On 20/12/2012 23:55, Bas Smeelen wrote: > On 12/21/12 00:40, Matthew Seaman wrote: >> On 13/12/2012 08:29, Matthew Seaman wrote: >> >> (On 'pkg check -Ba' producing 'shared library not found' errors for some >> packages) >> >>> Unfortunately it seems to be a fairly common effect in some large >>> projects. Other packages showing the same symptoms: >>> >>> thunderbird (yeah -- that one was predictable...) >>> openjdk6 >>> virtualbox-ose >>> >>> ... and that's just out of what's installed on my desktop: by no means >>> comprehensive. As far as I can tell from a quick check, openjdk6 >>> doesn't rely on setting LD_LIBRARY_PATH in the environment. >>> >>> I've raised issue #403 in pkgng Github. >> I've just finished committing fixes for this problem to the master and >> release-1.0 branches in Github. If anyone is feeling enthusiastic and >> would like to try pulling those sources and confirming that their >> favourite packages no longer generate scads of nasty errors when >> re-analysing shlib dependencies, I'd be grateful. >> >> Cheers, >> >> Matthew >> >> PS. If you're running pkg-1.0.3, I recommend you pull down the >> release-1.0 branch for these tests. While you could upgrade to 1.1.a1 >> from master, that involves various local.sqlite DB schema changes which >> will be tedious to unwind should you want to revert to the released >> version. >> > > I would like to. > But just getting used to svn and other new things since simple csup and > friends. > How do I pull it? > I have pkg-1.0.3_1 on a machine building packages for my laptop right now.
Install git, and then something like: git clone https://github.com/pkgng/pkgng.git cd pkgng git checkout release-1.0 make then you can run pkg-static from the pkg-static directory, or you can 'make install', and run pkg as usual. There will be a pkg-1.0.4 release fairly soon though. Cheers, Matthew -- Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
