On 10/06/2020 15:51, Donald Wilde wrote:
Okay, it didn't work, but discovered INDEX-12 in /usr/ports, so
' grep gcc INDEX-12 | wc -l ' worked.
Such an interesting file, INDEX-12. More research needed. Is it not
INDEX-13 because I did ' make index' instead of ' make fetchindex ' ?
You should al
On 29/04/2019 11:52, Christoph Moench-Tegeder wrote:
This situation should be improved. Given that etcupdate is in all
supported releases, we can even update UPDATING and the Handbook.
So, does anyone have a pointer to the official procedure?
Basically run:
# etcupdate
towards the end of yo
On 27/12/2018 01:45, Walter Parker wrote:
> I've just upgraded an existing FreeBSD 11.1 system with php56 to FreeBSD
> 11.2 and php72.
>
> In order to do this, I used a mix of ports and packages to delete php56 and
> all of the php56 extensions and replace them with php72 and php72
> extensions. E
On 21/12/2018 17:10, Andrea Brancatelli wrote:
> Hello.
>
> Just a quick head up Today we update a FreeBSD 11.2 to 12.0 machine
> and our SSHD got broken.
>
> The problem is with HMAC line in the config file, specifically the
> hmac-ripemd160 value. It was legit in 11.2 (and I suspect
> def
On 08/10/2017 11:27, Dr. Nikolaus Klepp wrote:
> Hi!
>
> My notes suggest for this case:
>
> pkg clean # cleans /var/cache/pkg/
> rm -rf /var/cache/pkg/* # just remove it all
> pkg update -f # forces update of repository catalog
> rm /var/db/pkg/
On 19/09/2017 09:32, Aristedes Maniatis wrote:
> On 19/9/17 6:15PM, Kurt Jaeger wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>>> Now that we are on a faster upgrade policy for minor branches, it is
>>> expected that we'll upgrade from 11.0 to 11.1 to 11.2 much faster than in
>>> the old days. I can cope with that, but it ap
On 2017/02/01 11:19, Ronald Klop wrote:
> Is it possible to update the /usr/ports tree to the same version as is
> used by the default pkg repositories?
> I use some ports which are not distributed as pkgs. When I 'portsnap
> auto' the ports tree gets new updates which are not in the pkgs yet and
>
On 2017/01/13 16:31, Chris H wrote:
> As a general rule:
> install from pkg(8) remove with pkg(8)
> install from ports(7), remove with ports(7)
>
Sorry -- this is completely bogus. You can freely mix and match either
way. Just make sure that the package names match up.
In fact the ports removes
On 2017/01/13 15:43, Holger Kipp wrote:
> so currently via pkg upgrade I got perl5-5.24.1.r4_1, which perl itself
> confirms:
^
> ===> Installing for perl5.24-5.24.1.r5_1
Notice the difference in package names. One is call
On 10/26/16 09:09, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
> Recently I've upgraded one of my server running 9.3-STABLE with jail
> containing 4.11-STABLE system.
> The host was source-upgraded upto 10.3-STABLE first and next to 11.0-STABLE
> and jail configuration migrated to /etc/jail.conf. The jail kept intact.
On 2016/10/21 13:47, Pete French wrote:
>> In bad case metadata of every file will be placed in random place of disk.
>> ls need access to metadata of every file before start of output listing.
>
> Umm, are we not talkong abut an issue where the directoyr no longer contains
> any files. It used to
On 2016/10/19 09:55, Matt Smith wrote:
> On Oct 19 10:38, Miroslav Lachman wrote:
>> Jonathan Haack wrote on 2016/10/19 10:09:
>>> Awe geez ... pkg won't work ... says "shared object "libssl.so.7" not
>>> found, required by "pkg"
>>
>> Do not panic, just run pkg-static to upgrade pkg it-self
>>
>>
On 09/10/2016 23:56, George Mitchell wrote:
> On 10/09/16 15:57, Kurt Jaeger wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>>> What am I doing wrong? (I get the same failure attempting to upgrade
>>> to 10.1-RELEASE and 10.2-RELEASE.) -- George
>>
>> Ah, one thing:
>>
>> Please do update to the latest
On 22/09/2016 13:56, Eugene M. Zheganin wrote:
> Is there any way to figure out what these writes are ? Because I cannot
> propose any simple enough method.
