On Thu, Jun 17, 2004 at 08:36:18AM +0400, Sergey Zaharchenko wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 16, 2004 at 08:32:49PM -0600,
> Dan MacMillan probably wrote:
> > From: Sergey Zaharchenko at June 16, 2004 06:18
> > >
> > > On Wed, Jun 16, 2004 at 11:38:38AM +0100,
> > > Matthew Seaman probably wrote:
> > >
> >
On Wed, Jun 16, 2004 at 08:32:49PM -0600,
Dan MacMillan probably wrote:
> From: Sergey Zaharchenko at June 16, 2004 06:18
> >
> > On Wed, Jun 16, 2004 at 11:38:38AM +0100,
> > Matthew Seaman probably wrote:
> >
> > > Heh. There's nothing to worry about -- I don't own or use any Windows
> > > box
From: Sergey Zaharchenko at June 16, 2004 06:18
>
> On Wed, Jun 16, 2004 at 11:38:38AM +0100,
> Matthew Seaman probably wrote:
> > On Sun, Jun 13, 2004 at 03:41:53PM -0700, Graham North wrote:
> >
> > Heh. There's nothing to worry about -- I don't own or use any Windows
> > boxes, so there's no c
On Wed, Jun 16, 2004 at 11:38:38AM +0100,
Matthew Seaman probably wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 13, 2004 at 03:41:53PM -0700, Graham North wrote:
>
> Heh. There's nothing to worry about -- I don't own or use any Windows
> boxes, so there's no chance of picking up a worm from my e-mails.
>
However, this
On Sun, Jun 13, 2004 at 03:41:53PM -0700, Graham North wrote:
> I did not open it at first because it came as two attachments a txt file and
> a dat file. What is your rationale for doing this? What is the dat file -
> that still remains unopened.
Heh. There's nothing to worry about -- I don't
, Graham/
- Original Message -
From: "Peder Blom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Graham North" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, June 14, 2004 9:55 AM
Subject: Re: Pruning the Ports Tree
> On Sun, 13 Jun 2004 11:52:18 -0700
&
On Sun, 13 Jun 2004 11:52:18 -0700
"Graham North" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Uli and the rest of the FreeBSD forum:
>
> Thanks for your advice - though I am not entirely sure what the
> purpose of your last questions are.
>
> To answer though:
> My HD is about 1.2G - it is sharing 2.0G with
ROTECTED]>
To: "Graham North" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, June 13, 2004 3:11 PM
Subject: Re: Pruning the Ports Tree
On Sun, 13 Jun 2004, Graham North wrote:
Hi Uli and the rest of the FreeBSD forum:
Thanks for your advi
/
- Original Message -
From: "Matthew Seaman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Graham North" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Fong, Nicholas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent:
th" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, June 13, 2004 3:11 PM
Subject: Re: Pruning the Ports Tree
> On Sun, 13 Jun 2004, Graham North wrote:
>
> > Hi Uli and the rest of the FreeBSD forum:
> >
> > Thanks for your
t; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Graham North" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, June 13, 2004 1:29 AM
Subject: Re: Pruning the Ports Tree
On Sat, 12 Jun 2004, Graham North wrote:
Is it alright to prune the Ports tree - and still do updates later.
I am
quot;Peter Ulrich Kruppa" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Graham North" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, June 13, 2004 1:29 AM
Subject: Re: Pruning the Ports Tree
> On Sat, 12 Jun 2004, Graham North wrote:
>
> > Is it alright to prune
Lose 10 karma points for not keeping your line lengths reasonably
short.
On Sat, Jun 12, 2004 at 11:41:47PM -0700, Graham North wrote:
> Is it alright to prune the Ports tree - and still do updates later.
You're on your own if you do this. All of the infrastructure that
supports the use of the p
On Sat, 12 Jun 2004, Graham North wrote:
Is it alright to prune the Ports tree - and still do updates later.
I am running 4.8 stable and recently did a full Ports tree
update using CVSUP. This generates several questions. 1) I
took the advice of Michael Urban's book and upgraded from the
"Head"
14 matches
Mail list logo
