sfully on the first line – I use timeout because sometimes
> the compiler goes into an infinite loop – the 2nd line requires the
> compiler to issue an internal error as the first line of output. Grep
> returns 0 if the pattern is found
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* sameer
Hi,
I am Shubham Narlawar. Currently, I am a Computer Engineering undergrad
student at Pune University, India. I am interested in contributing to GCC
for GSOC 2019.
We have done a project from GCC GSOC 2018 idea list which is implementing
Csmith fuzzer leveraging GCC C Extensions under the
n, Feb 10 2019, Shubham Narlawar wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am Shubham Narlawar. Currently, I am a Computer Engineering undergrad
> > student at Pune University, India. I am interested in contributing to GCC
> > for GSOC 2019.
> >
> > We have done a project
On Wed, Apr 3, 2019 at 10:01 PM Martin Jambor wrote:
> Hello Shubham,
>
> On Fri, Mar 29 2019, Shubham Narlawar wrote:
> > Hi, here is my proposal for the above idea. Please review and suggest
> > necessary changes.
> >
> >
>
On Thu, Apr 4, 2019 at 2:13 PM Martin Liška wrote:
> On 4/3/19 6:31 PM, Martin Jambor wrote:
> > Hello Shubham,
> >
> > On Fri, Mar 29 2019, Shubham Narlawar wrote:
> >> Hi, here is my proposal for the above idea. Please review and suggest
> >&g
On Fri, Apr 5, 2019 at 5:37 PM Martin Liška wrote:
> On 4/4/19 1:44 PM, Shubham Narlawar wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 4, 2019 at 2:13 PM Martin Liška wrote:
> >
> >> On 4/3/19 6:31 PM, Martin Jambor wrote:
> >>> Hello Shubham,
> >>>
> >>>
On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 2:13 PM Martin Liška wrote:
> On 5/15/19 9:49 AM, Shubham Narlawar wrote:
> > Hello Martin and community,
>
> Hi Shubham.
>
> Thank you for starting working on the project. There are some
> recommendations
> before we fully being:
>
> 1
On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 2:23 PM Martin Liška wrote:
> On 5/15/19 9:49 AM, Shubham Narlawar wrote:
> > void func_1();
> > void func_3();
> > .
> >
> > void foo1() __attribute__ ((weak, alias("func_1")));
> > void foo3() __attribute__ ((weak,
Thanks. I will use plain text.
On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 2:32 PM Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>
> On Wed, 15 May 2019 at 10:24, Shubham Narlawar wrote:
> > I tried to send you Aligned patch and one csmith program but it bounces
> > back. I don't know why it happened. Sorry for sen
Hello,
>From the gimple statement or basic block, is there any way to get
function pointer? From gimple structure, I am able to get basic block
but unable to get function pointer neither from basic block nor
gimple.
Regards,
Shubham
Hello,
I'm writing a Simple LTO pass. I have placed my optimization routine under
execute() hook. In my optimization routine, I want to delete an
instruction for which I have the gimple_stmt_iterator. If I call
gsi_remove(gsi, true), it causes a crash in remove_stmt_from_en_lp_fn()
where it is
Hello all, I have been figuring out to work on some project. So while
searching I found GCC Plugin API project quite interesting.
So, please can I get some more information and links about gcc Plugin API
project.
Can anyone help me please.
Hello,
I am working on gcc-4.9.4 and encountered different results of loop
vectorization on array arr0, arr1 and arr2.
Testcase -
int main()
{
int i;
for (i=0; i<64; i++)
{
arr2[i]=(arr1[i]|arr0[i]);
}
}
Using -O2 -ftree-vectorize, Above loop is vectorized if arr
On Tue, 16 Feb, 2021, 5:55 PM Shuai Wang via Gcc, wrote:
> Thank you for your reply!
>
> I tried to use this in the following code:
>
> tree func_decl = gimple_call_fndecl(stmt); // stmt is the function call
> statement
> function* f = DECL_STRUCT_FUNCTION(func_decl);
> std::cerr << get_name(f->
Hello,
Is there a direct way to print the name of the function call in gimple call
statement?
For example -
void bar() {
a = foo();//gimple* stmt
}
I want to print "foo" from the above gimple*.
I traced debug_gimple_stmt(gimple*) but it seems complex to just print
"foo".
Thanks and R
On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 2:51 AM David Malcolm wrote:
>
> On Sun, 2021-10-10 at 23:04 +0530, Shubham Narlawar via Gcc wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Is there a direct way to print the name of the function call in gimple
> > call
> > statement?
