On 16/03/17 22:16, Andrew Jenner wrote:
On 16/03/2017 21:11, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
The e200z3 upwards have SPE units. None of them have classic FP. So it
would make most sense for the e200/VLE support to be part of the SPE
backend rather than the classic PowerPC backend.
Great to hear! An
Hi,
I gave my partial French translation a field trial this week and it didn't went
well. QtCreator can't see error messages any more if they are translated.
QtCreator identifies errors and warnings by parsing gcc output:
file.c:24:5: error: …
file.c:25:3: warning: …
But if "error" and "warnin
On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 9:48 AM, Frédéric Marchal wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I gave my partial French translation a field trial this week and it didn't
> went
> well. QtCreator can't see error messages any more if they are translated.
>
> QtCreator identifies errors and warnings by parsing gcc output:
>
>
On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 10:48 AM, Frédéric Marchal wrote:
> This list certainly needs more thinking and IDE folks could give more insight
> but you see were I'm heading.
Not my area of expertise, but it seems the Glorious Future (TM) in
this area is something called the "language server protocol"
On Friday 17 March 2017 13:32:17 Janne Blomqvist wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 10:48 AM, Frédéric Marchal
wrote:
> > This list certainly needs more thinking and IDE folks could give more
> > insight but you see were I'm heading.
>
> Not my area of expertise, but it seems the Glorious Future (
On 17 March 2017 at 12:17, Frédéric Marchal wrote:
> On Friday 17 March 2017 13:32:17 Janne Blomqvist wrote:
>> Not my area of expertise, but it seems the Glorious Future (TM) in
>> this area is something called the "language server protocol", see
>> http://langserver.org/ . Though AFAIK nobody is
On Fri, 2017-03-17 at 12:20 +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 9:48 AM, Frédéric Marchal
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I gave my partial French translation a field trial this week and it
> > didn't went
> > well. QtCreator can't see error messages any more if they are
> > translate
On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 09:50:18AM +, Sekhar, Ashwin wrote:
> Hi GCC Team, Aarch64 Maintainers,
>
>
> The rules in Vector Function Application Binary Interface Specification for
> OpenMP
> (https://sourceware.org/glibc/wiki/libmvec?action=AttachFile&do=view&target=VectorABI.txt)
> is used in
On Friday 17 March 2017 09:30:40 David Malcolm wrote:
> This all sounds a lot like:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79423
That's exactly the problem I'm faced with. Thanks for pointing it out to me.
> Paraphrasing myself from that RFE: given that many IDEs can already
> parse L
On Friday 17 March 2017 12:28:48 Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 17 March 2017 at 12:17, Frédéric Marchal wrote:
> > On Friday 17 March 2017 13:32:17 Janne Blomqvist wrote:
> >> Not my area of expertise, but it seems the Glorious Future (TM) in
> >> this area is something called the "language server pr
On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 12:28:48PM +, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 17 March 2017 at 12:17, Frédéric Marchal wrote:
> > On Friday 17 March 2017 13:32:17 Janne Blomqvist wrote:
> >> Not my area of expertise, but it seems the Glorious Future (TM) in
> >> this area is something called the "language
One of the following revision caused a bootstrap comparison failure on
aarch64-linux-gnu:
r246225
r246226
r246227
Thanks,
Andrew Pinski
Ignore the URLs in the log file below, this is a Jenkins to Cavium.
-Original Message-
From: jenk...@cavium.com [mailto:jenk...@cavium.com]
Sent: Fri
On 03/17/2017 07:38 PM, Pinski, Andrew wrote:
One of the following revision caused a bootstrap comparison failure on
aarch64-linux-gnu:
r246225
r246226
r246227
Can you help narrow that down?
Bernd
On 03/17/2017 12:47 PM, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
On 03/17/2017 07:38 PM, Pinski, Andrew wrote:
One of the following revision caused a bootstrap comparison failure on
aarch64-linux-gnu:
r246225
r246226
r246227
Can you help narrow that down?
I'm provisioning an aarch64 system now.
jeff
On Mär 17 2017, Frédéric Marchal wrote:
> On Friday 17 March 2017 09:30:40 David Malcolm wrote:
>> What should the diagnostic be called?
>>
>> -fdiagnostics-output-format=VALUE
>> -fdiagnostics-mi
>> -fide
>
> If users are expected to add it manually to their IDE's environment, let's
> ke
On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 11:47 AM, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
> On 03/17/2017 07:38 PM, Pinski, Andrew wrote:
>>
>> One of the following revision caused a bootstrap comparison failure on
>> aarch64-linux-gnu:
>> r246225
>> r246226
>> r246227
>
>
> Can you help narrow that down?
I can though I don't want
On 03/17/2017 03:31 PM, Andrew Pinski wrote:
On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 11:47 AM, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
On 03/17/2017 07:38 PM, Pinski, Andrew wrote:
One of the following revision caused a bootstrap comparison failure on
aarch64-linux-gnu:
r246225
r246226
r246227
Can you help narrow that down?
On 03/17/2017 03:28 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
On 03/17/2017 03:31 PM, Andrew Pinski wrote:
On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 11:47 AM, Bernd Schmidt
wrote:
On 03/17/2017 07:38 PM, Pinski, Andrew wrote:
One of the following revision caused a bootstrap comparison failure on
aarch64-linux-gnu:
r246225
r246226
On 03/17/2017 04:12 PM, Jim Wilson wrote:
I have access to a fast box that isn't otherwise in use at the moment so
I'm taking a look. r246225 builds OK. r246226 does not. So it is
Bernd's combine patch. A little experimenting shows that the compare
difference is triggered by the use of -gtogg
On 03/17/2017 05:51 PM, Jim Wilson wrote:
On 03/17/2017 04:12 PM, Jim Wilson wrote:
I have access to a fast box that isn't otherwise in use at the moment so
I'm taking a look. r246225 builds OK. r246226 does not. So it is
Bernd's combine patch. A little experimenting shows that the compare
d
20 matches
Mail list logo