Given you're using volumes for datasets where ZFS knows nothing about
the contained filesystem structure, about the only way to proceed is vi
On 08/12/16 12:23, Kurt Jaeger wrote:
> Hi!
>
>> I subscribe to the RSS feed of FreeBSD security advisories
>> (http://vuxml.freebsd.org/freebsd/rss.xml). Today, it told me that there
>> were forty-something advisories. I went to the VuXML site and saw that a
>> stack of old entries have been u
On 08/07/16 06:55, Doug Hardie wrote:
> Is there any information available on when freebsd-update might be
> corrected to upgrade some 9.3 systems to 11.0? I have tried all the
> beta's and none of them will do the upgrade even with the EN applied.
> Bug 211398 has the details.
According to the h
On 28/07/2016 18:52, Harry Schmalzbauer wrote:
> Most of the machines I'm responsible for don't have internet access –
> and won't ever have.
> Currently, I don't have a 11-machine for building pkg(8) handy.
> How Do I get pkg(8) the official way (for machines without internet access)?
> Are there
On 25/07/2016 07:36, Marko Cupać wrote:
> On Sun, 24 Jul 2016 19:25:23 +
> Glen Barber wrote:
>
>> Note to freebsd-update(8) consumers: An EN for earlier FreeBSD
>> releases is required before upgrading to 11.0-BETA2 will work
>> properly, so it is advised to wait until the ENs are published
On 18/06/2016 05:40, Ben Steel via freebsd-stable wrote:
> It's not just you, Wolfgang. See bug 210332 at bugs.freebsd.org.
> The new certificate is in place on the 4 mirrors that I found (US East,
> US West, UK, Russia) but didn't verify cleanly and wasn't in the
> documentation.
>
> For me, the
On 17/06/2016 00:21, Wolfgang Zenker wrote:
> I'm getting presented a new SSL certificate for svn.freebsd.org.
> Like the previous one, it can not be verified by svnlite on any
> of my 10-STABLE machines, though ca_root_nss is installed. But
> the previous certificate at least matched the fingerpri
On 03/15/16 11:28, Andrea Brancatelli wrote:
> Hello everybody,
>
> we're suddenly having problems with unbound on almost all of our servers
> and I cannot really understand why.
>
> To make a long story short, we use this forward.conf:
>
> root@dbengine-ent-rm-01:/var/unbound # cat /etc/unbo
On 15/08/2015 16:46, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
> The ntp code is not very transparent, but I think the root cause
> are the ntp/config.h changes that came with the 4.2.8p3 update. A
> number of previously disabled obscure clock drivers were enabled,
> but crucially CLOCK_RAWDCF was disabled, and
On 08/11/15 08:21, Marko Cupać wrote:
> - Next morning I get notification from freebsd-cron for the same update
> I installed yesterday, but only for /usr/share/man/whatis. (not ok)
Did you by any chance happend to run the weekly/320.makewhatis periodic
script that night? It is enabled by def
On 07/24/15 07:58, Holm Tiffe wrote:
> ..interrestingly people here seem to focus my problem to ZFS.. but my
> problem was to build an raid over 4 disks on my old i386 machine and that
> failed with 2 different approaches.
>
> I'm accepting that ZFS is a too big thing for the i386 architecture
> a
On 07/24/15 07:58, Holm Tiffe wrote:
> ..interrestingly people here seem to focus my problem to ZFS.. but my
> problem was to build an raid over 4 disks on my old i386 machine and that
> failed with 2 different approaches.
>
> I'm accepting that ZFS is a too big thing for the i386 architecture
> a
On 09/07/2015 23:35, Dmitry Morozovsky wrote:
> after transition to utx.log (actually, long enough ago, but quick googling
> does not show reports), there are no simple way to query 'last' for
> crash/reboot times:
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=168844
Cheers,
On 06/18/15 13:54, Royce Williams wrote:
> Did you (re)generate your dh.params file as noted in the Workaround section?
There isn't a default dh.param file. The suggested work-around in the
EN is to generate one.
