Re: [Freesurfer] mri_label2label problem

Hi Doug, Yes i was visualising it on fsaverage. I switched to sub003 and the ROI looks perfect. What a simple mistake, thanks for your help. Kind regards, Bronwyn Overs Research Assistant Neuroscience Research Australia Margarete Ainsworth Building Barker Street Randwick Sydney NSW 2031 Australi

Re: [Freesurfer] mri_label2label problem

Are you visualizing the output on subject sub003? It looks like fsaverage On 01/26/2017 06:23 PM, Bronwyn Overs wrote: > Hi Mailing list, > > I have been running the mri_label2label command and have encountered a > problem with the newly generated label. The command I am running is as > follows

Re: [Freesurfer] mri_label2label problem revisited

Michael, can you send me the label in fsaverage space? doug On 06/16/2015 05:00 PM, Michael Kranz wrote: > Hi guys, > > I have created a custom surface label in the fsaverage template. I > then used mri_label2label to map onto an individual subject. Despite > the fsaverage label looking ok, the

Re: [Freesurfer] mri_label2label problem revisited

ok, thanks Michael, we will investigate On Tue, 23 Jun 2015, Michael Waskom wrote: Hi Bruce, Not the same Michael but I see this all the time with 5.3. Interestingly, transforming annotations using mri_surf2surf does not run into the issue — perhaps that is what you're thinking of? Best, Mic

Re: [Freesurfer] mri_label2label problem revisited

Hi Bruce, Not the same Michael but I see this all the time with 5.3. Interestingly, transforming annotations using mri_surf2surf does not run into the issue — perhaps that is what you're thinking of? Best, Michael On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 8:20 AM, Bruce Fischl wrote: > Hi Michael > > what vers

Re: [Freesurfer] mri_label2label problem revisited

Hi Michael what version are you using? I thought this was fixed long ago cheers Bruce On Tue, 16 Jun 2015, Michael Kranz wrote: Hi guys, I have created a custom surface label in the fsaverage template. I then used mri_label2label to map onto an individual subject. Despite the fsaverage label

Re: [Freesurfer] mri_label2label problem

h...@med.uni-muenchen.de > > > > > http://www.mail-archive.com/freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/msg15125.html > > Re: [Freesurfer] Mri_label2label problem? > Douglas N Greve
Tue, 21 Sep 2010 06:47:09 -0700 > what does the original label look like? Can you convert one of the

[Freesurfer] mri_label2label problem

) Klinikum der Universität München Max-Lebsche-Platz 30 81377 Munich | Germany ruthger.righ...@med.uni-muenchen.de http://www.mail-archive.com/freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/msg15125.html Re: [Freesurfer] Mri_label2label problem? Douglas N Greve
Tue, 21 Sep 2010 06:47:09 -0700 what does the

Re: [Freesurfer] mri_label2label problem

Hi Ri, You can try using the dilate and erode label tool in tksurfer. Click on subject Y's label and in the tksurfer tools window, Tools -> Labels -> Dilate Selected Label Tools -> Labels -> Erode Selected Label Sita. On Sun, 10 Oct 2010, Ritobrato Datta wrote: > Hello All, > > I hand drew

Re: [Freesurfer] Mri_label2label problem?

what does the original label look like? Can you convert one of the predefined labels (eg, lh.V1.label) to see if the same thing happens? doug Pye, Brandon (NIH/NIMH) [F] wrote: > Hey guys, > > We are using mri_label2label to convert a label created from a cluster (using > mri_surfcluster) from

[Freesurfer] Mri_label2label problem?

Hey guys, We are using mri_label2label to convert a label created from a cluster (using mri_surfcluster) from an average subject to each individual subject. We have 6 individual labels that we are converting. All of the analysis is done using surface data. I use the command in the generalize