Kean Johnston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | > Here is how Mark and I have agreed on those sort of things. If such a | > patch is accepted in 3.4.x but not in 4.0.x, then we've introduced a | > regression in 4.0.x. So, the way we deal with it is that, the patch | > is first applied to | > 4.0.x, then to 3.4.x retrospectively. Is that workable for you? | Absolutely. I actually did all the workin in a 4.0.2 cvs tree, and | Im backporting it to my 3.4.5 tree.
Ok. -- Gaby
