On Wednesday, 11 March 2020 at 0:20:03 +, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
[originally sent to current@]
> I just updated my laptop from source, and somewhere along the way
> the key-codes Xorg sees changed.
Indeed. This doesn't just affect -CURRENT: it happened to me on
-STABLE last week, so I'm c
On Wednesday, 24 June 2020 at 9:36:23 -0700, Donald Wilde wrote:
> All,
>
> I recently upgraded my 12-STABLE system to the latest, and now my
> swap subsystems aren't working. I deliberately set up a 40GB
> partition for swap, and when I do 'top -t' I am only seeing 7906M
> total.
That looks susp
On Wednesday, 24 June 2020 at 18:51:04 -0700, Donald Wilde wrote:
> On 6/24/20, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
>> On Wednesday, 24 June 2020 at 9:36:23 -0700, Donald Wilde wrote:
>>> All,
>>>
>>> I recently upgraded my 12-STABLE system to the latest, an
On Wednesday, 24 June 2020 at 20:34:24 -0700, Donald Wilde wrote:
> On 6/24/20, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
>> On Wednesday, 24 June 2020 at 18:51:04 -0700, Donald Wilde wrote:
>>> On 6/24/20, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
>>>> On Wednesday,
On Friday, 26 June 2020 at 1:55:29 +0700, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
> 26.06.2020 1:30, Donald Wilde wrote:
>
>> Here's 'pstat -s' on the i3 (which registers as cpu HAMMER):
>>
>> Device 1K-blocks UsedAvail Capacity
>> /dev/ada0s1b 335544320 33554432 0%
>> /dev/ada0s1d
On Wednesday, 24 June 2020 at 23:27:27 -0700, Kevin Oberman wrote,
without trimming:
> On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 10:30 PM Greg 'groggy' Lehey
> wrote:
>
>> On Wednesday, 24 June 2020 at 20:34:24 -0700, Donald Wilde wrote:
>>> On 6/24/20, Greg 'groggy' L
On Thursday, 25 June 2020 at 19:31:34 -0700, Donald Wilde wrote:
> On 6/25/20, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
>> On Wednesday, 24 June 2020 at 23:27:27 -0700, Kevin Oberman wrote,
>> without trimming:
>>
>>> On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 10:30 PM Greg 'groggy&
[line lengths recovered]
On Sunday, 1 May 2016 at 20:16:38 -0700, Jordan Hubbard wrote:
>
>> On May 1, 2016, at 5:49 PM, Warren Block wrote:
>>
>> The first quarter of 2016 showed that FreeBSD retains a strong sense of
>> ipseity. Improvements were pervasive, lending credence to the concept
On Monday, 1 November 2004 at 10:05:16 +1100, Carl Makin wrote:
> Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
>
>> On Monday, 25 October 2004 at 14:21:33 -0600, secmgr wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> It's beginning to look like that's a bad idea. Lukas is
>>
On Tuesday, 16 November 2004 at 12:50:33 -0500, Sam wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I'm trying to create a stripe over 10 disks and am hitting
> a 32-bit wall in the volume size. The plex properly sees
> the full 3726 GB, but the volume shaves off the 32nd bit
> and only sees 1678 GB.
>
> Usual for vinum?
On Wednesday, 8 December 2004 at 11:20:34 +, Robert Watson wrote:
>
> On Tue, 7 Dec 2004, Michael Nottebrock wrote:
>
>> I recently enabled SW_WATCHDOG in my kernel, but when watchdog triggers
>> a panic, no crashdump is taken although dumps are enabled. What could be
>> causing this?
>
> If y
On Thursday, 9 December 2004 at 14:52:14 +0100, Michael Schuh wrote:
> Hello,
>
> sorry for my wrong posting, it was late at night and i have *not*
> doublechecked my configuration.
If you get a panic, it's not your fault. You shouldn't be able to
panic the machine with an invalid configuration.
On Tuesday, 21 December 2004 at 13:42:40 -0500, Paul Mather wrote:
> On Tue, 2004-12-21 at 19:00 +0100, Nikolaj Hansen wrote:
>
>> I also do not think it belongs in the stable branch just yet :-D Any hope
>> of you fixing the old vinum in the 5.3 branch or is it a wait for the 5.4?
