On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 2:45 AM, Bernt Hansson wrote:
> On 2013-06-16 13:39, Jerry wrote:
>> I saw the answer to this a while back, but I cannot find it now.
> youtube-dl -t 'filename'
You can also use this trick to work on youtube directly:
This video use flash player:
http://www.youtube.com/wa
On Sun, 16 Jun 2013 13:57:09 +0200
Matthias Apitz articulated:
> El día Sunday, June 16, 2013 a las 07:39:30AM -0400, Jerry escribió:
>
> > I saw the answer to this a while back, but I cannot find it now.
>
> dom.ipc.plugins.enabled = false
>
> to be set via about:config in FF
Perhaps that sho
On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 1:39 PM, Jerry wrote:
> After working fine for quite a while, this problem has started. When
> attempting to play videos on "youtube", I am greeted with a message
> that states "Adobe Flash Player is Required for Video Playback?
Some clips are forced to show commercials an
El día Sunday, June 16, 2013 a las 07:39:30AM -0400, Jerry escribió:
> I saw the answer to this a while back, but I cannot find it now.
dom.ipc.plugins.enabled = false
to be set via about:config in FF
matthias
--
Matthias Apitz | /"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign: www.asciiribb
On Tue, 23 Apr 2013 21:37:49 +0200, Fernando Apesteguía wrote:
> El 23/04/2013 21:24, "Walter Hurry" escribió:
>>
>> FreeBSD 9.1-RELEASE on amd64.
>>
>> I have installed Flash according to the instructions in the handbook.
>> When I do 'about:plugins' in Firefox, I get the following response:
>>
El 23/04/2013 21:45, "Ralf Mardorf" escribió:
>
>
> On Tue, 2013-04-23 at 21:37 +0200, Fernando Apesteguía wrote:
> > That's an issue with Firefox. Search the list. There is a setting you
have
> > to change in Firefox in order to avoid that problem.
>
> Perhaps the answer is somewhere in the threa
On Tue, 2013-04-23 at 21:37 +0200, Fernando Apesteguía wrote:
> That's an issue with Firefox. Search the list. There is a setting you have
> to change in Firefox in order to avoid that problem.
Perhaps the answer is somewhere in the thread "[Solved] Youtube & Flash
Videos broken?", but OTOH, Flas
El 23/04/2013 21:24, "Walter Hurry" escribió:
>
> FreeBSD 9.1-RELEASE on amd64.
>
> I have installed Flash according to the instructions in the handbook.
> When I do 'about:plugins' in Firefox, I get the following response:
>
> Shockwave Flash
>
> File: npwrapper.libflashplayer.so
> Versio
On Tue, 2013-04-23 at 19:24 +, Walter Hurry wrote:
> What is wrong?
It's wrong to consume crap that needs proprietary software, that isn't
available for *nix, resp. it's smarter to use an OS that fit to the
individual needs of the user. FreeBSD and Linux aren't a good choice, if
you want to c
On Tuesday 31 July 2012 11:44:32 Jerry wrote:
> On Tue, 31 Jul 2012 05:20:13 -0500
>
> ajtiM articulated:
> > Works on Opera here too but after updtae Firefox to 14.0.1 doesn't
> > work on Firefox. Ans as I red on Linux forums they have a problem
> > with Firefox 14.0.1 too.
>
> This one is not w
On Tue, 31 Jul 2012 05:20:13 -0500
ajtiM articulated:
> Works on Opera here too but after updtae Firefox to 14.0.1 doesn't
> work on Firefox. Ans as I red on Linux forums they have a problem
> with Firefox 14.0.1 too.
This one is not working with Firefox 14.0.1 either.
http://www.huffingtonpost.
On Tuesday 31 July 2012 00:42:42 Jeff Tipton wrote:
> On 07/31/2012 05:18, Polytropon wrote:
> > On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 14:55:46 -0600 (MDT), Warren Block wrote:
> >> On Tue, 31 Jul 2012, Manish Jain wrote:
> >>> Okay, so can you please go to the URL below and see whether the bubbles
> >>> work for yo
On 07/31/2012 05:18, Polytropon wrote:
On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 14:55:46 -0600 (MDT), Warren Block wrote:
On Tue, 31 Jul 2012, Manish Jain wrote:
Okay, so can you please go to the URL below and see whether the bubbles work
for you ?
http://news.discovery.com/human/games-lumosity-word-bubbles.html
On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 14:55:46 -0600 (MDT), Warren Block wrote:
> On Tue, 31 Jul 2012, Manish Jain wrote:
> > Okay, so can you please go to the URL below and see whether the bubbles
> > work
> > for you ?
