Nick Pavlica writes:
> I have had excellent results with Novell GroupWise.
Groupware is fine if you need other functions more than e-mail, but for
an organization interested primarily or exclusively in messaging,
Exchange is the best choice.
For example, Lotus Notes (like Groupwise, IIRC) is pri
I have made some limited progress on the FreeBSD 5.3 Netserver problem
outline below.
I have been able to install FreeBSD 5.3 on a Netserver using the onboard
SCSI card. However it will not install if I use the HP 1si NetRaid card
for the SCSI drives.
So it appears to be having a problem with
Hi
I am setting up zope-2.7.5-final on a server (FreeBSD 5.3-RELEASE).
Installed python-2.3.5 from sources (not ports). After configuring and
compiling it correctly, I got an initial error on running runzope.
Following the exhortation I found on the following webpage :
http://mail.zope.org/piper
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Anthony
> Atkielski
> Sent: Friday, March 18, 2005 3:45 PM
> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: MS Exchange server on FreeBSD?
>
>
>
> Exchange is the best choice for intra-organizational e-
Thanks for all the replies. I will take a look at the, more or less,
open solutions. I never intended to use the MS exchange as my primary
mail server. But its functionality for syncinig calenders, documents and
so on, seemed to a "nice" "simple" way of dealing with my situation
here. I have t
> -Original Message-
> From: Peter Ulrich Kruppa [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, March 18, 2005 6:47 AM
> To: Ted Mittelstaedt
> Cc: Jerry McAllister; "Marco Greene (ML)";
> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Subject: RE: Stupid ASCII loader prompt
>
> >
> > The ultra-pro-beastie
> -Original Message-
> From: Jerry McAllister [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, March 18, 2005 6:47 AM
> To: Ted Mittelstaedt
> Cc: Jerry McAllister; ""Marco Greene (ML)"";
> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: Stupid ASCII loader prompt
>
> >
> > The ultra-pro-beastie mo
Ted Mittelstaedt writes:
> Not really true unless you do an apples to oranges comparison.
Comparing Exchange to groupware products _is_ largely an
apples-to-oranges comparison.
Despite what Microsoft says, Exchange is essentially a messaging
system--an e-mail server. It does that very well--muc
Hello everyone,
I am new to BSD-style operating systems, and currently reading about and
seriously considering a migration from Linux to free BSD on my home machine.
Before I do that, I would like to make sure (as far as possible) that my
critical applications will continue to work, one way or th
Christian Tischler writes:
> Thanks for all the replies. I will take a look at the, more or less,
> open solutions. I never intended to use the MS exchange as my primary
> mail server. But its functionality for syncinig calenders, documents and
> so on, seemed to a "nice" "simple" way of dealing
I'm still getting errors like this:
ad10: TIMEOUT - WRITE_DMA retrying (2 retries left) LBA=5601695
ad10: FAILURE - WRITE_DMA timed out
ad10: TIMEOUT - WRITE_DMA retrying (2 retries left) LBA=4848803
ad10: FAILURE - WRITE_DMA timed out
ad10: WARNING - READ_DMA UDMA ICRC error (retrying request) LB
Does the gnome cpu net hd mem applet take allot of resources to show
on your desktop ?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
SpamAssassin now recommends an environment variable setting like
"export LANG=en_US" be made when unicode support is not needed, for
performance reasons, as of the migration to Perl 5.8, which uses
unicode by default at some expense to SpamAssassin's performance. I'm
trying to figure out the best
On Sat, 2005-03-19 at 11:25 +0100, Gert Cuykens wrote:
> Does the gnome cpu net hd mem applet take allot of resources to show
> on your desktop ?
Why do you not just test it yourself? All you need to do is to run 'top'
in a terminal window.
