___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 7:59 AM, Warner Losh wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 7:32 AM, George Mitchell
> wrote:
>
> > On 03/21/18 04:51, Eitan Adler wrote:
> > > On 19 March 2018 at 22:59, Dewayne Geraghty
> > > wrote:
> > >> [...]
> > >> PS Normally I would bisect, but we're converting 2 large
On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 7:32 AM, George Mitchell
wrote:
> On 03/21/18 04:51, Eitan Adler wrote:
> > On 19 March 2018 at 22:59, Dewayne Geraghty
> > wrote:
> >> [...]
> >> PS Normally I would bisect, but we're converting 2 large PROLOG
> applications
> >> to erlang... (prayers welcome)
> > [...]
On 03/21/18 04:51, Eitan Adler wrote:
> On 19 March 2018 at 22:59, Dewayne Geraghty
> wrote:
>> [...]
>> PS Normally I would bisect, but we're converting 2 large PROLOG applications
>> to erlang... (prayers welcome)
> [...]
What next, converting a FORTH application to LISP? (Sorry, couldn't
resi
On 19 March 2018 at 22:59, Dewayne Geraghty
wrote:
> Hi Eitan,
> Agreed. Unfortunately all I have is that it abruptly shuts down. Both
> under load (10,8,?) - during a full package rebuild (~1200 ports); and
> during periods of idleness between 1am-2am. From our console.log there are
> approxi
On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 11:10:47AM -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> (Please keep me CC'd as I am not subscribed to -stable)
>
> I haven't seen any issues, but that means very little. Details:
>
> Two boxes -- one bare metal, one VPS (QEMU):
>
> $ uname -a
> FreeBSD XXX 11.1-STABLE Fr
On Tue, 2018-03-20 at 10:50 +, Pete French wrote:
>
> On 20/03/2018 01:05, Dewayne Geraghty wrote:
> >
> > We rebuild 11.1-Stable at least every two weeks. Our build on the 7th
> > Feb is in use on our development boxes, however the rebuild on 22nd
> > resulted in frequent crashes and our re
(Please keep me CC'd as I am not subscribed to -stable)
I haven't seen any issues, but that means very little. Details:
Two boxes -- one bare metal, one VPS (QEMU):
$ uname -a
FreeBSD XXX 11.1-STABLE FreeBSD 11.1-STABLE #0 r330529: Tue Mar 6
11:36:04 PST 2018
root@XXX
On 20/03/2018 01:05, Dewayne Geraghty wrote:
We rebuild 11.1-Stable at least every two weeks. Our build on the 7th
Feb is in use on our development boxes, however the rebuild on 22nd
resulted in frequent crashes and our reverting to FreeBSD 11.1-STABLE
r329008. Is anyone actually running a St
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
On 19 March 2018 at 18:05, Dewayne Geraghty
wrote:
> We rebuild 11.1-Stable at least every two weeks. Our build on the 7th
> Feb is in use on our development boxes, however the rebuild on 22nd
> resulted in frequent crashes and our reverting to FreeBSD 11.1-STABLE
> r329008. Is anyone actually r
On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 12:05:33PM +1100, Dewayne Geraghty wrote:
> We rebuild 11.1-Stable at least every two weeks. Our build on the 7th
> Feb is in use on our development boxes, however the rebuild on 22nd
> resulted in frequent crashes and our reverting to FreeBSD 11.1-STABLE
> r329008. Is an
We rebuild 11.1-Stable at least every two weeks. Our build on the 7th
Feb is in use on our development boxes, however the rebuild on 22nd
resulted in frequent crashes and our reverting to FreeBSD 11.1-STABLE
r329008. Is anyone actually running a Stable that was built after 22nd
Feb? Could you p
On Mon, 30 Sep 2013 21:01:26 +0200, Brett Glass wrote:
How stable are folks finding FreeBSD 9.2-RELEASE to be? The improvements
are welcome, but there have been a few troubling messages about kernel
panics and VM issues on the various mailing lists. It's never clear
until the release drops
> I have just upgraded two virtual machines running on ESXi. They are i386
> with 256Mb of RAM and one CPU, with just a few ports installed (sudo and
> screen and dependencies). They don't do much job (low-traffic authoritative
> nameservers for a dozen of domains). I upgraded by freebsd-update. I
Le Mon, 30 Sep 2013 13:01:26 -0600,
Brett Glass a écrit :
Hello,
> How stable are folks finding FreeBSD 9.2-RELEASE to be? The
> improvements are welcome, but there have been a few troubling
> messages about kernel panics and VM issues on the various mailing
> lists. It's never clear until th
On Mon, 30 Sep 2013 13:01:26 -0600
Brett Glass wrote:
> How stable are folks finding FreeBSD 9.2-RELEASE to be? The
> improvements are welcome, but there have been a few troubling
> messages about kernel panics and VM issues on the various mailing
> lists. It's never clear until the release dr
How stable are folks finding FreeBSD 9.2-RELEASE to be? The
improvements are welcome, but there have been a few troubling
messages about kernel panics and VM issues on the various mailing
lists. It's never clear until the release drops whether these are
actual problems with the software or hard
Someone asked about getting The DL360 G8 to boot to their intel
branded pci NIC, but I cannot find that email :(
At any rate, we removed the Broadcom daughterboard from the system and
insured that the intel PCI NIC (i350) was bootable in the BIOS.
