On Sun, 13 Jun 2004, Graham North wrote:
I read my emails with pine (a console mail client) on my FreeBSD system - no chance for Windows virii.Hi Uli: Thanks again. There was an email from Mathew Seaman - however it came as only attachments, and not knowing him I did not open them - there was not text at all in the body of the email. Maybe I will now open it..
I do not know anything much about inodes or file handles either... My thinking was to just use brute force and chop away much of the ports collection that I am not likely to need on my little web server.
Too true,
you would need - apache (and if you like mod_php and mysql ???) - midnight commander (mc) for file management - a console browser (links or lynx) for quick checks.
Still I would recommend binary upgrades, these programs don't need any special compile time options. But that's your fun.
Uli.
I don't want to put everything into too much of a tizzy however the next time I update them. Probably the most sensible thing to do is simply remove it entirely and just do single port upgrades as needs be.
Cheers, Graham/
----- Original Message ----- From: "Peter Ulrich Kruppa" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Graham North" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, June 13, 2004 3:11 PM Subject: Re: Pruning the Ports Tree
ofOn Sun, 13 Jun 2004, Graham North wrote:
Hi Uli and the rest of the FreeBSD forum:
Thanks for your advice - though I am not entirely sure what the purposeRemember,your last questions are.I wanted to know about your ressources, since your ports dirctory might grow very big, if you don't clean it up every now and then. Matthew gave some hints about that at the last part of his mail.
I hardly know anything about inodes, but as far as I understand, you would have to reformat your entire filesystem to change anything about this.
The simpliest way to update your system on a small hd would be to keep strictly to binary upgrades and installations. You won't need the ports directory then (neither the system sources in /usr/src).
Another simple idea would be to get another small hd somewhere, devide it into two slices and mount one on /usr/ports and the other on /usr/src . This would give you enough space to do full rebuilds of your system and your ports.
If you have enough patience and time you can also download single port directories from www.freebsd.org/ports, place them in appropriate directories and try to make install them. They will complain when they are missing some other port. I have done that to set up a samba printer server, but next time I will use binary packages.
Uli.
To answer though: My HD is about 1.2G - it is sharing 2.0G with another OS. /usr ~ 778M usr/ports ~247M total /usr being used is ~595M with about 183M free.
The problem is not disk space - it appears to be file handles.filethose ports files are only about 0.5K each - so lots of inodes are being used in file infrastructure. Midnight Comm which I use for a lot ofarenavigation indicates that I had 99838 inodes available - of which therepartnow only 602 free! Yesterday that was about 900, but then I mirrored"[EMAIL PROTECTED]"of a friend's website and used another 300. As you can see, I need to free up some file handling capability.
Thanks for any further advice you can give.
Cheers, Graham/
----- Original Message ----- From: "Peter Ulrich Kruppa" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Graham North" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, June 13, 2004 1:29 AM Subject: Re: Pruning the Ports Tree
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]"On Sat, 12 Jun 2004, Graham North wrote:
Is it alright to prune the Ports tree - and still do updates later.
I am running 4.8 stable and recently did a full Ports tree update using CVSUP. This generates several questions. 1) I took the advice of Michael Urban's book and upgraded from the "Head" of the source tree rather than from that for 4.8 - did I really want to do that? Does it matter for a Ports only updating?It is recommended to use the appropriate kernel and base system with your ports. Things might work the way you did it, or (probably) not.
2) The tree is getting pretty big - result, lots offiles. My hard drive is not very big - it is down to a few hundred inodes (file handles) within the usr directory. Can I prune the tree on my hard drive without compromising future updates? If it helps, my machine is not using X only command mode so there are lots of Ports that will never be made.For further advices it would be helpful to know how big your hd is and how much diskspace is used by your ports tree. You can check the latter by # du -h -d 1 (see # man du)
Regards,
Uli.
Thanks for any help that can be offered.
Graham/
_______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to
+---------------------------+ | Peter Ulrich Kruppa | | Wuppertal | | Germany | +---------------------------+
_______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to
+---------------------------+ | Peter Ulrich Kruppa | | Wuppertal | | Germany | +---------------------------+
_______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
+---------------------------+ | Peter Ulrich Kruppa | | Wuppertal | | Germany | +---------------------------+ _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"