On Monday, 1 November 2004 at 10:05:16 +1100, Carl Makin wrote: > Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote: > >> On Monday, 25 October 2004 at 14:21:33 -0600, secmgr wrote: >> >> >> >> It's beginning to look like that's a bad idea. Lukas is >> (understandably) working only on gvinum, and since I know it's nearly >> there, I'm not going to do any further work on Vinum in FreeBSD 5. >> Given the problems, I'd suggest that we yank it. > > Do you want to yank it in 5 or 6-CURRENT?
Well, it's been yanked in -CURRENT. My understanding was that it should also be yanked in 5.x: a number of changes have been made that effectively break old Vinum, > There are a *lot* of people using vinum and yanking it in 5-STABLE > would force us all to use the 5.3 security branch until gvinum > caught up. Yes, I'm afraid so. I can think of better ways that this could have been managed, but I haven't had much influence. Greg -- See complete headers for address and phone numbers.
pgpaGayfYyURY.pgp
Description: PGP signature
