On 12/22/2011 03:48, Kostik Belousov wrote:
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 09:03:02PM +0400, Andrey Zonov wrote:
On 15.12.2011 17:01, Kostik Belousov wrote:
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 03:51:02PM +0400, Andrey Zonov wrote:
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 12:42 AM, Jeremy Chadwick
wrote:
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at
On 2011/12/22 at 23:02, 1126 wrote:
>
> Hello!
> I considered switching from emacs23 to emacs24 over the
> christmas-holidays.. So I removed emacs23 and installed emacs-devel
> via ports. Emacs runs fine, in terminal, but it crashes my whole
> X-system when I try to start it as X-client... The e
On Dec 22, 2011, at 3:58 PM, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 12:44:14AM +0100, O. Hartmann wrote:
>> On 12/21/11 19:41, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> while the discussion continued here, some work started at some other place.
>>> Now... in case someone here is will
On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 04:23:29PM -0800, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> On 22 December 2011 11:47, Steve Kargl
> wrote:
>
> > There is the additional observation in one of my 2008
> > emails (URLs have been posted) that if you have N+1
> > cpu-bound jobs with, say, job0 and job1 ping-ponging
> > on cpu0
On 12/22/2011 16:23, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> You've done something
> that noone else has actually done - provided actual results from
> real-life testing, rather than a hundred posts of "I remember seeing
> X, so I don't use ULE."
Not to take away from Steve's excellent work on this, but I actually
On 22 December 2011 11:47, Steve Kargl
wrote:
[snip]
Thankyou for posting some actual measurements!
> There is the additional observation in one of my 2008
> emails (URLs have been posted) that if you have N+1
> cpu-bound jobs with, say, job0 and job1 ping-ponging
> on cpu0 (due to ULE's cpu-a
On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 04:04:48PM -0700, Charlie Martin wrote:
> We've got another mystery panic in 7.2-PRE. Upgrading is not an
> option; however, if this is familiar to anyone, backporting a patch
> would be.
>
> The stack trace is:
>
> db_trace_self_wrapper() at 0x8019120a = db_trace
On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 12:44:14AM +0100, O. Hartmann wrote:
> On 12/21/11 19:41, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > while the discussion continued here, some work started at some other place.
> > Now... in case someone here is willing to help instead of talking, feel
> > free to go to h
On 12/21/11 19:41, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
> Hi,
>
> while the discussion continued here, some work started at some other place.
> Now... in case someone here is willing to help instead of talking, feel free
> to go to http://wiki.freebsd.org/BenchmarkAdvice and have a look what can be
> imp
We've got another mystery panic in 7.2-PRE. Upgrading is not an option;
however, if this is familiar to anyone, backporting a patch would be.
The stack trace is:
db_trace_self_wrapper() at 0x8019120a = db_trace_self_wrapper+0x2a^M
panic() at 0x80308797 = panic+0x187^M
devfs_pop
on 22/12/2011 21:47 Steve Kargl said the following:
> On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 09:01:15PM +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>> on 22/12/2011 20:45 Steve Kargl said the following:
>>> I've used schedgraph to look at the ktrdump output. A jpg is
>>> available at http://troutmask.apl.washington.edu/~kargl/fr
On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 09:01:15PM +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 22/12/2011 20:45 Steve Kargl said the following:
> > I've used schedgraph to look at the ktrdump output. A jpg is
> > available at http://troutmask.apl.washington.edu/~kargl/freebsd/ktr.jpg
> > This shows the ping-pong effect where
on 22/12/2011 20:45 Steve Kargl said the following:
> I've used schedgraph to look at the ktrdump output. A jpg is
> available at http://troutmask.apl.washington.edu/~kargl/freebsd/ktr.jpg
> This shows the ping-pong effect where here 3 processes appear to be
> using 2 cpus while the remaining 2 pr