>
> AFAIK, the o
On Tuesday, 18 January 2005 at 8:33:03 -0600, Craig Boston wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 18, 2005 at 12:21:59PM +0100, David Elsing wrote:
>> Quote from the manual of the 4th example of the chapter "HOW TO SET UP
>> VINUM":
>> "In addition, the volume specification includes the keyword
>> setupstate, whic
On Sunday, 30 January 2005 at 14:28:47 -0400, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>
> Just got burnt on one of my machines, where I was looking to reconfigure
> my RAID drive ... right now, its down :(
>
> I cleared everything off the drive, unmount'd it and then did a 'vinum
> resetconfig' ... that all worked
On Tuesday, 1 February 2005 at 16:36:26 +0900, FUJITA Kazutoshi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm using recent 5-STABLE,
> and try to mirror root partition with vinum.
>
> my /boot/loader.conf is below
>
> vinum_load="YES"
> vinum.autostart="YES"
>
> But I got following message when boot
>
> ...
> vinum: loade
On Saturday, 19 March 2005 at 17:58:06 -0500, Sven Willenberger wrote:
> I am hoping someone has found a way to create this type of raid set
> using [g]vinum. I see that it is a trivial matter to create a mirror of
> 2 striped sets but I have not seen a way to create a stripe set out of
> multiple
I've recently acquired an AMD64 box (dual Opteron 242, SiS [EMAIL PROTECTED]
motherboard
(http://www.msi.com.tw/program/products/server/svr/pro_svr_detail.php?UID=484).
See below for more details). I find it very unstable running with 8
GB memory, though 4 GB are not a problem. At first I thought
On Wednesday, 30 March 2005 at 15:30:37 -0700, Scott Long wrote:
> Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
>> I've recently acquired an AMD64 box ...
>>
>> What's unstable? ... The amd64 5.4-PRERELEASE kernel just
>> hangs/freezes.
>
> 5.3-RELEASE has a lo
On Wednesday, 30 March 2005 at 14:35:46 -0800, Steve Kargl wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 31, 2005 at 07:54:39AM +0930, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
>> None of these problems occur when I use 4 GB memory. About the only
>> strangeness, which seems to come from the BIOS, is that it
On Thursday, 31 March 2005 at 10:32:33 +0930, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
> On Thu, 31 Mar 2005 08:14, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
>>> Have you run sysutils/memtest86 with the 8 GB?
>>
>> Heh. Difficult when the system doesn't run.
>
> You could try
On Thursday, 31 March 2005 at 5:54:17 +0200, Matthias Buelow wrote:
> Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
>
>> I'm pretty sure it's not the memory. I've tried each pair
>> individually, and it's only when they're both in there together that
>>
On Wednesday, 30 March 2005 at 23:01:03 -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
>
> On Mar 30, 2005, at 8:54 PM, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
>>> lapic0: LINT1 trigger: edge
>>> lapic0: LINT1 polarity: high
>>> lapic1: Routing NMI -> LINT1
>>> lapic
[gratuitous empty lines removed]
On Wednesday, 30 March 2005 at 21:28:36 -0700, Scott Long wrote:
> Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
>> On Wednesday, 30 March 2005 at 23:01:03 -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
>>
>>> On Mar 30, 2005, at 8:54 PM, Greg 'groggy' Lehey
On Wednesday, 30 March 2005 at 22:27:43 -0700, Scott Long wrote:
> Jon Noack wrote:
>> On 03/30/05 23:14, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
>>> On Wednesday, 30 March 2005 at 21:28:36 -0700, Scott Long wrote:
>>>> Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
>>
On Thursday, 31 March 2005 at 0:00:22 -0600, Jon Noack wrote:
> On 03/30/05 23:49, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
>> Here's the complete output of acpidump -t, anyway:
>>
>>
>>
>> Since I don't know anything about ACPI, this doesn't say too
On Sunday, 3 April 2005 at 14:45:40 -0700, Nate Lawson wrote:
> Christian Brueffer wrote:
>> On Sun, Apr 03, 2005 at 12:07:14PM -0400, Pierre-Luc Drouin wrote:
>>> Christian Brueffer wrote:
On Sat, Apr 02, 2005 at 09:16:48PM -0500, Pierre-Luc Drouin wrote:
> Since I upgraded from 5.3
On Sunday, 3 April 2005 at 21:43:57 -0700, Nate Lawson wrote:
> Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
>>
>> I'm experiencing similar issues. How can I confirm that this is the
>> case without rebooting the machine (which would be inconvenient)? Is
>> there som
On Sunday, 3 April 2005 at 21:59:45 -0700, Nate Lawson wrote:
> Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
>> On Sunday, 3 April 2005 at 21:43:57 -0700, Nate Lawson wrote:
>>> Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
>>>> I'm experiencing similar issues. How can I c
On Thursday, 31 March 2005 at 10:59:02 -0800, David O'Brien wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 31, 2005 at 11:24:29AM +0930, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
>> On Thursday, 31 March 2005 at 10:32:33 +0930, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
>>> On Thu, 31 Mar 2005 08:14, Greg 'grogg
On Friday, 8 April 2005 at 13:04:18 -0700, David O'Brien wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 10:09:11AM +0930, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
>> The moral of the story is, I suppose, "don't buy the MSI K8T
>> Master2-FAR". I was warned about the mother
On Wednesday, 17 January 2007 at 9:56:51 +1000, Greg Black wrote:
> On 2007-01-16, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
>
>> The 1.5.x version _is_ working for me. It is 2.0.x that
>> exhibits severe problems.
