Re: [Freesurfer] strangely low lhCorticalWhiteMatterVol estimate

2012-03-15 Thread Michael Harms
Hi Doug, As a post-mortem to this thread, in the process of going to "tweak" the wm.mgz as you suggested, I noticed that there were actually some substantial errors in the surfaces in the calcarine, presumably due to topology correction gone astray. So, whether or not that precipitated the probl

Re: [Freesurfer] strangely low lhCorticalWhiteMatterVol estimate

2012-03-01 Thread Douglas N Greve
mris_euler_number surf/lh.white euler # = v-e+f = 2g-2: 166103 - 498303 + 332202 = 2 --> 0 holes F =2V-4: 332202 = 332206-4 (0) 2E=3F:996606 = 996606 (0) total defect index = 0 mris_euler_number surf/rh.white euler # = v-e+f = 2g-2: 167114 - 501336 + 334224 = 2 --

Re: [Freesurfer] strangely low lhCorticalWhiteMatterVol estimate

2012-03-01 Thread Bruce Fischl
what is the euler number for the white surface for this subject (mris_euler_number)? On Thu, 1 Mar 2012, Douglas N Greve wrote: > Hi Mike, I *think* I've found the problem with this subject. The way > that the volume inside the white surface is computed is to create a > high-res volume (.25mm iso

Re: [Freesurfer] strangely low lhCorticalWhiteMatterVol estimate

2012-03-01 Thread Douglas N Greve
Hi Mike, I *think* I've found the problem with this subject. The way that the volume inside the white surface is computed is to create a high-res volume (.25mm iso), then create a shell based on the intersection of the faces with the volume. The outside of the shell is "flooded", the result is

Re: [Freesurfer] strangely low lhCorticalWhiteMatterVol estimate

2012-02-29 Thread Douglas N Greve
Hi Mike, can you upload the subject and I'll take a look? doug Michael Harms wrote: > Hello, > > Anyone have a chance to look at this? Should we just forget about > trying to get an accurate lhCorticalWhiteMatterVol value for this > subject? > > thanks, > -MH > > On Tue, 2012-02-21 at 15:35 -060

Re: [Freesurfer] strangely low lhCorticalWhiteMatterVol estimate

2012-02-29 Thread Michael Harms
Hello, Anyone have a chance to look at this? Should we just forget about trying to get an accurate lhCorticalWhiteMatterVol value for this subject? thanks, -MH On Tue, 2012-02-21 at 15:35 -0600, Michael Harms wrote: > Hi guys, > > We have a subject processed with FS v5.1 in which > lhCortical

[Freesurfer] strangely low lhCorticalWhiteMatterVol estimate

2012-02-22 Thread Michael Harms
Hi guys, We have a subject processed with FS v5.1 in which lhCorticalWhiteMatterVol in aseg.stats is much too low -- only 33781 mm^3. From what I see, the aseg.mgz looks fine. 'mris_volume lh.white' returns 287261 and running mri_segstats without the --excl-ctxgmwm option returns a Left-Cerebra