https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105394
--- Comment #10 from rguenther at suse dot de <rguenther at suse dot de> --- On Tue, 3 May 2022, acoplan at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105394 > > --- Comment #9 from Alex Coplan <acoplan at gcc dot gnu.org> --- > Testing looks good: I regression tested a cross toolchain configured with > --with-arch=armv8.1-m.main+mve: no regressions, and it fixes the problem seen > here: > > FAIL->PASS: g++.dg/opt/pr79734.C -std=gnu++14 (test for excess errors) > FAIL->PASS: g++.dg/opt/pr79734.C -std=gnu++17 (test for excess errors) > FAIL->PASS: g++.dg/opt/pr79734.C -std=gnu++20 (test for excess errors) > FAIL->PASS: g++.dg/opt/pr79734.C -std=gnu++98 (test for excess errors) Good, I'll push the patch to trunk then.
