Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
Kean Johnston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

| > The full list of bugs is produced below.  Maintainers, please look
| > into any of those and see which ones you can fix or give guidance for
| > fixes in ways that are suitable for a stable branch.
| Do I still have time / opportunity to refresh the SCO ports?

This being a stable release branch, I'll consider only regressions fixes. Is that the case?
I guess it depends on how pedantic we want to define
'regression'. I did a mostly-working port circa 3.4.1, but
it had some problems, but teh last known-to-be-working-well
port was 2.95.3. I have people baying for 3.4 all the time.
So its technicalyl a regression from 2.95.3, and almost one
from 3.4.1 :)

Kean

Reply via email to