--
GnuPG key : 0xD25FCC81 | http://cyb.websimplex.d
On Sat, Mar 19, 2005 at 10:38:13AM +0100, Anthony Atkielski wrote:
>
> I need to know what is causing these problems. They have been reported
> for a year by various people on various configurations (different
> motherboards and chipsets). I've seen lots of complaints and reports,
> but no solut
Why are the last messages showing eventhough ports seem to be detected and
working fine? Is there a way to disable/fix those "unknown" devices? PC is
a notebook (with APM/PnP only, ACPI is disabled).
Part of kernel:
#device apic# I/O APIC
device apm
device a
Anthony Atkielski wrote:
Christian Tischler writes:
Thanks for all the replies. I will take a look at the, more or less,
open solutions. I never intended to use the MS exchange as my primary
mail server. But its functionality for syncinig calenders, documents and
so on, seemed to a "nice" "sim
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Mar 18, 2005 at 02:22:29PM +0100, Svein Halvor Halvorsen wrote:
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-03-18 11:24 +0100]
On Fri, Mar 18, 2005 at 10:21:17AM +0100, Christian Tischler wrote:
> I wondered whether there is an option to shut down an idle HDD until it
> is n
One option is to use communigate. It allegedly works with the outlook
mapi client and should work on freebsd.
http://www.stalker.com/content/solutions.htm
I've heard from a lot of people that swear by it, particularly in the ISP
space.
Jerry
> Thanks for all the replies. I will take a look at
On Sat, 19 Mar 2005 11:43:59 +0100, cyb <"cyb."@gmx.net> wrote:
> On Sat, 2005-03-19 at 11:25 +0100, Gert Cuykens wrote:
> > Does the gnome cpu net hd mem applet take allot of resources to show
> > on your desktop ?
>
> Why do you not just test it yourself? All you need to do is to run 'top'
> in
On Thu, 17 Mar 2005 13:13:10 +0100, Gert Cuykens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I wanted to reinstall mozilla but this time with the mail thingie enabled.
> I did make config make deinstall make reinstall but it get stuck doing
> nothing at the end saying nNCL:registering deferred (0)
>
Any body kno
I'm currently in the market for an "All-in-One" device for the home network,
mostly for the fax functionality (it'll be replacing an Canon scanner and
Okidata 810e laser printer). Before anyone suggests their favorite FreeBSD
Fax modem/app, I'll let it be known that I've been told that the expecta
Ryan J. Cavicchioni wrote:
Am I looking at the correct values?
Yes.
Which is the actual process limit?
The lower number, 3632, is the max processes permitted per user.
What would you recommend that I set it to in order to have my machine
shrug off the fork bomb sooner?
Probably around 300.
What wo
Is there any way of detecting the type of file system on a disk,
specifically UFS2 or UFS1?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
On Sat, Mar 19, 2005 at 09:27:57AM -0500, Robert Munn wrote:
> Is there any way of detecting the type of file system on a disk,
> specifically UFS2 or UFS1?
If all you need to know is wether a UFS file system is UFS1 or UFS2,
you could use /sbin/dumpfs
-cpghost.
--
Cordula's Web. http://www.c
Robert Munn wrote:
Is there any way of detecting the type of file system on a disk,
specifically UFS2 or UFS1?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
"
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i recently bought a new and larger hard drive for my computer. i put it
the machine as '/dev/ad3'. while educating myself about this new drive,
i installed freebsd 5.3 on one of the slices. i am ready to eliminate
the old 'ad0' and want to move the new drive so it will
Doug Lee wrote:
SpamAssassin now recommends an environment variable setting like
"export LANG=en_US" be made when unicode support is not needed, for
performance reasons, as of the migration to Perl 5.8, which uses
unicode by default at some expense to SpamAssassin's performance. I'm
trying to figu
I take it noone can help me with this?
On Wed, 16 Mar 2005 18:27:54 -0500, Alexander Chamandy
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
>I'm having some problems with php4 and libgd support. I'm
> running FreeBSD/i386 5.3 which was upgraded from the 4.x STABLE branch
> a long time ago, bu
Brian Curnow wrote:
Thanks for the reply.