> >
> > http://news.discovery.com/human/games-lumosity-word-bubbles.html
> >
> > [...]
>
> Wor
On Monday 30 July 2012 16:49:09 Warren Block wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Jul 2012, ajtiM wrote:
> > It doesn't work on my computer:
> > FreeBSD 9.0 Release, KDE 4.8.4
> >
> > I updated Firefox 13 to 14.0.1 and flash doesn't work anymore (on Opera
> > works). In pluginred.dat I have:
> > [INVALID]
> > /usr
On Mon, 30 Jul 2012, ajtiM wrote:
It doesn't work on my computer:
FreeBSD 9.0 Release, KDE 4.8.4
I updated Firefox 13 to 14.0.1 and flash doesn't work anymore (on Opera works).
In pluginred.dat I have:
[INVALID]
/usr/local/lib/npapi/linux-f10-flashplugin/libflashplayer.so:$
1336714805000:$
On
On Monday 30 July 2012 15:55:46 Warren Block wrote:
> On Tue, 31 Jul 2012, Manish Jain wrote:
> > <<
> > I've not experienced any problem with sites that
> > use Flash, including Youtube.
> >
> >
> >
> > Okay, so can you please go to the URL below and see whether the bubbles
> > work for you ?
>
On Tue, 31 Jul 2012, Manish Jain wrote:
<<
I've not experienced any problem with sites that
use Flash, including Youtube.
Okay, so can you please go to the URL below and see whether the bubbles work
for you ?
http://news.discovery.com/human/games-lumosity-word-bubbles.html
I don't have
On Tue, 31 Jul 2012, Manish Jain wrote:
<<
I've not experienced any problem with sites that
use Flash, including Youtube.
Hi Jeff,
Okay, so can you please go to the URL below and see whether the bubbles work
for you ?
recent linux-flash 12.x do not work with any recent version of fire
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 1:37 AM, Alexandre L. wrote:
> No, the addon called "NoScript" is used to block JavaScript, Flash and co.
> But here the problem is the npviewer and/or the Flash plugin that is/are
> buggy.
> If you want to see a video on Youtube for example, you must allow JavaScript
>
Here the link to this workaround by DutchDaemon :
http://forums.freebsd.org/showpost.php?p=67155&postcount=15
--- En date de : Mar 23.3.10, Jeff Laine a écrit :
> De: Jeff Laine
> Objet: Re: Flash sometimes freezes firefox, also many npviewer.bin processes
> left running aroun
se you can't see the video.
I use this addon in Firefox 3.6 to block unwanted scripts but when I use Flash
I got the same problem.
--- En date de : Mar 23.3.10, Steve Franks a écrit :
> De: Steve Franks
> Objet: Re: Flash sometimes freezes firefox, also many npviewer.bin processe
On Mon,22-03-2010 [17:41:16], Steve Franks wrote:
> /usr/ports/www/xpi-noscript is another option, not without caveats...
>
> Steve
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 6:47 PM, Yuri wrote:
> > Sometimes after some flash object is displayed firefox gets frozen for many
> > few seconds,maybe ~20sec.
>
/usr/ports/www/xpi-noscript is another option, not without caveats...
Steve
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 6:47 PM, Yuri wrote:
> Sometimes after some flash object is displayed firefox gets frozen for many
> few seconds,maybe ~20sec.
> Do you see the same? Is there anyfix for this?
>
> In additions I
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 1:47 AM, Yuri wrote:
> Sometimes after some flash object is displayed firefox gets frozen for many
> few seconds,maybe ~20sec.
> Do you see the same? Is there anyfix for this?
>
> In additions I have 54 processes like this one
> 50006 ?? I 0:00.00
> /usr/local/lib/ns
On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 1:07 PM, C. P. Ghost wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 9:25 AM, Polytropon wrote:
>> On Sat, 6 Mar 2010 09:03:58 +0100, Sabine Baer wrote:
>>> Well, it is, indeed. Me I am very glad beeing able to do eg
>>> linux-opera -display :0 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bhmf4l4OxNw
>
On Sun, 7 Mar 2010 07:29:48 +0100, Sabine Baer wrote:
> OK, I really didn't know youtube_dl (and clive someone mentioned in
> the thread). So, thanks a lot. I youtube-dl-ed my puff pastry examle.