> On my systems, I had to do this to support the actual patch (not to perform
> the
On 14/06/2015 10:57, Frank Seltzer wrote:
> Because of a recent alert I updated both of my FreeBSD computers (both
> running 10.1-STABLE and built from /etc/src) to r284296 and am having a
> problem with sendmail. Sendmail is giving me the following error every
> 30 minutes:
>
> Jun 14 09:50:04 Ac
On 05/19/15 16:15, Ulrich Drolshagen wrote:
> I brought myself in real trouble with a really important 9.0 release
> system (9.0-RELEASE-p4). It's amd64. By accident I deleted the following
> binaries from /bin: cat, chflags, chio, chmod and cp
> Does anybody still have an old iso from which he can
On 05/07/15 14:32, Steven Hartland wrote:
>
>
> On 07/05/2015 14:29, Ronald Klop wrote:
>> On Thu, 07 May 2015 15:23:58 +0200, Steven Hartland
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 07/05/2015 14:10, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
On Thu, May 07, 2015 at 02:05:11PM +0100, Steven Hartland wrote:
>
On 12/10/2013 17:36, Zoran Kolic wrote:
> I binary upgraded to 9.2 and installed pkg, made pkg2ng.
> Finally I did "pkg update" and "pkg upgrade". Now, I have
> old binaries, instead of new ones. I tried to issue
> "freebsd-update install" the last time and it refused to
> do anything, since there
On 28/09/2013 11:32, Phil Regnauld wrote:
> To the offended poster: read the last line of tunefs(8) - there's
> probably
> many more places you could use serious time looking for deviations from
> corporate correctnes.
There used to be a function in the shutdown utility called
d
On 28/09/2013 10:44, Boris Samorodov wrote:
> 28.09.2013 02:06, David Demelier пишет:
>> On 21.09.2013 12:40, Matthew Seaman wrote:
>>> On 21/09/2013 11:31, O. Hartmann wrote:
>>>> I'd like to switch off this silly "Nakatomi Socrates" message whic
On 21/09/2013 11:31, O. Hartmann wrote:
> I'd like to switch off this silly "Nakatomi Socrates" message which
> reminds me on Linux and their childish naming schemes.
>
> It is only cosmetics, but it bothers me whenever I switch on the laptop.
>
> I guess there is a switch already prsent to have
On 19/09/2013 17:04, Zoran Kolic wrote:
> Is there a plan to have repo for files, used by
> pkgng on upcomming releases?
Yes, and the implementation of that plan is advancing well. Hardware is
up and running, and the build system is pretty much ready to go. Most
of the action at the moment is ab
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 02:29:01PM +0200, Florent Peterschmitt wrote:
> Le 12/08/2013 14:27, CeDeROM a écrit :
> > Hello :-)
> >
> > On a fresh install of FreeBSD 9.2-RC1 I get this warning:
> >
> > sm-mta[]: SYSERR(root): hash map "Alias0": missing map file
> > /etc/mail/aliases.db: No such file
On 08/08/2013 13:05, Mark Felder wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 8, 2013, at 6:59, Trond Endrestøl wrote:
>>
>> I'm just guessing, but I doubt a jail would be able to create new ZFS
>> filesystems outside its own structure, if at all able. A jail would
>> however be allowed to (un)mount already existing fil
On 07/08/2013 15:19, Panagiotis Christias wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 10:43:49PM +0100, Matthew Seaman wrote:
>> On 06/08/2013 22:28, Thomas Laus wrote:
>>> I like the 'sendmail from ports' suggestion a little better. Going this
>>> route, I only need
On 06/08/2013 22:28, Thomas Laus wrote:
> I like the 'sendmail from ports' suggestion a little better. Going this
> route, I only need to make configuration changes to /etc/mail/mailer.conf
> once. All subsequent freebsd-update operations won't require rebuilding
> sendmail and it's tools. An
On 06/08/2013 14:45, Thomas Laus wrote:
> I have been updating my FreeBSD systems for many years by updating and
> building from source. For the FreeBSD 9.2 cycle, I decided to use
> freebsd-update for binary update instead. I use Sendmail + Cyrus-SASL and
> the freebsd-update process only ins
On 01/08/2013 09:41, Pavel Timofeev wrote:
> to Matthew Seaman
> No luck
>
> root@test:/etc/mail # grep ip /etc/rc.conf
> #ipv6_activate_all_interfaces="NO"
> #ipv6_network_interfaces="none"
> ip6addrctl_enable="YES"
> ip6addrctl_policy="
On 01/08/2013 08:41, Pavel Timofeev wrote:
> Or I did it wrong?
Yes. This:
> ip6addrctl_enable="NO"
You need to turn the ip6addrctl function *on* before you can set the
policy to prefer ipv4.
