Installed.
Gerald
Index: index.html
===
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs/index.html,v
retrieving revision 1.514
diff -u -3 -p -r1.514 index.html
--- index.html 24 Aug 2005 19:04:13 - 1.514
+++ index.html 31 Aug 2005 19:24
Volker Reichelt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Just to let you know (to avoid duplicate work):
|
| There are several C++ bugs assigned to Mark which he already
| fixed on mainline and the 4.0 branch. Since he's busy with 4.0/4.1
| regressions, I'll try to backport (at least some of) the patches
|
Just to let you know (to avoid duplicate work):
There are several C++ bugs assigned to Mark which he already
fixed on mainline and the 4.0 branch. Since he's busy with 4.0/4.1
regressions, I'll try to backport (at least some of) the patches
back to the 3.4 branch. (He agreed to that plan in privat
On Wed, 2005-08-31 at 12:42, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
> rtl-optimization: 20
> 17810 internal compiler error: in verify_local_live_at_start for
> arm-rtems, arm-linux
This is a dup of 15342. I'm just testing a back-port of the fix to the
3.4 branch.
R.
Hi,
Despite a number of bug fixing patches applied to gcc-3_4-branch
(special thanks to Richard Sandiford), the total count of bugs open
against GCC-3.4.5 only has increased from 115 (last report) to 117
(this morning). That reflects a continual flux of incoming PRs for
GCC-3.4.x and bugs pres
On Tue, 2005-08-02 at 22:07 +0200, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The number of open PRs registered as CC-3.4.x regressions only and
> targetted for 3.4.5 has decreased from 125 (last week) to 115. Which
> is a progress! Still, we have too many PRs for a stable branch.
>
> Here is the com
Hi,
The number of open PRs registered as CC-3.4.x regressions only and
targetted for 3.4.5 has decreased from 125 (last week) to 115. Which
is a progress! Still, we have too many PRs for a stable branch.
Here is the complete list as communicated to me by the bugzilla mail
interface. Note t
Bernardo Innocenti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
|
| > The full list of bugs is produced below. Maintainers, please look
| > into any of those and see which ones you can fix or give guidance for
| > fixes in ways that are suitable for a stable branch.
|
| This m68k patch
Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
> The full list of bugs is produced below. Maintainers, please look
> into any of those and see which ones you can fix or give guidance for
> fixes in ways that are suitable for a stable branch.
This m68k patch:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-07/msg00783.html
Kean Johnston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > Here is how Mark and I have agreed on those sort of things. If such a
| > patch is accepted in 3.4.x but not in 4.0.x, then we've introduced a
| > regression in 4.0.x. So, the way we deal with it is that, the patch
| > is first applied to
| > 4.0.x, t
Here is how Mark and I have agreed on those sort of things. If such a
patch is accepted in 3.4.x but not in 4.0.x, then we've introduced a
regression in 4.0.x.
So, the way we deal with it is that, the patch is first applied to
4.0.x, then to 3.4.x retrospectively. Is that workable for you?
Ab
Kean Johnston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
| > Kean Johnston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > | > The full list of bugs is produced below. Maintainers, please
| > look
| > | > into any of those and see which ones you can fix or give guidance for
| > | > fixes in ways that
Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
Kean Johnston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > The full list of bugs is produced below. Maintainers, please look
| > into any of those and see which ones you can fix or give guidance for
| > fixes in ways that are suitable for a stable branch.
| Do I still have time / opp
Kean Johnston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > The full list of bugs is produced below. Maintainers, please look
| > into any of those and see which ones you can fix or give guidance for
| > fixes in ways that are suitable for a stable branch.
| Do I still have time / opportunity to refresh the SC
The full list of bugs is produced below. Maintainers, please look
into any of those and see which ones you can fix or give guidance for
fixes in ways that are suitable for a stable branch.
Do I still have time / opportunity to refresh the SCO ports?
If Sept 30 is the deadline I will definately b
Daniel Berlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Fixed.
| It was counting a slightly higher number of bugs than it actually sent
| (it does some of the query filtering client-side in the script)
Thanks.
-- Gaby
On Mon, 2005-07-25 at 11:41 +0200, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The SC has agreed me taking up the GCC-3.4.5 ball.
> I'm planning for two releases from the GCC-3.4.x series this year:
> (a) GCC-3.4.5 on September 30, and
> (b) GCC-3.4.6 on December, 15.
>
> The number of bugs (reg
Gerald Pfeifer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Installed. If you prefer a different summary (I haven't changed the
| existing one), please let me know.
That is fine. Thanks!
-- Gaby
Installed. If you prefer a different summary (I haven't changed the
existing one), please let me know.
Gerald
Index: index.html
===
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs/index.html,v
retrieving revision 1.508
diff -u -3 -p -r1.508 index
Hi,
The SC has agreed me taking up the GCC-3.4.5 ball.
I'm planning for two releases from the GCC-3.4.x series this year:
(a) GCC-3.4.5 on September 30, and
(b) GCC-3.4.6 on December, 15.
The number of bugs (regressions) currently targetted for 3.4.5 is
quite huge: 125 according to my
20 matches
Mail list logo
