Hi Freesurfers,
I would like to make sure I am using the funcroi commands correctly for
anatomical and functional ROI analyses (using the aseg to anatomically
constrain), and I have some questions about the commands.
If I want to extract the average percent signal change in the whole left
amyg
the label file instead of seg?
Thanks!
Emily
On Dec 12, 2013, at 11:36 AM, Douglas N Greve wrote:
>
> On 12/12/2013 10:08 AM, Emily Boeke wrote:
>> Hi Freesurfers,
>>
>> I would like to make sure I am using the funcroi commands correctly for
>> anatomical a
;
> where ces.nii.gz is the output of isxconcat-sess for the analysis/contrast
> you want to extract the data from
>
> doug
>
> On 12/12/2013 02:04 PM, Emily Boeke wrote:
>> Hi Doug,
>>
>> Thanks for your response.
>>
>> I have another question rel
rage/mri/orig.mgz
>
> instead
> doug
>
> On 12/13/2013 09:17 AM, Emily Boeke wrote:
>> Hi Doug,
>>
>> I tried the mri_label2vol command but the mask created does not match the
>> label. The mask is shifted so that it's posterior to the label (by ~15
>> sli
Hi Freesurfers,
I have some questions about ROI analyses.
1. I use the mni305 and fsaverage flags during preprocessing. Does this mean
that when I run funcroi-config, funcroi-sess, etc, the analysis is being done
for each subject in mni305 space, as opposed to native space? Meaning, If I
spec
--src
subject fsaverage --trglabel ${SUBJECTS_DIR}/subject/label/mylabel.label
--trgsubject subject -regmethod surface --hemi lh
Thanks,
Emily
On Mar 28, 2014, at 11:15 AM, Douglas N Greve wrote:
>
> On 03/28/2014 08:51 AM, Emily Boeke wrote:
>> Hi Freesurfers,
>>
>> I
it creating one
segmentation out of my label and one out of the rest of the cortical surface?
Also, could you please address the 3rd question from the email below? Thanks so
much!
Best,
Emily
On Mar 28, 2014, at 12:37 PM, Douglas N Greve wrote:
>
> On 03/28/2014 12:04 PM, Emily Boeke
Hi all,
I want to convert a mask I made in MNI152 space using the Harvard-Oxford Atlas
into a (subcortical) label file so that I can run an ROI analysis using
func2roi-sess. Does anyone know what commands I would need to do so?
Thanks!
Emily___
Free
Hi all,
I would like to save copy of the CentOS5 release of Freesurfer in my group's
work space as described in the email below. The link in the email that is
supposed to explain this doesn't work; could someone please let me know how to
do this or point me to another webpage that explains it?
Hi All,
I'm running Monte Carlo simulations on functional data, and the coordinate
information outputted in the cluster.summary file isn't making sense. Usually
the coordinates for the clusters listed are Talairach coordinates, but in the
.summary files I'm getting, the coordinates are labeled
flowed
can you send the file?
On 06/25/2013 10:08 AM, Emily Boeke wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I'm running Monte Carlo simulations on functional data, and the coordinate
> information outputted in the cluster.summary file isn't making sense. Usually
> the coordinates for th
Any thoughts on why this file turned out this way?
Thanks!
Emily
On Jun 26, 2013, at 8:09 AM, Emily Boeke wrote:
> Sure, here it is:
>
> # Cluster Growing Summary (mri_volcluster)
> # $Id: mri_volcluster.c,v 1.38.2.3 2009/01/16 02:26:36 greve Exp $
> # cwd
> /autofs/c
This was the command I ran:
mri_glmfit-sim --glmdir tal.sm.wls.pct.rfx --sim mc-z 1 2
HvL.SBQ.2.1.pos --stim-sign pos
On Jun 28, 2013, at 3:29 PM, Douglas N Greve wrote:
> Hi Emily, what is your mri_glmfit-sim command line?
> doug
>
>
> On 06/28/2013 02:40 PM, Em
4.5
Emily
On Jul 2, 2013, at 11:45 AM, Douglas N Greve wrote:
>
> Hi Emily, what version of FS are you using?
> doug
>
>
> On 07/02/2013 11:41 AM, Emily Boeke wrote:
>> Hi Doug,
>>
>> Sorry to be overly persistent, but I just wanted to make sure y
Hello everyone,
I am looking at a visual stimulus vs fixation contrast in my individual
subjects' data to make sure we are seeing normal activation there. If I look at
the surface data in tksurfer, I see activation in the occipital cortex, but in
the mni305 analysis, there is no activation in t
ps. If you really want to see the full volume analysis, then there are
some flags that will do this.
Message: 14
Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2013 13:15:37 -0400
From: Emily Boeke
Subject: [Freesurfer] Different results in surface and volume analyses
To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Message-ID: <948e8fdf-
Hi Freesurfers,
I have a contrast that produces comparable activation in both hemispheres. But
when I set the threshold using FDR in the Configure Overlay Display window,
the threshold is set to 5.1 for left hemisphere and 3.3 for the right
hemisphere, leaving significant clusters only in the
Hi Freesurfers,
I am doing some analyses for an experiment where paradigm files were
automatically generated by Matlab during stimulus presentation. The script was
designed to make paradigm files for an older version of freesurfer, so the
files only have 2 columns. I am going to adjust these fi
18 matches
Mail list logo