On Fri, 15 Nov 2024, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > The HTML pages from Martin Liska's Sphinx doc experiment are still > online, and Google thinks they are the canonical locatiosn for GCC docs.
...which is really weird. I wonder what influenced Google's ranking here (all the more given that there should be few, if any, external links to that Sphinx docs). > On IRC mjw suggested that you (Gerald) might object to breaking links > by just removing them. I think the pages are already broken (the links > in the sidebar are half missing already). Mark knows me a bit, I guess. :-) In this specific case I'm fine dropping those links without a redirect (which may then permeate the obsolete URLs). Unless anyone feels strongly about it (and I understand you don't, Jonathan), I wouldn't put redirects in place. On Fri, 15 Nov 2024, Mark Wielaard wrote: > Sorry for the "stop energy" here. When I said that I didn't realize > these files are all "top-level". No worries - it's good to consider things from different angles. Gerald