I saw a few other posts that talked about that
setting. My list is bit different, I have TSC, i8254
and ACPI-safe. When I boot it picks ACPI-safe.
I've tried the other options but they didn't seem to
make any difference.
How did you try them?
I did not
On Fri, 18 Mar 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i recently bought a new and larger hard drive for my computer. i put it
the machine as '/dev/ad3'. while educating myself about this new drive,
i installed freebsd 5.3 on one of the slices. i am ready to eliminate
the old 'ad0' and want to move the ne
Hi Alexander,
PHP actually comes with libgd bundled now. Just use --with-gd (but you
may not even have to do that). You do not need the external library.
Alexander Chamandy wrote:
I take it noone can help me with this?
On Wed, 16 Mar 2005 18:27:54 -0500, Alexander Chamandy
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hi all,
I've got a FreeBSD 6.x -current file server running NFS and I mount
lots of things via NFS on other Freebsd 6.x -current servers with an NFS
client. I get _lots_ of file locking issues. See below for just one
example. I'm wondering, will NFSv4 fix this or switching to samba ?
If not, I
Hi,
I had exactly same problem, to resolve this, use the -L option of mount_nfs.
But I don't know how can I add this option in /etc/fstab.
Hope this help.
Regards.
On Sat, 19 Mar 2005 11:42:34 -0500, Philip M. Golllucci
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've got a FreeBSD 6.x -current
Hello All,
I just finished installing fbsd for the 8th time. I just want to get it up
and running so I can start learning to use it . I have not gotten X to work yet
on the bsd box yetexcept when I used an old 4MB card. But X was too slow.
Here is my setup now:
My main computer is Wi
Hi,
That works!
I haven't tried it yet, but is it better to use the -L
or run these 3 services ? Also, if anyone knows how to add this in
fstab that would be nice too... Not that I reboot that often :)
Thanks!
-L
Do not forward fcntl(2) locks over the wire. All locks will be
local and not s
On Saturday 19 March 2005 08:29, Brian J. McGovern wrote:
> I'm currently in the market for an "All-in-One" device for the home
> network, mostly for the fax functionality (it'll be replacing an Canon
> scanner and Okidata 810e laser printer). Before anyone suggests their
> favorite FreeBSD Fax mod
Hello, Francis
My main computer is WinXP (because the rest of the family uses it). It is
connected to Adelphia cable modem via a D-Link, DI-524 wireless router. My
Daughter is connected to internet via the WLAN. My freeBSD box is connected to
modem via a crossover cable. bsd box has 96MB of R
> From: Jason Henson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2005 02:00:48 +
> Subject: Re: kern.maxpipekva exceeded, please see tuning(7)
> On 03/13/05 15:44:32, John DeStefano wrote:
> > I have seen a mention or two of this error on the lists before,
> > in
re: http://osnews.com/comment.php?news_id=10032&offset=15&rows=28
See a posting from Scott Long of FreeBSD;
---
Thanks for going to a public forum and saying I am full of crap.
I really appreciate that. Boy, you sure do want to see all of
our projects do well, don't you.
Apparently you have ze
On Sat, 19 Mar 2005 07:52:19 -0500 (EST), Jerry Bell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> One option is to use communigate. It allegedly works with the outlook
> mapi client and should work on freebsd.
> http://www.stalker.com/content/solutions.htm
>
> I've heard from a lot of people that swear by it, pa
To make it easier for people to find Scott Long's post to
osnews.com here it is in full:
---
Direct comment link From a BSD and former Adaptec person...
By Scott (IP: ---.samsco.org) - Posted on 2005-03-19 19:02:37
I don't know if it's better to post this here or onto the openbsd-m
> Theo de Raadt wrote:
> >>While I understand what you want Theo lets not remove the support for
> >>stuff that currently works. I just spent $349 on a Adaptec RAID card
> >>for my home server and if the support is removed I will be very upset.
