Well, there's evil, and there's Evil. This thread, including RussA's implicit
confirmation of Marcus' point about fora rigidity, dovetails nicely with the
[ab|mis]use thread and Nick's trope about ancillary vs primary effects. The
scammers, themselves not necessarily their children, are Evil ...
Glen -
In the spirit of some of our other woven threads here, I'm wondering how
practical it would be to build a natural language parser which could
apply rules such as those found in:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Straight_and_Crooked_Thinking
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_falla
In an attempt to continue following the alt-right, and having landed on a firm
ad hominem character judgement of Curtis Yarvin, I need to track the following
3 people (labeled "Trumpist Intellectuals" in a Bulwark article):
https://gyaanipedia.fandom.com/wiki/Chuck_de_Caro
https://en.wikipedia.o
Maybe google sends mail to spam when it can't figure out how to monetize
it, thus encouraging me to get a more exploitable life?
-- rec --
On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 10:49 AM uǝlƃ ↙↙↙ wrote:
> Well, there's evil, and there's Evil. This thread, including RussA's
> implicit confirmation of Marcus'
Hah! Yes, tools that help with individual and group self-regulation are
definitely of value and I share any implied bottom-up or peer-peer
regulation over *harsh* top down. Like many good things, I think there
is a distribution of "archies" as well as "scales"... which means
there is always roo
On 1/29/21 10:34 AM, Roger Critchlow wrote:
> Maybe google sends mail to spam when it can't figure out how to
> monetize it, thus encouraging me to get a more exploitable life?
Great bumper sticker...
Get an exploitableLife!
>
> -- rec --
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 10:49 AM uǝlƃ ↙↙↙ <
One can hope to be a reflective and philosophical monster.
From: Friam On Behalf Of Steve Smith
Sent: Friday, January 29, 2021 12:06 PM
To: friam@redfish.com
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Message to the non-posting 95%
On 1/29/21 10:34 AM, Roger Critchlow wrote:
Maybe google sends mail to spam when it
Very nice fuzzification of the interplay between top-down and bottom-up. I
thought about preemptively pointing out that in either usage for the text
(yours: extracting reasoning, mine: extracting context), there has to be some
prior model. All measurement has a prior model. But your characteriza
Glen,
Thanks for this link.
https://www.real-time-with-bill-maher-blog.com/
I took your take to be: "Free speech does NOT entail a right to be gratuitously
impolite. That I make people angry when I talk does not speak to its freedom,
so much as to its arrogance. " I think the closest I have
I certainly agree with Ed. Coding does indeed suggest the final stage for a
particular language--should that colon instead be on a semi-colon. I would,
though, argue for "algorithmic thinking" rather than "computational
thinking".
George Duncan
Emeritus Professor of Statistics, Carnegie Mellon Un
I would say to boost signals concerning claims that,
1) are correct
2) have evidence
3) are novel
Other types of signals can be attenuated. Realistically, the media follows
this principle above all else:
4) have an audience
-Original Message-
From: Friam On Behalf Of thompnicks...@g
And I would gently suggest (not argue) that before ""algorithmic thinking"
we should teach systems thinking/analysis: what will be the system in
question and its defined boundaries, what the variables/agents within the
system, the input/output relationships between those variables under what
contex
At first I agreed with your 3 priorities. But as I worked on some other stuff,
I think some doubt has crept in. Each of the bullets has some uncertainty
around it. Some things are pretty much but not entirely *certainly* correct.
But most things have high uncertainty. Evidence can be slight, ple
If you don't want to do it, I'll be happy to press Delete on the class of QAnon
posts. 😊
(Fine, put tensors on 1-3.)
-Original Message-
From: Friam On Behalf Of u?l? ???
Sent: Friday, January 29, 2021 2:52 PM
To: friam@redfish.com
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Strawman/Steelman
At first I agree
Ha! Yes, please. I keep asking people to BE MY CONTENT CURATOR for me. I'm
simply too lazy to do all the work to come up with my own opinions. To quote
Black Sabbath: "Life's fantasy; to be locked away and still to think you're
free."
On 1/29/21 2:57 PM, Marcus Daniels wrote:
> If you don't wan
It's obviously the case that there are a lot of people that just can't form
opinions properly.
-Original Message-
From: Friam On Behalf Of u?l? ???
Sent: Friday, January 29, 2021 3:01 PM
To: friam@redfish.com
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Strawman/Steelman
Ha! Yes, please. I keep asking people t
Has anyone been watching what's happening in the stock market with GameStop?
On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 1:30 PM Steve Smith wrote:
> Perhaps no-one cares or shares my confusion with the use
> Strawman/Steelman championed by Glen and adopted by others, however:
>
>consensus development:
>
> http
Yep. I've logged into my TD Ameritrade account several times to see if they've
limited purchases of GME. Supposedly Robinhood did limit purchases. It looked
like I could always buy on TDA... but I'm not sure. I would never actually buy
GME, *except* to screw The Man. 8^D
On 1/29/21 3:41 PM, Mer
The term “computational thinking” incorporates all the points you brought up.
Ed
___
Ed Angel
Founding Director, Art, Research, Technology and Science Laboratory (ARTS Lab)
Professor Emeritus of Computer Science, University of New Mexico
1017 Sierra Pinon
Santa Fe, NM 87501
Duly noted.
On Fri, Jan 29, 2021, 5:22 PM Edward Angel wrote:
> The term “computational thinking” incorporates all the points you brought
> up.
>
> Ed
> ___
>
> Ed Angel
>
> Founding Director, Art, Research, Technology and Science Laboratory
> (ARTS Lab)
> Professor Emeritus
20 matches
Mail list logo
