int) != sizeof (uint8_t *)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105460 --- Comment #4 from Iain Sandoe --- for the record, I am aware of the issue and Matt (github reference quoted below) proposed a patch - however that patch breaks Objective-C++ and it's "in my queue" to see how we can produce a version that allow

[Bug c++/105465] С++14 behaviour of inherited constructors broken

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105465 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely --- And this was already explained in the stackoverflow answer.

[Bug c++/105465] С++14 behaviour of inherited constructors broken

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105465 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/105460] sizeof (unsigned int) != sizeof (uint8_t *)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105460 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||iains at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug target/105463] [11/12/13 Regression] MVE: Wrong code, incorrect alignment assumption

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105463 --- Comment #5 from Alex Coplan --- FWIW (which is probably not much) with -O3 the problem started with r11-3681-g29c650cd899496c4f9bc069d03d0d7ecfb632176 . commit 29c650cd899496c4f9bc069d03d0d7ecfb632176 Author: Dennis Zhang Date: Tue Oct 6

[Bug target/105073] [meta bug]Patch pending for GCC13.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105073 Bug 105073 depends on bug 105079, which changed state. Bug 105079 Summary: _mm_storeu_si16 inefficiently uses pextrw to an integer reg (without SSE4.1) https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105079 What|Removed

[Bug target/105079] _mm_storeu_si16 inefficiently uses pextrw to an integer reg (without SSE4.1)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105079 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/105079] _mm_storeu_si16 inefficiently uses pextrw to an integer reg (without SSE4.1)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105079 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Uros Bizjak : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2680f5eec23805ab8a344f942ca5a7e180d57905 commit r13-86-g2680f5eec23805ab8a344f942ca5a7e180d57905 Author: Uros Bizjak Date: Tue May

[Bug modula2/101392] cc1gm2 -fdump-system-exports SEGV on Solaris/SPARC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101392 Gaius Mulley changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING --- Comment #2 from Gaius Mulley

[Bug c++/105467] New: Dependency file produced by C++ modules causes Ninja errors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105467 Bug ID: 105467 Summary: Dependency file produced by C++ modules causes Ninja errors Product: gcc Version: 11.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/105463] [11/12/13 Regression] MVE: Wrong code, incorrect alignment assumption

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105463 --- Comment #4 from Richard Earnshaw --- Vector loads on MVE need to be lane-sized aligned. I think the movmisalign pattern for MVE needs to emit VLDRB.8 regardless of the mode, rather than an inner-mode sized access. Fortunately, for little-e

[Bug fortran/105466] New: [OpenMP] declare simd(proc-name) rejected when proc-name = current procedure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105466 Bug ID: 105466 Summary: [OpenMP] declare simd(proc-name) rejected when proc-name = current procedure Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords:

[Bug c++/105351] [concepts] Constraint checking does correctly match static member attributes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105351 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Ever confirmed|0

[Bug c++/105351] [concepts] Constraint checking does correctly match static member attributes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105351 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #

[Bug target/105463] [11/12/13 Regression] MVE: Wrong code, incorrect alignment assumption

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105463 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|12.0|11.4 Summary|[12/13 Regress

[Bug target/105463] [12/13 Regression] MVE: Wrong code, incorrect alignment assumption

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105463 --- Comment #3 from Alex Coplan --- Note with -O3 GCC 11 also has the problem, it's just that with GCC 12 vectorization was enabled by default at -O2. GCC 10 seems unaffected.

[Bug libstdc++/105441] [12/13 Regression] The floating point overload of from_chars ignores 'P' for hex format

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105441 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug tree-optimization/103116] SLP vectoriser fails to peel for gaps

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103116 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener --- So the issue is we have group_size == 2 but nunits == 4 but still gap == 0. That makes get_group_load_store_type assume overrun_p = false. I suppose that when we'd have 8 elements in x and four times the f

[Bug c++/105452] [9/10/11/12/13 Regression] static_assert inside anonymous union inside a templated struct causes invalid "inaccessible within this context" error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105452 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug ipa/105438] [11/12/13 Regression] Incorrect array-bounds warning with array size carried over from a previous template instantiation since r11-4987-g602c6cfc79ce4ae6 since r11-4987-g602c6cfc79ce4