Cheers,
Matthew
___
freebsd-stable@freebs
On 31/07/2013 13:24, Pavel Timofeev wrote:
> I wanted to say that sendmail asks only (IPv6) record of mx
> server, but not A (IPv4).
> Any ideas?
ip6addrctl(8) perhaps?
Also check /etc/rc.d/ip6addrctl and the variables used by that script in
/etc/defaults/rc.conf which you can use to set pre
On 17/05/2013 18:56, Michael Gass wrote:
> Running 9.0-Stable on an i386.
>
> Whenever I type a command at the prompt I get
> the output
>
> /usr/local/lib/libintl.so.9: Undefined symbol "_ThreadRuneLocale"
>
> and nothing else - the command will not run. Just the
> above output. Commands like
On 20/04/2013 19:15, Beat Siegenthaler wrote:
> On 19.04.13 16:00, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I did not recognize that 587 is only listening onIy on IPv4. Maybe it's
>>> new, maybe it was alltime so.
>>>
>>> sendmail 25090 root 4u IPv4 0xfe01e810f3d0 0t0 TCP *:25
>>>
On 15/02/2013 01:27, Rainer Duffner wrote:
> OK, another issue crept up.
>
> I started to build www/rt40 and it worked - until I updated it to the latest
> commit.
> Now I get:
>
> >> [02] Finished build of www/rt40: Ignored: please select one of
> AP_MODPERL, AP_MODFASTCGI, LIGHTTPD, SPAWN
On 25/01/2013 13:38, Ian Smith wrote:
> I'm trying to work out exactly when support for checking out 9-STABLE
> CVS sources - and I'm only talking about system sources here - will end?
The date that CVS for src will cease to be kept in sync with SVN and
when cvsup etc. are officially withdrawn fo
On 24/01/2013 11:30, John Mehr wrote:
> I'm working on writing a lightweight, dependency-free, BSD licensed
> program to pull source using the svn protocol (not using the
> aforementioned svnsup code). I've only got a few more pieces of the
> puzzle to sort out and some code cleanup and it should
On 04/01/2013 09:52, Patrick M. Hausen wrote:
> So - this is definitely no simple plug-in replacement for csup.
> And is there a "Components ports"? Doesn't look like it.
No. You'ld use portsnap(8) for ports. It's very similar to
freebsd-update(8) from a user perspective but apparently quite dif
On 03/01/2013 21:04, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
> Hello, Matthew.
> You wrote 4 января 2013 г., 0:39:33:
>
> MS> Ah. Yes, you are right. You can't track a stable branch with
> MS> freebsd-update. In that case, svn is the way to go.
> And even as developer I don't like this situation. My deve
On 03/01/2013 19:56, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
> Hello, Matthew.
> You wrote 3 января 2013 г., 22:21:16:
>
>>> I'm a bit reluctant to installing svn on every system that needs source
>>> updates. Are there more lightweight ways?
>
> MS> freebsd-update(8)
> It says (on 9-STABLE):
>
> The freeb
On 03/01/2013 18:57, Lee Dilkie wrote:
>
> On 1/3/2013 1:21 PM, Matthew Seaman wrote:
>> On 03/01/2013 17:48, Patrick M. Hausen wrote:
>>> I'm a bit reluctant to installing svn on every system that needs source
>>> updates. Are there more lightweight ways?
>
On 03/01/2013 17:48, Patrick M. Hausen wrote:
> I'm a bit reluctant to installing svn on every system that needs source
> updates. Are there more lightweight ways?
freebsd-update(8)
which is what 'make update' will run by default and in the absence of
any configuration to use other mechanisms.
On 02/01/2013 17:49, Paul Mather wrote:
> Yesterday, I updated my RELENG_8 ZFS-only system that has worked like a champ
> for ages. After a successful install{kernel,world} and reboot, I noticed the
> 20121130 entry in /usr/src/UPDATING and upgraded my ZFS pool via "zfs upgrade
> -a". I also u
On 27/12/2012 21:01, Garrett Wollman wrote:
>> I'm creating my own repository and have created a key for it.
> [...]
>> >What does pkg expect to be in this file?
> A public key. It does not use X.509 (nor is there any reason why it
> should, although I suppose it could be made to at the cost of
>
On 27/12/2012 10:38, Dimitry Andric wrote:
> On 2012-12-27 11:35, David Demelier wrote:
>> On 27/12/2012 11:02, Matthew Seaman wrote:
>>> pkgng is not in base and there are no plans to import it. If you are
>>> going to use pkgng then you need to install it, either fro
On 27/12/2012 09:44, Rainer Duffner wrote:
> as I see it, pkgng is actually included in 9.1 as /usr/sbin/pkg, right?