On Sat, Nov 3, 2012 at 9:56 PM, Rick Miller wrot
Am Sat, 3 Nov 2012 21:56:45 -0400
schrieb Rick Miller :
> On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 4:10 AM, Rainer Duffner
> wrote:
> > Am Thu, 1 Nov 2012 20:14:51 -0600 (MDT)
> > schrieb Brett Glass :
> >
> >> I need to build up a few servers and routers, and am wondering how
> >> FreeBSD 9.1 is shaping up. Will
On Sun, Nov 4, 2012 at 12:28 PM, Rainer Duffner wrote:
>
> Oh - will were be an 8.4 release? That would be interesting.
History shows that every release, since 4.x has gone to at least .4.
I'd be willing to bet we will see an 8.4. The branch is still being
developed.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wik
Hi!
> >Oh - will were be an 8.4 release? That would be interesting.
>
> I'd like to see a trend toward more point versions of FreeBSD.
> Particularly in 9.x, because it incorporates most of the items that
> have been on people's wish lists. 4.11 was one of the most robust
> and stable releases
At 10:28 AM 11/4/2012, Rainer Duffner wrote:
Oh - will were be an 8.4 release? That would be interesting.
I'd like to see a trend toward more point versions of FreeBSD.
Particularly in 9.x, because it incorporates most of the items that
have been on people's wish lists. 4.11 was one of the m
Am Sat, 3 Nov 2012 21:56:45 -0400
schrieb Rick Miller :
> On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 4:10 AM, Rainer Duffner
> wrote:
> > Am Thu, 1 Nov 2012 20:14:51 -0600 (MDT)
> > schrieb Brett Glass :
> >
> >> I need to build up a few servers and routers, and am wondering how
> >> FreeBSD 9.1 is shaping up. Will
On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 4:10 AM, Rainer Duffner wrote:
> Am Thu, 1 Nov 2012 20:14:51 -0600 (MDT)
> schrieb Brett Glass :
>
>> I need to build up a few servers and routers, and am wondering how
>> FreeBSD 9.1 is shaping up. Will it be likely to be more stable and
>> robust than 9.0-RELEASE? Are ther
Am Sat, 3 Nov 2012 11:06:26 -0400
schrieb Mark Saad :
> Hp did a presentation at work 2 weeks ago about the g8 . Hp said you
> can swap out a daughter card in the 360/380/580 for nic options like
> broadcom 4 port gigabit nic , melenox infinbabd, intel pro1000 4 port
> nic , qlogic 8Gb fc-al and
On Nov 2, 2012, at 3:15 PM, Rainer Duffner wrote:
> Am Fri, 2 Nov 2012 13:34:20 -0400
> schrieb Mark Saad :
>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Nov 2, 2012, at 4:10 AM, Rainer Duffner
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Am Thu, 1 Nov 2012 20:14:51 -0600 (MDT)
>>> schrieb Brett Glass :
>>>
I need to build up a few server
On 02/11/2012 15:57, Doug Hardie wrote:
On 1 November 2012, at 19:14, Brett Glass wrote:
I need to build up a few servers and routers, and am wondering how
FreeBSD 9.1 is shaping up. Will it be likely to be more stable and
robust than 9.0-RELEASE?
