Re: We need to remove the Sphinx HTML docs

2024-11-25 Thread Gerald Pfeifer
On Fri, 15 Nov 2024, Tamar Christina wrote: > FWIW, Even though I was one of those that really liked and wanted this > documentation update to sphinx, I agree with removing them as it is just > confusing or misleading to users at this point. > > I do hope that in the future we could try to moderni

Re: We need to remove the Sphinx HTML docs

2024-11-17 Thread Gerald Pfeifer
On Fri, 15 Nov 2024, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > The HTML pages from Martin Liska's Sphinx doc experiment are still > online, and Google thinks they are the canonical locatiosn for GCC docs. ...which is really weird. I wonder what influenced Google's ranking here (all the more given that there shou

Re: We need to remove the Sphinx HTML docs

2024-11-15 Thread Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
On Fri, 15 Nov 2024 at 12:42, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: > > On Fri, 15 Nov 2024, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > > All these directories should have been removed two years ago: > > Agreed. Thank you for digging into this and raising it, Jonathan! > > > $ ls -1 -d htdocs/onlinedocs/gcc/*/ > > htdocs/onlinedoc

Re: We need to remove the Sphinx HTML docs

2024-11-15 Thread Gerald Pfeifer
On Fri, 15 Nov 2024, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > All these directories should have been removed two years ago: Agreed. Thank you for digging into this and raising it, Jonathan! > $ ls -1 -d htdocs/onlinedocs/gcc/*/ > htdocs/onlinedocs/gcc/c-implementation-defined-behavior/ > htdocs/onlinedocs/gcc/ex

Re: We need to remove the Sphinx HTML docs

2024-11-15 Thread Mark Wielaard
Hi, On Fri, 2024-11-15 at 12:14 +, Jonathan Wakely via Gcc wrote: > On IRC mjw suggested that you (Gerald) might object to breaking links > by just removing them. I think the pages are already broken (the links > in the sidebar are half missing already). > > If we think preserving those links

RE: We need to remove the Sphinx HTML docs

2024-11-15 Thread Tamar Christina via Gcc
> -Original Message- > From: Gcc On Behalf Of > Jonathan Wakely via Gcc > Sent: Friday, November 15, 2024 12:25 PM > To: Gerald Pfeifer > Cc: gcc Mailing List > Subject: Re: We need to remove the Sphinx HTML docs > > On Fri, 15 Nov 2024 at 12:22, Jonathan Wa

Re: We need to remove the Sphinx HTML docs

2024-11-15 Thread Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
On Fri, 15 Nov 2024 at 12:22, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > > On Fri, 15 Nov 2024 at 12:14, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > > > > Hi Gerald, > > > > The HTML pages from Martin Liska's Sphinx doc experiment are still > > online, and Google thinks they are the canonical locatiosn for GCC > > docs. > > e.g. try

Re: We need to remove the Sphinx HTML docs

2024-11-15 Thread Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
On Fri, 15 Nov 2024 at 12:14, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > > Hi Gerald, > > The HTML pages from Martin Liska's Sphinx doc experiment are still > online, and Google thinks they are the canonical locatiosn for GCC > docs. > e.g. try > https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-d&q=%22inline+functio

We need to remove the Sphinx HTML docs

2024-11-15 Thread Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
Hi Gerald, The HTML pages from Martin Liska's Sphinx doc experiment are still online, and Google thinks they are the canonical locatiosn for GCC docs. e.g. try https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-d&q=%22inline+function+is+as+fast+as+a+macro%22++gcc The only hit from gcc.gnu.org is a s