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105438 --- Comment #8 from Martin Liška --- So the 2 following functions are merged: void _Z9configureILi7EEvRAT__Kii.part.0<7> (const int[7] & in, const int nrows) { ... void _Z9configureILi2EEvRAT__Kii.part.0<2> (const int[2] & in, const int nrows)

[Bug ipa/105438] [11/12/13 Regression] Incorrect array-bounds warning with array size carried over from a previous template instantiation since r11-4987-g602c6cfc79ce4ae6 since r11-4987-g602c6cfc79ce4

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105438 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org Su

[Bug middle-end/105083] scev_initialize should check for loop prerequesites

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105083 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug middle-end/105083] scev_initialize should check for loop prerequesites

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105083 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7bb6fa5a1c77ef6af26c70e3126a8b1353d1f987 commit r13-84-g7bb6fa5a1c77ef6af26c70e3126a8b1353d1f987 Author: Richard Biener Date: T

[Bug other/105404] new version of zlib

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105404 --- Comment #6 from Martin Liška --- (In reply to David Binderman from comment #4) > (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #3) > > No, because we don't use the buggy Z_FIXED feature. > > Righto. Presumably the upgrade can be postponed until

[Bug target/105463] [12/13 Regression] MVE: Wrong code, incorrect alignment assumption

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105463 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener --- (define_insn "*movmisalign_mve_load" [(set (match_operand:MVE_VLD_ST 0 "s_register_operand" "=w") (unspec:MVE_VLD_ST [(match_operand:MVE_VLD_ST 1 "neon_permissive_s

[Bug target/105463] [12/13 Regression] MVE: Wrong code, incorrect alignment assumption

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105463 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |12.0 --- Comment #1 from Richard Biene

[Bug tree-optimization/105461] [12/13 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault (in verify_use) since r12-4608-gb4702276615ff8d4

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105461 --- Comment #5 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6b4cc784806ac8676a08ecbbeadbd1bfa56073bb commit r13-83-g6b4cc784806ac8676a08ecbbeadbd1bfa56073bb Author: Richard Biener Date: T

[Bug debug/105464] '-fcompare-debug' failure (length) w/ -Og -fharden-compares -fno-tree-dce

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105464 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug modula2/102340] gm2 test sources shouldn't be executable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102340 Gaius Mulley changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug modula2/101389] Parallel build doesn't work

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101389 Gaius Mulley changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/105465] New: С++14 behaviour of inherited constructors broken

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105465 Bug ID: 105465 Summary: С++14 behaviour of inherited constructors broken Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug debug/105464] New: '-fcompare-debug' failure (length) w/ -Og -fharden-compares -fno-tree-dce

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105464 Bug ID: 105464 Summary: '-fcompare-debug' failure (length) w/ -Og -fharden-compares -fno-tree-dce Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: comp

[Bug target/105463] New: [12/13 Regression] MVE: Wrong code, incorrect alignment assumption

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105463 Bug ID: 105463 Summary: [12/13 Regression] MVE: Wrong code, incorrect alignment assumption Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug middle-end/105001] If executing with non-nvptx offloading, but nvptx offloading compilation is enabled: FAIL: libgomp.c/pr104783.c execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105001 Thomas Schwinge changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comme

[Bug target/105394] [12 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed with MVE during GIMPLE pass: veclower2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105394 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||13.0 Summary|[12/13 Regress

[Bug target/105394] [12/13 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed with MVE during GIMPLE pass: veclower2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105394 --- Comment #11 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:dfae0c5a29f336cdab234b28999f9ba9dc20a4d0 commit r13-81-gdfae0c5a29f336cdab234b28999f9ba9dc20a4d0 Author: Richard Biener Date:

[Bug rtl-optimization/105459] [12/13 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault (in record_operand_costs) since r12-3721-g63c6446f77b9001d

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105459 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |12.0

[Bug target/105394] [12/13 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed with MVE during GIMPLE pass: veclower2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105394 --- Comment #10 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Tue, 3 May 2022, acoplan at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105394 > > --- Comment #9 from Alex Coplan --- > Testing looks good: I regression tested a

[Bug tree-optimization/105462] [13 Regression] ice in set_range_info_raw, at tree-ssanames.cc:356

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105462 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org Resolu

[Bug rtl-optimization/105459] [12/13 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault (in record_operand_costs) since r12-3721-g63c6446f77b9001d

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105459 --- Comment #3 from Martin Liška --- But it's likely older as the revision revealed wrong streaming in of info->fp_expressions.