It appears to be for me. I had problems wit
Am Fri, 2 Nov 2012 13:34:20 -0400
schrieb Mark Saad :
>
>
>
> On Nov 2, 2012, at 4:10 AM, Rainer Duffner
> wrote:
>
> > Am Thu, 1 Nov 2012 20:14:51 -0600 (MDT)
> > schrieb Brett Glass :
> >
> >> I need to build up a few servers and routers, and am wondering how
> >> FreeBSD 9.1 is shaping up
On Nov 2, 2012, at 4:10 AM, Rainer Duffner wrote:
> Am Thu, 1 Nov 2012 20:14:51 -0600 (MDT)
> schrieb Brett Glass :
>
>> I need to build up a few servers and routers, and am wondering how
>> FreeBSD 9.1 is shaping up. Will it be likely to be more stable and
>> robust than 9.0-RELEASE? Are the
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 7:14 PM, Brett Glass wrote:
> I need to build up a few servers and routers, and am wondering how
> FreeBSD 9.1 is shaping up. Will it be likely to be more stable and
> robust than 9.0-RELEASE? Are there issues that will have to wait
> until 9.2-RELEASE to be fixed? Opinions
> I need to build up a few servers and routers, and am wondering how
> FreeBSD 9.1 is shaping up. Will it be likely to be more stable and
> robust than 9.0-RELEASE? Are there issues that will have to wait
> until 9.2-RELEASE to be fixed? Opinions welcome.
>
> --Brett Glass
I've got 9.1-RC2 running
On 11/01/12 22:14, Brett Glass wrote:
I need to build up a few servers and routers, and am wondering how
FreeBSD 9.1 is shaping up. Will it be likely to be more stable and
robust than 9.0-RELEASE? Are there issues that will have to wait
until 9.2-RELEASE to be fixed? Opinions welcome.
--Brett Gl
On 1 November 2012, at 19:14, Brett Glass wrote:
> I need to build up a few servers and routers, and am wondering how
> FreeBSD 9.1 is shaping up. Will it be likely to be more stable and
> robust than 9.0-RELEASE?
Doug Hardie responded:
> It appears to be for me. I had problems with 9.0 not rea
Am Thu, 1 Nov 2012 20:14:51 -0600 (MDT)
schrieb Brett Glass :
> I need to build up a few servers and routers, and am wondering how
> FreeBSD 9.1 is shaping up. Will it be likely to be more stable and
> robust than 9.0-RELEASE? Are there issues that will have to wait
> until 9.2-RELEASE to be fixed
On 1 November 2012, at 19:14, Brett Glass wrote:
> I need to build up a few servers and routers, and am wondering how
> FreeBSD 9.1 is shaping up. Will it be likely to be more stable and
> robust than 9.0-RELEASE?
It appears to be for me. I had problems with 9.0 not reading CDs and rebooting
w
I need to build up a few servers and routers, and am wondering how
FreeBSD 9.1 is shaping up. Will it be likely to be more stable and
robust than 9.0-RELEASE? Are there issues that will have to wait
until 9.2-RELEASE to be fixed? Opinions welcome.
--Brett Glass
I need to build up a few servers and routers, and am wondering how
FreeBSD 9.1 is shaping up. Will it be likely to be more stable and
robust than 9.0-RELEASE? Are there issues that will have to wait
until 9.2-RELEASE to be fixed? Opinions welcome.
--Brett Glass
x27;t know if this has anything to do with zfs.
I don't believe it has anything to do with zfs. The NLM is a
separate protocol from NFS.
> 3) Is it a good idea to switch to nfsv4? Performance? Stability?
>
NFSv4 will provide better file locking (if you need that) imho, but
is still
On 08/31/2010 09:21, Giulio Ferro wrote:
> 1) Is it a good idea to upgrade this production system to the latest 8
> stable (8.1 stable I believe)? Is it really stable?
For this question alone, I can verify that it is stable to upgrade to
the stable branch. Though on one hand it might be reasonable
ied for
themselves.
1) Is it a good idea to upgrade this production system to the latest 8
stable (8.1 stable I believe)? Is it really stable?
2) Are the zfs aforementioned tuning in /boot/loader.conf still necessary?
3) Is it a good idea to switch to nfsv4? Performance? Stability?
and above al
On 19/03/2010 12:35, Dominic Fandrey wrote:
> ...
