Hi Natalia,
I had the same issue in some cases. This is happens if you native data is not
perfectly isotropic and seems to be related to a rounding error. The only the
solution I found is to fix the resolution of your data prior to mri_nu_correct
manually.
Check your voxel size with mri_info.
Hi Ri,
you can process data with higher resolution than 1mm^3 if you follow the
HiResRecon (https://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/HiResRecon). The changes
to the pipeline were done using v5.1, however, this should still work fine.
Best,
Falk
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: freesurfe
: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Betreff: [Freesurfer] recon-all pipeline for (sub-millimeter) 7T data
Hello!
I wrote a bash script some time ago to process data acquired at a
sub-millimeter resolution following the nice wiki entry of Falk Lüsebrink
(https://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki
Hi Clelia,
I think the reviewer might refer to the -3T flag of recon-all which enables
3T-specific NU intensity correction parameters and usage of a special atlas for
Talairach alignment.
Best,
Falk
Von: freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
[mailto:freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu] Im
Me too.
Best,
Falk
Von: freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
[mailto:freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu] Im Auftrag von Andrea Grant
Gesendet: Montag, 10. August 2015 16:23
An: Freesurfer support list
Cc: Kyoko Fujimoto; Jonathan Polimeni
Betreff: Re: [Freesurfer] options for 7T images...
Hi Prasad,
for me FreeSurfer worked pretty nicely with 7T data. Most critical parts are
skull-stripping and surface alignment if intensities of the cortex vary a lot
(e.g. darker cortex in temporal lobes). However, I haven’t tried the
hippocampal subfields yet and have usually processed small c
ew minutes on 1 mm data only? Would it
help to add the openmp flag in that case?
Best,
Falk
----
Falk Lüsebrink, M. Sc.
Otto-von-Guericke-Universität Magdeburg
Forschungscampus STIMULATE
http://www.forschungscampus-stimulate.de/
Universitätsplatz 2
39106 Magde
ischl
Gesendet: Dienstag, 19. Juli 2016 15:37
An: Freesurfer support list
Betreff: Re: [Freesurfer] mri_ca_label with high resolution data
Hi Falk
I think openmp will help with this in V6, but probably not before Bruce
On Tue, 19
Jul 2016, Falk Lüsebrink wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
>
&
Hi Dorsa,
until version 6 of FreeSurfer is released you could try to follow the
HiResRecon (https://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/HiResRecon) which should
enable you to process the data in its native resolution. With FreeSurfer v6
this workaround will not be necessary anymore, as the proces
can jump in on that.
Best,
Falk
P.S. Be sure to also reply to the list also.
Von: Dorsa Haji Ghaffari [mailto:gh...@umich.edu]
Gesendet: Dienstag, 19. Juli 2016 18:21
An: Falk Lüsebrink
Betreff: Re: [Freesurfer] question about voxel size
Thank you. I was actually able to get results using my high
9
Jul 2016, Falk Lüsebrink wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
>
>
> I’m currently processing a 250 µm MPRAGE with a dev build from mid of May.
> Running recon-all with default parameters ran flawlessly. Afterwards I
> added the -hires flag to process the data without conformatio
0
An: Falk Lüsebrink
Cc: Freesurfer support list
Betreff: Re: AW: [Freesurfer] mri_ca_label with high resolution data
Hi Falk
the dev version of mri_ca_label does use openmp, so should be faster.
cheers
Bruce
On
Thu, 21 Jul 2016, Falk Lüsebrink wrote:
> Hi Bruce,
>
> I started the proces
Hi Bruce,
I thought so. Are there any other means to accelerate this procedure (in the
future)?
Best,
Falk
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Bruce Fischl [mailto:fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu]
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 21. Juli 2016 15:52
An: Falk Lüsebrink
Cc: Freesurfer support list
Betreff
Hi Bruce,
thanks. Keep up the fantastic work!
Best,
Falk
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Bruce Fischl [mailto:fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu]
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 21. Juli 2016 16:44
An: Falk Lüsebrink
Cc: Freesurfer support list
Betreff: Re: AW: AW: AW: [Freesurfer] mri_ca_label with high
Hi Theresa,
first, if you use the -hires flag in version 5.3 the processing pipeline will
not start to downsample your data at some point (if I remember correctly during
the normalization stage). As you stated that you were expecting the automatic
downsampling you should either omit the hires f
Hi Damien,
depending on what you want to do you are forced to use the stable release. The
developmental version of FreeSurfer should be used for testing only, not
publishing results.