>
> I was surprised and annoyed when I found that the reasonably reliable
> 1.5.x version had been replace
On Wednesday, 17 January 2007 at 3:16:44 +0100, Roland Smith wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 17, 2007 at 11:37:53AM +1030, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
>>
>> I can't agree. It has hijacked some keys used by Wikipedia (alt-S,
>> alt-P), and so far I've found it impo
On Monday, 26 June 2006 at 19:15:36 +0200, Roland Smith wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 26, 2006 at 12:22:07PM -0400, Sven Willenberger wrote:
>> I have an i386 system currently running 5.2.1-RELEASE with a vinum
>> mirror array (2 drives comprising /usr ). I want to upgrade this to
>> 5.5-RELEASE which, if I
On Wednesday, 30 March 2005 at 16:04:44 -0700, Scott Long wrote:
> Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
>> On Wednesday, 30 March 2005 at 15:30:37 -0700, Scott Long wrote:
>>
>>> Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
>>>
>>>> I've recently a
On Wednesday, 30 March 2005 at 16:01:14 -0700, Scott Long wrote:
> Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
>> On Wednesday, 30 March 2005 at 14:35:46 -0800, Steve Kargl wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, Mar 31, 2005 at 07:54:39AM +0930, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
>>&
On Wednesday, 30 March 2005 at 14:57:15 -0800, Steve Kargl wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 31, 2005 at 08:14:45AM +0930, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
>> On Wednesday, 30 March 2005 at 14:35:46 -0800, Steve Kargl wrote:
>>> On Thu, Mar 31, 2005 at 07:54:39AM +0930, Greg 'groggy
[Format recovered--see http://www.lemis.com/email/email-format.html]
[gratuitous empty lines removed]
On Wednesday, 30 March 2005 at 16:23:34 -0700, Scott Long wrote:
> Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
>> On Wednesday, 30 March 2005 at 16:04:44 -0700, Scott Long wrote:
>>&g
On Wednesday, 30 March 2005 at 15:25:37 -0800, Peter Wemm wrote:
> On Wednesday 30 March 2005 03:09 pm, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
>> On Wednesday, 30 March 2005 at 16:04:44 -0700, Scott Long wrote:
>>> Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
>>>> As I describ
On Thursday, 12 May 2005 at 17:16:59 +0200, Matthias Buelow wrote:
> Peter Orlowski wrote:
>
>>> At this point, I'm thinking that as far as S/W RAID goes in FreeBSD, the
>>> "R" is pretty meaningless
>>
>> Well, "R" does not mean "redundant" but "realtime backup" ;-(.
>
> BTW., what is the status o
On Friday, 10 June 2005 at 18:05:37 +0100, Steve Roome wrote:
> We're using mostly:
>
> 5.4-STABLE FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE #0: Mon Jun 6 12:22:18 BST 2005
>
> This is on a Dell PowerEdge 2850. (2 * 2.8 GHz Xeons, 4GB ram, disks),
> we've been keeping up with stable because supposedly all these new
> f
On Wednesday, 6 July 2005 at 2:31:37 +0200, Michael Nottebrock wrote:
> Readily reproducable, 5.4-STABLE as of last week.
>
> Kernel messages prior to panic (from memory):
>
> pcm0: unregister: mixer busy
> WARNING: Driver mistake: destroy_dev on 30/3
This is a phkism. It's supposed to tell the
On Tuesday, 6 September 2005 at 14:05:03 +0100, Tomas Palfi wrote:
> To all,
>
> i've got a server with two identical disks which I would like to set
> up as a one way mirror with Vinum volume manager. How do I go about
> configuring the entire disk making it bootable mirror of the first
> one?
T
On Wednesday, 21 September 2005 at 14:39:55 -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 21, 2005 at 02:31:18PM -0400, John Nielsen wrote:
>> Should it be possible to compile and run MySQL 4.1 with GCC 3.4 on a FreeBSD
>> 4.11 machine?