>
> My wpi problems are more severe.
>
> I recently purchased a new battery for my notebook and to improve
> my battery uptime I deactivated the bluetooth device in the BIOS
> (HP6510b).
>
> Ever since the wlan connection is less reliable. ...
E
I'm running RELENG_8 (built yesterday) and have encountered
problems with wpi and acpi_hp.
The thing about acpi_hp is that it misses most of the hardware
when activated in the loader.conf. The WLAN, BT and other sysctls
are only available if I load the module after boot.
My wpi problems are more
Quoting Boris Samorodov (from Thu, 17 Dec 2009 20:55:44 +0300):
Ivan Voras writes:
Alexander Leidinger wrote:
Hi,
please CC me on replies.
Seems you were not CCed...
I'm now subscribed to stable@, thanks for forwarding this.
I have a system which was at 7.1-pX. After the update to 7.2
Alexander Leidinger wrote:
Hi,
please CC me on replies.
I have a system which was at 7.1-pX. After the update to 7.2-p5 it
started to exhibit deadlocks after some minutes of uptime.
With 7.1 (generic kernel) it was running fine, with 7.2 generic the
problems started directly.
The system i
Hi,
please CC me on replies.
I have a system which was at 7.1-pX. After the update to 7.2-p5 it
started to exhibit deadlocks after some minutes of uptime.
With 7.1 (generic kernel) it was running fine, with 7.2 generic the
problems started directly.
The system is now at 7-stable with a c
Jeff,
On 15 aug 2009, at 05:04, Jeff Richards wrote:
(da6:umass-sim6:6:0:0): SYNCHRONIZE CACHE(10). CDB: 35 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0
...
I've had lots of stability issues with USB drives until I added some
quirks to prevent the SYNCHRONIZE CACHE from happening. For example:
Index: cam
debug.sizeof.g_geom: 68
--- On Sat, 8/15/09, Jeff Richards wrote:
From: Jeff Richards
Subject: Re: Multiple USB drives stability question
To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Date: Saturday, August 15, 2009, 10:50 AM
I am now trying to rsync large files from the 320GB gmirror+gjournal device to
the 2nd 1TB
idle while the
source providers are still reporting 100% active.
Is there any tuning I should be investigating for these GEOM classes?
--- On Fri, 8/14/09, Jeff Richards wrote:
From: Jeff Richards
Subject: Re: Multiple USB drives stability question
To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Date: Friday
/49273a95d669d784 removed.
fuse4bsd: version 0.3.9-pre1, FUSE ABI 7.8
GEOM_LABEL: Label ufsid/4a509cddbd500a7e removed.
--- On Fri, 8/14/09, Jeff Richards wrote:
From: Jeff Richards
Subject: Multiple USB drives stability question
To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Date: Friday, August 14, 2009, 8:19 P
Is there a practical limit on the number of active USB drives with FreeBSD?
I've had stability issues using multiple USB drives as storage.
My initial design goal was cheap, hot-swappable storage. I am only using a
100MB network currently so throughput on the storage is not a problem
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 08:19:19AM +0100, Victor Balada Diaz wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 10:02:07AM +0100, Victor Balada Diaz wrote:
> > Stopped stress testing this morning. After all the weekend testing
> > seems the re(4) problems were fixed. No single interface up/down error.
> > netsta
On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 10:02:07AM +0100, Victor Balada Diaz wrote:
> Stopped stress testing this morning. After all the weekend testing
> seems the re(4) problems were fixed. No single interface up/down error.
> netstat -i reports no errors and everything is fine. Thanks a lot!
>
> I'm going to d
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 10:55:35AM +0100, Søren Schmidt wrote:
> On 10Dec, 2008, at 10:11 , Victor Balada Diaz wrote:
> >
> >Thanks for explaining me what the flags do. I'm not skilled enough
> >to create
> >the DMA quirks but if you could give me some patches i'll test them.
> >Also
> >if you
On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 01:13:09PM +0100, Victor Balada Diaz wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 10:50:21AM +0100, Victor Balada Diaz wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 06:00:56PM +0900, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
> > >
> > > I've reverted r185756 which caused GMII access issues on some
> > > controllers.