Following the notes of the HiResRecon
(https://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/HiResRecon) you should be able
...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu<mailto:freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
[mailto:freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu] Im Auftrag von Falk Lüsebrink
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 6. Oktober 2016 17:51
An: Freesurfer support list
Betreff: [Freesurfer] [Dev Build] Processing very high resolution dataset
Dear all,
I am cur
Hi Yun,
if it is for some reason impractical to use a beta version of FreeSurfer you
can also try to follow the HiResRecon (http://freesurfer.net/fswiki/HiResRecon)
I put together some time ago. This solves the issues related to high resolution
data and will circumvent conformation to 1 mm^3.
-
Robert Frost
CRICOS 00026A
This email plus any attachments to it are confidential. Any unauthorised use is
strictly prohibited. If you receive this email in error, please delete it and
any attachments.
Please think of our environment and only print this e-mail if necessary.
On Mon, Oct 12
Hi Ajay,
I ran into the same error processing hires data a while ago using a nightly
build of centos 6 with the hires flag only. Disk space or alike wasn't an
issue. I ran mris_topo_fixer instead of mris_fix_topology to get working
surfaces.
Best,
Falk
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: f
-qsphere stage
again also.
Best,
Falk
Von: Ajay Kurani [mailto:dr.ajay.kur...@gmail.com]
Gesendet: Montag, 30. November 2015 21:50
An: Falk Lüsebrink
Cc: Freesurfer support list; Bruce Fischl
Betreff: Re: [Freesurfer] Freesurfer 6.0 - Autorecon2 failure
(mris_euler_number) using high res (0.5mm
Hi Bruce,
I have applied one of his denoising algorithms on my high resolution datasets
and also got very nice results. I used it on a single subject only, however,
this could be beneficial for the upcoming hires pipeline to account for lower
SNR.
You can find his algorithms and publicatio
Hi Xiaomin,
currently I don't have access to my notes, however, if I remember correctly,
you can specify thresholds in mris_make_surfaces for consideration in the
surface placement. This obviously works well only if the contrast between
WM/GM/CSF is high enough.
If you are interested and nobod
Hi Trisanna,
you can find instructions on how to process data with an isotropic resolution
other than 1mm^3 with FreeSurfer v5.1 and above here:
https://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/HiResRecon
For v5.3 the pipeline should be slightly adapted, however, can easily be done.
If you need assist
Dear FreeSurfers,
I am processing some T1-weighted images of the human brain with an isotropic resolution of .5 mm using version 5.1.
After mri_fill my hemispheres are separated nicely and the cerebellum is completely removed. However, looking at the filled.mgz, posterior and superior of th
Hello all,
I'm processing some high resolution data with an isotropic resolution of 0.5mm
and I was wondering if it would be possible to speed up mris_fix_topology
somehow. Due to the increased number of vertices and also increased number of
defects this stage takes incredibly long (e.g. lots o
Hi Bruce,
so you use the conformed and fixed ?h.orig during mris_make_surfaces on the
.5mm data? Never thought of that.
Best,
Falk
Original-Nachricht
> Datum: Wed, 16 Jan 2013 11:16:45 -0500 (EST)
> Von: Bruce Fischl
> An: "Falk Lüsebrink"
Hi Colin,
actually there is no hard limit for the size of your input data, except for the
subcortical segmentation which behaves quite strange.
What I currently do is to run recon-all on the hires data normally conforming
the data. Then I use the upsampled brainmask as a mask to skullstrip my h
Dear Chris and Antonin,
I found in some archived message or in the wiki that the default used to be 50
iterations at some time in previous releases of FreeSurfer for standard
recon-all. Therefore, I changed it to 50 as default for every resolution in the
recent release. This works fine for exam
Dear Andrius,
You can load the ?h.inflated.nofix in freeview and the overlay ?h.defect_labels
to see what's going on. It may be that a chunk of skull or the cerebellum is
still attached, in which case you'll want to correct the brainmask.mgz or
wm.mgz, respectively, to remove the non-brain tiss
Hi Karteek,
as for higher resolution (>0.7mm) the brainmask often includes lots of
residual, I changed my pre-processing slightly.
Currently I do bias field correct my 7T data with SPM and create a mask of the
WM, GM and CSF segmentation you get along with it. Then I recon-all -autorecon1
the
Dear Peter,
I haven't tried myself, but have a look at:
https://github.com/stnava/ANTsR/wiki/Installing-ANTsR-in-Windows-10-(along-with-FSL,-Rstudio,-Freesurfer,-etc).
It gives an overview of several neuroscientific tools to be installed using
the Windows 10 bash.