> It took me 5 minutes and 11.69M space on diks but then I was able to
> look at it using mplayer. Fi
On Sat, Mar 06, 2010 at 09:25:41AM +0100, Polytropon wrote:
> On Sat, 6 Mar 2010 09:03:58 +0100, Sabine Baer wrote:
> > Well, it is, indeed. Me I am very glad beeing able to do eg
> > linux-opera -display :0 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bhmf4l4OxNw
> > since I live in a Windows free zone at home
On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 1:07 PM, C. P. Ghost wrote:
> And remember, youtube-dl is a hack. It can break anytime
> YT changes its embedding. I wished YouTube would switch
> to HTML5, or at least added this as an option.
Actually this option exists
http://www.youtube.com/html5
The problem is Opera a
On 3/6/10, C. P. Ghost wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 9:25 AM, Polytropon wrote:
>> On Sat, 6 Mar 2010 09:03:58 +0100, Sabine Baer wrote:
>>> Well, it is, indeed. Me I am very glad beeing able to do eg
>>> linux-opera -display :0 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bhmf4l4OxNw
>>> since I live in a
On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 2:54 PM, Robert Huff wrote:
>> > And remember, youtube-dl is a hack. It can break anytime
>> > YT changes its embedding.
>>
>> That's what "make update" is used for. :-)
>
> More importantly, it's about the author (and maintainer, if
> they're different) fixing thi
Chuck Swiger writes:
> For all practical purposes, if you upgrade to a new major
> version, then you must rebuild all installed ports.
And if you have the time and knowledge to not have to do this
... you're probably not involved in the discussion to begin with.
:-)
Polytropon writes:
> > And remember, youtube-dl is a hack. It can break anytime
> > YT changes its embedding.
>
> That's what "make update" is used for. :-)
More importantly, it's about the author (and maintainer, if
they're different) fixing things promptly after a change, My
expe
On Mar 5, 2010, at 11:35 PM, Pongthep Kulkrisada wrote:
* Warren Block (wbl...@wonkity.com) wrote:
When you upgrade from 7.x to 8.x, it's necessary to rebuild *all*
ports.
Thanks for your suggestion, but it does not seem likely.
All operating systems can always distinguish the system and pac
On Fri, Mar 05, 2010 at 12:14:15PM +0700, Pongthep Kulkrisada wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have been using FBSD since 5.4 until now 8.0.
> Mostly, I use it as a server and coding C (as my hobby).
> All the time I stay in console without fancy of any GUI.
> For GUI applications, I mostly use Windows.
>
On Sat, 6 Mar 2010 12:15:37 +0100, "C. P. Ghost" wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 10:01 AM, Polytropon wrote:
> > If they don't want to make one, there's no way to convince
> > them. Since the majority of free and standardized operating
> > systems isn't oriented at market share, there is no reaso
On Sat, 6 Mar 2010 12:07:25 +0100, "C. P. Ghost" wrote:
> That's true. I love youtube-dl too, as it helps me keep a local
> .flv copy, even for videos that have been removed for one reason
> or another.
A very useful feature, especially for offline operations.
> However, there are other video
On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 10:01 AM, Polytropon wrote:
> If they don't want to make one, there's no way to convince
> them. Since the majority of free and standardized operating
> systems isn't oriented at market share, there is no reason
> for Adobe to follow a crying "Please!" :-)
There is only one
On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 9:25 AM, Polytropon wrote:
> On Sat, 6 Mar 2010 09:03:58 +0100, Sabine Baer wrote:
>> Well, it is, indeed. Me I am very glad beeing able to do eg
>> linux-opera -display :0 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bhmf4l4OxNw
>> since I live in a Windows free zone at home.
>
> Well,
On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 11:53 PM, Jerry wrote:
> Adobe, a commercial entity, obviously feels that the cost of
> supporting the FreeBSD community is not a financially prudent business
> venture.
Well, that's their decision, of course. However, Linux and FreeBSD
aren't so far apart either, at least
> On Fri, 5 Mar 2010 23:02:36 -, "Graham Bentley"
> wrote:
>>
>> > It looks very bad for browsing web without flash viewer.
