On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 12:28:48PM +0000, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 17 March 2017 at 12:17, Frédéric Marchal wrote:
> > On Friday 17 March 2017 13:32:17 Janne Blomqvist wrote:
> >> Not my area of expertise, but it seems the Glorious Future (TM) in
> >> this area is something called the "language server protocol", see
> >> http://langserver.org/ . Though AFAIK nobody is working on GCC
> >> integration so far.
> >
> > I was looking for a short term solution. Not something that might possibly
> > be
> > available in 20 years :-)
>
> Changing GCC's output and getting IDEs to support it isn't exactly
> short term either (and the suggested (E) additions look ugly IMHO).
>
> > Translations are unusable from within an IDE until gcc offers some solution
> > to
> > let the IDE detects errors and warnings irrespective of the selected
> > language.
> >
> > Currently, every single translated gcc*.po file is affected (Spanish and
> > Indonesian users would still see errors as "error" apparently translates to
> > "error" in those languages).
>
> Or the translators decided not to translate those words, maybe for this
> reason.
For Spanish at least, "error" is the correct translation, although the
pronunciation is vastly different.
Gabriel