Best,
Falk
Von: freesurfer-
Dear Antonin,
I haven’t used CIVET myself, however, if I remember correctly it employs
several metrics to estimate cortical thickness, referred to “Link”, “Laplace”,
and “Average Near”. The latter one is a re-implementation of the one used in
FreeSurfer. They are described and compared here:
h
Dear Antonio,
“-norm3diters“ are the iterations of mri_normalize, whereas “-nuiterations”
refers to the number of cycles of mri_nu_correct.mni. I suppose they both work
in v6. If not you can simply create a file with expert options.
Hope this helps!
Best,
Falk
Von: freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.
Dear Gustav,
1. If they have been acquired in the same session with the same protocol,
you will increase your SNR by the square root of the number of volumes you use.
This can potentially also help in case of minor motions artifacts. However, if
your SNR is already high, it's probably be
Dear Antonietta,
I don’t know of any official statement in that regard, however, Yong Li (CC’ed)
seems to have updated the QA tools working with FS 6 in April. He may share his
code.
Best,
Falk
Von: freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
[mailto:freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu] Im Auft
Hi Stefano,
never have done this myself, however, have you tried using the -f flag? The
helps says this should output the stats to a tablefile.
Best,
Falk
Von: freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
[mailto:freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu] Im Auftrag von
std...@virgilio.it
Gesendet: Mi
Hi Eric,
I think the easiest way to avoid N3 is to simply add the -nonuintensitycor flag
to recon-all and create a symbolic link from nu.mgz to orig.mgz it as otherwise
recon-all will end with an error. I'm not sure about the nomenclature of the T2
file, but you should do the same.
Best,
Falk
External Email - Use Caution
Dear Lisa,
what you potentially can do is to use the denoised surface (*h.white) as a
starting point (instead of *h.orig) in the unfiltered stream. This should
remove any bias introduced by the denoising, however, you should gain the
advantages of d
I did not find it. Can you attach the link? I would be interested
in this information and how to proceed.
Thanks in advance,
Best,
El vie., 12 oct. 2018 a las 13:59, Falk Lüsebrink
(mailto:falk.luesebr...@ovgu.de>>) escribió:
External Email - Use Caution
Dear Lisa,
wh
External Email - Use Caution
Dear Rosalia,
I’d suggest you run recon-all –autorecon1 with you native data. Then you use
mri_mask to mask the T1.mgz with your skull stripped volume to get your desired
skull stripping. Name the result brainmask.mgz and continue with recon-all
–au
External Email - Use Caution
Dear Rui,
there is no hard limit to resolution. Your data should have a decent quality
(no motion artifacts, high SNR, high contrast, isotropic resolution) and the
suggestions of the submillimeter reconstruction should give good results. I
have run
,
Rosalia
El jue., 18 oct. 2018 8:26, Falk Lüsebrink
mailto:falk.luesebr...@ovgu.de>> escribió:
External Email - Use Caution
Dear Rosalia,
I’d suggest you run recon-all –autorecon1 with you native data. Then you use
mri_mask to mask the T1.mgz with your skull stripped volume to ge
External Email - Use Caution
Dear Rosalina,
you should run recon-all -sd ~/Desktop/MS_STUDY/subjects -s 001 -autorecon2 and
everything will run nicely. You should not include the -i flag again if you
want to continue processing your data, as this flag tells FreeSurfer to create
Dear Falk,
Thank you very much for your email and explanation. It is working now.
I wonder how I could set the smoothing for autorecon3 as to run recon -all -all
I had the options: -qcache -openmp 8
Kind regards,
Rosalia
On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 2:06 PM Falk Lüsebrink
mailto:falk.luesebr
’ and I use them in autorecon2 or 3?
Best regards,
Rosalia
On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 2:34 PM Falk Lüsebrink
mailto:falk.luesebr...@ovgu.de>> wrote:
External Email - Use Caution
Dear Rosalia,
You can specify all flags in every call of recon-all. If this flags does not
change any co
Hi Freesurfers,
I'm currently doing my bachelors thesis in medical engineering and I'm
trying to measure the cortical thickness of scans acquired by a 7T MRT.
A colleague of mine has used Freesurfer (v4.0.5) before and mentioned that
high resolution scans with a voxel size smaller than 1x1x1mm (
2009
-
Does anyone know what to do?
Regards,
Falk
-Original Message-
From: Bruce Fischl [mailto:fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu]
Sent: Friday, March 06, 2009 1:26 PM
To: Falk Lüsebrink
Cc: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer
cted voxels added...
white matter segmentation took 2.4 minutes
writing output to wm.seg.mgz...
ERROR: mri_segment-MRIcheckVolDims: volume1 height=256 != volume2 height=320.