> >>The drive is written. Leave it alone. Let it be
Theo de Raadt wrote:
re: http://osnews.com/comment.php?news_id=10032&offset=15&rows=28
See a posting from Scott Long of FreeBSD;
---
Thanks for going to a public forum and saying I am full of crap.
I really appreciate that. Boy, you sure do want to see all of
our projects do well, don't you.
Appar
I have a working kdc on my LAN and use OpenSSH's "gssapi-with-mic"
authentication to connect to other machines. However, I can't
use /usr/bin/ksu to su to root without entering root's password, even if I
have a current, valid ticket and am listed in root's .k5login;
$ sudo cat /root/.k5login
#
There has got to be a better way to work with the vendors in order to
get the support we need. It just seem to me that the "screw you guys, I
am going home" stuff just does not work. The vendors need a business
case in order to do things - they are in business to make money and I
can agree wit
On Sat, 19 Mar 2005 12:38:48 -0700, Scott Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Otherwise, stop crying that no one will help you.
Please enlighten us (those who buy Adaptec hardware and would like
full functionality on OpenBSD) why no one at Adaptec will help the
OpenBSD developers by simply giving t
> I'd love to have fully open stuff from all the RAID
> companies too, but I also want the users of FreeBSD to be able to use
> the resources that are out there to their full advantage and not be
> pinned down by my political beliefs on the subject.
Which is why you go onto public posting sites an
On Mar 19, 2005, at 2:39 PM, Theo de Raadt wrote:
[ ... ]
Sigh. Theo, there are lots of ways of interacting with other people:
if you go out of your way to antagonize somebody, the result is
generally not going to be positive. I think Scott is mature enough to
continue to help other BSD projec
On Sat, 19 Mar 2005, Francis Whittington wrote:
My main computer is WinXP (because the rest of the family uses it).
It is connected to Adelphia cable modem via a D-Link, DI-524 wireless
router. My Daughter is connected to internet via the WLAN. My freeBSD
box is connected to modem via a cross
On Sat, Mar 19, 2005 at 01:53:58PM -0600, Kirk Strauser wrote:
> I have a working kdc on my LAN and use OpenSSH's "gssapi-with-mic"
> authentication to connect to other machines. However, I can't
> use /usr/bin/ksu to su to root without entering root's password, even if I
> have a current, vali
I'm working on autoconf support for ACE (A C++ framework) and TAO
(Real-time CORBA ORB).
The resulting configuration is failing for FreeBSD, something I'd
like before the upcoming ACE/TAO release. I downloaded FreeBSD 5.3
and installed it under vmware to reproduce (and hopefully fix) this
probl
The OpenBSD community doesn't want help for closed utilities and
drivers. All we want is documentation. No source, no
binary-only-cannot-distrubute drivers and utilities, just enough
documenatation for which to write their drivers, and support
oursevles. No one has been able to answer us on how rel
It's not a binary driver, it's a 2-clause BSD licensed driver that
contains full source. You said that the OpenBSD driver is unstable,
so I offered to help. That has nothing to do with binary apps.
Deleting it from the OpenBSD tree is always an option, of course.
Scott
Jason Crawford wrote:
The
Does only portmanager create packages ? Or does make install also make
a package ? How can i tell them to put all the packages in the
/usr/ports/packages/ instead of the port application directory ?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://li
> It's not a binary driver, it's a 2-clause BSD licensed driver that
> contains full source. You said that the OpenBSD driver is unstable,
> so I offered to help. That has nothing to do with binary apps.
> Deleting it from the OpenBSD tree is always an option, of course.
