On Thu, Jun 17, 2004 at 08:36:18AM +0400, Sergey Zaharchenko wrote: > On Wed, Jun 16, 2004 at 08:32:49PM -0600, > Dan MacMillan probably wrote: > > From: Sergey Zaharchenko at June 16, 2004 06:18 > > > > > > On Wed, Jun 16, 2004 at 11:38:38AM +0100, > > > Matthew Seaman probably wrote: > > > > > > > Heh. There's nothing to worry about -- I don't own or use any Windows > > > > boxes, so there's no chance of picking up a worm from my e-mails. > > > > > > However, this won't save you from picking up a worm which has forged its > > > mail's `From' address to be [EMAIL PROTECTED], or any other > > > address... so unless you change your OS and/or mailer to something more > > > secure, it's still a good idea to stay alert. > > > > On the other hand, the fact that Matthew signs all his email means we always > > know who to blame. :)
More to the point, you know that if it's signed by my key, it's from me, even if I do occasionally slip up and use the work e-mail address when I should be using my personal one (Bad mutt! No biscuit!) > Sure --- but his signatures mean nothing to Graham as long as he uses > Outlook, which was the original problem :) Unless, of course he has visited http://www.pgpi.org/ and downloaded one of the free Windows version of PGPi which includes a plugin for Outlook: http://www.pgpi.org/cgi/download.cgi?filename=PGPFW658Win32.zip Although it seems that PGP Corp have decided that the latest versions of their software will only include the e-mail plugin in the pay-for variant. Dunno if that software will work with WinXP either. But thems the breaks when you use commercial OSes. Cheers, Matthew -- Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 26 The Paddocks Savill Way PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Marlow Tel: +44 1628 476614 Bucks., SL7 1TH UK
pgpd1aj0YjKSG.pgp
Description: PGP signature