>>
>> I think it looks great - no ads !!! Hurray !!!
>
> I may politely add that exactly this is the reason I removed
> a working "Flash" support from my system. I rathe
Pongthep Kulkrisada wrote:
> * Warren Block (wbl...@wonkity.com) wrote:
> > When you upgrade from 7.x to 8.x, it's necessary to rebuild
> > *all* ports.
> ...
> Some people only use console, they should rebuild all ports
> relating to their work.
> They do not have to rebuild KDE or GNOME, for exa
On Sat, 6 Mar 2010 08:46:16 -, "Graham Bentley" wrote:
> Points very well made. In fact shouldn't we be campaigning against
> such closed source perversion of our Open Standards Internet, not
> complaining that one company doesn't make a media content viewer
> for us?
In fact, if Adobe wishes
On Sat, 6 Mar 2010 09:03:58 +0100, Sabine Baer wrote:
> Well, it is, indeed. Me I am very glad beeing able to do eg
> linux-opera -display :0 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bhmf4l4OxNw
> since I live in a Windows free zone at home.
Well, there's always "youtube-dl -a" for that. Just for YT
I don'
On Sat, Mar 06, 2010 at 04:49:16AM +0100, Polytropon wrote:
[SNAFU]
> That's the situation with "Flash". And as I have experienced
> it, I can honestly say that I'm fine without "Flash". I may
> review my opinion, if given some reason to do so.
>
> But as it has already been mentioned, that's a
* C. P. Ghost (cpgh...@cordula.ws) wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 6:12 PM, Pongthep Kulkrisada
> wrote:
> > % uname -a
> > FreeBSD bsdhost.localdomain 8.0-STABLE FreeBSD 8.0-STABLE #0: Tue Dec 1
> > 19:12:37 ICT 2009 r...@bsdhost.localdomain:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC
> > i386
>
> So
* daniele (gl...@live.com) wrote:
> Dont worry I wanted to try to help for what I can. I installed the
> plugin this morning and I was curious.
Thank you again for your kind.
> It's strange though. The plugin is there. I dont know if there's a kind
> of log somewhere to see if it "sees" it.
I al
* Warren Block (wbl...@wonkity.com) wrote:
> When you upgrade from 7.x to 8.x, it's necessary to rebuild *all* ports.
Thanks for your suggestion, but it does not seem likely.
All operating systems can always distinguish the system and packages.
For instance, gcc is tightly coupled with the system
On Fri, 5 Mar 2010 23:02:36 -, "Graham Bentley" wrote:
>
> > It looks very bad for browsing web without flash viewer.
>
> I think it looks great - no ads !!! Hurray !!!
I may politely add that exactly this is the reason I removed
a working "Flash" support from my system. I rather like to
se
On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 5:02 PM, Graham Bentley wrote:
>
>> It looks very bad for browsing web without flash viewer.
>
> I think it looks great - no ads !!! Hurray !!!
>
Bingo!
If the OP wants M$-like flash support, then . . . well . . . use M$
(and its friend$). It's not really fair to complain
> It looks very bad for browsing web without flash viewer.
I think it looks great - no ads !!! Hurray !!!
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freeb
On Fri, 5 Mar 2010 18:54:40 +0100
C. P. Ghost articulated:
> Of course, it's all a matter of personal tastes, likes and dislikes.
> I'd rather have a native flash plugin for FreeBSD/amd64 too (Firefox
> and Opera), but this is unlikely in the near future, knowing the
> miserable track record of A
On Fri, 5 Mar 2010, Pongthep Kulkrisada wrote:
Or the problem is that I cvsup(ed) from 7.1 to 7.2 and then csup(ed) to 8.0.
Some libraries are probably not updated???
But ``make install'' success, so libraries should not be problems.
I don't know.
When you upgrade from 7.x to 8.x, it's necessa
On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 6:12 PM, Pongthep Kulkrisada wrote:
> * C. P. Ghost (cpgh...@cordula.ws) wrote:
>> If you csup, you update only /usr/src (or /usr/ports). Have you actually
>> updated the system and the ports as well?
> % uname -a
> FreeBSD bsdhost.localdomain 8.0-STABLE FreeBSD 8.0-STABLE #
* C. P. Ghost (cpgh...@cordula.ws) wrote:
> If you csup, you update only /usr/src (or /usr/ports). Have you actually
> updated the system and the ports as well?