The driver is free, but
Even a working driver without any management utilities is not what I
would want to run on a production server. I need to be able to find
out what is wrong with the RAID setup, if anything, state of all the
disks, etc... which I cannot do without rebooting. And I fail to see
how letting a community
> It's not a binary driver, it's a 2-clause BSD licensed driver that
> contains full source. You said that the OpenBSD driver is unstable,
> so I offered to help. That has nothing to do with binary apps.
From
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/pds.cgi?ports/sysutils/aaccli
Sources for ports/s
> Sigh. Theo, there are lots of ways of interacting with other people:
> if you go out of your way to antagonize somebody, the result is
> generally not going to be positive. I think Scott is mature enough to
> continue to help other BSD projects-- including OpenBSD-- regardless,
> but this s
On Mar 19, 2005, at 3:43 PM, Theo de Raadt wrote:
It's not a binary driver, it's a 2-clause BSD licensed driver that
contains full source. You said that the OpenBSD driver is unstable,
so I offered to help. That has nothing to do with binary apps.
From
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/pds.cgi?ports
> I personally don't care about Adaptec anymore, but I do care about the
> people there. If LSI or whoever else can provide better support, then
> that's fine with me. I do however have quite a bit of experience in
> knowing how things work at Adaptec and knowing what compromises can be
> made.
"cc: cannot specify -o with -c or -S and multiple compilations"
Compiling of gnome-vfs-2.10.0 stops with errors and this is not nice,
cause I need this dep for bluefish.
Does this error sounds familiar to somebody? An error in the port?
(gnome is up2date)
--
dick -- http://nagual.st/ -- PGP/Gn
>
> ...deliberately breaking OpenBSD's support for Adaptec hardware as some
> sort of ultimatum is a childish and self-destructive action. I hope
> the other OpenBSD committers veto any such action as being
> counterproductive and harmful to your users.
Horsecookies. What was done was
Sorry, forgot you guys too!
-- Forwarded message --
From: Jason Crawford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2005 15:51:08 -0500
Subject: Re: Adaptec AAC raid support
To: Scott Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: Aaron Glenn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Adam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Theo de Raadt
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Jerry McAllister [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Friday, March 18, 2005 6:47 AM
> > To: Ted Mittelstaedt
> > Cc: Jerry McAllister; ""Marco Greene (ML)"";
> > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> > Subject: Re: Stupid ASCII loader prompt
> >
> > >
> > > The ul
Theo, I'd like to make a comment as a new user in this community:
I think BSD is great. I don't care what flavor you're talking about; I
think they're great. I use FreeBSD, but I have great respect for OpenBSD
and the others, and it was a hard choice deciding which to run.
However, when I see TOP
I was looking at top and wondering the difference between WCPU and CPU
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Charles Swiger wrote:
On Mar 19, 2005, at 2:39 PM, Theo de Raadt wrote:
Those controllers will not be supported in OpenBSD 3.7 in May. If
Adaptec wishes them to be supported in a future release, they had
better come and make amends. We are sick of supporting the hardware
of vendors who shit on th
> you guys want to produce fully open and unencumbered stuff. That's
> wonderful. But why is it so important to go around screaming and
> yelling about it and alientating those who do try to help? Let me
> tell you, Doug is about the most positive and supportive guy you'll
> ever have at Adaptec
> Sorry, I got suckered into a side argument about why the kernel driver
> in OpenBSD sucks. Yes, the management app is closed, but the driver is
> open. And if the OpenBSD driver sucks and people want it to stop
> crashing and don't want to go beating their heads against the wall at
> Adaptec a
Christian Tischler writes:
> Actually the number of users will be quite small, and bandwidth is not
> an consideration.