/usr/sbin/pkg and /usr/local/sbin/pkg are very different.
/usr/local/sbin/pkg is a binary package management system.
/usr/sbin/pkg is a shim that can bootstrap the installation of
On 21/12/2012 18:01, Walter Hurry wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Dec 2012 17:13:56 +0000, Matthew Seaman wrote:
>>
>> Could you show me the output from:
>>
>> ldd /usr/local/bin/VBoxBalloonCtrl objdump -p
>> /usr/local/bin/VBoxBalloonCtrl
>>
Thank you for that
On 21/12/2012 14:12, Walter Hurry wrote:
> Before I had a chance to try the git version, pkg-1.0.4 turned up in the
> ports. Good work!
>
> Hmm...
>
> $ pkg info pkg
> pkg-1.0.4 New generation package manager
> $ pkg -v
> 1.0.3
> $
>
> Forgotten (by bapt I assume) again?
N
On 20/12/2012 23:55, Bas Smeelen wrote:
> On 12/21/12 00:40, Matthew Seaman wrote:
>> On 13/12/2012 08:29, Matthew Seaman wrote:
>>
>> (On 'pkg check -Ba' producing 'shared library not found' errors for some
>> packages)
>>
>>> Unf
On 13/12/2012 08:29, Matthew Seaman wrote:
(On 'pkg check -Ba' producing 'shared library not found' errors for some
packages)
> Unfortunately it seems to be a fairly common effect in some large
> projects. Other packages showing the same symptoms:
>
>t
On 20/12/2012 13:06, CeDeROM wrote:
> Hello :-)
>
> I want to test new "pkg" tool, but it complains that there is no
> repo.txz file on the repository:
>
> # pkg install libreoffice
> Updating repository catalogue
> pkg:
> ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/amd64/packages-9-stable/All//r
On 13/12/2012 07:37, Scot Hetzel wrote:
> This same issue with firefox was reported in this PR:
>
> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=131237
>
> And included a simple fix which was rejected by the firefox maintainer
> due to firefox sets LD_LIBRARY_PATH at runtime to find its share
> lib
On 12/12/2012 23:17, Walter Hurry wrote:
> That looks like a useful feature. But why is it saying this?
>
> pkg: (firefox-17.0.1,1) shared library libxpcom.so not found
> pkg: (firefox-17.0.1,1) shared library libmozalloc.so not found
> (lots more output snipped)
>
> $ locate libxpcom.so
> /usr/l
On 12/12/2012 17:38, Kevin Oberman wrote:
> If you use pkgng, please try editing /usr/local/sbin/pkg_libchk to
> replace "pkg_info" with "pkg info" in all locations and let me know
> how it works, . I'm hoping that will make it work with pkgng, but I
> have no way to check as I can't currently use
On 10/12/2012 14:39, S.N.Grigoriev wrote:
> after the security announcement
> (http://www.freebsd.org/news/2012-compromise.html) I use svn to
> update my local ports tree. I've found out that the port index is not
> updated. What is the preferred/recommended way to update port indexes
> when using
On 26/11/2012 08:07, Perry Hutchison wrote:
> Once csup goes away, how will a base-only system update
> the sources, e.g. to follow a security branch?
freebsd-update(8)
Cheers,
Matthew
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://
On 24/11/2012 13:18, Beeblebrox wrote:
> 5. > You should save the entire log
> I don't know how to do this.
See script(1)
Cheers,
Matthew
--
Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil.
PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 16/09/2012 22:24, Andreas Nilsson wrote:
> Since no one asked: Why would you want to do it this way? If you are using
> pkgng updating is as easy as: pkg upgrade.
Actually, we (the pkgng developers) think this is a perfectly valid use
case, and we'd like to have it as a standard choice availabl
On 16/09/2012 21:10, Marcelo Gondim wrote:
> Em 16/09/2012 14:42, Sergey V. Dyatko escreveu:
>> On Sat, 15 Sep 2012 08:48:09 -0300
>> Marcelo Gondim wrote:
>>
>>> Em 15/09/2012 01:41, Mike Manilone escreveu:
Hi,
I'm using ports with pkgng enabled. But I found that portmaster
wo
On 16/08/2012 20:56, Michael Schnell wrote:
> Hi,
> I don't know if this came up already, but not as far as I know. So, I
> was thinking it would be nice to add a mechanism to pkgng, which enables
> the user to get the ports tree corresponding to the current repository.