[Bug c++/105452] [9/10/11/12/13 Regression] static_assert inside anonymous union inside a templated struct causes invalid "inaccessible within this context" error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105452 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |9.5 Known to work|

[Bug rtl-optimization/105459] [12/13 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault (in record_operand_costs) since r12-3721-g63c6446f77b9001d

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105459 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/105458] [12/13 Regression] ICE in set_relation, at value-relation.cc:609 since r12-4790-g4b3a325f07acebf4

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105458 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org Sum

[Bug rtl-optimization/105455] ICE: verify_flow_info failed (error: verify_flow_info: REG_BR_PROB does not match cfg)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105455 --- Comment #1 from Martin Liška --- Started with introduction of -fharden-conditional-branches in r12-4759-g95bb87b2458bfab4.

[Bug rtl-optimization/105455] ICE: verify_flow_info failed (error: verify_flow_info: REG_BR_PROB does not match cfg)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105455 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org St

[Bug c++/105452] static_assert inside nameless nested union: invalid "inaccessible within this context" error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105452 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/105394] [12/13 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed with MVE during GIMPLE pass: veclower2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105394 --- Comment #9 from Alex Coplan --- Testing looks good: I regression tested a cross toolchain configured with --with-arch=armv8.1-m.main+mve: no regressions, and it fixes the problem seen here: FAIL->PASS: g++.dg/opt/pr79734.C -std=gnu++14 (te

[Bug tree-optimization/105461] [12/13 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault (in verify_use) since r12-4608-gb4702276615ff8d4

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105461 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener --- diff --git a/gcc/toplev.cc b/gcc/toplev.cc index ed546b2cad8..60497845dfe 100644 --- a/gcc/toplev.cc +++ b/gcc/toplev.cc @@ -1478,6 +1478,7 @@ process_options (bool no_backend) "by t

[Bug tree-optimization/105461] [12/13 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault (in verify_use) since r12-4608-gb4702276615ff8d4

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105461 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[12/13 Regression] ICE: |[12/13 Regression] ICE:

[Bug tree-optimization/105461] [12/13 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault (in verify_use)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105461 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||needs-bisection Summary|ICE

[Bug tree-optimization/105461] ICE: Segmentation fault (in verify_use)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105461 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2022-05-03 Status|UNCONFIR

[Bug tree-optimization/105462] [13 Regression] ice in set_range_info_raw, at tree-ssanames.cc:356

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105462 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug tree-optimization/105462] [13 Regression] ice in set_range_info_raw, at tree-ssanames.cc:356

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105462 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org Target Mile

[Bug tree-optimization/105462] ice in set_range_info_raw, at tree-ssanames.cc:356

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105462 --- Comment #1 from David Binderman --- Reduced C code is int mpfr_atan_aux_r; void mpfr_atan() { 2 * mpfr_atan_aux_r > mpfr_atan_aux_r ?: __builtin_unreachable(); mpfr_atan_aux_r = 2 * mpfr_atan_aux_r; }

[Bug c/105462] New: ice in set_range_info_raw, at tree-ssanames.cc:356

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105462 Bug ID: 105462 Summary: ice in set_range_info_raw, at tree-ssanames.cc:356 Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Componen

[Bug rtl-optimization/105453] [9/10/11 Regression] load introduced by ce1 for conditional loads at -O1, might cause issues with the C/C++ memory model

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105453 --- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1) > There is no issue here as there is no atomic barrier as required by the c11 > and c++11 standards in their memory model I agree that GCC's output is allowed b

[Bug target/105460] sizeof (unsigned int) != sizeof (uint8_t *)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105460 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to zhonghao from comment #0) > Clang's comments say there is an `unsigned int`-sized "reserved" member > here, Where is "here"? Don't just copy comments from code on GitHub and paste them as big

[Bug tree-optimization/105461] New: ICE: Segmentation fault (in verify_use)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105461 Bug ID: 105461 Summary: ICE: Segmentation fault (in verify_use) Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-checking, ice-on-valid-code Severity: normal

[Bug rtl-optimization/105459] ICE: Segmentation fault (in record_operand_costs)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105459 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org,