On Sun, 31 Aug 2025 at 00:32, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: > > On Sat, 26 Apr 2025, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > > I found (and removed) some more sphinx leftovers under /onlinedocs/cpp/ > > Thanks! > > I found some time and dug into this. Addressing this properly means to > update some of our scripting, for which I have a prototype ready. > > On the libstdc++ my updated scripts found the following which look like > orphans: > > $ ll /www/gcc/htdocs/onlinedocs/libstdc++/ext/ > total 6760 > -rw-rw-r--. 1 gccadmin gcc 1132364 2. Jun 2015 lwg-active.html > -rw-rw-r--. 1 gccadmin gcc 1414040 2. Jun 2015 lwg-closed.html > -rw-rw-r--. 1 gccadmin gcc 4344911 2. Jun 2015 lwg-defects.html
As noted in my previous email, these can go. > drwxrwxr-x. 2 gccadmin gcc 20480 25. Mai 2011 pb_ds The pb_ds docs were converted from HTML files under libstdc++/doc/html/ext/pb_ds to part of the XML DocBook manual in 2011 with r0-110490-gce1140e3f2f7cd so that directory looks like a leftover from before then. So that can be removed too. > > and > > $ ll /www/gcc/htdocs/onlinedocs/libstdc++/dated/ > total 240 > drwxrwsr-x. 2 gccadmin gcc 4096 15. Jul 2010 17_intro > drwxrwsr-x. 2 gccadmin gcc 24 15. Jul 2010 18_support > drwxrwsr-x. 2 gccadmin gcc 24 15. Jul 2010 19_diagnostics > drwxrwsr-x. 2 gccadmin gcc 69 15. Jul 2010 20_util > drwxrwsr-x. 2 gccadmin gcc 93 15. Jul 2010 21_strings > drwxrwsr-x. 2 gccadmin gcc 102 15. Jul 2010 22_locale > drwxrwsr-x. 2 gccadmin gcc 46 15. Jul 2010 23_containers > drwxrwsr-x. 2 gccadmin gcc 24 15. Jul 2010 24_iterators > drwxrwsr-x. 2 gccadmin gcc 24 15. Jul 2010 25_algorithms > drwxrwsr-x. 2 gccadmin gcc 24 15. Jul 2010 26_numerics > drwxrwsr-x. 2 gccadmin gcc 123 15. Jul 2010 27_io > -rw-rw-r--. 1 gccadmin gcc 34003 13. Nov 2007 abi.html > -rw-rw-r--. 1 gccadmin gcc 12934 29. Jul 2003 abi.txt > -rw-rw-r--. 1 gccadmin gcc 17669 13. Mär 2004 ballocator_doc.txt > -rw-rw-r--. 1 gccadmin gcc 14563 12. Feb 2008 configopts.html > -rw-rw-r--. 1 gccadmin gcc 18057 12. Feb 2008 debug.html > -rw-rw-r--. 1 gccadmin gcc 27077 13. Nov 2007 debug_mode.html > -rw-rw-r--. 1 gccadmin gcc 13087 12. Feb 2008 documentation.html > -rw-rw-r--. 1 gccadmin gcc 3417 13. Nov 2007 explanations.html > drwxrwsr-x. 2 gccadmin gcc 255 15. Jul 2010 ext > drwxrwsr-x. 2 gccadmin gcc 41 15. Jul 2010 faq > -rw-rw-r--. 1 gccadmin gcc 8966 12. Feb 2008 install.html > -rw-rw-r--. 1 gccadmin gcc 201 16. Mär 2001 lib3styles.css > -rw-rw-r--. 1 gccadmin gcc 1772 6. Sep 2002 makedoc.awk > -rw-rw-r--. 1 gccadmin gcc 18003 13. Nov 2007 parallel_mode.html > drwxrwsr-x. 2 gccadmin gcc 8192 15. Jul 2010 pb_assoc > -rw-rw-r--. 1 gccadmin gcc 24625 12. Feb 2008 test.html I think these were all removed by r0-85736-g620039adfb7162 (or even earlier) so I think the whole 'dated' dir can go. > And there is /www/gcc/htdocs/onlinedocs/libstdc++/latest-doxygen/ > where everything is one year, eight days old. That symlink (and the dir it points to) should stay. > Which of these three can I yank? (And which do I need to account for?)