On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 01:13:09PM +0100, Victor Balada Diaz wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 10:50:21AM +0100, Victor Balada Diaz wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 06:00:56PM +0900, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
> > >
> > > I've reverted r185756 which caused GMII access issues on some
> > > control
On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 10:50:21AM +0100, Victor Balada Diaz wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 06:00:56PM +0900, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
> >
> > I've reverted r185756 which caused GMII access issues on some
> > controllers. If you are brave enough to try beta code, you can
> > get latest re(4) in the
On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 06:00:56PM +0900, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 09:10:45AM +0100, Victor Balada Diaz wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 08:57:07AM +0100, Victor Balada Diaz wrote:
> > > On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 09:07:19PM +0900, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Dec
On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 09:10:45AM +0100, Victor Balada Diaz wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 08:57:07AM +0100, Victor Balada Diaz wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 09:07:19PM +0900, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
> > > On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 12:32:25PM +0100, Victor Balada Diaz wrote:
> > > > Also i
On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 08:57:07AM +0100, Victor Balada Diaz wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 09:07:19PM +0900, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 12:32:25PM +0100, Victor Balada Diaz wrote:
> > > Also i didn't see any problem with interfaces going up and down,
> > > but that usual
On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 05:05:59AM +1100, Peter Jeremy wrote:
> On 2008-Dec-10 10:55:35 +0100, Søren Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >And you will not use 64bit DMA even if the chipset supports it.
> >However I have not seen any chipsets supporting this fail, YMMV as
> >usual :)
>
> There
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 09:07:19PM +0900, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 12:32:25PM +0100, Victor Balada Diaz wrote:
> > Also i didn't see any problem with interfaces going up and down,
> > but that usually happen after some hours of uptime, so i'll let
> > you know if the error
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 03:08:24PM +0100, Victor Balada Diaz wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 09:07:19PM +0900, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
[...]
> > > > > > It seems that your controller supports MSI so you can set a
> > tunable
> > > > > > hw.re.msi_disable to 0 to enable MSI. With MSI you c
On 2008-Dec-10 10:55:35 +0100, Søren Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>And you will not use 64bit DMA even if the chipset supports it.
>However I have not seen any chipsets supporting this fail, YMMV as
>usual :)
There's a reference in wikipedia pointing to
http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 01:18:00PM +0100, Arnaud Houdelette wrote:
> Victor Balada Diaz a écrit :
> >Hello,
> >
> >I got various machines[1] at hetzner.de and I've been having problems
> >with interrupts on FreeBSD 7.0 and now FreeBSD 7.1 -BETA2 in amd64. I've
> >been trying to narrow the problem s
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 03:01:30PM +0100, Victor Balada Diaz wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 12:08:40PM +, Oliver Peter wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 09, 2008 at 07:52:37PM +0100, Victor Balada Diaz wrote:
...
> I can use GENERIC kernel again (ie, USB enabled) and so far
> i didn't find any problem y
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 09:07:19PM +0900, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 12:32:25PM +0100, Victor Balada Diaz wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 07:28:00PM +0900, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
> > > On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 09:59:35AM +0100, Victor Balada Diaz wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Dec
On Wed, 10 Dec 2008 21:07:19 +0900
Pyun YongHyeon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 12:32:25PM +0100, Victor Balada Diaz wrote:
> > As these seems to improve the current situation, is there any
> > chance of merging -current driver in 7.1 before release?
> >
>
> I think re(4)
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 12:08:40PM +, Oliver Peter wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 09, 2008 at 07:52:37PM +0100, Victor Balada Diaz wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I got various machines[1] at hetzner.de and I've been having problems
> > with interrupts on FreeBSD 7.0 and now FreeBSD 7.1 -BETA2 in amd64. I've
On Tue, Dec 09, 2008 at 07:52:37PM +0100, Victor Balada Diaz wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I got various machines[1] at hetzner.de and I've been having problems
> with interrupts on FreeBSD 7.0 and now FreeBSD 7.1 -BETA2 in amd64. I've
> been trying to narrow the problem so someone more knowledgeable than m
Victor Balada Diaz a écrit :
Hello,
I got various machines[1] at hetzner.de and I've been having problems
with interrupts on FreeBSD 7.0 and now FreeBSD 7.1 -BETA2 in amd64. I've
been trying to narrow the problem so someone more knowledgeable than me
is able to fix it. This mail is an other atte
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 12:32:25PM +0100, Victor Balada Diaz wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 07:28:00PM +0900, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 09:59:35AM +0100, Victor Balada Diaz wrote:
> > > On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 03:12:26PM +0900, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
> > > > On Tue, D
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 07:28:00PM +0900, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 09:59:35AM +0100, Victor Balada Diaz wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 03:12:26PM +0900, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
> > > On Tue, Dec 09, 2008 at 07:52:37PM +0100, Victor Balada Diaz wrote:
> > > > Hello,
> >
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 09:59:35AM +0100, Victor Balada Diaz wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 03:12:26PM +0900, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 09, 2008 at 07:52:37PM +0100, Victor Balada Diaz wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > I got various machines[1] at hetzner.de and I've been havin
On 10Dec, 2008, at 10:11 , Victor Balada Diaz wrote:
Thanks for explaining me what the flags do. I'm not skilled enough
to create
the DMA quirks but if you could give me some patches i'll test them.