On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 11:31:45AM +0100, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 04:52:50PM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote:
> >
> > I have placed several files at
> >
> > http://troutmask.apl.washington.edu/~kargl/freebsd
> >
> > dmesg.txt --> dmesg for ULE kernel
> > summary--> A s
On Thursday, December 22, 2011 10:02:09 am 1126 wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I considered switching from emacs23 to emacs24 over the
> christmas-holidays.. So I removed emacs23 and installed emacs-devel via
> ports. Emacs runs fine, in terminal, but it crashes my whole X-system when
> I try to start it
On 12/22/2011 9:56 AM, Joshua Boyd wrote:
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 11:56 PM, Adam Vande Morewrote:
VT-x(or the AMD equiv) is a CPU feature and is necessary to run 64-bit
guests. VT-d(or the AMD equiv)/IOMMU is the what is done in the chipset
however it isn't necessary to run 64-bit guests. Bot
On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 11:31:45AM +0100, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 04:52:50PM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote:
>>
>> I have placed several files at
>>
>> http://troutmask.apl.washington.edu/~kargl/freebsd
>>
>> dmesg.txt --> dmesg for ULE kernel
>> summary--> A summary
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 05:25:51PM +0100, Attilio Rao wrote:
> If someone else thinks he has a specific problem that is not
> characterized by one of the cases above please let me know and I will
> put this in the chart.
It seems I stumbled over another thing.
Setup: 2 Servers providing devices b
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 11:56 PM, Adam Vande More wrote:
> VT-x(or the AMD equiv) is a CPU feature and is necessary to run 64-bit
> guests. VT-d(or the AMD equiv)/IOMMU is the what is done in the chipset
> however it isn't necessary to run 64-bit guests. Both of these features
> are only found o
Hello!
I considered switching from emacs23 to emacs24 over the
christmas-holidays.. So I removed emacs23 and installed emacs-devel via
ports. Emacs runs fine, in terminal, but it crashes my whole X-system when
I try to start it as X-client... The error message tells me that there is
a glib-pr
On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 01:07:58AM -0800, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> Are you able to go through the emails here and grab out Attilio's
> example for generating KTR scheduler traces?
>
Did your read this part of my email?
> >
> > Attilio,
> >
> > I have placed several files at
> >
> > http://troutmask
On 12/22/11 04:07, Adrian Chadd wrote:
Are you able to go through the emails here and grab out Attilio's
example for generating KTR scheduler traces?
Adrian
[...]
I've put up two such files:
http://www.m5p.com/~george/ktr-ule-problem.out
http://www.m5p.com/~george/ktr-ule-interact.out
but I do
Hi Artem, Tijl,
On Tue, 20 Dec 2011 09:27:43 -0800, Artem Belevich wrote
> Something like that. [...]
> These days malloc() by default uses mmap, so if you don't force it to
> use sbrk() you can probably lower MAXDSIZE and let kernel use most
> of address space for hinted mmaps.
> [...]
On Tue, 2
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 04:52:50PM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 12:14:24PM +0100, Attilio Rao wrote:
> > 2011/12/15 Steve Kargl :
> > > On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 05:25:51PM +0100, Attilio Rao wrote:
> > >>
> > >> I basically went through all the e-mail you just sent and identif
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 09:03:02PM +0400, Andrey Zonov wrote:
> On 15.12.2011 17:01, Kostik Belousov wrote:
> >On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 03:51:02PM +0400, Andrey Zonov wrote:
> >>On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 12:42 AM, Jeremy Chadwick
> >>wrote:
> >>
> >>>On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 11:47:10PM +0400, Andrey Zo
Are you able to go through the emails here and grab out Attilio's
example for generating KTR scheduler traces?
Adrian
On 21 December 2011 16:52, Steve Kargl
wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 12:14:24PM +0100, Attilio Rao wrote:
>> 2011/12/15 Steve Kargl :
>> > On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 05:25:51PM
26 matches
Mail list logo