Regards,
Falk
Original-Nachricht
> Datum: Sat, 21 Mar 2009 10:08:24 +0100
> Von: "Falk Lüs
Hi Freesurfers,
Im trying to evaluate the usefulness of high resolution scans acquired at
7T with an isometric voxel size of .6mm for the measurement of cortical
thickness. The inhomogeneities are taken care of by dividing the scans with
another scan of another sequence, so they are not an iss
tream?
Regards,
Falk
-Original Message-
From: Nick Schmansky [mailto:ni...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu]
Sent: Wednesday, April 01, 2009 7:53 PM
To: Falk Lüsebrink
Cc: Freesurfer Mailing List
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Measuring cortical thickness with high resolution data
Falk,
Attached is a mod
ny flags at all, the error is the same. The unmodified recon-all performs well.
Regards,
Falk
-Original Message-
From: freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
[mailto:freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu] On Behalf Of Nick Schmansky
Sent: Thursday, April 02, 2009 3:28 PM
To: Fa
Hi Doug,
Thanks! Now recon-all is processing well.
Regards,
Falk
-Original Message-
From: Doug Greve [mailto:gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu]
Sent: Monday, April 06, 2009 6:25 PM
To: Falk Lüsebrink
Cc: 'Nick Schmansky'; freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Subject: RE: [Freesurfer]
ril 06, 2009 6:25 PM
To: Falk Lüsebrink
Cc: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu; 'Nick Schmansky'
Subject: RE: [Freesurfer] Measuring cortical thickness with high resolution
data
Falk, it looks like that file was somehow converted to DOS. try:
dos2unix recon-all
chmod a+x recon-all
then re-
Hi Freesurfers,
I tried using aparcstats2table today and encountered following error
message:
Trackback (most recent call last):
File usr/share/freesurfer/bin/aparcstats2table, line 6, in
Import fsutils
ImportError: No module named fsutils
Is anyone able to offer some help?
Hi Krish,
Thanks for your help.
Regards,
Falk
-Original Message-
From: freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
[mailto:freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu] On Behalf Of Krish
Subramaniam
Sent: Tuesday, April 14, 2009 5:03 PM
To: Falk Lüsebrink
Cc: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Hi Freesurfers,
Im currently working on four different subjects and Im having problems
with the skull stripping for three of them. The four subjects Im trying to
process are:
1) 0.6mm iso voxel size, being the same subject as 4)
2) 0.5mm iso voxel size
3) 0.8mm iso voxel
Hi everyone,
Id like to compare the individual cortical thickness results of Freesurfer
with the results of another software. The other software measures the
cortical thickness for example across the whole left parietal lobe. So I
have to get the according value of the whole left parietal lobe
right). then use mris_anatomical_stats to get the stats on this new
label.
Nick
On Mon, 2009-04-27 at 16:31 +0200, Falk Lüsebrink wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
>
>
> I’d like to compare the individual cortical thickness results of
> Freesurfer with the results of another software.
Hi Elina,
You could have a look at
http://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/recon-all#Step-wiseDirectives-1 and
http://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/ReconAllDevTable to identify the
needed time of each process. But I have to mention, that the timeline is not
perfectly accurate and can vary
Hi everyone,
As I dont do a study in which I compare a group of subjects with some kind
of abnormality with a control group I was looking for literature values for
cortical thickness. The only paper I found which was written by von Economo
et al. in 1925 doing a post-mortem analysis.
Are t
t: Wednesday, May 13, 2009 2:55 PM
To: Bruce Fischl
Cc: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu; Falk Lüsebrink
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Literature values for cortical thickness
Hi Falk,
We do indeed have cortical thickness values for each of the parcellation
units for a range of subjects (healthly elderly,
Hi FreeSurfers,
Im still trying to process some high resolution data through the freesurfer
stream, but it is constantly failing during several different stages. The
biggest issue is the skull stripping and Im still trying to get good
results here.
Using the hires switch during autoreco
Hi Ali,
Try using the cm switch for mri_convert. This should conform the input not
to 1mm iso and 256x256 matrix size, but will conform to the minimum voxel
size. The result should be an image having the correct resolution and matrix
size. Though you should keep in mind that you will have 320
Hi FreeSurfers,
At the end of mri_fill Im told to check the filled volume as the cerebellum
may be included. It is and also the brainstem. But actually I dont know
how to fix this. Do I need to include the seed points for cc and pons for
better cutting planes? Do I need to manually edit the
also tried using seed points, though the cerebellum was never erased.