>>
>> I have a server which, for the time being at least, cannot b
On Saturday, 19 November 2005 at 21:37:03 -0600, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
> I recently upgraded from stable-6 of Nov 4 to stable-6 of today on
> my Dell Latitude D800 Laptop, and suddenly the response of the
> touchpad mouse and keyboard was bery bad.
Heh. I saw the subject line and though
On Sunday, 20 November 2005 at 23:01:41 -0600, Doug Poland wrote:
>
> On Sun, November 20, 2005 01:59, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
>> On Saturday, 19 November 2005 at 21:37:03 -0600, Stephen
>> Montgomery-Smith wrote:
>>> I recently upgraded from stable-6 of
On Tuesday, 22 November 2005 at 17:12:46 -0800, Graham North wrote:
> Am currently trying to choose between a couple of laptops, the luck
> winner of which will have Freebsd loaded alongside WinXP.
>
> Dell Latitude d600 with Radeon 9000? video, intel pro wireless
> or
> IBM R51 - Intel Extreme2, i
On Wednesday, 23 November 2005 at 11:42:17 -0800, Gary Kline wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 23, 2005 at 08:19:07PM +0100, Bartosz Fabianowski wrote:
>>> Or, can the touch pads be disabled in the bios?
>>
>> I have a Dell Inspiron 8600C, which only has a touch pad. ...
>>
>> Of course, this is not a Thinkpad
On Saturday, 26 November 2005 at 20:25:58 -0600, Eric Anderson wrote:
> Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
>> I've had both Dell and ThinkPad (no longer IBM). I prefer Dell,
>> despite their attempts to convince me otherwise.
>>
>> However, we currently seem t
On Sunday, 27 November 2005 at 23:10:01 +, Chris Howells wrote:
> On Sunday 27 November 2005 11:50, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
>> Since then I've also discovered that the builtin wireless card doesn't
>> work either. It's:
>>
>> iwi0:
On Thursday, 24 November 2005 at 11:17:41 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> On the [Dell] warrenty... I'm hard on equipment and I depend on my
> equipment. I've been impressed that if I put my foot down and "say"
> that I believe something needs replacing, then without much fuss,
> they do it.
On Friday, 2 December 2005 at 14:32:58 +0100, kama wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I am just wondering why the cpu-timer is doubled from what I set in
> kern.hz?
>
> # vmstat -i
> ...
> cpu0: timer 14314031 1999
>
> # sysctl -a | grep hz
> kern.clockrate: { hz = 1000, tick = 1000, pro
[Format recovered--see http://www.lemis.com/email/email-format.html]
Log output wrapped.
On Sunday, 24 March 2002 at 21:52:40 -0800, Jesse Geddis wrote:
> wow, this person is quite effective. they've been trying this since
> this morning 4mins after i got my web server up. been doing it every
>
On Thursday, 11 April 2002 at 10:43:46 +0400, Eugene Mitrofanov wrote:
> Hi
>
> I have 2 raid0 volumes on my server. Some time ago one hard disk died
> and I removed it from the server. Now the system reboots suddenly every
> 1..5 days. I recompiled kernel with debuging info and located the place
On Thursday, 25 April 2002 at 23:18:34 +1000, Darren Reed wrote:
>
> Can someone explain why when I use gdb under FreeBSD 4.5, I cannot open
> files on an NFS partition that I can outside of gdb ?
>
> ie. i can do:
>
> $ wc Makefile
>
> but I cannot do:
>
> $ gdb `which wc`
> (gdb) run Makefile
>
On Thursday, 25 April 2002 at 16:59:21 +0200, Holger Kipp wrote:
> Hi,
>
> finally solved. PR filed with diffs.
>
> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=37458
> (just in case anyone is interested)
I forwarded you the commit messages some hours ago.
Greg
--
See complete headers for address
On Wednesday, 29 May 2002 at 8:11:41 -0600, Scott Long wrote:
> On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 01:42:11PM +0930, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
>>
>> I'm sure that there are good reasons for small stripe sizes. I don't
>> believe that efficiency is one of them
On Wednesday, 29 May 2002 at 17:16:36 -0700, Matthew Dillon wrote:
> I am not going to take a stand on performance other then to say to
> both parties: prove your points.
Well, I thought I had done just that. If you have any issues with my
claims, you're welcome to raise them.