For small installations, I don't think Exchange is really
cost-effective. It's quite a monster. Easy to justify in a large
organization where all IT projects are monsters, any
On Mar 19, 2005, at 3:50 PM, Theo de Raadt wrote:
Sigh. Theo, there are lots of ways of interacting with other people:
if you go out of your way to antagonize somebody, the result is
generally not going to be positive. I think Scott is mature enough to
continue to help other BSD projects-- includ
The fact that the management utiltiy it uses is closed
binary-only-can't-distrubute type of utility, means it can't be used
by anyone who really cares about stability of their system,
development, or who just loves freedom. And won't be used by this
community which accounts for over 1,800 adaptec A
> What part of the FreeBSD AAC driver is closed, emcumbered, or otherwise
> non-free?
The bits that do management.
Therefore, the bits that let it do what RAID controllers are meant to do.
Can you fully operate an aac(4) card -- 100% of it's abilities, on a
FreeBSD machine, without using a bina
Theo and Scott, a few words:
Theo: I happen to own a system that runs FreeBSD and uses an Adaptec AAA
card,
here's the dmesg:
ahc0: port 0x1000-0x10ff mem
0x4040-0x407f,0x4010-0x40100fff irq 11 at device 0.0 on pci2
RAID functionality unsupported
device_probe_and_attach: ahc0 attach
> Of course, sooner or later someone will kindly point them in the
> direction of electronic documentation, in which case I'm sure they'll
> come up with the "oops, our Acrobat licence expired"-excuse.
Your flippant reply, doesn't illustrate the source of the real
problem. Companies in
Theo de Raadt wrote:
What part of the FreeBSD AAC driver is closed, emcumbered, or otherwise
non-free?
The bits that do management.
Therefore, the bits that let it do what RAID controllers are meant to do.
Can you fully operate an aac(4) card -- 100% of it's abilities, on a
FreeBSD machine, witho
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Charles Swiger
> Sent: Saturday, March 19, 2005 1:30 PM
> To: Theo de Raadt
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Scott Long; Sean Hafeez;
> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: Adaptec AAC raid support
>
>
>
> I'll heartily agree that there is little reason for any company to
> keep information like this closed.
Yet you are not helping.
> But going around making personal
> attacks on company employees that don't give you the cookie you want
> is pretty shitty too.
Then I guess that Doug Richardson m
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Bob Beck
> Sent: Saturday, March 19, 2005 1:44 PM
> To: Bram Van Dam
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: aac support
>
>
>
> > Of course, sooner or later someone will kin
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Bnonn
> Sent: Saturday, March 19, 2005 12:59 PM
> To: FreeBSD Questions Mailing List
> Subject: Re: Adaptec AAC raid support
>
>
> Theo, I'd like to make a comment as a new user in this community:
>
> I t
> I'm not stuffing anything down anyone's throats.
You are insulting me on public lists.
You are, thus, also telling your users not to bother your beloved
Adaptec.
You're telling them what the binary which you worked on is the best
they are going to get.
> I'm enabling FreeBSD
> users to use t
--On Saturday, March 19, 2005 12:32 PM -0500 Francis Whittington
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello All,
I just finished installing fbsd for the 8th time. I just want to get
it up and running so I can start learning to use it . I have not gotten X
to work yet on the bsd box yetexcept when I
> I'm not stuffing anything down anyone's throats. I'm enabling FreeBSD
> users to use the resources that are available to them. That's quite
> different than cancelling developer work and threatening to remove a
> driver due to a political dispute. Freedom isn't about coercing others
> to be
Theo de Raadt wrote:
I'm not stuffing anything down anyone's throats.
You are insulting me on public lists.
You are, thus, also telling your users not to bother your beloved
Adaptec.
You're telling them what the binary which you worked on is the best
they are going to get.
I'm enabling FreeBSD
u
> Do you ask for the blueprints to the plane before you get onboard? Do
> you demand that Ford or GM give you the source to the fuel ingector
> computer before you get into a car? I'm saying that resources are out
> there that will allow OpenBSD users to manage their RAID arrays RIGHT
> NOW.
On Mar 19, 2005, at 4:48 PM, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
Scott is or was under NDA with Adaptec. Scott certainly is not in a
position to give away all of Adaptec's internal documentation.