% uname -a
FreeBSD bsdhost.localdomain 8.0-STABLE FreeBSD 8.0-STABLE #0: Tue Dec 1
19:12:37 ICT 2009 r...@bsdhost.localdomain:/usr/o
* daniele (gl...@live.com) wrote:
> hmmm... :-/
>
> is at least now the web browser opera working ?
[edit]Yes, it is working but without flash. [/edit]
Thanks for your prompt response.
Pongthep
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://list
* daniele (gl...@live.com) wrote:
> hmmm... :-/
>
> is at least now the web browser opera working ?
Yes it is working.
Thanks for your prompt response.
Pongthep
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/fr
On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 5:12 PM, Pongthep Kulkrisada wrote:
> Or the problem is that I cvsup(ed) from 7.1 to 7.2 and then csup(ed) to 8.0.
If you csup, you update only /usr/src (or /usr/ports). Have you actually
updated the system and the ports as well?
> FBSD should make it simpler than this.
I
On 03/05/10 17:12, Pongthep Kulkrisada wrote:
* daniele (gl...@live.com) wrote:
HI !
I tested the process of installing firefox/opera and flash plugin.
Everything run on my system FreeBSD 8, even though I did not stress
browser& plugin.
Here's all the step that I took to make the flash plugin
* daniele (gl...@live.com) wrote:
> HI !
>
> I tested the process of installing firefox/opera and flash plugin.
> Everything run on my system FreeBSD 8, even though I did not stress
> browser & plugin.
>
> Here's all the step that I took to make the flash plugin work for
> firefox and opera (basica
On 03/05/10 12:00, Pongthep Kulkrisada wrote:
* Polytropon (free...@edvax.de) wrote:
Do you have compat7x installed?
No I don't.
If you already updated to OS 8.0,
you should update your ports tree, too, and
use the current ports.
I always csup the SELECTED port tree but not all.
Just insta
* Polytropon (free...@edvax.de) wrote:
> Do you have compat7x installed?
No I don't.
> If you already updated to OS 8.0,
> you should update your ports tree, too, and
> use the current ports.
I always csup the SELECTED port tree but not all.
> Just installing isn't enough, there's some configurat
On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 6:14 AM, Pongthep Kulkrisada wrote:
> The problem is that ``flash viewer'' is not installed.
> Shockwave/Adobe/Macromedia flash viewers are not shipped with FBSD CD.
I'm running OpenSolaris/x86 as guest in VirtualBox on FreeBSD/amd64
for that, since Adobe provides a Flash p
On Fri, Mar 05, 2010 at 12:14:15PM +0700, Pongthep Kulkrisada wrote:
[...]
> I use opera-10.10 for web browsing.
> It looks very bad for browsing web without flash viewer.
> I tried installing from ports.
> - opera-linuxplugins-10.10.
> - linux-f10-flashplugin-10.0
> - f4l-0.2.1.4 (I guess
On Fri, 5 Mar 2010 12:14:15 +0700, Pongthep Kulkrisada
wrote:
> I installed FBSD 7.1 with KDE 3.5 from CD.
> Then I csup(ed) and buildworld to FBSD 7.2 and then finally FBSD 8.0
> while remaining KDE unchanged.
Do you have compat7x installed? If you already updated
to OS 8.0, you should update
On Sun, Dec 27, 2009 at 06:01:17AM +0900, Byung-Hee HWANG wrote:
> Hello, my desktop's memory is so low (256M). Therefore i can not run
> firefox. Instead, i'm running epiphany. That's too proper to me. Anyway
> is there any way to install flash plugin with epiphany? Currently, my
> version is 8.0-
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 4:12 PM, PJ wrote:
> PJ wrote:
> > I have heard that there is an alternative to flash that is apparently
> > more efficient and less cumbersome in terms of data transfers; and that
> > it is "lighter" whatever that may mean.
> > Anyone know anything about this?
>
I think y
From: millenia2...@hotmail.com
To: af.gour...@videotron.ca
Subject: RE: flash alternative
Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 10:22:25 -0500
> Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 10:00:01 -0500
> From: af.gour...@videotron.ca
> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Subject: flash alternative
>
> I have h
PJ wrote:
> I have heard that there is an alternative to flash that is apparently
> more efficient and less cumbersome in terms of data transfers; and that
> it is "lighter" whatever that may mean.