> I
On Sunday, 18 August 2002 at 13:51:54 -0700, Chern Lee wrote:
> I'm not sure where along the line I lost my second CPU, but I'm sure I had
> it 4.5. Now, the second CPU is never detected.
>
> Dual Pentium III 600
> Intel L440GX motherboard w/ 440GX+ chipset
>
> This is a VA Linux machine. Any id
On Thursday, 17 October 2002 at 9:35:40 +1000, Christopher Vance wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 16, 2002 at 04:31:57PM -0300, Vitor de Matos Carvalho wrote:
>> Detected the DST problem, because the Security Team did not notify? It will
>> be that this error for being of did not enteresse of administrators
On Thursday, 24 October 2002 at 11:12:11 +0400, Eugene Mitrofanov wrote:
> On 23-Oct-2002 Coleman Kane wrote:
>> I recently installed 4.7-R on a machine that runs vinum and have had no
>> trouble with my system. I also have run vinum start multiple times and
>> all it seems to do is creade another
On Saturday, 12 October 2002 at 10:32:09 +0930, Phil Kernick wrote:
> Aragon Gouveia wrote:
>> Ideally you should build, install, and boot your new kernel before
>> installing your new world. If your new kernel fails to boot for whatever
>> reason, you can easily boot the old kernel and have a full
On Thursday, 28 November 2002 at 16:26:09 -0400, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Nov 2002, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>
>>
>> Okay, I need to confirm this before I run it, cause if it doesn't work,
>> I'm royally screwed ...
>>
>> The old server, the drives on the controller I couldn't bring up h
On Thursday, 19 December 2002 at 21:33:50 -0600, Hari Bhaskaran wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am having a problem using the bootvinum script. It seems to
> consider only the first slice (PC-partition) of the root
> spindle. I have put all vinum related files
> here http://65.189.239.65/vinum_files/
>
> I have
On Thursday, 19 December 2002 at 22:34:57 -0600, Hari Bhaskaran wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 20, 2002 at 02:26:34PM +1030, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
>
>> I must confess to being a bit baffled. You seem to be confused on a
>> number of points. Certainly there's never a
On Tuesday, 11 March 2003 at 0:36:58 +0100, Joan Picanyol i Puig wrote:
> * Doug Barton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20030311 00:14]:
I think it's already covered by the statement "Owing to the generic
nature of most USB devices, with some exceptions any device of a given
class will be supp
On Sunday, 30 March 2003 at 14:08:24 +0200, Dag-Erling Smrgrav wrote:
> Lukas Ertl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Anyone has an idea what's going wrong here? (Apart from me doing bullsh*t
>> benchmarking :-) .)
>
> Just out of curiosity, try again with prime stripe sizes (31, 61, 127,
> 257, 509) o
On Sunday, 30 March 2003 at 16:30:17 +0200, Dag-Erling Smrgrav wrote:
> Anti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> try benchmarking ccd as well to see how it compares? and try some big stripe
>> sizes (4093, 8191, 12281)?
>
> I believe Greg showed in his USENIX paper on Vinum that large stripe
> sizes are
On Sunday, 30 March 2003 at 18:10:07 +0200, Dag-Erling Smrgrav wrote:
> Lukas Ertl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I'm currently testing with prime stripe sizes, but it doesn't seem to
>> help. I additionally added "options AHC_ALLOW_MEMIO" to the kernel, and it
>> has raised write performance in th
On Sunday, 20 July 2003 at 20:27:00 +0200, Joan Picanyol i Puig wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I had a power failure, and the on-disk configuration for vinum went
> bizarre. The logs read from disks are at http://biaix.org/pk/debug/
> (log.$DEVICE files).
They're not much help, and a lot of the files are inacc
be a
> very complex check.
Well, the minimum correct solution is to return an error if somebody
tries to access the inaccessible part of the volume. That should
happen, and I'm confused that it doesn't appear to be doing so in this
case.
On Tuesday, 30 March 2004 at 11:07:55 -0300, Jo
On Monday, 25 October 2004 at 14:21:33 -0600, secmgr wrote:
> Andrew Konstantinov wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 2004-10-25 at 05:55, Oliver Torres Delgado wrote:
>>
>>
>>> I have freebsd 5.3 rc1 installed perfectly, i configure vinum with the
>>> handbook and all work perfect
>>> but when try run vinum with
On Friday, 29 October 2004 at 14:20:40 -0600, secmgr wrote:
> Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
>
>> A bit of background: we know that 'gvinum' will replace Vinum; the
>> original intention had been to do it seamlessly, but for various
>> reasons that did h
73 matches
Mail list logo
