Re: [Freesurfer] Getting the resolution out

2005-09-20 Thread Evelina Busa
Hi Daniel, Is it possible to get the original dicom data? You said the data were already processed by Freesurfer when they got to you, so maybe whoever gave them to you can point you to the whereabouts of the raw dicom files? Ev On Tue, 20 Sep 2005, Daniel Goldenholz wrote: Hi Bruce I a

Re: [Freesurfer] Getting the resolution out

2005-09-20 Thread Bruce Fischl
the COR files will always be 1mm isotropic, since we resample the data to ensure it is On Tue, 20 Sep 2005, Daniel Goldenholz wrote: Hi Bruce I am not sure that I have the original dicom files. I did find a file called COR-.info in mri/orig/ This is the filedump... Perhaps this has the answ

Re: [Freesurfer] Getting the resolution out

2005-09-20 Thread Daniel Goldenholz
Hi Bruce I am not sure that I have the original dicom files. I did find a file called COR-.info in mri/orig/ This is the filedump... Perhaps this has the answer? imnr0 1 imnr1 256 ptype 2 x 256 y 256 fov 0.256000 thick 0.001000 psiz 0.001000 locatn 0.00 strtx -0.128000 endx 0.128000 strty

Re: [Freesurfer] Getting the resolution out

2005-09-20 Thread Bruce Fischl
Hi Daniel, you need to look at your original data (e.g. dicom files). You can mri_info to tell you. Bruce On Tue, 20 Sep 2005, Daniel Goldenholz wrote: Hi. I was handed some data analyzed with freesurfer, and I would like to know what is the exact resolution of the T1 mri, i.e. 1.25mm x 3mm

[Freesurfer] Getting the resolution out

2005-09-20 Thread Daniel Goldenholz
Hi. I was handed some data analyzed with freesurfer, and I would like to know what is the exact resolution of the T1 mri, i.e. 1.25mm x 3mm x 2mm for example. Where can I look in the freesurfer folder to find out? Thanks -- Daniel Goldenholz

Re: [Freesurfer] newbie question regarding pooling (analysis over different sessions)

2005-09-20 Thread Doug Greve
One way to do it is, as you suggest, just put all the runs into the same bold directory, then just use mc as registration. This works to some extent. The main problem with it is that you can get fairly different B0 distortion between sessions because of the different head/body position in the

[Freesurfer] newbie question regarding pooling (analysis over different sessions)

2005-09-20 Thread Sebastian Moeller
Dear fs-fast wizards, doing monkey fMRI in Bremen (block desing so far) I run into the problem that analysing the data from one session does not lead to well defined activation maps. Therefore I would like to pool over several sessions (always within one subject). Unfortunately I have did not

Re: [Freesurfer] Atlases and newer releases

2005-09-20 Thread Bruce Fischl
Hi Satra, not usually, but in this case yes, since the changes are so large and affect the folding patterns (e.g. ventricles completely filled) Bruce On Tue, 20 Sep 2005, Satrajit Ghosh wrote: Does one need to recreate custom atlases when changing to a new release? And if so does this proc

[Freesurfer] Atlases and newer releases

2005-09-20 Thread Satrajit Ghosh
Does one need to recreate custom atlases when changing to a new release? And if so does this process imply reprocessing all the subjects originally used to create the atlas? Thanks, Satra ___ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https

RE: [Freesurfer] Autorecon re-processing

2005-09-20 Thread Bruce Fischl
no, you want white matter to be close to 110 and gray matter to have a sharp boundary and be considerably darker (e.g. 60) On Tue, 20 Sep 2005, Fornito, Alexander wrote: Would manually changing the intensities in brain volume using the configure volume brush tool in tkmedit help? Shoudl white

RE: [Freesurfer] Autorecon re-processing

2005-09-20 Thread Fornito, Alexander
Would manually changing the intensities in brain volume using the configure volume brush tool in tkmedit help? Shoudl white matter be re-labelled as 255? What would be a good value for grey matter? -Original Message- From: Bruce Fischl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tue 9/20/2005 2