> Anyone know anything about this?
> TIA
> PJ
> ___
> fre
On Sun, Apr 19, 2009 at 10:32 PM, Christopher Chambers
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Nspluginwrapper's website says that version 1.2.2 is capable of
> installing flash 10. When I tried it, I got the message: no appropriate
> viewer found. Any ideas?
I just installed it with success on 7.2-RC1/amd64. I had
nsp
Chris Maness wrote:
Is this an Open Source alternative?
Chris
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
No
Is this an Open Source alternative?
Chris
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
michael skrev:
Chris Maness wrote:
Is there now a cleaner way to install flash on FreeBSD, or do we still
have to wade through this:
http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=51075+0+archive/2008/freebsd-emulation/20081102.freebsd-emulation
http://crnl.org/blog/2008/11/01/flash-9-fo
Chris Maness wrote:
Is there now a cleaner way to install flash on FreeBSD, or do we still
have to wade through this:
http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=51075+0+archive/2008/freebsd-emulation/20081102.freebsd-emulation
http://crnl.org/blog/2008/11/01/flash-9-for-freebsd-71
this
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 2:32 PM, herbert langhans
wrote:
> Hi Grant,
> here is a full description how to do that:
> http://freebsd.langhans.com.pl
The info on swfdec on this page appears to be outdated - the swfdec
homepage quotes a release on 12/21/08, and purportedly works with
youtube; I'm tes
Grant Peel wrote:
Hi all,
Is there a port that emulates Adobe Flash? i.e. Adobe's download site
says 'Platform not supported' is there a port or package thats can be
used to view Flash content in Firefox?
-Grant
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org ma
Hi Grant,
here is a full description how to do that:
http://freebsd.langhans.com.pl
Cheers
herbs
On Wed, 14 Jan 2009 09:25:10 -0500
Grant Peel wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Is there a port that emulates Adobe Flash? i.e. Adobe's download site
> says 'Platform not supported' is there a port or package
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 09:25:10AM -0500, Grant Peel wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Is there a port that emulates Adobe Flash? i.e. Adobe's download site
> says 'Platform not supported' is there a port or package thats can be
> used to view Flash content in Firefox?
You could try graphics/gnash
Roland
-
Grant Peel wrote:
Hi all,
Is there a port that emulates Adobe Flash? i.e. Adobe's download site
says 'Platform not supported' is there a port or package thats can be
used to view Flash content in Firefox?
-Grant
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org ma
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 1:29 PM, John Nielsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wednesday 29 October 2008 01:22:40 pm Mikhail Teterin wrote:
> > Sent by John Nielsen:
> > > I just updated to RELENG_7 (aka 7.1-PRERELEASE these days) on Monday
> > > and am able to use Flash 9 in native Firefox 3 with
Sent by John Nielsen:
I just updated to RELENG_7 (aka 7.1-PRERELEASE these days) on Monday and
am able to use Flash 9 in native Firefox 3 with sound, no sound lag and
no crashes so far. I have:
FreeBSD 7.1-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Oct 27 18:31:37 EDT 2008
compat.linux.osrelease=2.6.16
linux_base-f8-
On Wednesday 29 October 2008 01:22:40 pm Mikhail Teterin wrote:
> Sent by John Nielsen:
> > I just updated to RELENG_7 (aka 7.1-PRERELEASE these days) on Monday
> > and am able to use Flash 9 in native Firefox 3 with sound, no sound
> > lag and no crashes so far. I have:
> >
> > FreeBSD 7.1-PRERELE
On Tuesday 28 October 2008 01:30:18 pm matt donovan wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 10:41 AM, Dánielisz László <
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I also had some fight with Adobe's Flash player, but unfortunately
> > without success.
> > I remaing curios about any solution.
> >
TED] Behalf Of Glyn Millington
> Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2008 3:41 PM
> To: Mikhail Teterin
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Danielisz Laszlo; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: flash-9, 10 on FreeBSD
>
> What is not clear is do you run wine/firefox from the command line or
> f
t I'm using.
Ah well, there you have me!
Glyn
___
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Glyn Millington
Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2008 3:41 PM
To: Mikhail Teterin
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Danielisz Laszlo; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: fla
Mikhail Teterin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Sent by Glyn Millington:
>> My solution was to install Wine and run the MS port of Firefox. So far
>> it works flawlessly for me.