Regards,
Falk
-Original Message-
From: freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
[mailto:freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu] On Behalf Of Bruce Fischl
Sent: Monday, May 18, 2009 2:07 PM
To: Falk Lüsebrink
Cc: frees
sn't need to be included within FreeSurfer but it would be better if it
could handle the .mgz format.
Regards,
Falk
-Original Message-
From: freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
[mailto:freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu] On Behalf Of Falk Lüsebrink
Sent: Monday, May 18, 2009 2:36
me voxels, so I think I will stick with it.
Thanks in advance,
Regards,
Falk
-Original Message-
From: Allison Stevens [mailto:astev...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu]
Sent: Tuesday, May 19, 2009 5:38 PM
To: Nick Schmansky
Cc: Falk Lüsebrink
Subject: RE: [Freesurfer] mri_fill
Falk,
I can help you g
Hi FreeSurfers,
Due to an accident and after several hundreds of hours of work I was finally
able to completely (actually not completely, but it seems to work) process
high resolution data with an isometric voxel size of 0.6mm without any
manual intervention, while using the advantage of all at
Hello,
Im having trouble to generate a correct aseg.mgz for one volume of mine.
The nu_noneck.mgz is also incorrect and therefore I think the -careg stage
of autorecon2 might fail. Is there a way to do some kind quality check, like
the tal-check during autorecon1, to see whether the talairach.
Kavec
Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2009 1:31 PM
To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Troubleshooting
Hi Falk,
On Thursday 28 May 2009 11:56:51 Falk Lüsebrink wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
>
> Im having trouble to generate a correct aseg.mgz for one volume of mine.
> The nu_
Yes, the skull stripping looks nice.
- Original Message -
From: "Bruce Fischl"
To: "Falk Lüsebrink"
Cc:
Sent: Monday, June 29, 2009 6:19 PM
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Bad aseg
Did you check the skull stripping?
On Jun 29, 2009, at 3:54 AM, F
I could do that, but not before wednesday.
- Original Message -
From: "Bruce Fischl"
To: "Falk Lüsebrink"
Cc:
Sent: Monday, June 29, 2009 6:53 PM
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Bad aseg
do you want to send us the subject?
On Mon, 29 Jun 2009, [UTF-8] Falk
Lüsebri
Hi FreeSurfers,
As the subcortical segmentation fails fairly often on my high resolution
data I want to skip it by using the noaseg flag, but Im currently
encountering another issue.
1.)During the fix stage of autorecon2 I receive following error during
mris_euler_numbers (also if I
Behalf Of Bruce Fischl
Sent: Thursday, July 30, 2009 2:39 PM
To: Falk Lüsebrink
Cc: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Processing data with -noaseg flag
Hi Falk,
can you really not afford the 6 minutes or so of scan time to get a good
1mm dataset? We have analyzed a bunch of 7T da
20, 2009 12:12 AM
To: Falk Lüsebrink
Cc: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] mris_fix_topology
It was not mris_fix_topology that failed but mris_euler_number (but that
might have failed because of something in the topology fix). What
happens if you:
cd /home/falk
: Thursday, August 20, 2009 4:44 AM
To: Falk Lüsebrink
Cc: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu; 'Douglas N Greve'
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] mris_fix_topology
are you out of disk space?
On Thu, 20 Aug 2009, Falk Lüsebrink wrote:
> Hi Doug,
>
> I get the following error:
>
> rh.orig:
uce Fischl
Sent: Thursday, August 20, 2009 2:36 PM
To: Falk Lüsebrink
Cc: freesur...@surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] mris_fix_topology
yes. The only time I've seen this error is when the surface file didn't
finish writing. You can load the defects with something l
same. A fix is highly appreciated.
Thanks,
Falk Lüsebrink
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it
put volume T1.mgz is conformed to 256^3 and therefore to an
isotropic resolution of 1mm. This also happens if mri_normalize is used by hand
using the -noconform flag.
A fix is highly appreciated.
Thanks in advance,
Falk Lüsebrink
___
Freesurfer mai
ttached is the recon-all.log and the output of mri_info of orig.mgz and
nu.mgz.
Thanks again,
Falk Lüsebrink
Original-Nachricht
> Datum: Tue, 9 Nov 2010 21:06:49 -0500 (EST)
> Von: Bruce Fischl
> An: "Falk Lüsebrink"
> CC: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvar
Hi Bruce,
I'm trying to process data with a higher native resolution than 1mm^3 in
order to investigate whether a better resolution leads to more accurate
results in terms of cortical thickness.
Best,
Falk Lüsebrink
-Original Message-
From: freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvar
82 matches
Mail list logo