>
> At least I've the probl
On 01/08/2012 18:13, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
> Any of you who are expereincing problems with packets dropped due to
> invalid checksums with IPv6 and pf after the recent merges, can you
> report back if you also see this without "modulate state" in your
> pf.conf (if you have 'modulate' in there, ca
On 30/07/2012 21:38, Chuck Burns wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 21:01:23 +0200
> Beat Siegenthaler wrote:
>> It seems to be important to know, what "build from port" means. There is
>> still some tweaking necessary.
> Is it possible that openssl in base is just left over from the
> previous world?
On 26/07/2012 21:51, Mike Andrews wrote:
> Sounds like what I hit and filed kern/170070 on -- basically a host not
> being able to talk to itself on IPv6, except on the ::1 address.
>
> Workaround: ifconfig lo0 -txcsum6 -rxcsum6
>
> or in /etc/rc.conf:
>
> ifconfig_lo0="inet 127.0.0.1/8 -txcsum6
So, I tried to do a routine update to the latest stable/9 yesterday
(r238771), and I found that access to the jail on my server had stopped
working. Everything else seemed to be fine, and reverting to the
previous system (r237456 from 2012-06-22 (Boot Environments FTW)) bought
it all back to life
On 16/06/2012 21:03, Shiv. Nath wrote:
> Dear Metthew,
Matthew, one a, one e.
> first thanks for assisting to secure 22/25 ports from brute force attack.
> i wish to consult if the following white list looks fine to exclude
> trusted networks (own network)
>
>
>
> int0="em0"
> secured_attack_p
On 15/06/2012 17:55, Shiv. Nath wrote:
>
>> Limiting yourself to 200 states won't protect you very much -- you tend
>> to get a whole series of attacks from the same IP, and that just uses
>> one state at a time.
>>
>> Instead, look at the frequency with which an attacker tries to connect
>> to yo
On 15/06/2012 17:17, Shiv. Nath wrote:
> Hi FreeBSD Gurus,
>
>
> i want to use PF to Preventing SMTP Brute Force Attacks. i need some help
> to understand correct syntax.
>
> URL Explaining this: http://www.openbsd.org/faq/pf/filter.html#stateopts
>
>
> i expect the following behavior from the
On 04/06/2012 00:30, Mark Andrews wrote:
> The ports system defaults are to use a common build/runtime tree
> but at the cost of a little more disk space each major application
> could have its own build/runtime tree. This is a tradeoff. Most
> of the time having a shared set of libraries is a wi
On 03/06/2012 02:21, Erich wrote:
>> 2. No decent packet manager (I hope pkgng will make life easier). You
>> > can't just upgrade this and that packet and see what's new, and
>> > rollback if you don't like somthing .
> I really hope this will never come. Why? It will kill make install.
> Make in
On 01/06/2012 09:16, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
> The reason I rebuild the ports last is because, unless I'm wrong, any
> port that's statically linked to a system library would be linked to the
> old library from the old world.
Uh -- if it's statically linked, then the object code is copied from the
On 31/05/2012 16:41, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
> You missed the bit about 3 reboots, while these don't take 15 mins each,
> they're still time consuming and disruptive.
> 1/ reboot after installing new kernel
> 2/ reboot after installing new world
> 3/ reboot after rebuilding ports
If you rebuilt the
On 29/05/2012 04:47, Randy Bush wrote:
> is the clang build for releng_9 for amd64 in good enough shape that i
> can simply
> csup
> hack make.conf
> make buildworld
> make kernel
> boot single
> make installworld
> mergemaster -cviFU
> reboot
>
> as if life was normal?
Pace Doug'
On 23/04/2012 18:08, Prabhpal S. Mavi wrote:
> i want to know the advice from experts, what is best? is it really
> important to update the system to new ports available. Or once i have no
> issue, i should follow golden rule. don't fix if not broken. i personally
> want my system to update at all
On 17/04/2012 23:02, Andy Dills wrote:
> However, once the system finishes booting and loads into sysinstall, and I
> go to partition the drives, I get "No disks found! Please verify that your
> disk controller is being properly loaded at boot time".
