On Mon, 28 Jan 2008 17:22:16 +0900 Pyun YongHyeon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think re(4) in CURRENT have fixed these issues. > Would you try re(4) in CURRENT? Perhaps I was being unclear; under FreeBSD 7.x (RELENG_7) re(49 works fine. It is only &.3 that has problems with re(4). -- Regards, Torfinn Ingolfsen _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