>>
> This has two problems:
>
> 1. It requires a (licensed) Windows install handy.
No it doesn't. The MS version of
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 06:31:13PM +, Craig Butler wrote:
>
> The way forwards has to be to jump onto the gnash band wagon I
> think that project is moving leaps and bounds.
>
> Why be tied into proprietary closed sourced drivel that the people who
> write it aren't prepared to support
On Oct 28, 2008, at 4:22 PM, Manolis Kiagias wrote:
The following excerpt from /usr/ports/UPDATING will completely
answer your question :)
Sigh. And I get onto other people for not reading that. :-D
--
Kirk Strauser
___
freebsd-questions@freeb
Kirk Strauser wrote:
On Oct 28, 2008, at 4:00 PM, Manolis Kiagias wrote:
If it is firefox3 you are talking about, create a symbolic link to
the actual plugins directory:
ln -s /usr/local/lib/browser_plugins/libgnashplugin.so
/usr/local/lib/firefox3/plugins
Well, that seems pretty obvious
On Oct 28, 2008, at 4:00 PM, Manolis Kiagias wrote:
If it is firefox3 you are talking about, create a symbolic link to
the actual plugins directory:
ln -s /usr/local/lib/browser_plugins/libgnashplugin.so /usr/local/
lib/firefox3/plugins
Well, that seems pretty obvious now. It leads me
Kirk Strauser wrote:
On Tuesday 28 October 2008 13:31:13 Craig Butler wrote:
The way forwards has to be to jump onto the gnash band wagon I
think that project is moving leaps and bounds.
Any idea how to get the Firefox plugin working? I installed it with "PLUGIN"
and "GTK" sele
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 02:08:43PM -0400, Mikhail Teterin wrote:
> Sent by Glyn Millington:
> >My solution was to install Wine and run the MS port of Firefox. So far
> >it works flawlessly for me.
> >
> This has two problems:
>
> 1. It requires a (licensed) Windows install handy.
> 2. The so
I'm having issue with flash10 (yet somehow it was working before) and
my co-workers, they are able to run it just fine
I'm running CentOS 5.2, I know it's not FreeBSD, but still maybe
somehow would help...
kernel: npviewer.bin[26449]: segfault at rip
rsp
On Tuesday 28 October 2008 13:31:13 Craig Butler wrote:
> The way forwards has to be to jump onto the gnash band wagon I
> think that project is moving leaps and bounds.
Any idea how to get the Firefox plugin working? I installed it with "PLUGIN"
and "GTK" selected, and /usr/local/lib/brow
Sent by Craig Butler:
gnash all the way for me..
Does it work with YouTube?
-mi
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 03:40:28PM -0200, User Lenzi wrote:
> Em Ter, 2008-10-28 às 07:41 -0700, Dánielisz László escreveu:
>
> > Hello!
> >
> > I also had some fight with Adobe's Flash player, but unfortunately without
> > success.
> > I remaing curios about any solution.
> >
> > Laci
> >
>
Craig Butler writes:
> The way forwards has to be to jump onto the gnash band wagon
> I think that project is moving leaps and bounds.
The last time I tried it (2-3 months ago) gnash was no
more funnctional than Flash 9.
> Why be tied into proprietary closed sourced drivel that t
On Tue, 2008-10-28 at 14:34 -0400, Mikhail Teterin wrote:
> Sent by Craig Butler:
> > gnash all the way for me..
> >
> Does it work with YouTube?
>
> -mi
>
Some of the video's work on youtube with the gnash-devel
I think there is an issue with the videos that use the On2 VP62 codec...
(a
On Tue, 2008-10-28 at 14:08 -0400, Mikhail Teterin wrote:
> Sent by Glyn Millington:
> > My solution was to install Wine and run the MS port of Firefox. So far
> > it works flawlessly for me.
> >
> This has two problems:
>
>1. It requires a (licensed) Windows install handy.
>2. The s
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 01:49:34PM -0400, Mikhail Teterin wrote:
> Sent by matt donovan:
>> FreeBSD 7.1 should work with flash9 myself I had no luck so far but nox-
>> does say it should work
> I'm using 7.1-PRERELEASE as of Sep 23 and it does not work (yet?) Juergen,
> please, confirm, that your
1 - 100 of 403 matches
Mail list logo