If you boot into 'Live CD' rather than the in
On 27/03/2012 19:25, Brett Glass wrote:
> I've just noted that as of this month, there is no release of FreeBSD --
> on any branch -- whose EOL is less than a year away. Should there not
> be at least one release with extended support?
ITYM 'more than a year away' there...
8.3 is due, in fact, o
On 26/03/2012 09:56, Kurt Jaeger wrote:
>>> From knowing that you have too many files open you can increase the
>>> > > maxfile numbers - but if you want to know what uses them try this -
>>> > >
>>> > > lsof -n | awk '{print $2 "\t" $1}' | sort | uniq -c | sort
> On my system, it shows interestin
On 23/03/2012 11:08, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> On 2 of the systems, /etc/periodic/security/510.ipfdenied gets run
> during "periodic security" even though it's explicitly shut off in
> periodic.conf. Thus on these 2 systems, our security mails contain this
> line: ipfstat: not found
Are you sure t
On 02/03/2012 16:45, Mark Linimon wrote:
>> Other ports aren't supported on certain target architectures but the build
>> > doesn't tell you that until after it has run for a couple of hours
> Those are also bugs. Please send PRs for those, as well. I am particularly
> concerned about amd64 in t
On 24/01/2012 14:01, Johann Hugo wrote:
> Is there any way to recover data from a (good) disk that was detached from a
> zpool ?
Possibly, but not necessarily easily. It depends on how much of your
pool that disk represents. If it's one half of a mirror, then sure --
easy. You just need a syst
On 23/01/2012 20:47, Steven Hartland wrote:
>>> In my case, I fixed it by having a separate /boot on some USB sticks --
>>> this was only ever accessed to read the kernel, kernel modules and
>>> bootloader at boot time, so no worries over performance.
>
> Out of interest whats the procedure you us
On 23/01/2012 19:29, Steven Hartland wrote:
> Initially the zpool was just the first raidz2. Only after install
> was the second raidz2 added to increase capacity.
>
> So what I believe has happened is the new kernel when installed
> happens to have data be located on the second raidz2 which
> con
On 23/01/2012 18:06, Chuck Swiger wrote:
> On Jan 23, 2012, at 9:04 AM, Steven Hartland wrote:
>> After some digging we discovered that this was likely due to the
>> fact that the BIOS only enumerates the first 12 disks and this
>> machine has more than that in the root zpool which was a striped
>>
On 22/01/2012 19:00, clift...@volcano.org wrote:
> If rm had an option to take files from standard input, or if
> there's another program I'm not aware of which does this, it
> could serve as the right-hand side of this.
xargs(1) -- generic solution to taking a list of command arguments from
a fil
On 22/01/2012 05:32, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> csup then pulls down src/some/Makefile (for RELENG_9), where the version
> number is different; say, version 1.14.3.0. Note that the version
> number is not "higher" (larger) than the previous (1.14.12.3). Thus
> /usr/src/some/Makefile doesn't get cha
On 17/01/2012 08:43, Aristedes Maniatis wrote:
> The dumpon utility will refuse to enable a dump device which is
> smaller
> than the total amount of physical memory as reported by the hw.physmem
> sysctl(8) variable.
>
> However, I have found that
>
> # dumpon -v /dev/ad4s1b
> k
On 13/01/2012 22:57, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> But if the appropriate misc/compatX port is installed, then those libraries do
> actually exist and the system should be fully usable... Modulo the compat
> libraries not working with the new kernel as Kostik has pointed out.
As soon as you update or inst
On 05/01/2012 15:37, Wolfgang Zenker wrote:
> Well, the problem I have here is at the server side: ftp users can be
> locked in a particular subtree of the file system by simply assigning
> them a chrooted login class. No need to setup any infrastructure in
> that subtree itself. Did not find out h
On 05/01/2012 14:09, Karl Denninger wrote:
> So if I want to do anything other than transfer to a Windows machine
> (barf!) I am stuck with either FTP (no encryption at all and subject to
> be picked off via trivial means while the data is in flight) or FTPS
> (which has its own set of issues.)
Do
On 05/01/2012 12:47, Karl Denninger wrote:
> Not SFTP (which is supported by the sshd) but FTPS is it supported
> by FreeBSD?
No, not supported in the base system.
> This question may belong on the ports list, but a quick perusal there
> didn't find anything particularly interesting (one poss
1 - 100 of 231 matches
Mail list logo
