Hello Sir/Madam,
I am currently running a statistical test using the FSGD method. I am
encountering a problem in relation to the creation of the glmdir folder
when I run the mri_glmfit function. I recieve an ERROR message that tells
me that the design matrix (automatically generated) is ill condit
Hello all,
I am facing a problem whereby after running GLMfit and cluserwise
correction for multiple comparisons using the monte-carlo method, I was
unable to generate any clusters. I do have significant images produced for
the glmfit.
All procedures were done according to the tutorial to match t
Hello all,
I would just like to know what is the significance of the files that are
produced after a glmfit is done. I was trying to find a write up online but
I was not able to.
They include :
- cnr.mgh
- F.mgh
- gamma.mgh
- gammavar.mgh
- sig.mgh
Thank you
Hello everyone,
Please pardon my rather simple question
I have done a GLM fit anlysis and have obtained a file sig.mgh alonf with a
few others after the analysis.As I know, I do not have to create ROIs in
order to do this. I also understand that doing a multiple comparison
analysis just compares
be a file called something like cache.th13.abs.y.ocn.dat.
> This will have a column for each cluster and a row for each subject. The
> value in the row will be the input for each subject.
> doug
>
> On 05/30/2013 11:21 PM, Joshua deSouza wrote:
> > Hello everyone,
> &g
mri_glmfit-sim. It might be named something
> different depending on your parameters (should always end in y.ocn.dat)
> doug
>
>
> On 6/2/13 3:57 AM, Joshua deSouza wrote:
>
> Hi Doug,
>
> This file that your saying, will be created after glmfit-sim is done
> using the
he input? cortical thickness? Are you using your own mask or is this a
> whole hemisphere analysis?
>
> doug
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On 6/2/13 10:29 PM, Joshua deSouza wrote:
>
> Hello Doug,
>
> Thank you for your quick replies to my queries. Really appreciate it.
n Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 12:40 AM, Joshua deSouza
wrote:
> Hello Doug,
>
> Each individuals subject data has already been smoothed by 5 10 15 20 and
> 25 through the qache function during the initial processing.
>
> I'm a little confused now. I thought that the mri_preproc
at 12:16 AM, Douglas N Greve
wrote:
> Unless you specify otherwise, mris_preproc will use unsmoothed data. If
> you then smooth it with mri_surf2surf and run run mri_glmfit with --fwhm
> then you will be smoothing it twice.
> doug
>
>
>
>
> On 06/04/2013 09:49 PM, Joshu
, Douglas N Greve
wrote:
>
> I think when you smooth it that much strange things happen. Try just one
> smoothing of 15mm.
>
>
>
>
> On 06/06/2013 03:36 AM, Joshua deSouza wrote:
>
>> Hi Doug,
>>
>> I did not specify anything in the mris_preproc, so it would be
Hello all,
I am having a problem with generating values of the vertices at the
hippocampal area. I believe it is a masking issue as reviewing the mask
after the glmfit analysis I see that the mask does not cover the entire
medial region excluding the corpus callosum. Can I do anything to change
th
achieve?
>
> cheers
> Bruce
>
> On Tue, 11 Jun 2013, Joshua deSouza wrote:
>
> Hello all,
>>
>> I am having a problem with generating values of the vertices at the
>> hippocampal area. I believe it is a masking issue as reviewing the mask
>> after the glmfit
12 matches
Mail list logo