no, that is not normal, you must have done something wrong :(
On 05/09/2016 12:09 PM, Martin Juneja wrote:
> Hi Dr. Greve,
>
> Thanks for all your help.
> After displaying second level functional connectivity maps (actually
> when I display subject-wise FC maps also), I tried to match the seed
>
Hi Dr. Greve,
Thanks for all your help.
After displaying second level functional connectivity maps (actually when I
display subject-wise FC maps also), I tried to match the seed region
location on FC maps using tksurfer, I found that that at the seed-region
partial correlation coefficient (pcc) va
Yes, those are the right commands. That will give you the ces (the
regression coefficient). Typically, people use the pearson correlation
coefficient (pcc), but I have not seen many differences between the two.
On 05/06/2016 05:13 PM, Martin Juneja wrote:
> Thanks a lot Dr. Greve.
>
> So as per
Thanks a lot Dr. Greve.
So as per your suggestion: I ran the command isxconcat-sess -sf sessidlist
-analysis workmem.sm05.rh -contrast encode-v-base -o my-group -all-contrasts
i.e.- without specifying -map argument. So this generates ces.nii.gz and
vesvar.nii.gz in output folder my-group.
To get t
You should not use the sig as that is the first level significance. If
you pass that to the higher level, then the results will be hard to
interpret. I think you'll want to use pcc or ces. Otherwise looks ok.
doug
On 05/06/2016 12:03 PM, Martin Juneja wrote:
> Dear FS experts,
>
> I just finishe