Also
if you have any other idea on what could i test or how can i debug
this
it would be m
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 11:58:12AM +0300, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote:
> Victor Balada Diaz wrote:
> >Digging at linux source code i've found that they do some special things
> >for this chipset that i've been unable to find on our code. This is
> >linux code for my chipset:
> >
> >371
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 03:12:26PM +0900, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 09, 2008 at 07:52:37PM +0100, Victor Balada Diaz wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I got various machines[1] at hetzner.de and I've been having problems
> > with interrupts on FreeBSD 7.0 and now FreeBSD 7.1 -BETA2 in amd64.
Victor Balada Diaz wrote:
Digging at linux source code i've found that they do some special things
for this chipset that i've been unable to find on our code. This is
linux code for my chipset:
371 AHCI_HFLAGS (AHCI_HFLAG_IGN_SERR_INTERNAL |
372
On Tue, Dec 09, 2008 at 07:52:37PM +0100, Victor Balada Diaz wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I got various machines[1] at hetzner.de and I've been having problems
> with interrupts on FreeBSD 7.0 and now FreeBSD 7.1 -BETA2 in amd64. I've
> been trying to narrow the problem so someone more knowledgeable t
Hello,
I got various machines[1] at hetzner.de and I've been having problems
with interrupts on FreeBSD 7.0 and now FreeBSD 7.1 -BETA2 in amd64. I've
been trying to narrow the problem so someone more knowledgeable than me
is able to fix it. This mail is an other attempt to ask a question
with rega
dump.
We ran 6.X for months with no stability issues, backing up nightly
w/o snapshots. Took the system down to single user mode, did
foreground fsck, enabled -L on dumps and the machine "kinda" hangs
twice a week (main host seems OK but jails stop responding and can
not be proper
On Fri, Jun 06, 2008 at 11:34:01AM -0800, Royce Williams wrote:
> >> On Jun 4, 2008, at 4:43 PM, Clifton Royston wrote:
> >>
> >>> Speaking just for myself, I'd love to get a general response from
> >>> people who have run servers on both as to whether 6.3 is on average
> >>> more stable than 6.2.
>> On Jun 4, 2008, at 4:43 PM, Clifton Royston wrote:
>>
>>> Speaking just for myself, I'd love to get a general response from
>>> people who have run servers on both as to whether 6.3 is on average
>>> more stable than 6.2. I really haven't gotten any clear impression as
6.3 has been stable for
On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 09:43:12PM +0100, Torfinn Ingolfsen wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Jan 2008 17:22:16 +0900
> Pyun YongHyeon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I think re(4) in CURRENT have fixed these issues.
> > Would you try re(4) in CURRENT?
>
> Perhaps I was being unclear; under FreeBSD 7.x
On Mon, 28 Jan 2008 17:22:16 +0900
Pyun YongHyeon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think re(4) in CURRENT have fixed these issues.
> Would you try re(4) in CURRENT?
Perhaps I was being unclear; under FreeBSD 7.x (RELENG_7) re(49 works
fine.
It is only &.3 that has problems with re(4).
--
Regards,
On Sun, Jan 27, 2008 at 01:48:36PM +0100, Torfinn Ingolfsen wrote:
> Hello!
>
> Is anybody having stability problems with if_re under FreeBSD
> 6.3-stable?
