Hi Doug,
All other things being equal, if you switch from AP to RL phase encoding
in an axial acquisition, then the PE direction will switch from the y-axis
to the x-axis in the images. It doesn't really have anything to do with
Siemens, since the images are written out in a standard anatomical
o
I guess it is possible that Siemens is doing something funny with the
images. I've never used sagittal before.
On 11/13/2012 12:51 PM, Clark Fisher wrote:
> I'm using a script that calls unpacksdcmdir. Maybe there is some setting in
> our config file that forces the orientation? Nothing obviou
Hi Clark, hi Doug
fugue has an option that might help here. Here is the relevant excerpt rom
calling fugue on the command line (as in fugue of fsl 5.0.1 but I am sure this
was also present in fsl 4.1.n):
"--unwarpdirspecifies direction of warping [x/y/z/x-/y-/z-] (default y)"
it seems that t
I'm using a script that calls unpacksdcmdir. Maybe there is some setting in
our config file that forces the orientation? Nothing obvious though.
On Nov 13, 2012, at 12:03 PM, Douglas N Greve wrote:
> I'm a little confused as to why the rows are not the phase encode direction
> to begin with.
I'm a little confused as to why the rows are not the phase encode
direction to begin with. What did you use to convert the dicoms to nifti?
doug
On 11/13/2012 11:59 AM, Clark Fisher wrote:
> Thanks Doug,
>
> Would the proper way to handle this then be to switch the rows and columns
> before unwa
Thanks Doug,
Would the proper way to handle this then be to switch the rows and columns
before unwarping, then switch them back before the further processing steps?
-Clark
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.
actually, I have no idea:). This is a wrapper around the FSL programs. I
wrote the code always assuming that the phase encode direction was the
row direction. Usually, it gets unpacked that way. Is the data getting
reoriented along the way?
doug
On 11/13/2012 11:34 AM, Satrajit Ghosh wrote:
> h
hi doug,
just to follow up on this. if i had the phase encode direction (we
currently store various dicom attributes in a nifti header extension),
where would i provide it?
cheers,
satra
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 11:27 AM, Douglas N Greve wrote:
> Hi Clark, the phase encode direction is always
Hi Clark, the phase encode direction is always lost since that
information is not represented in the nifti header. epidewarp.fsl always
assumes that the phase encode direction is in the row direction.
doug
On 11/13/2012 07:32 AM, Clark Fisher wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I recently switched the pha
Hi everyone,
I recently switched the phase encoding direction of the functional sequence
I've been using from F >> H to R >> L and ran into a problem with
epidewarp.fsl (in version 4). The unwarping was still happening along the F >>
H axis in the new images where phase encoding was R >> L.
10 matches
Mail list logo