Hello, Have you been able to look at the data I sent over yet? It would be
great to get a sense of what we can or cannot do to correct the boundaries.
Thanks
Corinna
On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 12:05 PM, Corinna Bauer
wrote:
> Hi Bruce, just checking in to see if you have had an opportunity to tak
Hi Bruce, just checking in to see if you have had an opportunity to take a
look at the data I sent over?
Thanks
Corinna
On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 6:19 PM, Corinna Bauer wrote:
> Sure. I'm uploading now. The above is approximately slice 75, although the
> control points/wm surface problem is seen
Sure. I'm uploading now. The above is approximately slice 75, although the
control points/wm surface problem is seen throughout in this subject.
Thanks
Corinna
On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 3:46 PM, Bruce Fischl
wrote:
> Hi Corinna
>
> it's hard to tell what's going on from a single slice. If you up
Hi Corinna
it's hard to tell what's going on from a single slice. If you upload the
subject and tell us the specific coordinates that you see problems in we
will take a look
cheers
Bruce
On Tue, 17 May 2016, Corinna Bauer wrote:
Hello all,We are analyzing data from our collaborators and are
Hello all,
We are analyzing data from our collaborators and are running into some
difficulties with the accuracy of the pial and wm boundaries. The wm.mgz
appears to follow the actual WM, independent of the wm surface boundary.
Attached is an example showing two types of problems.
1. the WM surface