Frankly, I doubt even the CEO of Adaptec would be free to simply give
away all of their internal docs-- Adaptec un
> I'm done with this thread. A closed binary managmeent app isn't ideal,
> but it's better than nothing. I worked on it because I knew the
> compromises I could make at the time and I wanted to give the FreeBSD
> community something for it. I don't have infinite time and resources
> to fight the
having a problem trying to compile mozilla-1.7.5_2,2
nsFontMetricsPS.cpp: In member function `virtual void
nsFT2Type8Generator::GeneratePSFont(FILE*)':
nsFontMetricsPS.cpp:1625: error: 'struct FTC_ImageTypeRec_' has no
member named 'face_id'
nsFontMetricsPS.cpp:1627: error: 'struct FTC_ImageTypeRe
> -Original Message-
> From: Charles Swiger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, March 19, 2005 2:21 PM
> To: Ted Mittelstaedt
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Theo de Raadt; freebsd list
> Subject: Re: Adaptec AAC raid support
>
> I don't think Adaptec dictated terms to Intel vis-a-vis t
Hello,
On Fri, 18 Mar 2005 22:16:05 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Nick Pavlica <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Sent: Fri, 18 Mar 2005 19:45:44 -0700
> Subject: R
FreeBSD baby 5.4-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 5.4-PRERELEASE #7: Sat Mar 12
14:22:16 PST 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/AMD64 amd64
What I am doing is using a KVM with my AMD64 laptop. The KVM cables are
PS/2 so I have Radio Shack PS/2-2-TO-USB cable adapters to connect both
my mouse and k
On Saturday, March 19, Scott Long wrote:
> Theo de Raadt wrote:
> >
> > Why do you keep discussing the free stuff, and distracting everyone
> > from the non-free bits?
> >
> > Is it because you used to work for Adaptec? Are you paid to distract
> > people from the non-free code?
>
> No, but you
Hello,
I have been trying to connect from my FreeBSD box to a Microsoft VPN. I
am running Windows 2000 Pro and also Windows Millenium inside QEMU. I
have also tried using both "-user-net" and "/dev/tun0" connections. The
connections fail while trying to authenticate my name and password.
Is
On Mar 19, 2005, at 6:02 PM, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
I don't think Adaptec dictated terms to Intel vis-a-vis the i860 chips
used for hardware parity computation on some of their RAID cards, for
example. I don't think Adaptec dictated terms to Dell vis-a-vis the
PERC 4 series, either.
Whaat? Dell?
You don't offer freedom of choice, what you offer is a binary-only
solution, THAT IS THE ONLY SOLUTION, for that card. If you really did
stand for freedom of choice, then you would have started pushing to
open documentation way before this. Locking your users into only one
way of doing something su
Am Samstag, 19. März 2005 21:34 schrieb Gert Cuykens:
> Does only portmanager create packages ? Or does make install also make
> a package ? How can i tell them to put all the packages in the
> /usr/ports/packages/ instead of the port application directory ?
If "/usr/ports/packages" exists 'make p
Anthony,
I referenced the Novell GroupWise product. I'm not sure what you
were referencing with the generic "Groupware" that you mentioned.
It's clear that you have little knowledge of this technology and may
want to spend some time learning about it before making blanket
statements about it.
On Sat, 19 Mar 2005 22:04:10 +0100, Gert Cuykens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I was looking at top and wondering the difference between WCPU and CPU
Have you tried "man top"
"WCPU, when displayed, is the weighted cpu percentage (this is the
same value that ps(1) displays as CPU), CPU is the raw p
You sound more like a politician than an engineer, Nick. I'm not a
guinea pig,
and I have a business to run,and I'm not going to spend an extra $400.
per
system to to get the same speed as with 4.x just to be one of the
fellas.
I have no obligation to care about their plight, just as they've
in
1 - 100 of 135 matches
Mail list logo