> I know about PR kern/118719[1] but it doesn't look like the problem I'm
> having - at least my machine do
On Sun, 27 Jan 2008 13:48:36 +0100
Torfinn Ingolfsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ouch! The machine just rebooted. Perhaps this is kern/118719 after
> all. Anything I can do to diagnose this problem further?
forget about the reboot - it was caused by my attempt at a workaround
(using a if_ural i
Hello!
Is anybody having stability problems with if_re under FreeBSD
6.3-stable?
I know about PR kern/118719[1] but it doesn't look like the problem I'm
having - at least my machine doesn't panic.
My machine[2] runs FreeBSD 6.3-stable / amd64:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] uname -a
FreeBSD k
On Sun, Nov 12, 2006 at 02:26:36PM -0600, Barry Boes wrote:
B> After the last hang I added giant locks back in and the machine has
B> been up since.
B>
B> I don't have a serial console, just a graphic console. When the
B> machine hangs it stops replying to ethernet packets at all protocol
B> leve
After the last hang I added giant locks back in and the machine has
been up since.
I don't have a serial console, just a graphic console. When the
machine hangs it stops replying to ethernet packets at all protocol
levels and doesn't respond to keyboard input in any way, virtual
console or other
On 11/10/06, Barry Boes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Luck ran out. Hard "must press the reset button" hang. No console
messages. The system was idle at the time.
Is there anything you'd like me to do to attempt to narrow down the
problem or get debugging output? I do not know if the freeze
On Fri, Nov 10, 2006 at 04:28:30PM -0600, Barry Boes wrote:
B>
B> Luck ran out. Hard "must press the reset button" hang. No console
B> messages. The system was idle at the time.
B>Is there anything you'd like me to do to attempt to narrow down the
B> problem or get debugging output? I do
Fri, Nov 10, 2006 at 08:56:30AM -0600, Barry Boes wrote:
> > B>I see you listed on the EM stability issues list. I have a Tyan
> > B> H1000S with dual em ports on 6.1, and it won't stay up 5 minutes
> > B> without EM watchdog resets unless I use giant locks.
>
d NFS over both
ethernet ports and no problems yet.
Thanks for all the hard work!
Barry
Gleb Smirnoff writes:
> Hello Barry,
>
> On Fri, Nov 10, 2006 at 08:56:30AM -0600, Barry Boes wrote:
> B> I see you listed on the EM stability issues list. I have a Tyan
> B&
Hello Barry,
On Fri, Nov 10, 2006 at 08:56:30AM -0600, Barry Boes wrote:
B>I see you listed on the EM stability issues list. I have a Tyan
B> H1000S with dual em ports on 6.1, and it won't stay up 5 minutes
B> without EM watchdog resets unless I use giant locks.
B>
Hi on 3 different servers we had the same pronlem as below.
2 servers 6.1-STABLE and one 6.1-RELEASE security branch.
2 of the servers before hand were running without nfs and geli for
months stable, the 3rd was brand new.
We enabled geli encryption on loopback partitions and real partitions
to
Miroslav Lachman wrote:
I have same problem on ASUS RS120 with Seagate ST3250820AS/3.AAC
drives (disk loses, system reboots, slow read/write speed), but I
think this is drive problem - all drives has high
Reallocated_Sector_Ct value in SMART (above 130 reallocated sectors
after few weeks, some
Mike Jakubik wrote:
Dominic Marks wrote:
Jerome Sobecki wrote:
Hi all,
We have here some Supermicro Superserver 5015P-TR
(http://www.supermicro.com/products/system/1U/5015/SYS-5015P-TR.cfm)
Those servers, with a ICH7 controler, are currently working with FreeBSD
6.1 and everything seems ok
Dominic Marks wrote:
Jerome Sobecki wrote:
Hi all,
We have here some Supermicro Superserver 5015P-TR
(http://www.supermicro.com/products/system/1U/5015/SYS-5015P-TR.cfm)
Those servers, with a ICH7 controler, are currently working with FreeBSD
6.1 and everything seems ok, except that it's the t
Jerome Sobecki wrote:
Hi all,
We have here some Supermicro Superserver 5015P-TR
(http://www.supermicro.com/products/system/1U/5015/SYS-5015P-TR.cfm)
Those servers, with a ICH7 controler, are currently working with FreeBSD
6.1 and everything seems ok, except that it's the third time, on two
diff
1 - 100 of 197 matches
Mail list logo