> >
> >
Hello,
I have a PHI node that defines a variable that is used in 1 statement. I
then delete the statement. I think I need to update the PHI node to no
longer reference that variable. I looked through some code and I don't see
a way to just remove an element from a PHI node and I see in the file
o
On Thu, 16 Dec, 2021, 6:28 pm Richard Biener,
wrote:
> On December 16, 2021 7:33:37 AM GMT+01:00, Shubham Narlawar via Gcc <
> gcc@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
> >Hello,
> >
> >
> >I have a PHI node that defines a variable that is used in 1 statement. I
> >th
Hello,
My aim is to iterate over gimple call stmt parameters and check
whether it is constant or constant expression and mark/store them for
some gimple transformation.
I have an intrinsic function call of the following -
__builtin_xyz(void*, 7, addr + 10);
I want to find its parameters which a
On Mon, Jan 17, 2022 at 5:23 AM David Malcolm wrote:
>
> On Sun, 2022-01-16 at 18:52 +0530, Shubham Narlawar via Gcc wrote:
> > Hello,
>
> Hi; various notes inline below...
>
> >
> > My aim is to iterate over gimple call stmt parameters and check
> > whethe
On Mon, Jan 17, 2022 at 1:55 PM Richard Biener
wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jan 17, 2022 at 12:54 AM David Malcolm via Gcc
> wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, 2022-01-16 at 18:52 +0530, Shubham Narlawar via Gcc wrote:
> > > Hello,
> >
> > Hi; various notes inline below...
On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 2:19 AM Martin Sebor wrote:
>
> On 1/17/22 12:18, Shubham Narlawar via Gcc wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 17, 2022 at 1:55 PM Richard Biener
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> On Mon, Jan 17, 2022 at 12:54 AM David Malcolm via Gcc
> >> wrote:
On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 2:20 PM Richard Biener
wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jan 17, 2022 at 8:19 PM Shubham Narlawar
> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Jan 17, 2022 at 1:55 PM Richard Biener
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jan 17, 2022 at 12:54 AM David Malcolm via Gc
Hello,
Is it possible to generate a NOTE instruction at GIMPLE level?
My use case scenario is as below -
I want to create a note for __builtin_xyz(_x) such that there is a
placeholder just before function call and in RTL pass, I want to
modify/assign register number at this placeholder location.
Hello,
I want to know whether it is correct to add left shift instruction to
a constant expression statement like "_3 + 4"?
I am trying to add a left shift instruction in between below GIMPLE
instructions -
:
instrn_buffer.0_1 = instrn_buffer;
_2 = tree.cnt;
_3 = (int) _2;
_4 = _3 + 4
On Sat, Feb 19, 2022 at 1:15 AM Andrew Pinski wrote:
>
> On Fri, Feb 18, 2022 at 11:04 AM Shubham Narlawar via Gcc
> wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > I want to know whether it is correct to add left shift instruction to
> > a constant expression statement like
On Mon, Feb 21, 2022 at 1:02 PM Richard Biener
wrote:
>
> On Sun, Feb 20, 2022 at 11:44 PM Andrew Pinski via Gcc
> wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, Feb 20, 2022 at 10:45 AM Shubham Narlawar
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Sat, Feb 19, 2022 at 1:15 AM Andrew Pinski
On Tue, Feb 22, 2022 at 3:55 PM Richard Biener
wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 22, 2022 at 8:38 AM Shubham Narlawar
> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 21, 2022 at 1:02 PM Richard Biener
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Sun, Feb 20, 2022 at 11:44 PM Andrew Pinski via Gcc
On Wed, Feb 23, 2022 at 12:52 PM Richard Biener
wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 22, 2022 at 2:10 PM Shubham Narlawar
> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Feb 22, 2022 at 3:55 PM Richard Biener
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, Feb 22, 2022 at 8:38 AM Shubham Narlawar
Hello,
I want to collect complete rtl instruction corresponding to below gimple
call - "__builtin_temp"
I have gimple instructions of form -
slli_31 = _2 << 8;
srli_32 = slli_31 >> 8;
add_33 = srli_32 + 15;
_20 = __builtin_temp (instrn_buffer.36_1, 1, add_33);
For that, I put breakpoint in expa
Hello,
[1] I want to achieve hosting of a custom built-in call out of loop that
loads an immediate value.
for (int i = 0; i < 4000; i++) {
_9 = (unsigned int) _1;
slli_6 = _9 << 8;
srli_36 = slli_6 >> 8;
li_37 = __builtin_load_immediate (15);//I want to hoi
31 matches
Mail list logo
